427 vs 454
My 50th Anniversary Corvette book, (published in 2003 by the Auto Editors of Consumer Guide) says that both the 427 and the 1970 454 have the same bore and stroke, 4.25 x 3.76. It lists the 1971 and later 454 at 4.25 x 4.00. Is this a typo? If not, how could two engines with the same bore and stroke have different displacements?
And of course, which was the better engine? |
Originally Posted by 4howard
(Post 1576858824)
My 50th Anniversary Corvette book, (published in 2003 by the Auto Editors of Consumer Guide) says that both the 427 and the 1970 454 have the same bore and stroke, 4.25 x 3.76. It lists the 1971 and later 454 at 4.25 x 4.00. Is this a typo? If not, how could two engines with the same bore and stroke have different displacements?
And of course, which was the better engine? |
Originally Posted by 4howard
(Post 1576858824)
My 50th Anniversary Corvette book, (published in 2003 by the Auto Editors of Consumer Guide) says that both the 427 and the 1970 454 have the same bore and stroke, 4.25 x 3.76. It lists the 1971 and later 454 at 4.25 x 4.00. Is this a typo? If not, how could two engines with the same bore and stroke have different displacements?
And of course, which was the better engine? Others experience may vary. |
Originally Posted by vettsplit 63
(Post 1576858966)
Typo..... In my experience, the 3.76 motors were much quicker than the 4.0 stroke motors, everything else being equal. I could outrun LS6 454-450 HP Chevelles with my 396/375 HP Chevelle. It really torqued em off.:thumbs:
Others experience may vary. Jim |
(in inches for Cubic Inches)
Bore x bore x stroke x 0.786459 x number of cylinders. Ex - 4" x 4" x 3" x 0.786459 x 8 = 302 |
I prefer the 427 L-88 over the 454 LS7
|
Originally Posted by vettsplit 63
(Post 1576858966)
Typo..... In my experience, the 3.76 motors were much quicker than the 4.0 stroke motors, everything else being equal. I could outrun LS6 454-450 HP Chevelles with my 396/375 HP Chevelle. It really torqued em off.:thumbs:
Others experience may vary. (A long, long time ago running C/Stock at the local strip.) :D |
Back in 1970 I put a 454 450hp engine into my 64 Coupe. I still have the original receipt from the dealer. Would you believe that the crate motor cost me all of $749.50? Boy, how things have changed. FYI
PS: Stock bearings were junk. If you didn't replace them right off, then you spun them in a heartbeat. |
A couple of little parts you are leaving out of the equation, the heads and deck height. I know that on the small block, 1970 were the last year of the open chamber heads, but am not sure if that is true for the BB heads or not.
|
It's not only the cu.in. of the engine, but the tranny, rear end ratio and most importantly, the driver that makes a car fast.
I remember my buddies 396 vs. a 454 (both Chevelles). The 396 won. It was easy to see who won, but it was close. |
Generally speaking, the longer the stroke, the higher the torque, and the shorter the stroke, the higher the redline. The 454 is really just a "stroked" 427, so in theory at least, it has higher torque, but lower redline. Just to make things clear, the answer to the question "which is the better engine?" is "it depends". Again speaking theoretically, the 427 would be the "better" engine for road racing, and the 454 would be the "better" engine for drag racing.
|
My experance was even worse. My Friend had a brand new 69 Nova SS396 375HP with turbo hydromatic. First race was with a stock 4 speed 390 Mustang. The Mustang beat us with two on board in the Nova. Needless To say he was embrassed and I was shocked .
|
Originally Posted by a66bbvet
(Post 1576863970)
A couple of little parts you are leaving out of the equation, the heads and deck height. I know that on the small block, 1970 were the last year of the open chamber heads, but am not sure if that is true for the BB heads or not.
|
Originally Posted by PKguitar
(Post 1576865060)
Generally speaking, the longer the stroke, the higher the torque, and the shorter the stroke, the higher the redline. The 454 is really just a "stroked" 427, so in theory at least, it has higher torque, but lower redline. Just to make things clear, the answer to the question "which is the better engine?" is "it depends". Again speaking theoretically, the 427 would be the "better" engine for road racing, and the 454 would be the "better" engine for drag racing.
|
|
Originally Posted by 4howard
(Post 1576868068)
|
Originally Posted by claysmoker
(Post 1576868130)
Casting number on the bellhousing.
|
Originally Posted by vettsplit 63
(Post 1576858966)
Typo..... In my experience, the 3.76 motors were much quicker than the 4.0 stroke motors, everything else being equal. I could outrun LS6 454-450 HP Chevelles with my 396/375 HP Chevelle. It really torqued em off.:thumbs:Others experience may vary.
Originally Posted by Ironcross
(Post 1576862732)
I prefer the 427 L-88 over the 454 LS7
The old LS7 vs L88 debate has been around a long time. It'll probably go on until all the old guys are dead and everybody else has switched to the new LS stuff. |
Originally Posted by 4howard
(Post 1576868903)
Does that tell you anything about the car, engine, transmission?
|
Originally Posted by 4howard
(Post 1576858824)
My 50th Anniversary Corvette book, (published in 2003 by the Auto Editors of Consumer Guide) says that both the 427 and the 1970 454 have the same bore and stroke, 4.25 x 3.76. It lists the 1971 and later 454 at 4.25 x 4.00. Is this a typo? If not, how could two engines with the same bore and stroke have different displacements?
And of course, which was the better engine? I always find it interesting that there are always new books about Corvettes, especially old Corvettes, and they often get information wrong. The funny apart is that most are simply copying that information from other books or other previously published sources and yet, they still get things wrong. As to which is the better engine, obviously the 427. Look at all the $100,000, $200,000, $500,000 Corvettes over the years that were 427s and then check how many were 454s. The 427 will rev faster than a 454, and due to stroke, can rev higher and keep the same piston speed as the 454. However, at speeds over 7000 rpm, you only have about 10 - 12 hours of life in the rods, which you aren't punished so harshly by the 6500 in the 454. The 454 is cleaner emissions-wise, so if that is your criteria for better, then the 454 is. The 454 produces more torque, and on the street stop light grand prix, torque is king. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands