Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Shoulder harness angle with harness bars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2013, 10:15 PM
  #1  
BryanPendleton
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BryanPendleton's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Shoulder harness angle with harness bars

I have been investigating harness bars for my c5. The two most often recommended are the Hardbar and the Brey Krause. After investigating both, they both appear to position the mount bar level with the stock shoulder mounts. After viewing multiple photos this appears to position the attachment point ABOVE shoulder level which goes against most rules and harness mounting recommendations which state that the attachments points should be level or 20deg BELOW shoulders.

I have my eye on the Sparco Harness Bar because it drops those shoulder attachments lower to get a better shoulder strap angle. Something I would like to think that Sparco would weigh considerably in their design.

Anyway, I was looking for some feedback on those with the Harbar or BK bar, and what their shoulder strap position is relative to their shoulder height. Please provide driver height, seat, slider type, etc, as these all impact driver height position.

Last edited by BryanPendleton; 02-06-2013 at 11:13 PM.
Old 02-06-2013, 10:40 PM
  #2  
skxf430
Burning Brakes
 
skxf430's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 983
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Check out the Sharkbar, as the mounting point seems to be slightly lower than either the BK or the Hardbar.

A quick search will pull up several different threads.
Old 02-06-2013, 11:08 PM
  #3  
BryanPendleton
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BryanPendleton's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by skxf430
Check out the Sharkbar, as the mounting point seems to be slightly lower than either the BK or the Hardbar.
I have not found a sharkbar for a C5 though.
Old 02-06-2013, 11:17 PM
  #4  
phipp85
Burning Brakes
 
phipp85's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta Georgia
Posts: 1,045
Received 37 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

I like the Sharkbar. I'm 5' 10" and have a corbeau fx1 pro seat mounted on hardbar rails. My shoulder belts are parallel to the ground. I have the seat mounted very low as I had to cut the pedestals for a bottom mount off the seat to get it down as far as I would like. If you use sliders the seat will be higher than with the hardbar rails.
Old 02-06-2013, 11:31 PM
  #5  
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
 
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,089
Received 8,928 Likes on 5,333 Posts

Default

When I had the Hardbar installed in the C6 it came across at the shoulder belt mount level and the seat back release button would rub against it. The bar was too high and didn't allow the shoulder belts to fit over my HANS properly. I sold the Hardbar and went with a Sharkbar which is several inches lower than and several inches to the rear. That makes a big difference.

I am pretty sure the Hardbar is too high in the C5 as well. I do know the BK bar is lower than the Hardbar but I am not sure how much lower. If you place the cursor over the picture of the bar in this link you can see the bar is lower than the stock shoulder belt mounts:
http://www.bkauto.com/R_1115_Harness...r_p/r-1115.htm Probably would be a good idea to call BK directly and talk to them to see how much below the shoulder belt mounts the bar is located.

Bill
Old 02-07-2013, 07:48 AM
  #6  
AU N EGL
Team Owner
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Old 02-07-2013, 09:16 AM
  #7  
JeremyGSU
Drifting
 
JeremyGSU's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Ocala FL
Posts: 1,464
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

=Bill Dearborn;1583055342]When I had the Hardbar installed in the C6 it came across at the shoulder belt mount level and the seat back release button would rub against it. The bar was too high and didn't allow the shoulder belts to fit over my HANS properly. I sold the Hardbar and went with a Sharkbar which is several inches lower than and several inches to the rear. That makes a big difference.
Ditto. I had the Hardbar and found it too high with my seat setup and ended up switching to the Sparco. It's lower and I like the additional support brackets that go down to the seats.

