C6Z- Is this too aggressive for 80% street?
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
C6Z- Is this too aggressive for 80% street?
Hey guys,
Just got coilovers and an alignment. Michelin Pilot Super Sports 325 - R Nitto Invo 275 - F (Hey, they're still good!)
What can you tell me about this setup?
Just got coilovers and an alignment. Michelin Pilot Super Sports 325 - R Nitto Invo 275 - F (Hey, they're still good!)
What can you tell me about this setup?
#2
Le Mans Master
Too aggressive? No.
I would want a little bit of toe-in in front and rear and less camber in the rear. See the Pfadt chart below.
http://www.pfadtracing.com/blog/wp-c...-9.12.2011.pdf
I would want a little bit of toe-in in front and rear and less camber in the rear. See the Pfadt chart below.
http://www.pfadtracing.com/blog/wp-c...-9.12.2011.pdf
#3
Safety Car
I'm running -3.0 camber front and -1.6 rear. My car sees a lot of street use too. I agree that your rear camber is a little more than needed. Your front camber is light if you are running r compounds on the track
#5
Melting Slicks
Rule of thumb is about a half a degree less in the back than in the front. With that much in the back you will have a good bit of wear on the insides. With your -1.6 in the front I'd be looking at more like -1.1 in the back.
The reason for that is that you lose negative camber when you turn the front wheels, due to kingpin inclination angle, and the back tires don't lose any since they don't steer.
I'd be cranking back some negative camber in the back since it isn't going to help handling, the car is going to push the way it is set up now anyway, so all you gain from more negative camber in the back is more inside tire wear.
The reason for that is that you lose negative camber when you turn the front wheels, due to kingpin inclination angle, and the back tires don't lose any since they don't steer.
I'd be cranking back some negative camber in the back since it isn't going to help handling, the car is going to push the way it is set up now anyway, so all you gain from more negative camber in the back is more inside tire wear.
Last edited by Solofast; 07-30-2013 at 01:54 PM.
#6
Le Mans Master
Umm, I think you got the alignment backwards. You have more camber in the rear than the front. It should be the other way around. If the numbers were backwards, it would be a nice street/track alignment for street tires.
Anything under -2.0 is not aggressive, but your running street tires so running -3.0 would be a waste as you won't get enough grip to take advantage of all that camber.
Anything under -2.0 is not aggressive, but your running street tires so running -3.0 would be a waste as you won't get enough grip to take advantage of all that camber.
#7
Drifting
Thread Starter
Thanks for the tips guys.
I actually meant to take the pfadt specs to the alignment shop, but totally fogot! Doh!
Will try to dial back rear camber. Any thoughts on toe? all pfadt specs for dual and street use say no toe.
I actually meant to take the pfadt specs to the alignment shop, but totally fogot! Doh!
Will try to dial back rear camber. Any thoughts on toe? all pfadt specs for dual and street use say no toe.