C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

VIN 194377S103954 "Documented" 67/435hp Possible FAKE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2010, 01:47 PM
  #1  
REMIX
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
REMIX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default VIN 194377S103954 "Documented" 67/435hp Possible FAKE

Just FYI. The previous owner is now looking for the current owner. Can anyone help him?

No matter, if the provenance is that questionable, it's probably not a bad idea for this thread with the VIN remain to available for any future searches for any future buyers.

http://ferrarichat.com/forum/showpos...8&postcount=25

RMX
Old 04-25-2010, 02:12 PM
  #2  
knight37128
Le Mans Master
 
knight37128's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: "cutesy" TN
Posts: 6,048
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

So they made a 435hp out of a 400 air coupe.

Wouldn't it be cheaper to start with a 300hp car?
Old 04-25-2010, 04:51 PM
  #3  
wmf62
Race Director
 
wmf62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes on 621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

hmmm..... has TM experienced an epiphany?

http://tmichaelis.com/archives/147

Bill
Old 04-25-2010, 05:11 PM
  #4  
bb62
Safety Car
 
bb62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
Received 361 Likes on 216 Posts

Default

As I noted at the Ferrari site, just have Al Grenning look at the car to see if it is indeed a fake. It's worth the money for the piece of mind.
The following users liked this post:
ericisback (12-15-2021)
Old 04-25-2010, 07:07 PM
  #5  
Mark_Milner
Safety Car
 
Mark_Milner's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

And what else is new?



It has been mentioned on here before, it is easier to counterfeit paper than it is to counterfeit a car, so why does anyone put faith in documentation?

Most of these cars went through a used car lot once in their lives, and back in the '60s and '70s, the reputation of a Corvette was such no salesman ever wanted a potential buyer to be able to talk to a previous owner.

Paperwork was trashed immediately, if any existed.

Yet ever single high dollar car today has it.
Old 04-25-2010, 07:32 PM
  #6  
wow
Drifting
 
wow's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Carson City Nevada
Posts: 1,294
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

You hit the nail on the head Mark...paperwork is worked paper...the days of getting high dollars for a "real, documented" L71 is done...maybe 'cause there are about 2000 or more "real, documented" L71's than Chevy ever produced...
Old 04-25-2010, 07:37 PM
  #7  
SBR
Safety Car
 
SBR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2001
Location: Barrington IL
Posts: 4,289
Received 678 Likes on 382 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mark_Milner
And what else is new?



It has been mentioned on here before, it is easier to counterfeit paper than it is to counterfeit a car, so why does anyone put faith in documentation?

Most of these cars went through a used car lot once in their lives, and back in the '60s and '70s, the reputation of a Corvette was such no salesman ever wanted a potential buyer to be able to talk to a previous owner.

Paperwork was trashed immediately, if any existed.

Yet ever single high dollar car today has it.
1000% it is way easier to produce fake paperwork than it is to fake a real car. Real paperwork is nice but is only one factor in determining if a car is what it is supposed to be. I like knowing the full history of every car I own, seeing pictures of it when new and if possible talking with them. I have been very lucky in that I have been able to talk with the original owners of most of the cars that I have owned.
The following users liked this post:
provette67 (12-15-2021)
Old 04-25-2010, 08:11 PM
  #8  
bb62
Safety Car
 
bb62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
Received 361 Likes on 216 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SIXTSVN
You hit the nail on the head Mark...paperwork is worked paper...the days of getting high dollars for a "real, documented" L71 is done...maybe 'cause there are about 2000 or more "real, documented" L71's than Chevy ever produced...
That is complete nonsense. The NCRS iitself hasn't seen anywhere near that number of 67s for judging - never mind the L71 variety.

As for real cars - they will always be worth more than the restamps and fakes - paperwork or no paper work. SBR is right that the potential purchaser needs to do his homework to fully understand where the car came from. But as Al Grenning has definitively shown - the real original engined cars CAN be identified. And the process is no less accurate than the forensic and ballistics examination of the surface of a spent bullet. Those cars will continue to demand a premium.
Old 04-25-2010, 09:54 PM
  #9  
Patrick67
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Patrick67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Cascade Maryland
Posts: 2,216
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SIXTSVN
You hit the nail on the head Mark...paperwork is worked paper...the days of getting high dollars for a "real, documented" L71 is done...maybe 'cause there are about 2000 or more "real, documented" L71's than Chevy ever produced...
Hmmm, I wonder what that 02L89AA means.

Old 04-25-2010, 09:56 PM
  #10  
a560156
Drifting
 
a560156's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bb62
As I noted at the Ferrari site, just have Al Grenning look at the car to see if it is indeed a fake. It's worth the money for the piece of mind.
Unless you are the current owner, he cannot help you. Been there, done that!!!
Old 04-25-2010, 10:00 PM
  #11  
bb62
Safety Car
 
bb62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
Received 361 Likes on 216 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by a560156
Unless you are the current owner, he cannot help you. Been there, done that!!!
Anybody interested in purchasing a car can pay the fee that the owner can use to confirm the engine in his car. No owner/seller would ever back down from an offer like this - unless he has something to hide.
Old 04-26-2010, 08:14 AM
  #12  
REMIX
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
REMIX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Well, these cars are only 43 years old...what happens when they're 53 years old? 63 years old? What happens when guys like Al Grenning retire? How many of these people with that level of knowledge are going to be left eventually? The original owners are going to die off and most people didn't take photos of block stamps in 1967. Lots of folks immediately threw their window stickers and related paperwork away.

