C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

VIN 194377S103954 "Documented" 67/435hp Possible FAKE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2010, 05:41 PM
  #21  
SBR
Safety Car
 
SBR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2001
Location: Barrington IL
Posts: 4,289
Received 676 Likes on 382 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bb62
Al has a database of tens of thousands of Corvette engine pad stamping pictures. He can compare a photo of a pad with that of virtually any day of Corvette production for whatever block was being manufactured. He can tell when the broach machines were re-tooled and how they wore over time.

These data will ultimately be passed to someone and these broach machining lines - which are IMPOSSIBLE TO DUPLICATE - become the fingerprints of every "original" engine out there. 63 years or 163 years, the result will be the same - you CAN tell the original from the restamped. This IS important for those who demand originality.

As for the NCRS, yes you are right. They judge to a standard that if it looks correct - then you get full credit. NCRS awards are in no way "documentation" for a car - just a nice way to say that it looks like it came from the factory.
Mark,
This is why I have always put more value on the car having its original stamp pad vs. paperwork. It is nice to have both however
Old 04-26-2010, 06:13 PM
  #22  
Procrastination Racing
Le Mans Master
 
Procrastination Racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Ocala FL
Posts: 6,248
Received 250 Likes on 173 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bb62
...

These data will ultimately be passed to someone and these broach machining lines - which are IMPOSSIBLE TO DUPLICATE - become the fingerprints of every "original" engine out there. 63 years or 163 years, the result will be the same - you CAN tell the original from the restamped. This IS important for those who demand originality.

...

Actually, no. This is a common misconception. You can tell a block that has been DECKED and then stamped.

If you start with an unstamped block of the right date, you will not be able to tell it from an original, if the stamping was done well.

The real vs. unreal issue is based on broach marks. However, if you have a block that has the correct broach marks (OTC, passenger car without VINs, truck, etc.), then you cannot tell.
Old 04-26-2010, 07:54 PM
  #23  
bb62
Safety Car
 
bb62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
Received 361 Likes on 216 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Procrastination Racing
Actually, no. This is a common misconception. You can tell a block that has been DECKED and then stamped.

If you start with an unstamped block of the right date, you will not be able to tell it from an original, if the stamping was done well.

The real vs. unreal issue is based on broach marks. However, if you have a block that has the correct broach marks (OTC, passenger car without VINs, truck, etc.), then you cannot tell.
Boy, talk about a list of unlikely happenstances. Consider...

1. Unstamped blocks are extremely rare to begin with. I would bet that the number out there can be counted on two hands. The vast majority of blocks used by restampers are period blocks that were decked.
2. The owner of the block would then need to get a hold of the Grenning database and find the vehicles date appropriate for his block.
3. Then he needs to find a vehicle that matches that date.

That's a lot of happenstance. I would think the cost to do such a creation would be more expensive than trying to find an original vehicle.
Old 04-26-2010, 09:35 PM
  #24  
a560156
Drifting
 
a560156's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bb62
The general Corvette community, especially for those with 67 435 cars, is fairly small.
I am aware of that as I am a member.
Old 04-26-2010, 10:36 PM
  #25  
knight37128
Le Mans Master
 
knight37128's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: "cutesy" TN
Posts: 6,048
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

You can't buy this entertainment.
The following users liked this post:
scotty t (12-15-2021)
Old 04-26-2010, 10:45 PM
  #26  
jrs 427
Drifting
 
jrs 427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,788
Received 131 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

" I am aware as I am a member "

Sounds like a nice place to buy a cheap suit. The Gurus of finance are at it again. My toy is better than your toy. Who actually gives a rip if someone wants to fake a high hp identity. Only the greedy looking to turn a buck will lose sleep.
My heart goes out to the fools with too much money and not enough information to arm themselves against false truths.
I'm for love, happiness, and driving a Corvette during our short summers. You Trump types hold your ego high in the air and brag to your hearts content.
Yes there are phoney documented corvettes, now and always will be. I have been very fortunate to meet and speak with owners that appreciate classic machinery. When the bragging / arrogant personality takes over the conversation I quickly move on. Lifes too short to be this transparent.
Old 04-26-2010, 11:02 PM
  #27  
Procrastination Racing
Le Mans Master
 
Procrastination Racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Ocala FL
Posts: 6,248
Received 250 Likes on 173 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bb62
Boy, talk about a list of unlikely happenstances. Consider...

