C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

62 differential question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2009, 09:23 AM
  #1  
69ttop502
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
69ttop502's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Watkinsville, GA and Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 5,789
Received 855 Likes on 626 Posts

Default 62 differential question

I had to change the pinion seal on my 62 and while I was under there, decided to check out the numbers. It is a posi rear with the casting number 3789812 and date L201 with a thin P cast into the drivers side. On the passenger side was stamped CB and l17. My question is, is it possible for the stamping date to precede the casting date ie; l 17 before L 20. The dates are consistent with the build date of the car. Its serial # 1243. It could be I just didn't read it correctly as I did it kind of fast and the stamping wasn't real deep.

Thanks, trying to learn something here.

Bill

Last edited by 69ttop502; 01-26-2009 at 09:25 AM.
Old 01-26-2009, 09:43 AM
  #2  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes on 1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

The L201 is Dec 20, 1961.
The I17 is actually 1 17 (Jan 17). There is NO year in the stamped date because the year is provided in the CAST date.

Tom Parsons

Last edited by DZAUTO; 01-26-2009 at 09:45 AM.
Old 01-26-2009, 09:48 AM
  #3  
69ttop502
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
69ttop502's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Watkinsville, GA and Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 5,789
Received 855 Likes on 626 Posts

Default

Thanks Tom,

What is the 1 then at the end of the casting date? I had assumed that meant 1 for 61. I guess from your info I can assume this could be the original rear for the car. The build date I think was October 1961.

Bill
Old 01-26-2009, 09:54 AM
  #4  
MICK3
Racer
 
MICK3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Woonsocket RI
Posts: 424
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Vin # 1243 would have been built some time in October of 61, the stamped CB is the gear ratio, 336 posi, The rear end was cast after your car was built, L201 = December 20, 1961.
Old 01-26-2009, 10:02 AM
  #5  
69ttop502
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
69ttop502's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Watkinsville, GA and Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 5,789
Received 855 Likes on 626 Posts

Default

Ok thanks, I didn't see that Tom edited his post as I was typing mine. Thanks Mick and Tom. It is the first thing on this car that didn't turn out to be original, at least in date and casting numbers. I had never checked it before. As I am going to be selling the car in the next couple of months, does this hurt the value of the car at all since the motor and transmission appear to be original to the car?

Bill
Old 01-26-2009, 10:06 AM
  #6  
62Jeff
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
62Jeff's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Houston-ish Texas
Posts: 15,499
Received 47 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69ttop502
...does this hurt the value of the car at all since the motor and transmission appear to be original to the car?

Bill
In my opinion, not by much. It should be disclosed when you sell the car, but I believe a measurable majority of people are most interested about the engine and transmission data above all else. I'm not sure if NCRS even looks at the rear end date codes, they didn't 25 years ago when I was last judged, but that's not a fair data point due to age.

Given the build date of the car, and the date of the rear, I would be more inclined to think:
1) The dealer swapped out the rear at the time of sale because the customer wanted a different ratio

2) The rear was replaced under warranty when the car was still new

Last edited by 62Jeff; 01-26-2009 at 10:18 AM.
Old 01-26-2009, 10:10 AM
  #7  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

I think having a posi rear (even if not original) versus having an original 'peg-leg' (open) rear is probably a wash money-wise. I have my original '61 non-posi rear but wouldn't have paid any less if it had been a posi from some other year (I'm still thinking about swapping!)
Old 01-26-2009, 11:07 AM
  #8  
GCD1962
Race Director
 
GCD1962's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 14,761
Received 161 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

I have three units. One original & two replacements sitting on a shelf. I recently went with a 9" Ford rear.
Old 01-26-2009, 11:11 AM
  #9  
69ttop502
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
69ttop502's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Watkinsville, GA and Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 5,789
Received 855 Likes on 626 Posts

Default

Thanks guys, I have collected all the casting numbers and dates on the car at this point and certainly when it is ready to sell there will be full disclosure on all dates and numbers. Trying to get an ad ready for the March/April Driveline so need to get the car ready by then. Thanks for all the help. I guess I need to crawl under there again and mark the wheels and driveshaft and see what ratio is really in there.

Interestingly, I found in a chassis book that I have, it said in 62 through about serial# 1800, the units had a drain plug, and mine does not so I guess 2+2 does equal 4 sometimes in relation to these old cars.

Bill

Last edited by 69ttop502; 01-26-2009 at 11:17 AM.
Old 01-26-2009, 11:33 AM
  #10  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes on 1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

Bill,
Across the board (EXCEPT for early 62 models), the last year for a drain plug (pass cars & Vettes) in the bottom of the axle housing was 1961 (first year was 57). So, generally speaking, 62s will not have a drain plug, only a fill plug. Also, on posi equiped cars------FROM THE FACTORY-----------there should be a round metal tag retained by the fill plug which says something like USE POSITRACTION FLUID ONLY. If your 62 does not have one of these "posi" tags, they are available from all the Vette/Chevy pass car vendors. And they are reasonably good repos.
Also, even if your posi rear is not original to the car, I think the majority of buyers would MUCH PREFER to have the posi rear. At least it is correctly coded and is a 62 rear. To Tom Parsons, the date discrepancy is a NON-issue!

