Cunningham Motorsports Comparison: FAST vs MSD Intake Manifold
07-28-2015, 11:07 PM
#1
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Cunningham Motorsports Comparison: FAST vs MSD Intake Manifold
MOST POWERFUL STOCK BOTTOM END LS7 ON OUR DYNO, EVER!!
2007 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (M6)
A very loyal customer of ours came in for a little more power. With the gains we saw from the MSD Intake Manifold on other cars, the choice was simple.
The car already had our CMS Custom Heads/Cam Package with flex fuel and a FAST Intake Manifold. This N/A package already put down some massive gains without compromising reliability/drivability. The car baselined 601 rwhp and 540 rwtq on our mustang dyno with e85.
After the MSD Intake Manifold, the car put down a blistering 617 rwhp and 546 rwtq on our mustang dyno with e85 and our custom calibration. That's a gain of 16 rwhp and 6 rwtq over the FAST manifold. Impressive to say the least! We will post the dyno in the comments. You'll see there is no loss in bottom or mid range power. On the top of the RPM range, it just keeps carrying over the FAST manifold.
2007 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (M6)
A very loyal customer of ours came in for a little more power. With the gains we saw from the MSD Intake Manifold on other cars, the choice was simple.
The car already had our CMS Custom Heads/Cam Package with flex fuel and a FAST Intake Manifold. This N/A package already put down some massive gains without compromising reliability/drivability. The car baselined 601 rwhp and 540 rwtq on our mustang dyno with e85.
After the MSD Intake Manifold, the car put down a blistering 617 rwhp and 546 rwtq on our mustang dyno with e85 and our custom calibration. That's a gain of 16 rwhp and 6 rwtq over the FAST manifold. Impressive to say the least! We will post the dyno in the comments. You'll see there is no loss in bottom or mid range power. On the top of the RPM range, it just keeps carrying over the FAST manifold.
Last edited by Cunningham Motorsports; 07-28-2015 at 11:14 PM.
07-29-2015, 09:56 PM
#2
Race Director
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: CA
Posts: 11,218
Received 897 Likes
on
403 Posts
2017 C5 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '08
MOST POWERFUL STOCK BOTTOM END LS7 ON OUR DYNO, EVER!!
2007 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (M6)
A very loyal customer of ours came in for a little more power. With the gains we saw from the MSD Intake Manifold on other cars, the choice was simple.
The car already had our CMS Custom Heads/Cam Package with flex fuel and a FAST Intake Manifold. This N/A package already put down some massive gains without compromising reliability/drivability. The car baselined 601 rwhp and 540 rwtq on our mustang dyno with e85.
After the MSD Intake Manifold, the car put down a blistering 617 rwhp and 546 rwtq on our mustang dyno with e85 and our custom calibration. That's a gain of 16 rwhp and 6 rwtq over the FAST manifold. Impressive to say the least! We will post the dyno in the comments. You'll see there is no loss in bottom or mid range power. On the top of the RPM range, it just keeps carrying over the FAST manifold.
Cunningham Motorsports FAST Intake Manifold vs MSD Intake Manifold - YouTube
2007 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (M6)
A very loyal customer of ours came in for a little more power. With the gains we saw from the MSD Intake Manifold on other cars, the choice was simple.
The car already had our CMS Custom Heads/Cam Package with flex fuel and a FAST Intake Manifold. This N/A package already put down some massive gains without compromising reliability/drivability. The car baselined 601 rwhp and 540 rwtq on our mustang dyno with e85.
After the MSD Intake Manifold, the car put down a blistering 617 rwhp and 546 rwtq on our mustang dyno with e85 and our custom calibration. That's a gain of 16 rwhp and 6 rwtq over the FAST manifold. Impressive to say the least! We will post the dyno in the comments. You'll see there is no loss in bottom or mid range power. On the top of the RPM range, it just keeps carrying over the FAST manifold.
Cunningham Motorsports FAST Intake Manifold vs MSD Intake Manifold - YouTube
Nice results Ryne! As much as it pains me to ask, what is your thought on this intake over my Ported LS2 I currently running on the C5.
Since we will be doing a few tweaks, what do you think, and also how is it regarding bang for the buck?
Thanks, and good luck with the move...