1. Unstamped blocks are extremely rare to begin with. I would bet that the number out there can be counted on two hands. The vast majority of blocks used by restampers are period blocks that were decked.
2. The owner of the block would then need to get a hold of the Grenning database and find the vehicles date appropriate for his block.
3. Then he needs to find a vehicle that matches that date.

That's a lot of happenstance. I would think the cost to do such a creation would be more expensive than trying to find an original vehicle.
You are looking at this wrong. Today, all of this is true. But 15 and 20 years ago when many were made, it was much easier to do. All the big restorers have gathered up those unstamped blocks over the years. They knew what was going to happen.

Yes, the vast number are decked blocks but they get caught. But those are the little guys who are restoring, not the guys dropping $50,000 restoration on a $150,000 car.

I ran across a '63 block unstamped completely a couple of years ago that the guy wanted $3000 for the bare block. Now if you were building an all original (???) fuellie and you needed the original engine, what is $3000 in the price of a car that would go over $80,000? You would have a hard time justifying it for your $35,000 convertible you are building yourself and planning on never selling.

I have an unstamped 454 sitting in my garage. I used to have a couple of -R suffix blocks with no VIN and I still have an -S block. The -S blocks used to be easy to find, lots of automatic '63 and '64 Chevies dumping them for 350s and 383s.

A database of dates is not only available, but readily found. Noland Adams made one years ago for midyears. While it isn't as complete, it is close enough to have your dates in where they need to be. And really, it isn't that hard to go to a few shows, find cars with a VIN in your area, check dates to see where you need to be, and you are in.


The cars you really have to look over closely are not the ones that are fresh, as they are often dead giveaways, but the ones that were done 20 years ago and now have aged and have their own patina to them such you think they are old and real when they are just old.


And you think it is hard to find a car in the date range appropriate to your engine? You might not find it in this week or month, but a year or so will no doubt bring you want you seek.
Old 04-26-2010, 11:24 PM
  #28  
SledgeHammer 2.0
Drifting
 
SledgeHammer 2.0's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: Richmond Texas
Posts: 1,707
Received 261 Likes on 151 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by REMIX
What I'd REALLY like to know is: how liable is this dealer for passing along a fake? If you sell an expensive piece of art that turns out to be fake then the gallery that sold it usually has to eat it. Caveat emptor and all that, but the vehicle is purported to be "documented" and represented as such - isn't it up to the seller to verify this prior to stating such as fact?

You have to figure the people buying these toys are well-heeled enough that they can afford a decent lawyer if they've been scammed.

RMX
Well at the bottom of every listing that explains how well documented the car is there is always a disclaimer saying they are not liable if it's a fake.

Here is a link to the ad, If you look below the pictures it has all the disclaimers...
http://www.ronsusser.com/inventory.htm?id=859
Old 04-27-2010, 09:04 AM
  #29  
jrs 427
Drifting
 
jrs 427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,788
Received 131 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

I love the " reasonable effort " part. If I know it is a replica why would I tell you and take less money ? The financial money driven classic flippers are interested in making the almighty dollar... not preserving the past. If you read the forum closely you will see names that come up on a regular basis with these special optioned cars. I wouldn't be skeptical but one can make up their own mind.
Old 04-27-2010, 09:40 AM
  #30  
a560156
Drifting
 
a560156's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jrs 427
" I am aware as I am a member "

Sounds like a nice place to buy a cheap suit. The Gurus of finance are at it again. My toy is better than your toy. Who actually gives a rip if someone wants to fake a high hp identity. Only the greedy looking to turn a buck will lose sleep.
My heart goes out to the fools with too much money and not enough information to arm themselves against false truths.
I'm for love, happiness, and driving a Corvette during our short summers. You Trump types hold your ego high in the air and brag to your hearts content.
Yes there are phoney documented corvettes, now and always will be. I have been very fortunate to meet and speak with owners that appreciate classic machinery. When the bragging / arrogant personality takes over the conversation I quickly move on. Lifes too short to be this transparent.

