Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C5Z06 alignment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2012, 08:46 AM
  #1  
sabastian458
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
sabastian458's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Easley/Anderson South Carolina
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts

Default C5Z06 alignment

I posted a thread up over on the C5Z06 forum but it was recomended that I come here. After sometime, I finally have posted here. What I am looking for is a good alignment that I can feel comfortable about.

I will try to describe my concern below, please bare with me as I may not us the correct terms. I also dont track my car on tracks, but do spirited back roads, kinda like mountain runs? I also do a fair amount of highway driving too if that matters.

Currently the car doesnt "feel" right when doing sharpish turns, it feels as if it is getting "squirrelly" just after the turn in, and I have to make small correction to keep my line.

I am willing to listen to any suggestions to get my car handling better, but I am not wanting to spend $1,000's on coil overs and such.

My current suspension mods are; Pfadt polly mounts full kit. Bilstein shocks for lowered car (not the custom valved ones offered on here) Nitto Invo's (275/35R18 & 325/30R19) I plan to install Polly engine and trans mounts if that makes any difference at all. Other that that the suspension is stock 2002 C5 Z06.




I recently installed the pdaft poly mounts and had my car aligned. I will list the specs from the print out below.

What I am looking for is advise on changes, I have to take the car back because the steering wheel is off center to the left alot. I am looking for a good alignment that wont cause significant tire wear, but have good handling.

Anything seem too off? The guy doing the alignment stated that the Caster was a non tire wearing spec and that with the higher value would cause the car to be slightly harder to turn, giving it better high speed stability. Is that incorrect?


Front Left Spec range
Camber -0.6 -1.2 -0.2
Caster 8.4 6.4 7.4
Toe 0.03 -0.06 0.14

Front Right
Camber -0.6 -1.2 -0.2
Caster 8.2 6.4 7.4
Toe 0.04 -0.06 0.14

Front Spec Range
Cross Camber -0.0 -0.5 0.5
Cross Caster 0.2 -0.5 0.5
Total Toe 0.07 -0.12 0.28


Rear Left Spec Range
Camber -0.7 -1.2 -0.2
Toe 0.07 -0.11 0.09

Rear Right Spec Range
Camber -0.9 -1.2 -0.2
Toe 0.09 -0.11 0.09

Rear Spec Range
Cross Camber 0.2 -0.5 0.5
Total Toe 0.16 -0.22 0.18
Thrust Angle -0.01 -0.10 0.10
Old 05-03-2012, 10:06 AM
  #2  
redtopz
Melting Slicks
 
redtopz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Merced California
Posts: 3,155
Received 44 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

That's a lot of caster. I would go with more camber in front (maybe -1.3 or so), back off the caster to 7.5, and then slightly toe in the rear. That should be a solid performance alignment. If you still have issues with the rear stepping out after that, it won't be from the alignment.

BTW, if you installed poly bushings for the sway bars that is probably your problem. They can bind up and make the sway bars super stiff causing instability in turns. Lube up the inside of the bushings and use shims to take some of the clamping force off the bushings.
Old 05-03-2012, 10:20 AM
  #3  
PA Z06
Safety Car
 
PA Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Philly Burbs PA
Posts: 3,605
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

If you shoot me a pm I can send you the Pfadt chart of different alignment settings.
Old 05-03-2012, 10:34 AM
  #4  
sabastian458
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
sabastian458's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Easley/Anderson South Carolina
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

http://www.pfadtracing.com/blog/wp-c...-alignment.pdf

That chart?
Old 05-03-2012, 10:40 AM
  #5  
RDnomorecobra
Drifting
 
RDnomorecobra's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Chester Springs PA
Posts: 1,305
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redtopz
BTW, if you installed poly bushings for the sway bars that is probably your problem. They can bind up and make the sway bars super stiff causing instability in turns. Lube up the inside of the bushings and use shims to take some of the clamping force off the bushings.
I clean and re-lube mine beginning of each season. Gets all grimy in there.
Old 05-03-2012, 11:49 AM
  #6  
sabastian458
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
sabastian458's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Easley/Anderson South Carolina
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redtopz
That's a lot of caster. I would go with more camber in front (maybe -1.3 or so), back off the caster to 7.5, and then slightly toe in the rear. That should be a solid performance alignment. If you still have issues with the rear stepping out after that, it won't be from the alignment.

BTW, if you installed poly bushings for the sway bars that is probably your problem. They can bind up and make the sway bars super stiff causing instability in turns. Lube up the inside of the bushings and use shims to take some of the clamping force off the bushings.
I guess I shouldnt have said full poly bushings? IDK, however my sways are 100% stock including the bushings. I ment the control arms f&R's, U&L's and the shock mount. Sorry about that.
Old 05-03-2012, 12:03 PM
  #7  
froggy47
Race Director
 
froggy47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 10,851
Received 194 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Print out the Pfadt chart & tell the guy you want Performance Street or performance street with some track use with street tires. Your choice.

Get notified of new replies

To C5Z06 alignment




Quick Reply: C5Z06 alignment



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 AM.