Tom Parsons
Old 01-26-2009, 11:40 AM
  #11  
Gman58
Pro
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Gman58's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Felton Ca
Posts: 596
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Non Posi

My 58 came with a open rear end. It is dated coded correctly for the car. I bought a correct Posi case for it. I probably won't build it and put it in but it will go with the car when I sell it. Posi or non Posi it didn't keep me from buying the car. Greg
Old 01-26-2009, 11:42 AM
  #12  
Fawndeuce
Safety Car
 
Fawndeuce's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Location, Location QC,NY
Posts: 3,547
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 62Jeff
I'm not sure if NCRS even looks at the rear end date codes, they didn't 25 years ago
When I had mine judged at the MI regional last year, they were not judged, but I was told that the NCRS plans to judge them in the future. I don't know when that would be, but I agree that other than on a 98% type car, adding a posi shouldn't hurt the value.



Paul
Old 01-26-2009, 12:00 PM
  #13  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes on 1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by Fawndeuce
When I had mine judged at the MI regional last year, they were not judged, but I was told that the NCRS plans to judge them in the future. I don't know when that would be, but I agree that other than on a 98% type car, adding a posi shouldn't hurt the value.



Paul
I know that I've covered this here before, but for those who haven't seen it, or have forgotten due to old timers disease, here is a brief reminder regarding the addition of posi to a non posi car.

For those who may have a NON-posi rear, THAT IS ORIGINAL to their car, and REALLY, REALLY would like to have a posi, but DO NOT WANT to replace their center section, it is too easy to convert the rear to posi. FACTORY posi units are becoming scarce, expensive, AND old, stressed and possibly cracked. But it you can locate a good posi unit, your non-posi can be converted with minimal effort. Also, Eaton is now making an EXCELLENT posi unit to fit the 55-64 pass cars/56-62 Vettes. I have done several of the Eaton installations for customers, as well as a couple of my own rears. In my opinion, the BEST way to convert one of these early rears is to install the Eaton unit.
With either a factory posi or Eaton conversion, the ORIGINAL non-posi center case can be retained with its original gears, dates and codes. When installed, NO ONE can tell if it is or is not posi.

Tom Parsons
Old 01-26-2009, 12:03 PM
  #14  
muncieman
Burning Brakes
 
muncieman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Frederick Md
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Fawndeuce
When I had mine judged at the MI regional last year, they were not judged, but I was told that the NCRS plans to judge them in the future. I don't know when that would be, but I agree that other than on a 98% type car, adding a posi shouldn't hurt the value.



Paul
Let me see if I understand, the cars are judged sitting on the ground or in a parking lot. Without a jack, solid ground and some jack stands how do they think this will play out??? I can't see them slithering under these cars sitting on the ground, they set to low and many of the judges are shall we say full figured

Having you car judged is already a royal pain in the butt, let's make it even more fun

Drivers for me, trailer queens for others
Old 01-26-2009, 02:29 PM
  #15  
Fawndeuce
Safety Car
 
Fawndeuce's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Location, Location QC,NY
Posts: 3,547
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by muncieman
Let me see if I understand, the cars are judged sitting on the ground or in a parking lot. Without a jack, solid ground and some jack stands how do they think this will play out??? I can't see them slithering under these cars sitting on the ground, they set to low and many of the judges are shall we say full figured

Having you car judged is already a royal pain in the butt, let's make it even more fun

Drivers for me, trailer queens for others
Here is a pic of the undercarriage my car being judged at the Michigan regional last year, as you can see the guys really get under there, despite it having been driven 600+ miles through heavy rain and muck to get there.



The detailed feedback that the judging process provided me was extremely informative, I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in learning more about their car.
BTW, NCRS judging is not a white glove check for dust kind of deal, despite not being able to detail the undercarriage after the long drive, it still rated a TopFlight (even pre millage credit).



Paul
Old 01-27-2009, 09:24 AM
  #16  
62Jeff
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
62Jeff's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Houston-ish Texas
Posts: 15,499
Received 47 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69ttop502
Interestingly, I found in a chassis book that I have, it said in 62 through about serial# 1800, the units had a drain plug, and mine does not so I guess 2+2 does equal 4 sometimes in relation to these old cars.

Bill
You probably have the original rear housing in your car with a replacement case/gears

Get notified of new replies

To 62 differential question




Quick Reply: 62 differential question



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.