C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Camshaft Retrospective

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2009, 12:08 PM
  #1  
NiftyNiblick
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
 
NiftyNiblick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Camshaft Retrospective

I happened across the specs of my car's original Rochester injected engine.
The so-called Duntov 30/30 solid lifter camshaft, which was to reappear once again in the '69 Camaro Z28, seems outright wierd next to the current engine's hydraulic roller cam.
The valve lifts were less than one might expect to see on a high performance camshaft, but the durations were ludicrously long.

Any valve train experts out there with a possible reason for this?
Old 08-27-2009, 03:12 PM
  #2  
mikem350
Melting Slicks
 
mikem350's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Sunrise FL
Posts: 3,101
Received 95 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

OEM parts need to last under warranty, and higher lifts put more stress on all the valvetrain parts. Higher lifter wear, wiped cam lobes,etc. As technology improved parts and oils and the opening and closing ramps of the lobes, the mfgs were able to go to higher lifts. Longer duration = more horsepower up top, so that was the safer way to get more power.

Roller cams can follow the lobe profiles MUCH more easier than solids...enabling the outrageous profiles for more "area under the curve"
Old 08-27-2009, 03:44 PM
  #3  
NiftyNiblick
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
 
NiftyNiblick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, mikem350. Going by memory of my teens, the new engine doesn't quite have the cement mixer idle that I remember from fuelies in the old days. It's horsepower still matches up fine, however, while its ft. lbs. figure at useable rpm is vastly improved.

Every Corvette is a "fuelie" now, but mine, which only has a vin plate and a few coachwork parts actually remaining from 1962, remains one after 47 years!
Old 08-27-2009, 04:54 PM
  #4  
NEVERL8
Drifting
 
NEVERL8's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Corrales NM
Posts: 1,396
Received 247 Likes on 111 Posts

Default

I am not a valvetrain expert, per se, but I did recently rebuild my 327/350 L79 engine and converted it to a full roller setup.

The roller technology along with the advancement of metallurgy allows you to get much more performance out of a cam while sacrificing far less driveability and durability.

Roller cam and lifters can have much quicker ramp rates than flat tappet lifters. This allows you to open the valve much faster. Since the valve opens faster it can stay open longer (more total area under the curve) allowing for more air/fuel charge into the cylinder (if the intake and heads will support this). The newest metallargy in valve springs allows you to run high seat pressures and high lift. You can now snap the valves shut much more quickly (of course lighter valves, springs and retainers help).

The sum total if you do it right is an engine that has reasonable idle (not horrendous overlap or real narrow lobe centers), decent idle vacuum, runs hard to 6K RPMs all day, makes plenty of power, runs on pump gas, and will last for years and years with regular maintenance.

My next engine will be a solid roller big block. Now that should make some interesting sounds.
Old 08-27-2009, 04:57 PM
  #5  
knight37128
Le Mans Master
 
knight37128's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: "cutesy" TN
Posts: 6,048
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Springs don't wear out near as fast with a lower lift.

A fresh set of springs will do wonders for high RPMs.
Old 08-28-2009, 07:45 AM
  #6  
rustylugnuts
Drifting
 
rustylugnuts's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Tampa, FL & Harleysville, PA
Posts: 1,611
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NiftyNiblick
Thanks, mikem350. Going by memory of my teens, the new engine doesn't quite have the cement mixer idle that I remember from fuelies in the old days. It's horsepower still matches up fine, however, while its ft. lbs. figure at useable rpm is vastly improved.

Every Corvette is a "fuelie" now, but mine, which only has a vin plate and a few coachwork parts actually remaining from 1962, remains one after 47 years!
If I understand correctly, you have a 1962 fuelie, correct? If so this engine never had the 30-30 duntov camshaft. It had the 097 duntov solid lifter camshaft with very low lift, and a much longer duration then other camshafts that were used in the earlier years.

rustylugnuts

Last edited by rustylugnuts; 08-28-2009 at 07:49 AM.

Get notified of new replies

To Camshaft Retrospective




Quick Reply: Camshaft Retrospective



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 AM.