C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

63 340 2 head gaskets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2014, 09:36 AM
  #1  
65 Pro Vette
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
65 Pro Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Horsham Pa
Posts: 3,568
Received 1,044 Likes on 575 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019

Default 63 340 2 head gaskets

I know I read something about this years ago but can't find it. I just took my 340 engine apart yesterday, it was never apart- never and both heads had 2 steel head gaskets why did GM do that? car is late 63 over 20,000. Thanks
Old 02-02-2014, 09:43 AM
  #2  
Ironcross
Race Director
 
Ironcross's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Taylor Michigan
Posts: 12,142
Received 40 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65 Pro Vette
I know I read something about this years ago but can't find it. I just took my 340 engine apart yesterday, it was never apart- never and both heads had 2 steel head gaskets why did GM do that? car is late 63 over 20,000. Thanks
lower the compression ratio...to do that they used two steel shim gaskets....I found this out with my FI 62 when I changed the heads with a new set of 64`s in 64.....One way to actually know that the engine was never apart
Old 02-02-2014, 10:04 AM
  #3  
donbayers
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
donbayers's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: Edmond Oklahoma
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I'm confused. Are you saying that since there was two gaskets that it means it had been into???

Original compression ratio on 340 hp was supposed to be 11.25 to 1

For it to be a factory set up it should only have one gasket correct?

Just trying to learn all I can about the 63 340 engine

Thx
Old 02-02-2014, 10:55 AM
  #4  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

The two head gaskets were OEM on the '62-'63 327 SHP engines. I think this started shortly after '62 production started but not sure.

Early 409's used the same trick.

Supposedly, the reason was to lower compression to compensate for poor gasoline in some areas of the country. Must have been really bad as I built three of those engines in the early '60's from OTC parts and used one head gasket with normal premium fuel no problem. Even today, these engines run fine with one gasket on the gasoline many curse for being poor quality. 93 E 10.

Last edited by MikeM; 02-02-2014 at 10:59 AM.
Old 02-02-2014, 11:06 AM
  #5  
Bluestripe67
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Bluestripe67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2002
Location: Close to DC
Posts: 14,534
Received 2,126 Likes on 1,465 Posts
C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified 2020

Default

My former '63 327/340 had two head gaskets. Dennis
Old 02-02-2014, 12:32 PM
  #6  
W Guy
Drifting
 
W Guy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Hightstown NJ
Posts: 1,711
Received 178 Likes on 133 Posts

Default

Here's the answer.
Verne
Old 02-02-2014, 12:55 PM
  #7  
65 Pro Vette
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
65 Pro Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Horsham Pa
Posts: 3,568
Received 1,044 Likes on 575 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by W Guy
Here's the answer.
Verne
That's what I was looking for thanks.
Old 02-02-2014, 12:59 PM
  #8  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65 Pro Vette
That's what I was looking for thanks.
You didn't trust post #4?
Old 02-02-2014, 01:07 PM
  #9  
donbayers
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
donbayers's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: Edmond Oklahoma
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Great information!!!
Old 02-02-2014, 01:16 PM
  #10  
65 Pro Vette
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
65 Pro Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Horsham Pa
Posts: 3,568
Received 1,044 Likes on 575 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
You didn't trust post #4?
nothing like a pc of paper for back up
Old 02-02-2014, 01:18 PM
  #11  
RestoMike
Melting Slicks
 
RestoMike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Livin' large and havin' fun in wonderful Oklahoma
Posts: 2,590
Received 59 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
You didn't trust post #4?

Nothing like having it in print.

However.....todays driving conditions are quite a bit different from 1962. Cognizant builders will/should use a different approach to building this style engine taking into consideration many factors on how the car will be driven.
Old 02-02-2014, 01:32 PM
  #12  
donbayers
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
donbayers's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: Edmond Oklahoma
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RestoMike

Nothing like having it in print.

However.....todays driving conditions are quite a bit different from 1962. Cognizant builders will/should use a different approach to building this style engine taking into consideration many factors on how the car will be driven.
Care to elaborate on this???
Old 02-02-2014, 02:40 PM
  #13  
Boyan
Drifting
 
Boyan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Woodland Hills CA
Posts: 1,951
Received 462 Likes on 292 Posts

Default

Thats why I laugh when guys with 340hp cars keep quoting 11.1 to 1 compression and what not. When I calculated my 340's actual compression it was 10.25. Runs great on pump gas.
Old 02-02-2014, 05:16 PM
  #14  
W Guy
Drifting
 
W Guy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Hightstown NJ
Posts: 1,711
Received 178 Likes on 133 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
You didn't trust post #4?
I was just backing you up buddy.
Old 02-02-2014, 05:37 PM
  #15  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by W Guy
I was just backing you up buddy.
Thanks. I have that piece of paper you posted but I'm far too lazy to dig it out!

Now, am I right about the 409's having the two head gaskets per side? Seems I remember an acquaintance that bought a new '64 409 and it had two head gaskets on it. "Nother guy bought a new '62 and it had two.

My memory dims with each passing year.
Old 02-02-2014, 09:03 PM
  #16  
john neas
Pro
 
john neas's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The 2nd headgasket went away on my 62 409 the same week I bought the car.
Regards
Old 02-02-2014, 10:18 PM
  #17  
427Hotrod
Race Director
 
427Hotrod's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Corsicana, Tx
Posts: 12,603
Received 1,874 Likes on 912 Posts
2020 C2 of the Year - Modified Winner
2020 Corvette of the Year (performance mods)
C2 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
2017 C2 of Year Finalist

Default

The need to change the lash settings doesn't make any sense to me. Setting it to whatever was stock would just have you turning the nut a little further. If anything, it adds a little duration to the cam and makes it low speed power worse in addition to what it lost with the lessened compression.

Yes pushrods are now a little short..but that shouldn't affect cam settings.



JIM
Old 02-02-2014, 10:20 PM
  #18  
W Guy
Drifting
 
W Guy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Hightstown NJ
Posts: 1,711
Received 178 Likes on 133 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
Thanks. I have that piece of paper you posted but I'm far too lazy to dig it out!

Now, am I right about the 409's having the two head gaskets per side? Seems I remember an acquaintance that bought a new '64 409 and it had two head gaskets on it. "Nother guy bought a new '62 and it had two.

My memory dims with each passing year.
Yep, you're right. It's in print too somewhere but I think it might be in a Chevrolet Service News rather than a TSB. I'm far too lazy to dig it out!
Verne
Old 02-02-2014, 11:09 PM
  #19  
65tripleblack
Safety Car
 
65tripleblack's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Ocean Township NJ
Posts: 4,797
Received 235 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 427Hotrod
The need to change the lash settings doesn't make any sense to me. Setting it to whatever was stock would just have you turning the nut a little further. If anything, it adds a little duration to the cam and makes it low speed power worse in addition to what it lost with the lessened compression.

Yes pushrods are now a little short..but that shouldn't affect cam settings.



JIM
The old lash settings for the 283 in 1961 was .012"/.018". The settings shown in the document serve to increase the detonation resistance beyond the double gaskets by delaying the intake valve closing event and thus lowering the dynamic compression ratio.

Fact is, the 097 cam is much too mild a cam to tolerate 11.25:1 SCR. It's much too mild a cam to tolerate 10.5:1 SCR, so the lash setting gives GM some extra leeway, or margin for detonation resistance taking into account the more sloppily built engines that were herded "out the door" back in the "good old days".

Get notified of new replies

To 63 340 2 head gaskets




Quick Reply: 63 340 2 head gaskets



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 PM.