63 fuelie vs. 413 dart
#21
Drifting
In 62 at the Nationals Eckstrand ran a 12.72 in SS/SA for the win with his 413, driving for the Ramchargers. This was with his 420 hp with the 13.5 compression with the new heads (drag package). I am not so sure about the 11.00 compression motor and if it ran anything like the later 383s then my Massey Ferguson could beat it. In 63 the 426 wedge (Stage 1 and Stage 2) came out with even better flowing heads and all bets were off. Dodges and Plymouths were pretty much smoking all of the competition, save for a time or two when they were caught napping. Jim
#22
1976 1st
1977 3rd
1978 2nd
1979 7th
Regards
#23
Hot Rod did a drag test of a '63 11.0:1 Plymouth. They added slicks, a 4.56:1, leaf spring clips, and cranked up the front torsion bars. They ran 12.69@112 with the factory manifolds and lakes outlets open. They got beat in eliminations by a '62 13.5:1 413 with tubular headers, which ran 12.40@116.
I was referring to the 62 11.1 413s which my knowledge of is non-existent. I was not sure if it had any of the 413 13.5 goodies, they may have I don't know. If they did they probably performed quite well, if not then I may need some convincing. The earlier 383 and 361s were dogs even with the two fours. The later 383s were a marketing ploy that were over-hyped-Beep,Beep.
In 63 the 413s were old news, they were running 426 wedge stage 1 and stage 2 cars. They were a better animal with better breathing and better camshafts (I know I tried a couple of them). I believe the tests with the 63 cars, as I said I had a 426 wedge (was told it was a stage 2 although I could not bet my life on it as I was told other fables about the motor as well). Nevertheless even though mine was tired it pulled real strong but then again you could get maybe a 1000 additional RPMs over the 383s. Good running cars.
Dan, Larry Lombardo did go to work for Jenkins as a driver-when he won at Indy (68) we were about the same age, I think he was 18 and I was 17 when he won. That guy could flat out drive that car, plus he had a pretty good tuner as it turned out (Sinistri). I would like to go back and tear down his setup to see what he did. The car "Buckshot" is apparently in Pa. and will be rebuilt. Always one of my favorites as well as Ginanino (street eliminator winner in 68) and Kanners (street eliminator winner in 67) with their 57s.
#24
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Lake Minnetonka, Mn
Posts: 5,064
Received 1,720 Likes
on
805 Posts
2018 C1 of Year Finalist
I was referring to the 62 11.1 413s which my knowledge of is non-existent. I was not sure if it had any of the 413 13.5 goodies, they may have I don't know. If they did they probably performed quite well, if not then I may need some convincing. The earlier 383 and 361s were dogs even with the two fours. The later 383s were a marketing ploy that were over-hyped-Beep,Beep.
In 63 the 413s were old news, they were running 426 wedge stage 1 and stage 2 cars. They were a better animal with better breathing and better camshafts (I know I tried a couple of them). I believe the tests with the 63 cars, as I said I had a 426 wedge (was told it was a stage 2 although I could not bet my life on it as I was told other fables about the motor as well). Nevertheless even though mine was tired it pulled real strong but then again you could get maybe a 1000 additional RPMs over the 383s. Good running cars.
Dan, Larry Lombardo did go to work for Jenkins as a driver-when he won at Indy (68) we were about the same age, I think he was 18 and I was 17 when he won. That guy could flat out drive that car, plus he had a pretty good tuner as it turned out (Sinistri). I would like to go back and tear down his setup to see what he did. The car "Buckshot" is apparently in Pa. and will be rebuilt. Always one of my favorites as well as Ginanino (street eliminator winner in 68) and Kanners (street eliminator winner in 67) with their 57s.
In 63 the 413s were old news, they were running 426 wedge stage 1 and stage 2 cars. They were a better animal with better breathing and better camshafts (I know I tried a couple of them). I believe the tests with the 63 cars, as I said I had a 426 wedge (was told it was a stage 2 although I could not bet my life on it as I was told other fables about the motor as well). Nevertheless even though mine was tired it pulled real strong but then again you could get maybe a 1000 additional RPMs over the 383s. Good running cars.
Dan, Larry Lombardo did go to work for Jenkins as a driver-when he won at Indy (68) we were about the same age, I think he was 18 and I was 17 when he won. That guy could flat out drive that car, plus he had a pretty good tuner as it turned out (Sinistri). I would like to go back and tear down his setup to see what he did. The car "Buckshot" is apparently in Pa. and will be rebuilt. Always one of my favorites as well as Ginanino (street eliminator winner in 68) and Kanners (street eliminator winner in 67) with their 57s.