Dear Jrs,

Thanks for your opinion. I would suggest that if you feel compelled to make disparaging personal attacks that you take it to PM. No one wants to be a party to that crap.
Old 04-27-2010, 11:23 AM
  #31  
wow
Drifting
 
wow's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Carson City Nevada
Posts: 1,294
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by knight37128
You can't buy this entertainment.
Truer words never spoken...and it just gets better
Old 04-27-2010, 11:49 AM
  #32  
wow
Drifting
 
wow's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Carson City Nevada
Posts: 1,294
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

One more thing, pet peeve...if any poster on this forum has the fortitude to disparage, and the fortitude to disparage disparaging, then the poster(s) should have the fortitude to completely fill out their public profile and not hide behind anonymity.
Old 04-27-2010, 11:55 AM
  #33  
Vette Daddy
Le Mans Master
 
Vette Daddy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Pendleton IN
Posts: 7,182
Received 95 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by knight37128
You can't buy this entertainment.
Every time this subject comes up, the silly season begins.
Old 04-27-2010, 07:46 PM
  #34  
jrs 427
Drifting
 
jrs 427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,788
Received 131 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

Sorry if I stepped on your ego. Just my 2 cents. I will leave now and let you financial wizzards brag it out. You live in a very small world. People with financial adequacy rarely boast or belittle us common folks with your big words. Carry on " real owners ".
Old 04-27-2010, 08:18 PM
  #35  
1-2-b-67L89
Melting Slicks
 
1-2-b-67L89's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: York PA
Posts: 2,529
Received 67 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jrs 427
Sorry if I stepped on your ego. Just my 2 cents. I will leave now and let you financial wizzards brag it out. You live in a very small world. People with financial adequacy rarely boast or belittle us common folks with your big words. Carry on " real owners ".
What the heck is this all about jrs? Call off the dogs
Old 04-27-2010, 11:41 PM
  #36  
67L36Driver
Safety Car
 
67L36Driver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: St. Joseph Mo
Posts: 4,068
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts

Default



I.B.T.L.
Old 04-28-2010, 02:16 AM
  #37  
AZDoug
Race Director
 
AZDoug's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Camp Verde AZ
Posts: 12,434
Received 1,478 Likes on 905 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2017 C1 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by Procrastination Racing
You are looking at this wrong. Today, all of this is true. But 15 and 20 years ago when many were made, it was much easier to do. All the big restorers have gathered up those unstamped blocks over the years. They knew what was going to happen.
What is an "unstamped" block and why would it exist?

If it left GM as a service part, it would have something stamped on the pad, as the '68 and later CE blocks do, wouldn't it?

Doug

Get notified of new replies

To VIN 194377S103954 "Documented" 67/435hp Possible FAKE

Old 04-28-2010, 03:40 AM
  #38  
Stewart Allison
Melting Slicks
 
Stewart Allison's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne victoria
Posts: 2,565
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Far to much emphases on an original block. There are a million parts to a car why so much scrutiny over a correct stamp pad. There are castings on the block and cast dates that should be close. If the castings are close enough in dates I'm happy. The value of a car should be in it's restoration as it stands. If it has been awarded a Top Flight it's a great Corvette with or without the scrutiny of the stamp pad.... Stewy
Old 04-28-2010, 03:48 AM
  #39  
Stewart Allison
Melting Slicks
 
Stewart Allison's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne victoria
Posts: 2,565
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by AZDoug
What is an "unstamped" block and why would it exist?

If it left GM as a service part, it would have something stamped on the pad, as the '68 and later CE blocks do, wouldn't it?

Doug
Doug I'm not sure but it could be a serviceable part. If the engine threw a rod (never in a Chev) The spare parts counter would supply a correct block with no stamp. The service dept would stamp the correct numbers on the engine when re installed. But I could be barking up the wrong tree. It's just a wild guess...Stewy
Old 04-28-2010, 03:55 PM
  #40  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AZDoug
What is an "unstamped" block and why would it exist?

If it left GM as a service part, it would have something stamped on the pad, as the '68 and later CE blocks do, wouldn't it?

Doug
Nope. "CE" 5/50 replacement short blocks had the "CE" pad stamping, but ordinary Service replacement short blocks (or fitted blocks) had nothing stamped on the pad.

Complete (intake-to-pan) production engine assemblies were always available from Service (only during the time they were still in production at the engine plants), and they had the usual engine plant production stampings on the pad.


Quick Reply: VIN 194377S103954 "Documented" 67/435hp Possible FAKE



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.