Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS in C4 for Auto X

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2010, 07:52 AM
  #1  
DonF
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
DonF's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Woodway TX
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LS in C4 for Auto X

Thinking about a LS swap in my 96 LT4 this will put me in group 3 for NCCC Auto X. Any body who has done this for Auto X see a big diff.? Or should I just stroke the LT4? Some input would be nice before I take the jump. Thanks
Old 09-09-2010, 08:25 AM
  #2  
VetteDrmr
Le Mans Master
 
VetteDrmr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: Hot Springs AR
Posts: 9,500
Received 1,387 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

From what I understand the LT4s are underrated from the factory (another way to say they're *real* efficient on a chassis dyno). I don't think you'll see a lot of difference on an autocross track. Maybe during a DE, but that's not competitive.

It'll be a fairly involved conversion, but reasonable. Advantages are lighter weight, both your car and engine are OBD-II, lots of aftermarket support for LSx engines, etc.

Disadvantage is mounting points are different (including maybe the tranny), unknown front suspension interference issues, driveshaft may need to be shortened/lengthened, etc.

But it will surely be cool!

Have a good one,
Mike

Last edited by VetteDrmr; 09-09-2010 at 09:32 AM. Reason: fix typo
Old 09-09-2010, 09:06 AM
  #3  
shakedown067
Le Mans Master
 
shakedown067's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Van Steel Corvettes
Posts: 5,768
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13

Default

I think it would be worth it just for the lighter weight. It's one hell of a swap though. Don't think you'll just be dropping that in. I've also only heard of one doing a LSx swap with a ZF, all the others are using 4L60Es. There are some clearance and connection issues with the ZF and LSx motors. Good Luck.
Old 09-09-2010, 09:32 AM
  #4  
Shrek
Melting Slicks

 
Shrek's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Currituck NC
Posts: 2,294
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Here's the details on my stroked LT-4 I did in 2007.
It was a blast to build and even better to drive.

Carbed & Stroked LT-4
(478.5 crank HP @5900 rpm) Aug 07 on eng dyno after rebuild
(413.7 RWHP @5900 rpm) Dec 07 on chassie dyno after 30 laps at CMP

LT block with Eagle 383 rotating assembly
Fidanza aluminum flywheel
Titan GM Sportsman oil pump
LT-4 heads, ported and decked
1:6 roller rockers
Cam specs
...Duration@ .050: Int.-242 Ex.-248.
...Lift: Int.-.586 Ex.-.581.
...Max head flow: Int.-278 cfm Ex.-187 cfm
GM LT-4 4 barrel intake #24502592
Quick Fuel- Wedge Float road race carburator #Q-750-CT
AED billet aluminum throttle bracket #6600R
Lokar throttle cable #TC1000HT36
Mallory fuel pressure regulator w/return #4309
Dual feed braided fuel line with 0-15 psi gauge
K&N X-Stream air filter assembly
GM water pump #EWP18-1119
MSD ignition box. Digital 6 plus #6520
MSD crank trigger
MSD Blaster 3 coil
MSD distributor #8489
Stainless long tube offroad headers with sensor bungs
AC delete bracket and pulley


Here's a few pics from Aug 07 during the dyno break in.













Installed in the car







Old 09-09-2010, 10:35 AM
  #5  
DonF
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
DonF's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Woodway TX
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sherk, why carb. instead of injected?
Old 09-09-2010, 11:16 AM
  #6  
Shrek
Melting Slicks

 
Shrek's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Currituck NC
Posts: 2,294
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DonF
Sherk, why carb. instead of injected?
Sorry, I wasn't suggesting you go carb, I just wanted to show you a sample of the kind of HP a stroked LT could produce.

I purchased the car already stroked, but it had a F.A.S.T. system piggybacked onto the the factory ignition system. Never could get it to tune worth a crap, so when the oil pump fell off at an autocross and trashed the crank, I decided to yank it all out and go simple stupid with air-spark-fuel. I loved it, but carbs aren't for everyone.

I was also having head gasket issues along with the tuning issues, and that turned out to be someone had removed the steam cross over line at the rear of the heads. Ended up we had to toss the block also because of crappy repairs from crappy stroker clearencing in the block.

Old 09-10-2010, 12:19 AM
  #7  
vettehardt
Burning Brakes
 
vettehardt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: New Carlisle IN
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

Just FYI, but the LS motor in a C4 will put you into RP. Updateing and backdating motors is still not allowed in 3E, 3H, ect. In RP you must have a roll bar though.

Alot of the fastest cars at my region's autocrosses are group 1 or 2 LT4s. The rest of the fastest cars are C5 Z06s.

If you are lookign to just have more power, put a bigger cam and some better flowing heads on the LT4 and run that. At most autocrosses suspension work and tires will be more of an improvement than horsepower.

If you are just looking for something different to run, go ahead and put the LS into the C4 and have some fun. One of these days, my dad and I plan on building a 63 Grand Sport roadster replica with a 405hp LS6 in it. It will be an RP, fully gutted. We are shooting for around 2800lbs for total weight.

As for how easy it is to drop a LS motor in a C4 I don't know. What I do know is they make motor mount conversions that bolt up to a LS motor and then a standard 350 motor mount can bolt to that. They come in standard and 1" rear offset styles to accomodate different frames.
Old 09-10-2010, 07:21 AM
  #8  
Kubs
Le Mans Master
 
Kubs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Akron Ohio
Posts: 8,855
Received 1,722 Likes on 931 Posts
2023 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2022 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by vettehardt
Just FYI, but the LS motor in a C4 will put you into RP. Updateing and backdating motors is still not allowed in 3E, 3H, ect. In RP you must have a roll bar though.

Alot of the fastest cars at my region's autocrosses are group 1 or 2 LT4s. The rest of the fastest cars are C5 Z06s.

If you are lookign to just have more power, put a bigger cam and some better flowing heads on the LT4 and run that. At most autocrosses suspension work and tires will be more of an improvement than horsepower.

If you are just looking for something different to run, go ahead and put the LS into the C4 and have some fun. One of these days, my dad and I plan on building a 63 Grand Sport roadster replica with a 405hp LS6 in it. It will be an RP, fully gutted. We are shooting for around 2800lbs for total weight.

As for how easy it is to drop a LS motor in a C4 I don't know. What I do know is they make motor mount conversions that bolt up to a LS motor and then a standard 350 motor mount can bolt to that. They come in standard and 1" rear offset styles to accomodate different frames.

Yes changing style engines will put you in RP. You would have to stay GEN II small block in order to be Group 3.

Vettehardt, if that replica has a tube chassis and late model suspension (like a lot of replicas) it will actually be RPAF, RP Altered Frame.
Old 09-10-2010, 09:47 AM
  #9  
DonF
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
DonF's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Woodway TX
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You are correct, I looked it up in the Rule Book which I should of done in the first place. I do have the start of a roll cage that was going to be a winter project to finish it off.
Ummmm! More thinking now. Thanks
Old 09-10-2010, 08:53 PM
  #10  
vettehardt
Burning Brakes
 
vettehardt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: New Carlisle IN
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kubs

Yes changing style engines will put you in RP. You would have to stay GEN II small block in order to be Group 3.

Vettehardt, if that replica has a tube chassis and late model suspension (like a lot of replicas) it will actually be RPAF, RP Altered Frame.
No it is going to be a stock frame with allowable streangthening for RP. We already have a 82 frame with a 67 tub, an aftermarket high rise hood, and a one piece front end for a 65. We also already have a 82 aluminum rear end to go in after we change gears, probably 3.70. Once we aquire the big hunk of aluminum for the front of the car (LS6) and tranny (M21?) we will actually start building up the frame.

Last edited by vettehardt; 09-10-2010 at 08:55 PM.
Old 09-11-2010, 01:24 AM
  #11  
Kubs
Le Mans Master
 
Kubs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Akron Ohio
Posts: 8,855
Received 1,722 Likes on 931 Posts
2023 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2022 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by vettehardt
No it is going to be a stock frame with allowable streangthening for RP. We already have a 82 frame with a 67 tub, an aftermarket high rise hood, and a one piece front end for a 65. We also already have a 82 aluminum rear end to go in after we change gears, probably 3.70. Once we aquire the big hunk of aluminum for the front of the car (LS6) and tranny (M21?) we will actually start building up the frame.
Sounds cool! Post pics in a thread when you do this.

Get notified of new replies

To LS in C4 for Auto X




Quick Reply: LS in C4 for Auto X



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 AM.