|
Going to be very interesting to hear the engineers reports. Post have said they built on a sinkhole. From drone photos a vast void can be seen of ? Depth. Filling in should interesting. When do rebuild the support foundation is going to something. Just a good bet the whole complex may need a complete review. The corvette trinket shop may be 40' under next
|
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
(Post 1586164457)
I do see aerial photos from before the museum that show the karst sinkhole...and the museum was built anyway....any chance the original Geotechnical report is available?
I still believe the concentrated drainage patterns from the parking areas were a factor....but I am curious about the reports of additional sinkholes opening up in the area. After looking at the 1993 sat image, it shows the road winding around where the museum was eventually built. Why was the road winding around like that when there was nothing to go around yet? Was the land that sloped into the karst sinkhole and they built it up to put the museum on? Sure hope they get this remedied with minimal cost and demolition. |
Why are some of the cars listed already condemned? From the pictures floating around the internet, it seams like many can still be fished out. Sure, they will be damage, but fixable.
I could see a donation thing going to help get them out. |
Originally Posted by drivestwin
(Post 1586165063)
After looking at the 1993 sat image, it shows the road winding around where the museum was eventually built. Why was the road winding around like that when there was nothing to go around yet? Was the land that sloped into the karst sinkhole and they built it up to put the museum on?
Sure hope they get this remedied with minimal cost and demolition. :cheers: |
Originally Posted by C6BOB
(Post 1586159742)
Behind the Museum is a "drain pond" or "storm drain". I never got a good answer for what it was. I always thought it looked like a sink hole.
http://file.walagata.com/w/mazdabob/domeback.jpg
Originally Posted by NVR2L8
(Post 1586164275)
I don't want to be picky, but the "retention pond" you mention was not "built", it was already there, courtesy of mother nature. I am also pretty sure that it also drains into the underground cave system.
:cheers: If that was an original sink hole that was modified to be a retention basin, it was an incredibly poor choice given that the runoff would then exacerbate any underground erosion. My experience with retention basins is that they are intentionally designed and created with impermeable liners such as a barrier fabric or a clay seal layer so as to prevent any ground water intrusion. They then discharge out to surrounding water courses through a small pipe that is designed and sized so as to meter out the accumulated runoff slowly. This prevents any increased risk of down stream flooding from the increased volume of runoff generated from the newly paved impermeable surfaces, as compared to the before construction condition. |
Originally Posted by DALE#3
(Post 1586164174)
DER!Did you read ALL 150 posts?If you did witch i doubt.You, yourself, are speculating on what was speculated because you don't have experience in construction or destruction?Now i'm speculating on your knowledge.Nothing personal.The C7 was a speculation on how well it would do :cheers:
|
Sink hole locator
|
Originally Posted by tuxnharley
(Post 1586166151)
That certainly looks like a man made feature, given the even grading of the side slopes and the rock lined spillway for the runoff to flow over and into the basin.
If that was an original sink hole that was modified to be a retention basin, it was an incredibly poor choice given that the runoff would then exacerbate any underground erosion. My experience with retention basins is that they are intentionally designed and created with impermeable liners such as a barrier fabric or a clay seal layer so as to prevent any ground water intrusion. They then discharge out to surrounding water courses through a small pipe that is designed and sized so as to meter out the accumulated runoff slowly. This prevents any increased risk of down stream flooding from the increased volume of runoff generated from the newly paved impermeable surfaces, as compared to the before construction condition. One still has to wonder about the decision to build right next to a large sinkhole in the first place. |
Originally Posted by AORoads
(Post 1586159768)
The latest comment was that it was an error to state that the rest of the Museum was open. It is, in fact, closed until they can determine it's safe to be in there.
The museum is insured, as are the cars. They will be removed and restored by GM. Sounds like they are pretty confident that the dome area will be repaired and back in use by the Fall. |
Originally Posted by NVR2L8
(Post 1586161353)
OK Joe, I didn't figure you would let it go, so here is your link:
http://www.bgdailynews.com/news/muse...35b40349f.html "WKU civil engineering professor Matt Dettman said that while the wall of the sinkhole may develop a bit farther from the Skydome, the overall structure of the building appears to be stable." I'll be waiting for your apology, but something tells me that it won't be forthcoming anytime soon. ... unless, of course, you conclude that I paid off somebody at the local newspaper to concoct a phony story! ...Conspiracy theorists unite! What you wrote earlier was that; "the dome's foundation is sound." Now you're writing; "appears to be stable." Two totally different meanings... I was pretty sure that what you were writing was something to question, so that was the original reason I was skeptical of it in the first place. Now I see that my suspicion was validated. I don't suppose you are going to apologize for this, but I was right last night it looks like now. You were writing things that I clearly now realize were in your own words, you were NOT quoting another. That's fine, just wanted to point out the discrepancy and set the record straight.:thumbs: |
Originally Posted by jwbert
(Post 1586166263)
Yes I read all 150 posts and yes some are based in fact, but in this instance why speculate, why not wait for the reports based on professional analysis? :cheers:
I still believe it's too early to make hard and fast conclusions about this disaster. Call me careful, but I'm just not enjoying the hunches and speculation when written as fact-based conclusions here. |
Originally Posted by jwbert
(Post 1586166263)
Yes I read all 150 posts and yes some are based in fact, but in this instance why speculate, why not wait for the reports based on professional analysis? :cheers:
|
Getting Museum delivery tomorrow (see Delivery 5) and stopped by today to make sure everything was on schedule. Press conference was starting as I got there.
