What do you think of this?
08-22-2007, 12:13 PM
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
What do you think of this?
What will be the impact of a mid-engine Corvette on the amateur roadracing demographic? Will Corvette be able to just "jump in" and be competetive or will there be a long learning curve of development before it gets there? Just some thoughts.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1792438
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1792438
08-22-2007, 12:53 PM
#2
Race Director
What will be the impact of a mid-engine Corvette on the amateur roadracing demographic? Will Corvette be able to just "jump in" and be competetive or will there be a long learning curve of development before it gets there? Just some thoughts.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1792438
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1792438
08-22-2007, 12:55 PM
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes
on
24 Posts
Secondly, it allows GM and Corvette Racing to do something that is long, long overdue, and that is to become the second American automobile manufacturer to go for the overall victory at the 24 Hours of Le Mans - something that hasn't been achieved since the glory days of Ford's four-year winning onslaught in the 60s - some 40 years ago.
As you read this, GM's senior brain trust is contemplating every facet of this mid-engined scenario down to the last detail for the seventh-generation Corvette. The facts of the matter are hard to deny: The technical issues are on the way to being solved, the classic Corvette high-performance value proposition would remain intact, and GM's drive to establish itself as a global technological leader would be enhanced and embellished, especially with a mid-engined Corvette Racing prototype going for the overall victory at Le Mans.
As you read this, GM's senior brain trust is contemplating every facet of this mid-engined scenario down to the last detail for the seventh-generation Corvette. The facts of the matter are hard to deny: The technical issues are on the way to being solved, the classic Corvette high-performance value proposition would remain intact, and GM's drive to establish itself as a global technological leader would be enhanced and embellished, especially with a mid-engined Corvette Racing prototype going for the overall victory at Le Mans.
and a wild guess here that the world would see a Corvette LMP1 prototype racing long before the release of a mid engine C7 consumer car.
Last edited by AU N EGL; 08-22-2007 at 01:25 PM.
08-22-2007, 07:38 PM
#5
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: If you don't weigh in you don't wrestle Road America
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes
on
54 Posts
I've always thought that one of the things that makes the Corvette so easy to drive at high speed was having the engine in the front. Personally I think going rear engine is a mistake. Sure it's cool, but I always thought what made the Corvette special was a front engine car that can keep up and pass the exotic rear engine cars. I guess I will just have to stick with my "old school" vettes.
I'm excited to see Corvette take on the rest of the LMP1 competitiors but overall I'm not thrilled with the idea.
I'm excited to see Corvette take on the rest of the LMP1 competitiors but overall I'm not thrilled with the idea.
08-22-2007, 07:52 PM
#6
Joel,
big difference between mid and rear engine cars. It took Porsche 20 years or more to engineer out the evils of rear engine handling cars.
Mid engine is a totally different story. And you basically have 2 versions of a mid engine car...the typical in front of the rear axle giving a 49/51% weight balance.
and the not thought of as mid engine cars...those with the engine behind the front axle with a 51/49% balance. Those cars would be C5 & C6 Corvettes.
C5/6's are some of the best handling production cars around.
I don't know why GM would want to build a typical mid engined car (they've been there done that) Unless Tom's story line plays out...which makes a lot of sense considering GM has driven all the competition away in GT1.
big difference between mid and rear engine cars. It took Porsche 20 years or more to engineer out the evils of rear engine handling cars.
Mid engine is a totally different story. And you basically have 2 versions of a mid engine car...the typical in front of the rear axle giving a 49/51% weight balance.
and the not thought of as mid engine cars...those with the engine behind the front axle with a 51/49% balance. Those cars would be C5 & C6 Corvettes.
C5/6's are some of the best handling production cars around.
I don't know why GM would want to build a typical mid engined car (they've been there done that) Unless Tom's story line plays out...which makes a lot of sense considering GM has driven all the competition away in GT1.
08-22-2007, 10:23 PM
#7
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Boston, Dallas, Detroit, SoCal, back to Boston MA
Posts: 30,606
Received 239 Likes
on
167 Posts
Would it look like this?
a new replica
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1773605
EDIT
Makes sense if it shares the same hardware as this
a new replica
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1773605
EDIT
Makes sense if it shares the same hardware as this
Last edited by BrianCunningham; 08-22-2007 at 10:32 PM.
08-23-2007, 05:43 AM
#8
Drifting
Makes sense if it shares the same hardware as this
Is it possible that this concept car is actually an attempt to guage public opinion of the rear-engine Corvette body style, without letting anyone know that GM is considering a rear-engine Corvette?