Last edited by Dan Hampton; 09-13-2009 at 12:59 PM.
#25
Le Mans Master
Okay guys, you all heard the song "Shut Down" where the fuel injection sting ray beats the 413 dodge dart. It seems the guys on the mopar forum say its all a bunch of rubbish. One car magazine several years ago supposedly matched these 2 together in an actual race with cars donated to them and sure enough the mopar beat the corvette. However, in the song the corvette has drag slicks which of course would give it better traction. The car in the re-enactment drag race did not have drag slicks. Do you think if the sting ray had drag slicks the beach boy song would have really been true or was it really a myth as the mopar guy states. Opinions?
The following users liked this post:
Redbird (10-26-2023)
#27
Also, this is 1963. It is the 360 hp FI, not the 375 hp FI.
I've always thought of it as wishful thinking on the Sting Ray driver's part. "Just shut it off, man, I'm going to beat you."
I also figured the Sting Ray lost, simply because he was behind and I doubt he was going to gain so much top end as to fly by. Gearing didn't give them all that much top end back then.
Superstock Dodge is windin' out in low
But my fuel injected Stingray's really startin' to go
To get the traction I'm ridin' the clutch
My pressure plate's burnin' that machine's too much
Pedal's to the floor hear the dual quads drink
(Oooo pump it up now)
And now the four-thirteen's lead is startin' to shrink
(Oooo pump it up now)
He's hot with ram induction but it's understood
(Oooo pump it up now)
I got a fuel injected engine sittin' under my hood
(Oooo pump it up now)
Shut it off shut it off buddy now I shut you down
But my fuel injected Stingray's really startin' to go
To get the traction I'm ridin' the clutch
My pressure plate's burnin' that machine's too much
Pedal's to the floor hear the dual quads drink
(Oooo pump it up now)
And now the four-thirteen's lead is startin' to shrink
(Oooo pump it up now)
He's hot with ram induction but it's understood
(Oooo pump it up now)
I got a fuel injected engine sittin' under my hood
(Oooo pump it up now)
Shut it off shut it off buddy now I shut you down
And most importantly, it is just a song. It is written by guys who had been writing about guys winning the girl of their dreams, catching a perfect wave, having an endless summer, and having everyone in school think you were cool. In other words, a lot of fantasy.
What makes you think this song is "fact"?
#28
Race Director
A good friend "Skeet" Russell was an NHRA record holder in the 60s with his C/SA 361 CI, 330 HP Plymouth. He ran consistent mid 13s with 7" slicks and headers. NHRA was very strict back then to ensure engines were stock. He was selected as one of NHRA's "Golden 50" and the car was at the recent Indy Nationals. He still has the car (his mother bought it new, then Skeet took it over to race). Only recent change was to add a 2-4s set up (which was available back then). His best time so far is arou nd 12.40 at 115 mph - almost the same as a new 430 hp C-6 ! The car still has to original shortblock and trans (modified Torqueflight by Fairbanks). Incedible how grea the car looks and runs after 45 years ! All that said I vote for the 413 to beat the Vette back then
Last edited by GCD1962; 09-13-2009 at 02:57 PM.
#29
Safety Car
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: St. Clair Shores MI
Posts: 4,050
Received 132 Likes
on
74 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019
2017 C2 of the Year Finalist
He's hot with ram induction but it's understood
(Oooo pump it up now)
I got a fuel injected engine sittin' under my hood
(Oooo pump it up now)
Shut it off shut it off buddy now I shut you down
(Oooo pump it up now)
I got a fuel injected engine sittin' under my hood
(Oooo pump it up now)
Shut it off shut it off buddy now I shut you down
#30
Race Director
Thanks, Jim. '68 was the year. Ed Hedrick is a good friend of mine and he set numerous records in his DragonSnake back then (A/SP through C/SP). He went on to be Grump's Pro Stock driver in the late 60s. He was part of the Moroso consortium (Jenkins, Hedrick, Stahl and Moroso). Wild times and great memories. Thanks for the info. I would love to see the Lombardo car.
George
#31
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Lake Minnetonka, Mn
Posts: 5,064
Received 1,720 Likes
on
805 Posts
2018 C1 of Year Finalist
Dan - I remember Ed well. I was Dick Moroso's partner in the car back then. Is Ed still around? Jenkins was not part of Stahl/Moroso. It was Jere Stahl, Dick Moroso, Ed Hedrick and Bob Duffy of Duffy's Performance in Red Bank, NJ. Bob lasted about one week and said "I'm outta here". Dick held on as long as he could and packed it up one night and moved back to Greenwich to open Moroso Performance. Besides being a good friend I was also the first employee of Moroso Performace. Dick's partners in Moroso Performance were Paul Campbell (an old friend) and Vinnie Tarantola of Vitar Trans in Ridgewood, Queens, NY. Vinny was a C/GS recordholder along with friends (his place was next door) to Jack Merkel B/GS & A/GS record holder and Eddie Sanzo who I think at one point was also an A/GS record holder. Nothing like the old times !
