Saw Chevy Bolt EV at LA Auto Show
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Saw Chevy Bolt EV at LA Auto Show
OK, I thought I would hate the Bolt EV, but when I saw it in person, I actually liked it. It's good looking for the hatchback style of car it is, and is modern looking. It has lots of interior room. The 10" touchscreen was nice and intuitive, too. Dashboard gauges are all digital. Seats seemed comfortable. Back seat could definitely handle full sized adults no problem. EPA battery range is 238 miles, which pretty much covers most people's driving except long road trips. Price is $30K with Federal tax credit.
Anyone else see it yet?
Michael
Anyone else see it yet?
Michael
#2
Team Owner
OK, I thought I would hate the Bolt EV, but when I saw it in person, I actually liked it. It's good looking for the hatchback style of car it is, and is modern looking. It has lots of interior room. The 10" touchscreen was nice and intuitive, too. Dashboard gauges are all digital. Seats seemed comfortable. Back seat could definitely handle full sized adults no problem. EPA battery range is 238 miles, which pretty much covers most people's driving except long road trips. Price is $30K with Federal tax credit.
Anyone else see it yet?
Michael
Anyone else see it yet?
Michael
#3
*2018 most likely and it won't have any more gov't incentives so will probably cost closer to $45k
#4
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
#5
Team Owner
#6
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
#8
Team Owner
The only notable advantage the Bolt has is it hits the market first. It is also possible that Tesla will end up charging more than they are currently claiming, which would obviously favor the Bolt.
But at the moment, $700 million in deposits suggests there is tremendous demand for the Model 3, and I think it is likely that consumers who want an electric are going to be willing to wait on the much more appealing 3 rather than dropping money on the goofy looking Bolt.
#10
Both electric, both comparably priced. The main ways they are not comparable is the Model 3 is not ugly, and it has self-driving capability.
The only notable advantage the Bolt has is it hits the market first. It is also possible that Tesla will end up charging more than they are currently claiming, which would obviously favor the Bolt.
But at the moment, $700 million in deposits suggests there is tremendous demand for the Model 3, and I think it is likely that consumers who want an electric are going to be willing to wait on the much more appealing 3 rather than dropping money on the goofy looking Bolt.
The only notable advantage the Bolt has is it hits the market first. It is also possible that Tesla will end up charging more than they are currently claiming, which would obviously favor the Bolt.
But at the moment, $700 million in deposits suggests there is tremendous demand for the Model 3, and I think it is likely that consumers who want an electric are going to be willing to wait on the much more appealing 3 rather than dropping money on the goofy looking Bolt.
1. No dealer within 100s of miles
2. 1999 Kia levels of fit and finish
The current Tesla customers are early adopters are ok overlooking those annoyances. If Tesla wants to play with the big boys in terms of volume they'll need to get those 2 things figured out ASAP.
They'll also need to break their tradition of promising one thing (remember the $50,000 Model S?) and delivering something else (go try to find that car). A self driving, good looking, ludicrous mode equipped, $60,000*+ Model 3 is of no concern to GM and their Bolt market
*my price estimate is in line with how every other Tesla product has hit the market. I hope they prove me wrong.
Last edited by lionsfan5454; 11-25-2016 at 01:52 PM.
#11
Team Owner
I think you are overestimating the mainstream customer's tolerance for lame design when something more interesting is coming down the pike.
Agree on price though... I'm sure the 3 will be more pricey than the Bolt. But it's going to have to be a lot more expensive for the Bolt to have a chance. The econobox design gives the Bolt a big disadvantage.
#12
Tesla's complete dominance of the luxury sedan market (despite lacking comparable levels of luxury) argues otherwise. At a similar price point they are selling twice as many S models as Mercedes sells S classes and BMW sells 7's.
I think you are overestimating the mainstream customer's tolerance for lame design when something more interesting is coming down the pike.
Agree on price though... I'm sure the 3 will be more pricey than the Bolt. But it's going to have to be a lot more expensive for the Bolt to have a chance. The econobox design gives the Bolt a big disadvantage.
I think you are overestimating the mainstream customer's tolerance for lame design when something more interesting is coming down the pike.
Agree on price though... I'm sure the 3 will be more pricey than the Bolt. But it's going to have to be a lot more expensive for the Bolt to have a chance. The econobox design gives the Bolt a big disadvantage.
Re Model 3 design... let's tap the brakes. We're not talking about a Ferrari Daytona here. It's certainly more interesting looking than a Bolt (probably better looking, all things considered), but it is also somewhat ungainly from certain angles (lack of grill still looks odd) and it isn't that much more shapely than a previous gen Mazda 3
I chuckle at the Tesla fanboys just spouting off "It'll be $2,500 cheaper than the Bolt, have autopilot, more range and ludicrous mode". Yeah... no
Last edited by lionsfan5454; 11-25-2016 at 02:32 PM.
#13
Team Owner
Yeah, I don't know if that's really the Model S market though. I think the S has created its own market actually. "High End Tech" or something?
Re Model 3 design... let's tap the brakes. We're not talking about a Ferrari Daytona here. It's certainly more interesting looking than a Bolt (probably better looking, all things considered), but it is also somewhat ungainly from certain angles (lack of grill still looks odd) and it isn't that much more shapely than a previous gen Mazda 3
I chuckle at the Tesla fanboys just spouting off "It'll be $2,500 cheaper than the Bolt, have autopilot, more range and ludicrous mode". Yeah... no
Re Model 3 design... let's tap the brakes. We're not talking about a Ferrari Daytona here. It's certainly more interesting looking than a Bolt (probably better looking, all things considered), but it is also somewhat ungainly from certain angles (lack of grill still looks odd) and it isn't that much more shapely than a previous gen Mazda 3
I chuckle at the Tesla fanboys just spouting off "It'll be $2,500 cheaper than the Bolt, have autopilot, more range and ludicrous mode". Yeah... no
My prediction for the Bolt is disappointing sales followed by a rapid redesign. Reviews suggest they built a quality car... but styling it like an econobox was a huge mistake.
And yeah the 3 design is not perfect, but it is FAR better. The car will have much more cache, by virtue of brand and design.
#14
No, it will start higher and options will add up. But like the BMW 3 series which has typically won its segment despite being pricier than the competition, I think people will pay up for it.
My prediction for the Bolt is disappointing sales followed by a rapid redesign. Reviews suggest they built a quality car... but styling it like an econobox was a huge mistake.
And yeah the 3 design is not perfect, but it is FAR better. The car will have much more cache, by virtue of brand and design.
My prediction for the Bolt is disappointing sales followed by a rapid redesign. Reviews suggest they built a quality car... but styling it like an econobox was a huge mistake.
And yeah the 3 design is not perfect, but it is FAR better. The car will have much more cache, by virtue of brand and design.
If those Bolts tank and then used ones are dirt chip (like the Leaf), I'll happily pick one up for pennies on the dollar though
#17
Race Director