Engine Mods Outrageous Builds, High-Horsepower Modifications, strokers, and big cams for the Corvette

Thoughts on-Internal vs externally balanced 383 crank!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2002, 09:05 PM
  #1  
85vet
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
85vet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Heidelberg PA
Posts: 3,426
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Cruise-In V Veteran

Default Thoughts on-Internal vs externally balanced 383 crank!!

Interested in your thoughts on the differences between an externally balanced vs internally balanced 383 crank.

Is there a benefit in useing one over the other?

I think the internal balanced will allow me to use my current 350 harmonic balancer vs going up to a 400. This setup then would make the engine look completely stock with no apparent outside changes. :cool:

Is there any other benefit to an internal balanced crank?
Old 10-20-2002, 02:09 AM
  #2  
jackson
Le Mans Master

 
jackson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
Posts: 7,739
Received 628 Likes on 556 Posts

Default Re: Thoughts on-Internal vs externally balanced 383 crank!! (85vet)

Yes, by using internal you can retain 350 balancer & flywheel/flexplate & save money there. Of course if your balancer is original 1985, I'd get a new one for a stroker build.

I realize there are a FEW internal balance CAST 383 cranks ... more internal balance forged ... and a glut of external balance cast.

AND ... SOME of those bargain ($100 < $200) aftermarket 383 Cast External-balance cranks ain't such a bargain. SOME have very creative counterweight finishing (aka hacked) that results in a balancing bill $ 2-3 times $ what it should be. IMHO after balancing's factored in, a good Forged 383 Internal-balance crank may cost only $100 - $200 more in the end.

Old 10-20-2002, 10:51 AM
  #3  
CORKVETTE1
Melting Slicks
 
CORKVETTE1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: PITTSBURGH PA
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran

Default Re: Thoughts on-Internal vs externally balanced 383 crank!! (jackson)

internal ballaned job could set you back $300-$600 depending how much mallory metal they have to use :cheers:
Old 10-20-2002, 10:57 AM
  #4  
No Go
Melting Slicks
 
No Go's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 3,215
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Re: Thoughts on-Internal vs externally balanced 383 crank!! (jackson)

Are the SCAT forged cranks considered internally balanced?

Speaking with the phone technician at SCAT, he wasn't being very helpful in his statement-internally balanced in front and externally balanced in the rear on their forged 1 piece LT1 cranks.

Thanks.

:)
Old 10-20-2002, 02:20 PM
  #5  
vader86
Team Owner
 
vader86's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Athens AL
Posts: 59,639
Received 1,400 Likes on 1,016 Posts
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default Re: Thoughts on-Internal vs externally balanced 383 crank!! (85vet)

My Lingenfelter book kinda explains what the differences are, but he doesnt really say what the advantage is with internal or external :confused:
Old 10-20-2002, 03:28 PM
  #6  
71roadster
Burning Brakes
 
71roadster's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Thoughts on-Internal vs externally balanced 383 crank!! (85vet)

I am buying the scat crank for a 1 piece rear seal with a 3.75 inch stroke to build a 383. I will have the late model flywheel machined along with the rest of the rotating assembly to be internally balanced. It is a lot less stress on the crank and block as standing waves are minimzed in internal balance and maximized with external balance. Scat says there cranks designed for internal balance have extra material in the counterweights to reduce/eliminate the need for mallory metal. And if you use light weight rods and pistons you further ease the balancing process and reduce costs. I am going to use manley sportsmaster rods which are some of the lightest on the market and fit my horsepower target perfectly. They are a lot better and cleaner designed rod then the scats or the eagles and it clearly shows when handling them. Plus, they are only $100 more then most others and about 100 grams lighter. Thats a lot. Then if you use lightweight pistons you help even more. KB hyperuetectics are about 425-450 grams each compared to 500+ for most forged units unless you go with hi dollar lightweight forged. Either way, the lighter you keep the rotating and reciprocating weight, the cheaper it is to balance.

It would be easier and cheaper to just build external balance using the larger harmonic damper, but I kinda like complicating the h3ll out of everything.


cheers
Chris
Old 10-20-2002, 05:54 PM
  #7  
85vet
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
85vet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Heidelberg PA
Posts: 3,426
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Cruise-In V Veteran

Default Re: Thoughts on-Internal vs externally balanced 383 crank!! (71roadster)

Thanks, guys.

Keep it coming - this is great stuff and knowledge is HP and longetivity of your engine :cheers: .

Just curious - is the original crank on the 85 internally balanced?

Get notified of new replies

To Thoughts on-Internal vs externally balanced 383 crank!!




Quick Reply: Thoughts on-Internal vs externally balanced 383 crank!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 AM.