Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

12,000 lbs coil overs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2009, 05:29 PM
  #1  
impactblue
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
impactblue's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: SOCAL CA
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 12,000 lbs coil overs

a friend of mine is arguing with me his track 240sx has 12,000lbs coil overs by megan or some japanese company that you cant look up online. its not street legal due to emissions and the cage inside but he swears that it has that high of a spring rate.
i keep arguing thats impossible since the car wont put that much weight down on it thus it would have no weight transfer...

any high end mechanics or engineers willing to explain this further to me? and if its possible to have on his drift car.
thanks
Old 08-16-2009, 05:43 PM
  #2  
AU N EGL
Team Owner
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

maybe 120 lbs

http://www.hypercoils.com/Catalog.aspx
Old 08-16-2009, 06:16 PM
  #3  
impactblue
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
impactblue's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: SOCAL CA
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nono 12,000 lbs.
ive ran coil overs before on a mustang i had... i ran 250lbs fronts which was equal in spring rate to like a 1000 lbs conventional. a 12,000 lb coil over would be equalivent to 35,000 conventional spring... for something to make use of that pressure per square inch it would need to be like a CAT bulldozer to have effective weight transfer which would be pointless since you cant road race heavy machinery.

again someone please correct me if im wrong here... im not a scientist or mechanic by any means but i have a very broad science backround and what he says makes no sense to me.
Old 08-16-2009, 06:26 PM
  #4  
BrianCunningham
Team Owner
 
BrianCunningham's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Boston, Dallas, Detroit, SoCal, back to Boston MA
Posts: 30,596
Received 238 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

sounds like the springs NORAD used


http://science.howstuffworks.com/norad.htm/printable
Old 08-16-2009, 06:35 PM
  #5  
trackboss
Melting Slicks
 
trackboss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

They are not measured in lbs.
Old 08-16-2009, 07:51 PM
  #6  
flink
Racer
 
flink's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mac strut suspension is usually close to a 1:1 motion ratio, so a 12,000 lb/in spring rate
is a 12,000 lb/in wheel rate. Such a suspension would travel about 2mm during normal track use,
which is waaaaaaay less travel than you'd get from compression of the tires so you may
as well just weld up the shocks.

I think your friend is mistaken
Old 08-16-2009, 09:14 PM
  #7  
Mojave
Melting Slicks
 
Mojave's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: College Station TX
Posts: 2,231
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Many Japanese coilover sets use springs in Metric units. 12K kg/m equals 671.9 lbs/in.

http://www.phase2motortrend.com/tesudrcos189.html

Sounds like your friend is a idiot.
Old 08-16-2009, 09:28 PM
  #8  
gkmccready
Safety Car
 
gkmccready's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Redwood City CA
Posts: 3,520
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Er, um. Some of the overseas coilovers measure in kg/mm rather than lbs/in ... so a 12k coilover would be 12kg/mm. 12kg ~= 26.45lbs. 25.4mm per inch. You're looking at 672lb/in coilovers.

(Yeah, what Mojave said.)
Old 08-16-2009, 09:34 PM
  #9  
ghoffman
Le Mans Master
 
ghoffman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Bedford NH
Posts: 5,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default

Originally Posted by Mojave
Sounds like your friend is a idiot.
Old 08-17-2009, 07:20 AM
  #10  
AU N EGL
Team Owner
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

240sx has 12,000lbs coil overs by megan or some japanese company
on his drift car
Sounds like your friend is a idiot.
/thread
Old 08-17-2009, 07:39 AM
  #11  
Kubs
Le Mans Master
 
Kubs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Akron Ohio
Posts: 8,861
Received 1,730 Likes on 935 Posts
2023 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2022 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11

Default

Old 08-17-2009, 01:11 PM
  #12  
impactblue
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
impactblue's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: SOCAL CA
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks everyone, i looked it up also a little and other posts above are correct, they are measured in MM.
His shocks are also not some custom japanese ones as he claimed but a chinese brand thats bought and re-labeled so it called be used as JDM.