Seems like the only "safe" way to buy a car like this is to find a seller with a documented chain of ownership (increasingly more difficult) or buy something that clearly states it's not # matching.

Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't NCRS merely judge whether or not the car is "correct" but not that it's authentic?

RMX

Last edited by REMIX; 04-26-2010 at 08:16 AM.
Old 04-26-2010, 08:59 AM
  #13  
Mike Ward
Race Director
 
Mike Ward's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by REMIX

Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't NCRS merely judge whether or not the car is "correct" but not that it's authentic?

RMX
Well, since you asked to be corrected if you're wrong, you're right. The word 'authentic' is not on the radar. It's a shame that so many owners/buyers/sellers/bashers gloss over this fact, but.......
Old 04-26-2010, 09:51 AM
  #14  
bb62
Safety Car
 
bb62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
Received 361 Likes on 216 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by REMIX
Well, these cars are only 43 years old...what happens when they're 53 years old? 63 years old? What happens when guys like Al Grenning retire? How many of these people with that level of knowledge are going to be left eventually? The original owners are going to die off and most people didn't take photos of block stamps in 1967. Lots of folks immediately threw their window stickers and related paperwork away.

Seems like the only "safe" way to buy a car like this is to find a seller with a documented chain of ownership (increasingly more difficult) or buy something that clearly states it's not # matching.

Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't NCRS merely judge whether or not the car is "correct" but not that it's authentic?

RMX
Al has a database of tens of thousands of Corvette engine pad stamping pictures. He can compare a photo of a pad with that of virtually any day of Corvette production for whatever block was being manufactured. He can tell when the broach machines were re-tooled and how they wore over time.

These data will ultimately be passed to someone and these broach machining lines - which are IMPOSSIBLE TO DUPLICATE - become the fingerprints of every "original" engine out there. 63 years or 163 years, the result will be the same - you CAN tell the original from the restamped. This IS important for those who demand originality.

As for the NCRS, yes you are right. They judge to a standard that if it looks correct - then you get full credit. NCRS awards are in no way "documentation" for a car - just a nice way to say that it looks like it came from the factory.
Old 04-26-2010, 10:21 AM
  #15  
Lee H
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Lee H's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 1,124
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

A fake 67 435HP, I'm shocked!!
Old 04-26-2010, 01:20 PM
  #16  
a560156
Drifting
 
a560156's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bb62
No owner/seller would ever back down from an offer like this - unless he has something to hide.
A seller with something to hide? Now that's a first.
Old 04-26-2010, 01:46 PM
  #17  
bb62
Safety Car
 
bb62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
Received 361 Likes on 216 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by a560156
A seller with something to hide? Now that's a first.
The general Corvette community, especially for those with 67 435 cars, is fairly small. If an owner doesn't want to have his car verified (and at the expense of the potential purchaser to boot), then it is likely that people will know about it and the car will be devalued for that alone. The real cars have nothing to hide - that is why they are more expensive.

Get notified of new replies

To VIN 194377S103954 "Documented" 67/435hp Possible FAKE

Old 04-26-2010, 02:10 PM
  #18  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PTighe
Hmmm, I wonder what that 02L89AA means.

Take your pick - both stickers are fake.
Attached Images  
The following users liked this post:
marshal135 (12-14-2021)
Old 04-26-2010, 04:10 PM
  #19  
1-2-b-67L89
Melting Slicks
 
1-2-b-67L89's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: York PA
Posts: 2,529
Received 67 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

No big surprise on the issue of being a fake since it happens too much along with other high $ muscle automobiles but what seems baffling as knight37128 asked, why take a 400 tri-carb air car to make a switch. Seems like that cars original make up would place it in very high # country.
Old 04-26-2010, 05:10 PM
  #20  
REMIX
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
REMIX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1-2-b-67L89
No big surprise on the issue of being a fake since it happens too much along with other high $ muscle automobiles but what seems baffling as knight37128 asked, why take a 400 tri-carb air car to make a switch. Seems like that cars original make up would place it in very high # country.
What I'd REALLY like to know is: how liable is this dealer for passing along a fake? If you sell an expensive piece of art that turns out to be fake then the gallery that sold it usually has to eat it. Caveat emptor and all that, but the vehicle is purported to be "documented" and represented as such - isn't it up to the seller to verify this prior to stating such as fact?

You have to figure the people buying these toys are well-heeled enough that they can afford a decent lawyer if they've been scammed.

RMX

Last edited by REMIX; 04-26-2010 at 05:17 PM.


Quick Reply: VIN 194377S103954 "Documented" 67/435hp Possible FAKE



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 PM.