Last edited by JeremyGSU; 02-08-2013 at 10:44 AM.
Old 02-07-2013, 12:07 PM
  #8  
MYRX
Instructor
 
MYRX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Winterville GA
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Four years ago when I started doing track events, I purchased a Hardbar for my C5. I too discovered the angle wasn't ideal. I added the extenders and that made an improvement. My shoulder straps are at least level, 0 degrees. Knowing what I know now, I would elect to have the rear portion of a cage built into my car. basically a very nice 4 pt roll cage that would provide the ideal downward angle for the shoulder straps. PFADT used to sell a really nice chassie bar that I bet would be ideal.
Old 02-07-2013, 07:50 PM
  #9  
mountainbiker2
Melting Slicks
 
mountainbiker2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Burbank. CA.
Posts: 3,138
Received 37 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Here's my review on Hardbar.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/auto...installed.html

Steve A.

Last edited by mountainbiker2; 02-07-2013 at 07:54 PM.
Old 02-07-2013, 09:47 PM
  #10  
Gman57
Burning Brakes
 
Gman57's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Des Moines Iowa
Posts: 980
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I had the BK in my C6 and was giged at a NASA event a few years ago because the bar was level to slightly above the sholder line. I did have a aftermarket race seat in the gave me a 1-1.5" lower stance over stock. With this in mind if you ever get a race seat you could get spoted on this.... it cost me all of Sunday track events. I thought this was a bit overboard for a HPDE class.
G
Old 02-07-2013, 11:32 PM
  #11  
Ludedude
Racer
 
Ludedude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: Vegas baby, Vegas NV
Posts: 407
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gman57
I had the BK in my C6 and was giged at a NASA event a few years ago because the bar was level to slightly above the sholder line. I did have a aftermarket race seat in the gave me a 1-1.5" lower stance over stock. With this in mind if you ever get a race seat you could get spoted on this.... it cost me all of Sunday track events. I thought this was a bit overboard for a HPDE class.
G
The point of safety equipment is that if you elect to put it in, it should be put in properly. To not do so risks worse injury than if you had left it out and just run the stock belts. From an event organizer's point of view, it's their liability if they tech a car and let it out with non-conforming equipment.
Old 02-08-2013, 01:18 AM
  #12  
RX-Ben
Safety Car
 
RX-Ben's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenixville, PA
Posts: 3,769
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

100% correct on the below analysis of the angles. I am selling an AZ Speed&Marine bar for a C5 that properly situates the belts. Most of the other designs are not compliant with most orgs tech reqs.

Originally Posted by BryanPendleton
I have been investigating harness bars for my c5. The two most often recommended are the Hardbar and the Brey Krause. After investigating both, they both appear to position the mount bar level with the stock shoulder mounts. After viewing multiple photos this appears to position the attachment point ABOVE shoulder level which goes against most rules and harness mounting recommendations which state that the attachments points should be level or 20deg BELOW shoulders.

I have my eye on the Sparco Harness Bar because it drops those shoulder attachments lower to get a better shoulder strap angle. Something I would like to think that Sparco would weigh considerably in their design.

Anyway, I was looking for some feedback on those with the Harbar or BK bar, and what their shoulder strap position is relative to their shoulder height. Please provide driver height, seat, slider type, etc, as these all impact driver height position.
Old 02-08-2013, 06:59 AM
  #13  
BryanPendleton
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BryanPendleton's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ludedude
The point of safety equipment is that if you elect to put it in, it should be put in properly. To not do so risks worse injury than if you had left it out and just run the stock belts. From an event organizer's point of view, it's their liability if they tech a car and let it out with non-conforming equipment.
I am not sure I agree on the organization, track or anyone working for them having ANY liability. I am quit certain that the track and hosting organization are free from liability based on all the liability waiver forms that are signed before an event.

Last edited by BryanPendleton; 02-08-2013 at 07:09 AM.
Old 02-08-2013, 11:04 AM
  #14  
Gman57
Burning Brakes
 
Gman57's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Des Moines Iowa
Posts: 980
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Ludedude
The point of safety equipment is that if you elect to put it in, it should be put in properly. To not do so risks worse injury than if you had left it out and just run the stock belts. From an event organizer's point of view, it's their liability if they tech a car and let it out with non-conforming equipment.
I see their point.... It's that I was out 150.00+ and a 9 hour drive one way. I still was more secure in my car than some of the $1500-2000 dollar rat-traps on the track. That's my point....
Old 02-08-2013, 12:15 PM
  #15  
z060ntrack
Drifting
 
z060ntrack's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Clemmons NC
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

