Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2018 scca cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2017, 09:12 AM
  #21  
Moto One
Drifting
 
Moto One's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Truckee CA
Posts: 1,335
Received 164 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Matthew, just as a suggestion; You should drive a Cobra once and see that they are not that easy to handle, No power steering, No brake booster. MK2 have leaf springs.

Mark.
Old 11-02-2017, 09:17 AM
  #22  
eric1855
Instructor
 
eric1855's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2014
Posts: 144
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I have nothing against the Cobra kit cars in the class. I don't think they necessarily fit the rules, as written, but they do help make numbers and are good competition.

I think the rules need to be cleaned up though to make it clear what kit cars are allowed, and what aren't as "on paper" a cobra, stalker, exocet, 818, etc are all the same thing.
Old 11-02-2017, 12:45 PM
  #23  
v10climber
Racer
 
v10climber's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2016
Location: FL
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moto One
Matthew, just as a suggestion; You should drive a Cobra once and see that they are not that easy to handle, No power steering, No brake booster. MK2 have leaf springs.

Mark.
All of that (and more) can be pretty easily corrected in a CAM-S build.
Old 11-02-2017, 02:03 PM
  #24  
MatthewMiller
Le Mans Master
 
MatthewMiller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: St. Charles MO
Posts: 5,694
Received 1,705 Likes on 1,291 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moto One
Matthew, just as a suggestion; You should drive a Cobra once and see that they are not that easy to handle, No power steering, No brake booster. MK2 have leaf springs.

Mark.
As v10climber mentions, nothing about an original Cobra has anything to do with a legal Cobra in CAM-S. You can literally have any chassis/frame, any suspension, any ABS and traction control, any dampers, any springs, any engine, and any fiberglass body that sorta kinda resembles an original Cobra's body (which was hand-formed sheet aluminum made in England, btw, so no two are even the same). To my knowledge, the only actual, original Cobra that has ever competed in CAM is the one that Scott Fraser drives, and it's not close to stock anymore. The FFR and other kit cars have nothing to do with stock Cobras.
Old 11-02-2017, 03:57 PM
  #25  
l98tpi
Max G’s
Support Corvetteforum!
 
l98tpi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2008
Location: Monroe OH
Posts: 2,743
Received 73 Likes on 63 Posts
NCM Sinkhole Donor

Default

Originally Posted by eric1855
I have nothing against the Cobra kit cars in the class. I don't think they necessarily fit the rules, as written, but they do help make numbers and are good competition.
.


My only objection to anything that wants to run is weight and tires; anything else, bring it
Old 11-02-2017, 06:35 PM
  #26  
mattastick
Racer
 
mattastick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2016
Posts: 391
Received 58 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewMiller
So just to make sure we're all on the same page, there are weight limits in CAM-S right now. The problem I have with them is that they are intentionally used to penalize Corvettes and Vipers. Any car in the class can weigh as little as 2450lbs...EXCEPT C4-C6s and Vipers, which have to weigh 2900lbs. My proposal is that there should be a single minimum weight for cars, and it should be a weight that actual modified production Corvettes and Vipers can reasonably achieve while still remaining realistic street cars. Like I said, I believe 3000lb is that weight. Any car lighter than that could ballast up to that weight easily, and still have an advantage by virtue of being able to locate the ballast wherever desired (presumably lower and slightly ahead of rear axle line).
So rather than inconvenience you with having to build a better mousetrap, we should inconvenience everyone that owns anything lighter than 3k lbs by making them bolt steel/lead into their "street car". Got it... That makes 0 sense, btw.

Originally Posted by MatthewMiller
Well, first let's be clear: the CAM Invitational had 21 entries and it is more or less the "nationals" for CAM competition. The actual Nationals CAM-S class had only 14 entries. At the Invitational, one two-driver FFR Cobra showed up and was able to complete its runs, and it won. The only other Cobra DNS'd almost all its runs and never even got a chance to compete. 15 Corvettes, 1 Solstice, and the IH Scout all got beaten by one kit car Cobra. At the actual Nationals, there were three total Cobra entries (two cars, one of them two-driver again), and 11 Corvettes. One Corvette won the event, and the faster Cobra got second by only 0.2s. If a 2450lb, 90in-wheelbase kit car really wasn't any faster than a 2900lb Corvette, then statistically speaking we should not see the only reliable and semi-sorted kit car at the top of every event it enters.
If you want to look at results, let's consider this one: Danny Popp beat Mr. Losert by 1.4 seconds in Peru a few weeks before Nationals. If Danny had showed up and been able to keep a similar margin to Mike at the Invitational, he wins the class by .5 seconds. Also, don't forget that your future CAM-S winner at Nationals was running in CAM-C, as was the defending champ, both in cars that they had minimal seat time in, and they finished near the top. Rather than spending time bitching on the internet about a car that wins occasionally, why not focus on going to events, or just getting out and driving your car? You'd probably be a lot happier...
Old 11-02-2017, 07:42 PM
  #27  
MatthewMiller
Le Mans Master
 
MatthewMiller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: St. Charles MO
Posts: 5,694
Received 1,705 Likes on 1,291 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mattastick
So rather than inconvenience you with having to build a better mousetrap, we should inconvenience everyone that owns anything lighter than 3k lbs by making them bolt steel/lead into their "street car". Got it... That makes 0 sense, btw.
Huh? Are you really trying to say that having to strip a nice C4/5/6 down to a bare frame just to get close to an unreasonable minimum is an "inconvenience?" And you're really comparing it to the requirement to run ballast for kit cars that come in below a reasonable minimum weight? Ballast is a simple and useful tool that is used in a boatload of racing classes from solo all the way to F1.



If you want to look at results, let's consider this one: Danny Popp...
I didn't bring up results. Someone else did. What Danny Popp - a truly world class driver and Evolution instructor - can do in his highly developed C5 against "regular people" is not a yardstick by which to compare the speed potential of two different cars that have to conform to two different rules. Like I said before, let's put Danny in a well built and sorted Cobra kit car and see how it goes. FWIW, there is at least one autocrosser who actually has national championship to his name and who has owned and raced a C4, C5, C6, and a very unsorted Cobra kit car. He's on the record as saying that as horrible as his Cobra was, it was still light years faster than any of the production-based Corvettes. In his words, "I can't even believe we're having this discussion" of having to convince anyone that a 90", 2450lb car with 45/55 weight distribution will be loads faster than a 105", 2900lb Corvette with a 50-50 weight bias (at best). You don't have to compare results to know that a Cobra has stupidly more potential than any Corvette or Viper - elementary physics makes that obvious. If you can't acknowledge that...well...I don't what to tell you.
This. If you're getting beat, shut up and drive... Eric's car the last 2 years has shown it's driver, not car, that wins the fake jackets in September.
Well then why have any classes for solo competition at all? We can just have one big "run what ya brung" class. Every year at nationals we'll have 1500 entrants in one class, and about 100 trophies, and everyone will be happy because driver skill is all that matters....right?

Obviously driving skill matters a ton. That's not the point of this discussion. The point is that a Cobra, and especially a kit car, doesn't fit the spirit or the explicit rules of CAM at all. The other point is that there is no valid reason to penalize the cars that comprise 90% of CAM-S entries with a huge weight penalty. Regarding driving skill, it would be nice to know that when we all compete in a certain class, it would be on a level playing field so that driver skill and car setup/build abilities really did determine how well one did in the competition.
Old 11-02-2017, 08:54 PM
  #28  
mattastick
Racer
 
mattastick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2016
Posts: 391
Received 58 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewMiller
Huh? Are you really trying to say that having to strip a nice C4/5/6 down to a bare frame just to get close to an unreasonable minimum is an "inconvenience?" And you're really comparing it to the requirement to run ballast for kit cars that come in below a reasonable minimum weight? Ballast is a simple and useful tool that is used in a boatload of racing classes from solo all the way to F1.
You're the one calling CAM a class for street cars. What happens when someone builds a Solstice, Monza, Gremlin, Pinto, or any other number of 100 different actual CAM legal cars because the Cobra is outlawed? Those guys are still going to have to bolt 500+ lbs of steel/lead in their street cars. Ballast in Solo starts in Street Mod, and becomes the norm in Prepared on up. Those cars are not street cars, regardless of their starting point as a chassis. My STU car is 180lbs over the min weight for CAM, and I haven't even tried to take weight out of it (it's got an 11lb battery and a Sparco, and otherwise is very close to stock weight). Eric's car is already in the 29xxs somewhere, IIRC, with minimal money spent on weight reduction. Just because you're starting with the wrong car doesn't mean everyone else is.

Originally Posted by MatthewMiller
I didn't bring up results. Someone else did. What Danny Popp - a truly world class driver and Evolution instructor - can do in his highly developed C5 against "regular people" is not a yardstick by which to compare the speed potential of two different cars that have to conform to two different rules. Like I said before, let's put Danny in a well built and sorted Cobra kit car and see how it goes. FWIW, there is at least one autocrosser who actually has national championship to his name and who has owned and raced a C4, C5, C6, and a very unsorted Cobra kit car. He's on the record as saying that as horrible as his Cobra was, it was still light years faster than any of the production-based Corvettes. In his words, "I can't even believe we're having this discussion" of having to convince anyone that a 90", 2450lb car with 45/55 weight distribution will be loads faster than a 105", 2900lb Corvette with a 50-50 weight bias (at best). You don't have to compare results to know that a Cobra has stupidly more potential than any Corvette or Viper - elementary physics makes that obvious. If you can't acknowledge that...well...I don't what to tell you.
Danny could pants the entire CAM field in a shopping cart. Would you be complaining that shopping carts should be banned too? CAM-S rarely beats AS, just like CAM-C rarely beats FS. This year at Nationals, the winner in FS would have been 2nd in CAM-C. The winner in AS would have been 3rd in CAM-S. In a C5. Again, it's not the car that's the majority of the results.

When a well prepped and well driven Cobra (or any other kit car) shows up, it will kill CAM, at least for the people like you complaining about it. The people that enjoy CAM for the lack of rules, laid back style, hanging out with other car people, and shooting the **** in a parking lot will probably think it's cool (the same thing that's happened every time I've run against Danny in The Ultimate Street Car). You should probably just buy the car of the year for a Street class and have fun. That way there are no excuses. You'll still probably complain about something else though...

Originally Posted by MatthewMiller
Well then why have any classes for solo competition at all? We can just have one big "run what ya brung" class. Every year at nationals we'll have 1500 entrants in one class, and about 100 trophies, and everyone will be happy because driver skill is all that matters....right?

Obviously driving skill matters a ton. That's not the point of this discussion. The point is that a Cobra, and especially a kit car, doesn't fit the spirit or the explicit rules of CAM at all. The other point is that there is no valid reason to penalize the cars that comprise 90% of CAM-S entries with a huge weight penalty. Regarding driving skill, it would be nice to know that when we all compete in a certain class, it would be on a level playing field so that driver skill and car setup/build abilities really did determine how well one did in the competition.
If you want a pure driving competition, then GTFO of a builders class. CAM is a builders class. Anything with this open of a rulebook is a builders class. Solo has plenty of drivers classes (any of the Street classes, specifically CS is a perfect example) where the car and setup are minimal. Hell, the National office is starting SSC, where there's literally no differences in cars. You don't get a simple rulebook and a drivers class unless everyone is in equal hardware (spec class).
Old 11-02-2017, 09:11 PM
  #29  
chetly
Burning Brakes
 
chetly's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Livermore Ca
Posts: 882
Received 84 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

Don't you think that a Cobra putting an additional 450lbs exactly where they want it would probably make the car easier to drive and faster?
The following users liked this post:
bsalie99 (07-17-2018)
Old 11-02-2017, 10:24 PM
  #30  
Nokones
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Nokones's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2015
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 1,264
Received 231 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

B-Stew, Sean Breese, and I are waiting for Scott and Bruce to bringing it on next year with their newly small block Cobra. We're not planning on losing to that Cobra because We're going to shut it down.
Old 11-02-2017, 10:26 PM
  #31  
Nokones
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Nokones's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2015
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 1,264
Received 231 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Hey Tom:

I just saw the 2018 Match Tour schedule and I was wondering if San Diego is planning on combining the CAM Challenge with the Match Tour again for next year?

Last edited by Nokones; 11-02-2017 at 10:53 PM.
Old 11-02-2017, 10:42 PM
  #32  
MatthewMiller
Le Mans Master
 
MatthewMiller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: St. Charles MO
Posts: 5,694
Received 1,705 Likes on 1,291 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mattastick
You're the one calling CAM a class for street cars. What happens when someone builds a Solstice, Monza, Gremlin, Pinto, or any other number of 100 different actual CAM legal cars because the Cobra is outlawed? Those guys are still going to have to bolt 500+ lbs of steel/lead in their street cars.
Some of those cars are heavier than you think (especially the Solstice). But...yeah. So? The weight isn't why I think the Cobra should be outlawed from CAM.

Danny could pants the entire CAM field in a shopping cart. Would you be complaining that shopping carts should be banned too?
Do you read this stuff out loud before you post it? If you do, did these two sentences actually make sense? Exactly what point do you think you're making?

When a well prepped and well driven Cobra (or any other kit car) shows up, it will kill CAM, at least for the people like you complaining about it. The people that enjoy CAM for the lack of rules, laid back style, hanging out with other car people, and shooting the **** in a parking lot will probably think it's cool (the same thing that's happened every time I've run against Danny in The Ultimate Street Car). You should probably just buy the car of the year for a Street class and have fun. That way there are no excuses. You'll still probably complain about something else though...
Every time this discussion happens, someone always devolves it down to this: CAM isn't for people who care about competition or winning, so this isn't the class for you. My response will always be the same: if that were true, then it wouldn't be a competition class at all! We could just have fun runs with no timers and no trophies, or maybe everyone would get a trophy for being cool. That's one way you can tell that this a BS argument. The other way to tell is by how much some people protest a sensible, single minimum weight: if you really don't care about competition, then you really shouldn't care if your Pinto or Cobra has to meet a class minimum weight of 3000lb!

Originally Posted by chetly
Don't you think that a Cobra putting an additional 450lbs exactly where they want it would probably make the car easier to drive and faster?
It won't make it faster. Simple physics and the knowledge that tires lose grip coefficient as they get more highly loaded tells us that. It's also the reason why all pavement race cars are always run as light as possible: there are no rules for weight maximums in racing, only weight minimums!

As to it getting easier to drive, possibly. It depends on what you mean by "easier." For example, if you wanted to slow down the reactions of the car to steering inputs, you could put 225lb in the front bumper and 225lb in the rear bumper to increase the polar moment of yaw inertia. Some would perceive that as easier to drive, but it would be slower in any transition (as well as also worse for grip in all directions). If weight were an advantage, we'd see people ballasting the hell out of their cars in all classes!

Last edited by MatthewMiller; 11-02-2017 at 11:26 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Tomswheels (11-02-2017)
Old 11-02-2017, 10:51 PM
  #33  
Nokones
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Nokones's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2015
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 1,264
Received 231 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Hi Matt:

The drivers in CAM-S are the kool guys regardless. The drivers in the other classes wished they were kool like us.

Last edited by Nokones; 11-02-2017 at 10:52 PM.
Old 11-02-2017, 10:58 PM
  #34  
MatthewMiller
Le Mans Master
 
MatthewMiller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: St. Charles MO
Posts: 5,694
Received 1,705 Likes on 1,291 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nokones
Hi Matt:

The drivers in CAM-S are the kool guys regardless. The drivers in the other classes wished they were kool like us.
Believe it or not, I hang with all the cool CAM guys at my local events, too! And next year, I really have high hopes of at least making a couple national events so I can hang with you.


ETA: Sorry, I meant "kool."

Last edited by MatthewMiller; 11-02-2017 at 10:59 PM.
Old 11-02-2017, 11:09 PM
  #35  
Tomswheels
Instructor
 
Tomswheels's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2016
Posts: 232
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nokones
Hey Tom:

I just saw the 2018 Match Tour schedule and I was wondering if San Diego is planning on combining the CAM Challenge with the Match Tour again for next year?
I hope not. Last year it just seemed like too much for one weekend. I’d prefer to attend both events separately. Just an observation, but I believe “Mattastick” may have been dropped as a child.
Old 11-02-2017, 11:24 PM
  #36  
Nokones
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Nokones's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2015
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 1,264
Received 231 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Thanks Tom. I think Mattastick is one of those Street Touring dudes.
The following users liked this post:
Tomswheels (11-03-2017)
Old 11-02-2017, 11:27 PM
  #37  
MatthewMiller
Le Mans Master
 
MatthewMiller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: St. Charles MO
Posts: 5,694
Received 1,705 Likes on 1,291 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tomswheels
Just an observation, but I believe “Mattastick” may have been dropped as a child.
In fairness to him, I DO think shopping carts should not be allowed in CAM-S...
The following users liked this post:
Tomswheels (11-03-2017)

Get notified of new replies

To 2018 scca cam

Old 11-04-2017, 02:27 PM
  #38  
Nokones
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Nokones's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2015
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 1,264
Received 231 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewMiller
In fairness to him, I DO think shopping carts should not be allowed in CAM-S...
I agree with you Matt but, it's just another tube frame.
Old 11-04-2017, 03:50 PM
  #39  
MatthewMiller
Le Mans Master
 
MatthewMiller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: St. Charles MO
Posts: 5,694
Received 1,705 Likes on 1,291 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nokones
I agree with you Matt but, it's just another tube frame.
Old 11-20-2017, 07:19 PM
  #40  
Nokones
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Nokones's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2015
Location: Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 1,264
Received 231 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

The 2018 CAM rules are posted on the SCCA website. So far, the CAM event dates have not been posted.

The Cobra has to add 50 more pounds this year and the C7s are legal for CAM-S and the new Vipers are not.


Quick Reply: 2018 scca cam



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.