GT-R vs Z06, HP figures skewed ?
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
GT-R vs Z06, HP figures skewed ?
Oct C & D just did an article on the GT-R and its real HP vs Nissan's claimed 480 since things didn't add up, something all of us have been saying for some time. The Z06 is the real thing. However, it seems Nissan numbers weren't. C & D found the HP to be closer to 520 based on RWHP figures and assumed losses. Kind of makes sense now, 800 lbs heavier, more friction in an AWD and less HP doesn't make for a faster car than the Z06. Amazingly, One Lap of America results didn't make a very good case for the GT-R, especially considering it was driven by a very experienced Nissan driver.
#2
Melting Slicks
Who knows what real customer GT-R's actually make. I think all the test cars were ringers.
Automobile: 11.6 @ 126 mph
Car & Driver: 12.6 @ 111 mph
Where in the world did Automobile find 1 second and 15 mph of trap speed on a car with AWD and launch control!?!? In a car that heavy, that is around 125 hp difference. Nissan admitted cheating on the 'ring test with slicks and more boost; how many other tests were done with non-stock cars? I can't wait to see actual customer ET's and trap speeds, and I think they will be mid to high 12's at under 115 mph.
Automobile: 11.6 @ 126 mph
Car & Driver: 12.6 @ 111 mph
Where in the world did Automobile find 1 second and 15 mph of trap speed on a car with AWD and launch control!?!? In a car that heavy, that is around 125 hp difference. Nissan admitted cheating on the 'ring test with slicks and more boost; how many other tests were done with non-stock cars? I can't wait to see actual customer ET's and trap speeds, and I think they will be mid to high 12's at under 115 mph.
#3
Le Mans Master
Who knows what real customer GT-R's actually make. I think all the test cars were ringers.
Automobile: 11.6 @ 126 mph
Car & Driver: 12.6 @ 111 mph
Where in the world did Automobile find 1 second and 15 mph of trap speed on a car with AWD and launch control!?!? In a car that heavy, that is around 125 hp difference. Nissan admitted cheating on the 'ring test with slicks and more boost; how many other tests were done with non-stock cars? I can't wait to see actual customer ET's and trap speeds, and I think they will be mid to high 12's at under 115 mph.
Automobile: 11.6 @ 126 mph
Car & Driver: 12.6 @ 111 mph
Where in the world did Automobile find 1 second and 15 mph of trap speed on a car with AWD and launch control!?!? In a car that heavy, that is around 125 hp difference. Nissan admitted cheating on the 'ring test with slicks and more boost; how many other tests were done with non-stock cars? I can't wait to see actual customer ET's and trap speeds, and I think they will be mid to high 12's at under 115 mph.
#4
Team Owner
no matter what they claim say or do with ringers it still comes down to the track when they start to appear. At near 4,000 pounds when one was weighted at the track and a higher CG they will need a ton of HP. I would like to see the times of a stock one at tracks we all know. They have hyped them to gain sales and publicity or I guess they have found some thing in physics no other manufacturer has been able to find.
Last edited by John Shiels; 09-05-2008 at 10:57 AM.
#7
Team Owner
#11
Safety Car
There was one that just recently went to gainesville drag strip and trapped a highest of 114, with a fastest of 12.0. The reality of it is that the car is a 115-116 average trap, and 118-119 in great conditions. About the same as a C5Z.
The GT-R that ran at Road Atlanta did run a 1:36. But stock 996 GT3's run 1:37.
Never with any car have I seen a 10-13 mph between claimed trap speeds by mags, and the real world. That's like a C6Z trapping 114-117. And this car is supposed to eliminate the driver error factor.
The GT-R that ran at Road Atlanta did run a 1:36. But stock 996 GT3's run 1:37.
Never with any car have I seen a 10-13 mph between claimed trap speeds by mags, and the real world. That's like a C6Z trapping 114-117. And this car is supposed to eliminate the driver error factor.
Last edited by heavychevy; 09-05-2008 at 12:29 PM.
#12
Racer
Thread Starter
There's no way to know for sure what they have. The first couple of cars that were run and tested were likely hand-built ringers. If I were introducing a new car to a very competitive market, I'd sure make sure the initial reviews would be good. Physics is an exact science, and its laws are universal no matter which side of the Pacific you're on. 4000 lbs takes a certain amount of power to move, turn and stop, and it will always be easier to push around 3100 lbs than 4000 lbs. I'm not even going to mention the GT-R is dog butt ugly (what the Hell were they thinking ?).
I'm grateful to Nissan, they got me started with Corvettes by selling me a 1990 300ZX that had so much go wrong, it made me mad enough to stop at the chevy dealer........and I never looked back either. Every time I get in my Z06, I just thank my lucky stars. Also, when I accelerate, it doesn't sound like a cat farting !
I'm grateful to Nissan, they got me started with Corvettes by selling me a 1990 300ZX that had so much go wrong, it made me mad enough to stop at the chevy dealer........and I never looked back either. Every time I get in my Z06, I just thank my lucky stars. Also, when I accelerate, it doesn't sound like a cat farting !
#14
#15
There was one that just recently went to gainesville drag strip and trapped a highest of 114, with a fastest of 12.0. The reality of it is that the car is a 115-116 average trap, and 118-119 in great conditions. About the same as a C5Z.
The GT-R that ran at Road Atlanta did run a 1:36. But stock 996 GT3's run 1:37.
Never with any car have I seen a 10-13 mph between claimed trap speeds by mags, and the real world. That's like a C6Z trapping 114-117. And this car is supposed to eliminate the driver error factor.
The GT-R that ran at Road Atlanta did run a 1:36. But stock 996 GT3's run 1:37.
Never with any car have I seen a 10-13 mph between claimed trap speeds by mags, and the real world. That's like a C6Z trapping 114-117. And this car is supposed to eliminate the driver error factor.
#16
#17
Safety Car
#18
Team Owner
#20
Safety Car
Oh beleive me, that's nothing spectacular from a car that's supposed to be CGT/GT2 fast. Stock 996 GT3's run 1:37's and I know Reese ran a 1:36 in a C6Z for a mag article prior to repave. I know a couple guys running 1:34's in stock 997's GT3's as well. A buddy of mine ran a 1:38.0 in a Evo with a flash and street rubber.
It's not bad, and from what I hear the guy was a former pro motocross guy (As was my friend in the Evo, who was first time at Road Atlanta).
It's not bad, and from what I hear the guy was a former pro motocross guy (As was my friend in the Evo, who was first time at Road Atlanta).