To bad the Shark Bar is not available for the C5! It is, without a doubt the best bar for correct height and, as an added bonus has belt locators welded on. You also can get the pre cut panels with grommets which make the finished install look as though it's factory instlled.
Old 02-08-2013, 10:01 PM
  #16  
trackboss
Melting Slicks
 
trackboss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I have hardbar harness mount and seat mounts combined with a kirkey seat mounted pretty darn low. The bar is well above my shoulders, but I don't let it bother me. It's not a race car. Everyeone's shoulders harnesses will be at different heights becaue of not only each person's body, but because of how their seat is mounted. Throw on a hans and angle changes again. IMO, shoulders harnesses should be just barely above level when strapped down properly. Reason being is that in a forward impact the body will move foward and up in most cases. Having a downward angle will compress the spine. Even a level angle may cause some compression. Shoulders belts at an upward angle may reduce spinal compression in such an impact.
Old 02-08-2013, 11:20 PM
  #17  
NVR2L8
Drifting
 
NVR2L8's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Location: Bowling Green KY
Posts: 1,786
Received 50 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Per the NASA CCR:

15.5 Driver Restraint System

6. The shoulder harness shall be mounted behind the driver and above a line drawn downward from the shoulder point at an angle of no more than twenty (20) degrees with the horizontal.


Last edited by NVR2L8; 02-08-2013 at 11:23 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To Shoulder harness angle with harness bars

Old 02-09-2013, 01:00 AM
  #18  
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
 
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,089
Received 8,928 Likes on 5,333 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by trackboss
I have hardbar harness mount and seat mounts combined with a kirkey seat mounted pretty darn low. The bar is well above my shoulders, but I don't let it bother me. It's not a race car. Everyeone's shoulders harnesses will be at different heights becaue of not only each person's body, but because of how their seat is mounted. Throw on a hans and angle changes again. IMO, shoulders harnesses should be just barely above level when strapped down properly. Reason being is that in a forward impact the body will move foward and up in most cases. Having a downward angle will compress the spine. Even a level angle may cause some compression. Shoulders belts at an upward angle may reduce spinal compression in such an impact.
Gary used to make that same comment about his bar when he first started selling it. However, the harness manufacturers don't agree with that. All of them have the same requirements for installation.

Bill
Old 02-09-2013, 08:37 AM
  #19  
C5ZEE06
Drifting
 
C5ZEE06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 1,276
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RX-Ben
100% correct on the below analysis of the angles. I am selling an AZ Speed&Marine bar for a C5 that properly situates the belts. Most of the other designs are not compliant with most orgs tech reqs.
After trying several others, I too chose the Az speed and marine piece. I'm surprised yours hasn't sold- especially at your asking price.
Old 02-09-2013, 08:41 AM
  #20  
BryanPendleton
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BryanPendleton's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by trackboss
I have hardbar harness mount and seat mounts combined with a kirkey seat mounted pretty darn low. The bar is well above my shoulders, but I don't let it bother me. It's not a race car. Everyeone's shoulders harnesses will be at different heights becaue of not only each person's body, but because of how their seat is mounted. Throw on a hans and angle changes again. IMO, shoulders harnesses should be just barely above level when strapped down properly. Reason being is that in a forward impact the body will move foward and up in most cases. Having a downward angle will compress the spine. Even a level angle may cause some compression. Shoulders belts at an upward angle may reduce spinal compression in such an impact.
We are all entitled to our opinion, but based on the assessment that every harness manufacturer and every race organization that i have ever looked at specifies shoulder attachment level or below shoulder level, I am enclined to follow their recommendations. I would like to think they know and understand the risks a little more than we, the laymen, do, particularly companies like Schroth that do lots and lots of testing and harness innovation.
In addition to safety, I prefer to minimize any tech finding with the various race/HPDE organizations.



Quick Reply: Shoulder harness angle with harness bars



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 PM.