VIN 194377S103954 "Documented" 67/435hp Possible FAKE
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
VIN 194377S103954 "Documented" 67/435hp Possible FAKE
Just FYI. The previous owner is now looking for the current owner. Can anyone help him?
No matter, if the provenance is that questionable, it's probably not a bad idea for this thread with the VIN remain to available for any future searches for any future buyers.
http://ferrarichat.com/forum/showpos...8&postcount=25
RMX
No matter, if the provenance is that questionable, it's probably not a bad idea for this thread with the VIN remain to available for any future searches for any future buyers.
http://ferrarichat.com/forum/showpos...8&postcount=25
RMX
The following users liked this post:
ericisback (12-15-2021)
#5
And what else is new?
It has been mentioned on here before, it is easier to counterfeit paper than it is to counterfeit a car, so why does anyone put faith in documentation?
Most of these cars went through a used car lot once in their lives, and back in the '60s and '70s, the reputation of a Corvette was such no salesman ever wanted a potential buyer to be able to talk to a previous owner.
Paperwork was trashed immediately, if any existed.
Yet ever single high dollar car today has it.
It has been mentioned on here before, it is easier to counterfeit paper than it is to counterfeit a car, so why does anyone put faith in documentation?
Most of these cars went through a used car lot once in their lives, and back in the '60s and '70s, the reputation of a Corvette was such no salesman ever wanted a potential buyer to be able to talk to a previous owner.
Paperwork was trashed immediately, if any existed.
Yet ever single high dollar car today has it.
#6
Drifting
You hit the nail on the head Mark...paperwork is worked paper...the days of getting high dollars for a "real, documented" L71 is done...maybe 'cause there are about 2000 or more "real, documented" L71's than Chevy ever produced...
#7
Safety Car
And what else is new?
It has been mentioned on here before, it is easier to counterfeit paper than it is to counterfeit a car, so why does anyone put faith in documentation?
Most of these cars went through a used car lot once in their lives, and back in the '60s and '70s, the reputation of a Corvette was such no salesman ever wanted a potential buyer to be able to talk to a previous owner.
Paperwork was trashed immediately, if any existed.
Yet ever single high dollar car today has it.
It has been mentioned on here before, it is easier to counterfeit paper than it is to counterfeit a car, so why does anyone put faith in documentation?
Most of these cars went through a used car lot once in their lives, and back in the '60s and '70s, the reputation of a Corvette was such no salesman ever wanted a potential buyer to be able to talk to a previous owner.
Paperwork was trashed immediately, if any existed.
Yet ever single high dollar car today has it.
The following users liked this post:
provette67 (12-15-2021)
#8
As for real cars - they will always be worth more than the restamps and fakes - paperwork or no paper work. SBR is right that the potential purchaser needs to do his homework to fully understand where the car came from. But as Al Grenning has definitively shown - the real original engined cars CAN be identified. And the process is no less accurate than the forensic and ballistics examination of the surface of a spent bullet. Those cars will continue to demand a premium.
#10
#11
Anybody interested in purchasing a car can pay the fee that the owner can use to confirm the engine in his car. No owner/seller would ever back down from an offer like this - unless he has something to hide.
#12
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Well, these cars are only 43 years old...what happens when they're 53 years old? 63 years old? What happens when guys like Al Grenning retire? How many of these people with that level of knowledge are going to be left eventually? The original owners are going to die off and most people didn't take photos of block stamps in 1967. Lots of folks immediately threw their window stickers and related paperwork away.
Seems like the only "safe" way to buy a car like this is to find a seller with a documented chain of ownership (increasingly more difficult) or buy something that clearly states it's not # matching.
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't NCRS merely judge whether or not the car is "correct" but not that it's authentic?
RMX
Seems like the only "safe" way to buy a car like this is to find a seller with a documented chain of ownership (increasingly more difficult) or buy something that clearly states it's not # matching.
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't NCRS merely judge whether or not the car is "correct" but not that it's authentic?
RMX
Last edited by REMIX; 04-26-2010 at 08:16 AM.
#13
Well, since you asked to be corrected if you're wrong, you're right. The word 'authentic' is not on the radar. It's a shame that so many owners/buyers/sellers/bashers gloss over this fact, but.......
#14
Well, these cars are only 43 years old...what happens when they're 53 years old? 63 years old? What happens when guys like Al Grenning retire? How many of these people with that level of knowledge are going to be left eventually? The original owners are going to die off and most people didn't take photos of block stamps in 1967. Lots of folks immediately threw their window stickers and related paperwork away.
Seems like the only "safe" way to buy a car like this is to find a seller with a documented chain of ownership (increasingly more difficult) or buy something that clearly states it's not # matching.
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't NCRS merely judge whether or not the car is "correct" but not that it's authentic?
RMX
Seems like the only "safe" way to buy a car like this is to find a seller with a documented chain of ownership (increasingly more difficult) or buy something that clearly states it's not # matching.
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't NCRS merely judge whether or not the car is "correct" but not that it's authentic?
RMX
These data will ultimately be passed to someone and these broach machining lines - which are IMPOSSIBLE TO DUPLICATE - become the fingerprints of every "original" engine out there. 63 years or 163 years, the result will be the same - you CAN tell the original from the restamped. This IS important for those who demand originality.
As for the NCRS, yes you are right. They judge to a standard that if it looks correct - then you get full credit. NCRS awards are in no way "documentation" for a car - just a nice way to say that it looks like it came from the factory.
#17
The general Corvette community, especially for those with 67 435 cars, is fairly small. If an owner doesn't want to have his car verified (and at the expense of the potential purchaser to boot), then it is likely that people will know about it and the car will be devalued for that alone. The real cars have nothing to hide - that is why they are more expensive.
#18
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
The following users liked this post:
marshal135 (12-14-2021)
#19
Melting Slicks
No big surprise on the issue of being a fake since it happens too much along with other high $ muscle automobiles but what seems baffling as knight37128 asked, why take a 400 tri-carb air car to make a switch. Seems like that cars original make up would place it in very high # country.
#20
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
No big surprise on the issue of being a fake since it happens too much along with other high $ muscle automobiles but what seems baffling as knight37128 asked, why take a 400 tri-carb air car to make a switch. Seems like that cars original make up would place it in very high # country.
You have to figure the people buying these toys are well-heeled enough that they can afford a decent lawyer if they've been scammed.
RMX
Last edited by REMIX; 04-26-2010 at 05:17 PM.