kinda funny because i was arguing so much it couldnt be lbs/inch, kg/mm works out right =p
Old 08-17-2009, 06:16 PM
  #13  
Mojave
Melting Slicks
 
Mojave's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: College Station TX
Posts: 2,231
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by impactblue
thanks everyone, i looked it up also a little and other posts above are correct, they are measured in MM.
His shocks are also not some custom japanese ones as he claimed but a chinese brand thats bought and re-labeled so it called be used as JDM.

kinda funny because i was arguing so much it couldnt be lbs/inch, kg/mm works out right =p
It's either 12 kg/mm or 12,000 kg/m (just a matter if you use meter or millimeters).
Old 08-17-2009, 08:57 PM
  #14  
69427
Tech Contributor
 
69427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Posts: 18,346
Received 767 Likes on 549 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by impactblue
a friend of mine is arguing with me his track 240sx has 12,000lbs coil overs by megan or some japanese company that you cant look up online. its not street legal due to emissions and the cage inside but he swears that it has that high of a spring rate.
i keep arguing thats impossible since the car wont put that much weight down on it thus it would have no weight transfer...
any high end mechanics or engineers willing to explain this further to me? and if its possible to have on his drift car.
thanks
Weight transfer is a result of acceleration, c/g height, and trackwidth/wheelbase. It is not a result of spring rates. Springs merely allow the body to move around (lean or dive) due to the forces against the center of gravity. (You could weld the frame to the suspension, and the weight transfer would still be there.)
Old 08-17-2009, 09:08 PM
  #15  
waktasz
Pro
 
waktasz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Philly region SCCA
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by impactblue
nono 12,000 lbs.
ive ran coil overs before on a mustang i had... i ran 250lbs fronts which was equal in spring rate to like a 1000 lbs conventional. a 12,000 lb coil over would be equalivent to 35,000 conventional spring... for something to make use of that pressure per square inch it would need to be like a CAT bulldozer to have effective weight transfer which would be pointless since you cant road race heavy machinery.

again someone please correct me if im wrong here... im not a scientist or mechanic by any means but i have a very broad science backround and what he says makes no sense to me.
This makes no sense either.
Old 08-17-2009, 10:27 PM
  #16  
Mojave
Melting Slicks
 
Mojave's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: College Station TX
Posts: 2,231
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by impactblue
nono 12,000 lbs.
ive ran coil overs before on a mustang i had... i ran 250lbs fronts which was equal in spring rate to like a 1000 lbs conventional. a 12,000 lb coil over would be equalivent to 35,000 conventional spring... for something to make use of that pressure per square inch it would need to be like a CAT bulldozer to have effective weight transfer which would be pointless since you cant road race heavy machinery.

again someone please correct me if im wrong here... im not a scientist or mechanic by any means but i have a very broad science backround and what he says makes no sense to me.
Originally Posted by waktasz
This makes no sense either.
Some of what he said makes sense, some not so much.

On a Mustang, the stock spring location is not around the strut, but rather much closer to the inside of the control arm. When you move the coil to around the strut with a coil over, the motion ratio changes drastically, going from approx 4:1 to almost 1:1.

240sx's use more traditional struts with the spring around around the strut, so there is no motion ratio change, because the spring location did not change when installing a coil over (aka threaded strut or strut with a thread sleeve).


As was said above, body roll is a CONSEQUENCE of weight transfer, not a cause. Even if you replace your shocks and springs with solid tubes, you WILL still and ALWAYS get weight transfer, but the body won't dive or roll because the tube won't move.

When selecting spring rate, a great place to start is to look at the ride frequencies of the front and rear, and balance them for your application. For a sedan with no downforce, 1.5 hz to 2.0 hz is a great place to start, and you always want the rear frequency higher than the front. Running a spring rate that is significantly too high, even if properly damped by the shocks, will greatly reduce mechanical grip and make the car very sensitive to road imperfections.

Last edited by Mojave; 08-17-2009 at 10:30 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To 12,000 lbs coil overs




Quick Reply: 12,000 lbs coil overs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 PM.