CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/)
-   C3 Tech/Performance (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c3-tech-performance-3/)
-   -   big block 454 vs 427 (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c3-tech-performance/2413514-big-block-454-vs-427-a.html)

delgal 08-30-2009 01:41 PM

big block 454 vs 427
 
hello,

which is the difference enters, L88 427ci - L71 427ci- LS5 - LS7 454ci,
(year 1969 - 1971) power, starting torke, reliability, lightness???

thank you with you all:cheers::cheers::cheers::cheers::chee rs:


david

TimAT 08-30-2009 02:46 PM

Factory horsepower ratings L-88 427 is 430HP, the L-71 427 is 435, and the LS-7 454 is 460. The 454 will have a bit more torque (longer stroke). The reliability and weight is close enough to the same on all 3 to not be a factor.

OzzyTom 08-31-2009 02:33 AM


Originally Posted by TimAT (Post 1571320575)
Factory horsepower ratings L-88 427 is 430HP, the L-71 427 is 435, and the LS-7 454 is 460. The 454 will have a bit more torque (longer stroke). The reliability and weight is close enough to the same on all 3 to not be a factor.


Seeing as the original poster is a newbie, it should be stated that the L88 was in reality much higher in horsepower... it was a high compression (12:1) racing engine with over 500 hp!!! :thumbs:
Not ideal for street use today due to lower octane fuels, but definitely much more powerful than the factory rating of 430hp!

baxsom 08-31-2009 04:39 AM

dont forget that all pre72 rating were the one that was without accessories.
i think it was the gross reading, in 72 they switched to net which dropped the numbers but indicated a more real one. like the 71 454 vs 72 454. big rated numbers difference most of it was because of the scale.

joewill 08-31-2009 09:58 AM

people wil swear by the 427 and the way it revs due to shorter stroke.. but if all else is the same... then there is no replacement for displacement... the more displacement, the more torque.. especially at the lower end of the rpm range

FRSTR90 08-31-2009 02:05 PM


Originally Posted by baxsom (Post 1571326816)
dont forget that all pre72 rating were the one that was without accessories.
i think it was the gross reading, in 72 they switched to net which dropped the numbers but indicated a more real one. like the 71 454 vs 72 454. big rated numbers difference most of it was because of the scale.

It was all a game... Whether you take the numbers from 1970 or the numbers from 1973 in reality its all the same. Those factory ratings are just as irrelevant as the typical guy across your street with a 350 that has 500+ HP.

Jims66 08-31-2009 02:26 PM

Didn't the L88 have aluminum heads ?

MelWff 08-31-2009 04:11 PM

Yes, the L88 had aluminum heads


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands