[Z06] Trouble with RPS BC2
The reason we felt it was OK to send those few clutches out is because the couple of new stock factory clutches we measured came in at 3.1" and we felt that an extra .100" was a safe margin. After time has passed we have talked to Reese at MTI and he informed us that he has measured as much as .060" difference from the crank surface to the TOB mounting surface from car to car. We now know that if we send a clutch that is higher than 3.2" and the car happens to be "short" by .060" than it is possible to bottom out the TOB.
Since late last year we have only sent out clutches that are below 3.0" just to make sure there is plenty of room.
Thank you for coming on and letting us know what the deal is. It means a lot to me personally since we get two tons of speculation with every pound of solution. I always felt that since most were OK and some were not, there had to be a difference in there somewhere. Since a lot of clutches, including a bunch with the C-5, had occaisional problems, this might explain a lot of them. Production differences has to be a headache for the entire aftermarket industry when you design a product around a vehicle and have to assume they are all the same. I sure can't fault you or any other aftermarket manufacturer for not knowing this in advance. We appreciate you addressing the issue. Not all manufacturers would bother. Have you found anything about some of the claims of the pedal sticking to the floor?
Gary
Last edited by Luweegy; Jun 17, 2010 at 09:39 PM.
The reason we felt it was OK to send those few clutches out is because the couple of new stock factory clutches we measured came in at 3.1" and we felt that an extra .100" was a safe margin. After time has passed we have talked to Reese at MTI and he informed us that he has measured as much as .060" difference from the crank surface to the TOB mounting surface from car to car. We now know that if we send a clutch that is higher than 3.2" and the car happens to be "short" by .060" than it is possible to bottom out the TOB.
Since late last year we have only sent out clutches that are below 3.0" just to make sure there is plenty of room.
They obviously make a great product, but it's not cool to back track like they did on the street twin lite. For the record, I had the street twin lite on my car for a very short time and it was a good clutch. Didn't have any issues but I also was not hard on it at all.
Last edited by WeaponsGradeTorque; Jun 17, 2010 at 10:16 PM.

Thats how your are supposed to do business.
They obviously make a great product, but it's not cool to back track like they did on the street twin lite. For the record, I had the street twin lite on my car for a very short time and it was a good clutch. Didn't have any issues but I also was not hard on it at all.
It is nice to see Rob jump in and explain the problem and that it was only a couple of units. For us he has always stepped up to plate and offerred excellent customer service. We also did a lot of R&D for Ram and lets just say RPS is the ONLY company that has even come close to having the clutchs correct for the C6. And we have tested and tested and tested.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
It is nice to see Rob jump in and explain the problem and that it was only a couple of units. For us he has always stepped up to plate and offerred excellent customer service. We also did a lot of R&D for Ram and lets just say RPS is the ONLY company that has even come close to having the clutchs correct for the C6. And we have tested and tested and tested.
Ed,
I would like to purchase 1 RPS twin Disc clutch (part# STL-D4LSX-C6) for the price of $1356. This is the twin disc street lite clutch for a C6 Z06. Here is my address:
Rudy XXXXX
XXX XXXXX Terrace
Odenton, MD 21113
phone# (XXX-XXX-XXX)
Reply
Forward
Reply
|
ed@turboclutch.com
to me
show details 6/17/09
Hello Rudy,
Thank You for the order. I will have an invoice and tracking number for you shortly.
Ed
- Show quoted text -
Quoting R H <fastc6z06@gmail.com>:
Ed,
I would like to purchase 1 RPS twin Disc clutch (part# STL-D4LSX-C6) for the
price of $1356. This is the twin disc street lite clutch for a C6 Z06. Here
is my address:
Rudy XXXXXX
XXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Odenton, MD 21113
phone# (XXX-XXX-1055)
Reply
Forward
Reply
|
R H
to ed
show details 6/17/09
Great. Now, this is the "street lite" one that weights 32 lbs, correct?
Also, there was somehting else I needed to drain the clutch fluid?
- Show quoted text -
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:13 AM, <ed@turboclutch.com> wrote:
Hello Rudy,
Thank You for the order. I will have an invoice and tracking number for you shortly.
Ed
Quoting R H <fastc6z06@gmail.com>:
Ed,
I would like to purchase 1 RPS twin Disc clutch (part# STL-D4LSX-C6) for the
price of $1356. This is the twin disc street lite clutch for a C6 Z06. Here
is my address:
Rudy XXXXX
XXX XXXX Terrace
Odenton, MD XXXXX
phone# (XXX-XXX-1055)
Reply
Forward
Reply
|
ed@turboclutch.com
to me
show details 6/17/09
Hello Rudy,
Yes, the package weight 32 lbs. Not sure what you mean by draining the fluid? The system will need to be properly bleed, your installer should be capable of that. Let me know if you need any assistance.
Last edited by WeaponsGradeTorque; Jun 18, 2010 at 12:36 AM.
Last edited by Luweegy; Jun 18, 2010 at 01:47 AM.
Riddle me this Batman!! (just checking if anyone has a sense of humor).
Back in the summer of '09 for our Street Twins and Street Twin Lite clutches we were using a curved finger diaphram like every other clutch company. Most of our customers had C5's and had no high RPM shifting problems, but we later found out that some C6 customers where having high RPM shift problems with our Street Twins and Street Twin Lites but not our BC2's. After much research and debate with various industry people including some GM engineers we found that no one had a clear explanation as to exactly what was happening. We finally surmised that the shape of the curved finger was causing the pedal to get light at high RPMs on some cars, but not every car. Very frustrating as you can imagine. The reason the BC2's where not having problems is beacuse they use a flat diaphragm. It took us a few months to redesign the entire clutch including a new flywheel design in order for us to incorporate the flat diaphragm in our ST and STL clutches. So, in the mean time we instructed our dealers to not recommend the ST or STL if the customer had a C6 and planned on driving the car hard. Since the beginning of 2010 all of our clutches for the C5 and C6 applications use a flat diaphragm and we are not aware of any shifting issues at all.
Rob Smith
President, RPS
I would love to have your connection at Summit because I called Summit, Jegs, Mcleod, and Ram and they all said that they do do pay for labor. This is true for almost every performance part sold today. If your lifter goes bad the manufacturer does not pay the labor to get it out of the engine. If your shocks or sway bars or ring and pinion goes bad, the manufacturer does not pay the labor to remove these parts. In some cases the manufacturer does not even replace the part without a charge claiming it is a race part and is sold as is. Our warranty is 180 days which is twice the industry standard of just 90 days.
As a manufacturer I would have to charge a higher price on all of our clutches to cover any warranty claims that included labor.
Rob Smith
President, RPS
Last edited by Luweegy; Jun 18, 2010 at 02:41 PM.
As a manufacturer I would have to charge a higher price on all of our clutches to cover any warranty claims that included labor.
Rob Smith
President, RPS
Rob @ RPS... What's the build date for the clutches with the large stack height? My BC2 was built in October of 2009, I believe.
Rob @ RPS... What's the build date for the clutches with the large stack height? My BC2 was built in October of 2009, I believe.



