Afterward, I spoke with some senior staff who told me: — Deliveries are being handled as normal. — The entire museum is open to the public except the dome. Structural engineers, soils engineers, geologists and other experts have concluded there is no evidence of danger to the remainder of the museum. They are weighing options for recovering the vehicles and stabilizing the dome, as well as the best way to deal with the sinkhole itself. — All remaining vehicles were trolleyed and/or pushed out of the dome. They didn't want to start engines for fear the vibrations could cause further collapse of the undermined areas. — GM has already committed to restore all eight vehicles. Once recovered, they will go to Detroit for assessment and full restoration before coming back to the Museum to be put on display once again. As we were leaving, we saw a LOT of old sinkholes in the area. They are apparently pretty common here. |
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
(Post 1586162077)
I still maintain that the deep, overly large retention pond, built right next to the pavilion caused the groundwater tables to fluctuate wildly and erodes the karst formations of their dirt infill...which can lead to large voids....sinkholes.
Again, this is just my (40+ years of engineering and architecture) $0.02 worth. Someone, or a team of ppl involved in all aspects of the designs are going to be called into question, in the enquiries going forth. |
The wife and I had a nice talk yesterday about this. I have my paperwork in to transfer to the assembly plant and took a tour of the area in July.
The one house we almost bought ahead of time and were just going to rent out had about 50' sinkhole about 300' feet from the house. realtor said theyre very common and that one was probably 100 yrs old. Another house we looked at had a similar one and just talked to the owner a few weeks ago(hes from my area originally) and he had a fresh 5' one a few months back a couple hundred feet back and said its really no big deal. Now with this happening were wondering if its God trying to tell us something. |
Originally Posted by misteroman
(Post 1586168276)
Now with this happening were wondering if its God trying to tell us something.
|
Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe
(Post 1586166851)
Your post from last night, as I suspected was all wrong. You are the one that made mistakes when writing here, NOT me, as you seem to want to indict me.
What you wrote earlier was that; "the dome's foundation is sound." Now you're writing; "appears to be stable." Two totally different meanings... I was pretty sure that what you were writing was something to question, so that was the original reason I was skeptical of it in the first place. Now I see that my suspicion was validated. I don't suppose you are going to apologize for this, but I was right last night it looks like now. You were writing things that I clearly now realize were in your own words, you were NOT quoting another. That's fine, just wanted to point out the discrepancy and set the record straight.:thumbs: pre•lim•i•nar•y priˈliməˌnerē adjective: preliminary denoting an action or event preceding or done in preparation for something fuller or more important. "preliminary talks" synonyms: preparatory, introductory, initial, opening, prefatory, precursory; early, exploratory "the discussions are still at a preliminary stage" Now that all of my initial statements are in the press, and repeated by many engineers in writing, your assertions are becoming weaker (and more foolish) by the hour. .... of course you probably will find some inane reason to argue. :cheers: |
Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe
(Post 1586166851)
Your post from last night, as I suspected was all wrong. You are the one that made mistakes when writing here, NOT me, as you seem to want to indict me.
What you wrote earlier was that; "the dome's foundation is sound." Now you're writing; "appears to be stable." Two totally different meanings... I was pretty sure that what you were writing was something to question, so that was the original reason I was skeptical of it in the first place. Now I see that my suspicion was validated. I don't suppose you are going to apologize for this, but I was right last night it looks like now. You were writing things that I clearly now realize were in your own words, you were NOT quoting another. That's fine, just wanted to point out the discrepancy and set the record straight.:thumbs:
Originally Posted by NVR2L8
(Post 1586168538)
If you recall (or not) my earlier post, I stated that the engineers statements were "prelimary".
Now that all of my initial statements are in the press, and repeated by many engineers in writing, your assertions are becoming weaker and more foolish) by the hour. .... of course you probably will find some inane reason to argue. Argue by quoting your writings? I don't think so. Your writing of: "the dome's foundation is sound." was never stated in the press. You wrote it as if someone else stated it. You decided to write it - not what any expert was quoted as saying..... I questioned who wrote that 24 hours ago? Turns out NOBODY did...... It's OK, you're wrong - really, no big deal. It's ALL there.:yesnod: |
sinkhole
Ok all of my fiberglass friends :D
Ever since the sinkhole incident at the museum many thoughts have been going through my head. First of all sadness and disbelief. But also what they are going to do with the 8 cars that were affected. My opinion is to pull the cars out as careful as possible and display them just as they are. It would be cool if they had there own display. "These were the 8 sinkhole victims" Just wondering what everyone else's thoughts were.:rock: |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands