C6Z Track Tire Size Combinations
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
C6Z Track Tire Size Combinations
Looking for track tire combinations [front and rear] that have worked for others on their C6Z. Recently, there has been numerous retailers offering amazing prices on scrubs and new discontinued track tires. Matching available tire sizes, manufacturer and tread compounds to your needs however can be very challenging.
I'm comfortable with the max widths that can be utilized using similar OEM offsets. In front, I've run up to a 285 width with no obtrusion or rubbing. Others on the forum have indicated that a 295 will be OK. Another in my track club tried a 305 with disastrous results. For rears, up to and including a 345 width has worked satisfactorily. That said, and relative to track tires, it is the sidewall height/aspect ratio/overall diameter that needs to be addressed to ascertain whether the front-to-rear rolling relationship will trigger a traction control default.
My theory is that a computer default [trouble code] is recognized when the front and rear rolling diameters vary significantly from OEM specs. C6Z OEM 275/35-18 and 325/30-19 tires have a diameter relationship [rear versus front] of 1.043:1. I and others in my group have used combos ranging from 1:038:1 to 1.071:1 with no adverse impact. Assuming my theory to be correct, I am interested in sizes you have used that fit the car while not triggering any trouble codes? I am particularly interested if you are running 18" wheels on both ends.
Thanks in advance.
I'm comfortable with the max widths that can be utilized using similar OEM offsets. In front, I've run up to a 285 width with no obtrusion or rubbing. Others on the forum have indicated that a 295 will be OK. Another in my track club tried a 305 with disastrous results. For rears, up to and including a 345 width has worked satisfactorily. That said, and relative to track tires, it is the sidewall height/aspect ratio/overall diameter that needs to be addressed to ascertain whether the front-to-rear rolling relationship will trigger a traction control default.
My theory is that a computer default [trouble code] is recognized when the front and rear rolling diameters vary significantly from OEM specs. C6Z OEM 275/35-18 and 325/30-19 tires have a diameter relationship [rear versus front] of 1.043:1. I and others in my group have used combos ranging from 1:038:1 to 1.071:1 with no adverse impact. Assuming my theory to be correct, I am interested in sizes you have used that fit the car while not triggering any trouble codes? I am particularly interested if you are running 18" wheels on both ends.
Thanks in advance.
#3
Team Owner
#4
Race Director
#7
Melting Slicks
315/30/18 front and 345/30/19 rear. Fit fine. If I turn all the way to one side and back up they do rub the factory brake duct.
(note: the car is accelerating picture. ride height is actually lower.)
(note: the car is accelerating picture. ride height is actually lower.)
The following users liked this post:
Cone killer (07-12-2023)
#8
Supporting Vendor
You could run Pirelli P Zero DH compound slicks in 285/645/18 and 325/680/18. YES A NEW SIZE, 325/680/18. I have customers running 285/645/18, 305/645/18 or 305/660/18 on the front and 325/660/18 or 325/705/18 on the rear. The 325/660/18 isn't ideal for the rear.
#9
Team Owner
You could run Pirelli P Zero DH compound slicks in 285/645/18 and 325/680/18. YES A NEW SIZE, 325/680/18. I have customers running 285/645/18, 305/645/18 or 305/660/18 on the front and 325/660/18 or 325/705/18 on the rear. The 325/660/18 isn't ideal for the rear.
DH
#10
The following users liked this post:
Dirty Howie (03-24-2019)
#12
Le Mans Master
I have a set of Toyo R888R 295/30/18 and 335/30/18 that I’ll hopefully be mounting in the next week or so, I think as long as your offsets on your wheels are good you shouldn’t have any issues
#13
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,102
Received 2,044 Likes
on
1,301 Posts
Buddy runs 335 Rivals square on 18x12 and 13” wheels, so fronts are actually slightly taller being on narrower rims. No issues running in Comp mode, but fronts rub though not as bad since he’s gone to coil overs. Personally I’d go 18x11/12 with 315/335s, hope that helps.
#14
Team Owner
DH
#15
Le Mans Master
#16
Advanced
Thread Starter
Thanks for all the informative posts. May I assume that all the combinations and sizes that were run resulted in no engine management, ABS or traction control codes?
As stated in my original post, I had been informed that a significant mis-match as compared to the OEM rolling diameter ratio [front to rear] would result in a performance adjusting code. I'm sensing that advice may have been misguided???
I appreciate everyone's input.
As stated in my original post, I had been informed that a significant mis-match as compared to the OEM rolling diameter ratio [front to rear] would result in a performance adjusting code. I'm sensing that advice may have been misguided???
I appreciate everyone's input.
#17
295/30/18 & 335/30/18 have very similar height contrast as 275/35/18 & 325/30/19
Last edited by Boosted_Z; 03-25-2019 at 12:50 AM.
#18
Team Owner
I also use R888R on 18x11 - 18x12 Forgestar wheels on a c6z with no issues. Offset I believe is 30F 50R. I switch from 275/35r18 / 325/30r19 often. Overall keeps same rake but lowers about .4” when i switch. No traction/handling sensor issues. I set all alignment / ride height/ rake/ exc with my 295/335 combo . When I put the “stock” sizes on, it just raises vehicle about .4” and give more ground clearance for off season use .
295/30/18 & 335/30/18 have very similar height contrast as 275/35/18 & 325/30/19
295/30/18 & 335/30/18 have very similar height contrast as 275/35/18 & 325/30/19
I'm curious about your wheel/tire selection. Seems like your front wheels will stick out an inch more that stock. Your total front/rear width is much more square than stock stagger. How does it handle??
DH
#19
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,078
Received 8,918 Likes
on
5,327 Posts
Thanks for all the informative posts. May I assume that all the combinations and sizes that were run resulted in no engine management, ABS or traction control codes?
As stated in my original post, I had been informed that a significant mis-match as compared to the OEM rolling diameter ratio [front to rear] would result in a performance adjusting code. I'm sensing that advice may have been misguided???
I appreciate everyone's input.
As stated in my original post, I had been informed that a significant mis-match as compared to the OEM rolling diameter ratio [front to rear] would result in a performance adjusting code. I'm sensing that advice may have been misguided???
I appreciate everyone's input.
Ran them on my C6Z and continue to run them with my C7Z. If I use the Pirelli's I drop to an 18x12 rear wheel because the 325 tire is too small for a 12 inch wide wheel.
By the way Phoenix sells used Hoosiers if you don't want to pop for new ones.
Bill
Last edited by Bill Dearborn; 03-24-2019 at 09:50 PM.
#20
Correction for me - Offset IS 18x11-36F 18x12-50R
Very hard to give handling opinions - If you want best setup, 315/345 is hands down, a killer setup. I have used this once before with great success (borrowed friends spare set).
I setup my car for 295/335 due to overall tire options/no rubbing/I only do events for fun. Still has a light understeer feel upon entry till I get in throttle, but noticeably better than 275/325.
Very hard to give handling opinions - If you want best setup, 315/345 is hands down, a killer setup. I have used this once before with great success (borrowed friends spare set).
I setup my car for 295/335 due to overall tire options/no rubbing/I only do events for fun. Still has a light understeer feel upon entry till I get in throttle, but noticeably better than 275/325.
Last edited by Boosted_Z; 03-25-2019 at 01:10 AM.