George
George
Last edited by Dan Hampton; 09-13-2009 at 05:54 PM.
#32
Drifting
Hot Rod did a thorough analysis of the 426 and covered the differences from the 413...very few. (They did some bearing and connecting rod upgrades for the 426 because the engines were being run to way over 6500.) According to the article, the 11.0:1 and 13.5:1 engines mainly had piston differences. The 11.0:1 had 0.0035-0.0045 piston-to-wall, and the 13.5:1 had 0.008-0.010 piston-to-wall. Based on the pistons, they considered the 13.5:1 for racing only.
#33
Melting Slicks
A lot of your big cubic inch muscle cars were something of a slug on the street because they couldn't get traction and they couldn't breathe in stock form. In drag strip form, different story.
That includes the 440 MoPars and the Hemi's.
The SHP small blocks didn't have that much of a problem and could quite often win the race with a decent driver at the wheel.
That includes the 440 MoPars and the Hemi's.
The SHP small blocks didn't have that much of a problem and could quite often win the race with a decent driver at the wheel.
#34
Mashinter, there were some differences in the connecting rods but if Hot Rod did not pick up on the differences between the heads then I believe they screwed up (can't guarantee that at all cost). I started with a 383 in my 64 (it was a drag car I bought from my cousin who blew it up at Englishtown). It had some work done to the heads which was a restrictive part of the 383. I looked into the 413 heads and the 426 heads (and intakes etc) at the time and unless the Mopar guys that were counseling me were complete idiots, which I do not believe, then there were differences. I was racing some Chevys at the time and the Chrysler guys wanted to show me the ills of my ways with the bowties. I have also read since then that there were differences and the 426 heads were a better ticket than the 413 heads. In any event I got a line from a crazy hillbilly on the 426 for $600 and bought it instead. It ran great but was tired and did not last long. Tried a more improved 383 for a short while until I gave up in disgust and bought a Z28 and went racing with it and never looked back.
After the 413s and 426 wedges experiments with the heads the later 383s and I suppose some 361s raced benefited from better flow characteristics. The sad thing about the 383 is that I remember my shifts were around 5200 and with the 426 I was able to have fun up to around 6300. You are leaving a bit of power on the table I believe when you have to shift your air pump down around 5000.
I may have to do a little research to see if my memory is worth a damn, but I believe there were differences in the heads as well which can make a big difference. If the 413 was so superb why only one year? Chrysler played around with these engines quite a bit even though the hemi was in the works as well and every year brought a couple more improvements.-Jim
After the 413s and 426 wedges experiments with the heads the later 383s and I suppose some 361s raced benefited from better flow characteristics. The sad thing about the 383 is that I remember my shifts were around 5200 and with the 426 I was able to have fun up to around 6300. You are leaving a bit of power on the table I believe when you have to shift your air pump down around 5000.
I may have to do a little research to see if my memory is worth a damn, but I believe there were differences in the heads as well which can make a big difference. If the 413 was so superb why only one year? Chrysler played around with these engines quite a bit even though the hemi was in the works as well and every year brought a couple more improvements.-Jim
#35
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
The 13.5-1 engines also had no valve seals. Don't know about the 11-1 engines. The owners manual supplement said 300 miles/quart of oil was normal usage for a new engine. They used that much too.
#36
Mashinter, if the crew at HotRod did a thorough analysis and left out that there except for the pop up piston size or con rod length and strength and did not mention the difference in cylinder heads between the 413 and 426 then maybe they did not do their homework as well as they think they did.
In Larry Davis book on Super Stocks (a pretty decent book that appears to be well researched and well written) he writes at p62, "The 426 also had redesigned cylinder heads with enlarged valves and smoothed ports on both the intake and exhaust side. Valve size were 2.08 for the intake and 1.88 on the exhausts. The combustion chambers retained the basic design of the improved 413 heads used in 62." He then goes on to discuss the pistons and new camshafts and the fully adjustable rocker arms (which I also found to be a good feature) This dealt with the Stage 1 engine. He goes on to discuss there the flow was improved on the Stage 2 cars. As you know if you played with these cars, the stock heads seemed to be a restriction so any 'Improved" headwork made these cars come alive and my personal belief is that this is a important point, much too important to dismiss as a "few".-Jim
In Larry Davis book on Super Stocks (a pretty decent book that appears to be well researched and well written) he writes at p62, "The 426 also had redesigned cylinder heads with enlarged valves and smoothed ports on both the intake and exhaust side. Valve size were 2.08 for the intake and 1.88 on the exhausts. The combustion chambers retained the basic design of the improved 413 heads used in 62." He then goes on to discuss the pistons and new camshafts and the fully adjustable rocker arms (which I also found to be a good feature) This dealt with the Stage 1 engine. He goes on to discuss there the flow was improved on the Stage 2 cars. As you know if you played with these cars, the stock heads seemed to be a restriction so any 'Improved" headwork made these cars come alive and my personal belief is that this is a important point, much too important to dismiss as a "few".-Jim
#37
Drifting
Mashinter, there were some differences in the connecting rods but if Hot Rod did not pick up on the differences between the heads then I believe they screwed up (can't guarantee that at all cost). I started with a 383 in my 64 (it was a drag car I bought from my cousin who blew it up at Englishtown). It had some work done to the heads which was a restrictive part of the 383. I looked into the 413 heads and the 426 heads (and intakes etc) at the time and unless the Mopar guys that were counseling me were complete idiots, which I do not believe, then there were differences. I was racing some Chevys at the time and the Chrysler guys wanted to show me the ills of my ways with the bowties. I have also read since then that there were differences and the 426 heads were a better ticket than the 413 heads. In any event I got a line from a crazy hillbilly on the 426 for $600 and bought it instead. It ran great but was tired and did not last long. Tried a more improved 383 for a short while until I gave up in disgust and bought a Z28 and went racing with it and never looked back.
After the 413s and 426 wedges experiments with the heads the later 383s and I suppose some 361s raced benefited from better flow characteristics. The sad thing about the 383 is that I remember my shifts were around 5200 and with the 426 I was able to have fun up to around 6300. You are leaving a bit of power on the table I believe when you have to shift your air pump down around 5000.
I may have to do a little research to see if my memory is worth a damn, but I believe there were differences in the heads as well which can make a big difference. If the 413 was so superb why only one year? Chrysler played around with these engines quite a bit even though the hemi was in the works as well and every year brought a couple more improvements.-Jim
After the 413s and 426 wedges experiments with the heads the later 383s and I suppose some 361s raced benefited from better flow characteristics. The sad thing about the 383 is that I remember my shifts were around 5200 and with the 426 I was able to have fun up to around 6300. You are leaving a bit of power on the table I believe when you have to shift your air pump down around 5000.
I may have to do a little research to see if my memory is worth a damn, but I believe there were differences in the heads as well which can make a big difference. If the 413 was so superb why only one year? Chrysler played around with these engines quite a bit even though the hemi was in the works as well and every year brought a couple more improvements.-Jim
The only upgrade mentioned in the article is improved valve stem seals for '63. Chrysler found a seal that would fit inside the inner spring, and used that in 1963. The 413 could use a quart in 50 miles during break-in, but Hot Rod's 426 got 300 miles during break-in! You could look at that as a 500% improvement...
The article is by Ray Brock, who was very detailed in technical stuff, but maybe there were differences in the 426 head that his Chrysler source didn't cover. Hot Rod didn't tear down the engine, and have no pictures of the innards. Dunno.
The Max. Wedge Mopars were amazing. I know a couple lucky guys who had one...but I never got a ride. I kept that Jan. '63 Hot Rod as a reminder of what I missed.
Bill
#38
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
I found one article were Moter trend tested a 62 Dodge equipped with a 413 in a Dart. Best times were 14.4. Can any of you 63 FI owners match that time ?
#39
Safety Car
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: St. Clair Shores MI
Posts: 4,050
Received 132 Likes
on
74 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019
2017 C2 of the Year Finalist
yes
2005 PURE STOCK MUSCLE CAR DRAG RACE RESULTS
63 Chevrolet Corvette Fuelie 327/360 4M 3.70 gears 14.074 102.38 mph 3400lbs
Last edited by Donny Brass; 09-14-2009 at 09:27 AM.
#40
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Oklahoma City Oklahoma
Posts: 5,975
Received 979 Likes
on
491 Posts
Great music, sure !
This Beach Boys song is purely fiction, plenty of artistic and musical leeway given, after all, ultimately in a Beach Boys song, the words gotta' wind up rhyming !
Now if you're looking for a really fact based racing comparison look at Motor Trend's 1964 Ferrari GTO/Pontiac GTO matchup. Remember that one ?
Ray
Now if you're looking for a really fact based racing comparison look at Motor Trend's 1964 Ferrari GTO/Pontiac GTO matchup. Remember that one ?
Ray