Did You Know the '67 Corvette Almost Didn't Happen?
#1
CorvetteForum Editor
Thread Starter
Did You Know the '67 Corvette Almost Didn't Happen?
Did you know that the Shark-inspired Corvette Sting Ray of the late sixties almost didn’t happen, due to a debate over the coupe’s roof design?
Read the rest on the Corvette Forum homepage. >>
The following users liked this post:
JackTripper (06-20-2016)
#2
The article didn't seem to open, but I think they were saying the SIXTY-EIGHT almost didn't happen. The C3 was LATE-'60s. while the C2 spanned the early-to mid '60s (late '62 through mid-'67. And I would imagine there were more arguments about the C3 roof's potentially rattly and leaky removable panels and decreased luggage volume than the C2 coupe's already well-accepted fastback design.
PLUS the C3 was inspired by the '65 Mako Shark (which had a fastback), while the C2 came from Mitchell's '59 Sting Ray racer body on a mid-'50s Corvette SS chassis!
PLUS the C3 was inspired by the '65 Mako Shark (which had a fastback), while the C2 came from Mitchell's '59 Sting Ray racer body on a mid-'50s Corvette SS chassis!
#4
Supporting Lifetime
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 4,014
Received 1,266 Likes
on
507 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 Corvette of the Year Finalist -- Unmodified
2021 C1 of the Year Winner - Unmodified
2020 C1 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2016 C1 of the Year Finalist
This.
Let's not read too much into this. The story of the 1968 having been delayed (it was supposed to be the 1967) is fairly well-known.
The following users liked this post:
carl3989 (06-21-2016)
#5
Race Director
Member Since: Jan 2002
Location: Close to DC
Posts: 14,534
Received 2,126 Likes
on
1,465 Posts
C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified 2020
Well know old news. Glad it happened. Dennis
The following users liked this post:
427435 (06-22-2016)
#8
Drifting
#9
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,856 Likes
on
1,099 Posts
The coupe roof surface design error occurred in 1962 (mold surface was designed 0.1" low to the true surface, causing the entire roof to be 0.1" low) Once the real problem was discovered, making a new roof mold was out of the question financially, and "reefing" the upper half of the coupe doors continued through the end of '67 production.
#10
Advanced
The coupe roof surface design error occurred in 1962 (mold surface was designed 0.1" low to the true surface, causing the entire roof to be 0.1" low) Once the real problem was discovered, making a new roof mold was out of the question financially, and "reefing" the upper half of the coupe doors continued through the end of '67 production.
#11
Race Director
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes
on
621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07
bending the upper part of the door to fit....
see the current thread about coupe door fit
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...el-better.html
Bill
see the current thread about coupe door fit
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...el-better.html
Bill
Last edited by wmf62; 06-21-2016 at 08:24 PM.
#12
I read the C3 was supposed to debut in '67, but there was so many issues, Zora delayed it. Turned out all the issues weren't ironed out when it did come out the following year. Personally, I'm glad it played out the way it did, (see avatar).
Last edited by Donn21; 06-22-2016 at 09:48 PM.
#13
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,856 Likes
on
1,099 Posts
"THE MYSTERIOUS 1968 CORVETTE LAUNCH
-or-
WHY SO MANY CONVERTIBLES?
John Hinckley
Although the 1968 Corvette program was already a year late (it was supposed to launch for the 1967 model year), only half of the program appeared at launch in August, 1967, for the 1968 model year. Why?
The original design for the coupe had a one-piece targa removable roof panel; however, the first prototype coupe testing showed that due to body and frame torsional deflection, unless the car was parked on a dead-flat surface plate, you couldn’t remove the roof panel, or install it.
This resulted in a crash last-minute redesign of the coupe body structure, which added the “T-Bar” for additional stiffness and split the roof panel into two pieces; this delayed the launch of the coupe until February of 1968, which meant that the first six months of 1968 Corvette production (10,000 units) had to be 100% convertibles.
The convertible top supplier was only tooled and manned-up to produce 60 top assemblies per day, so when Chevrolet notified the supplier that they’d need 120 tops per day, Chevrolet had to step in and help him hire and train extra people and add a third shift, and the supplier ran seven days a week for the first six months of 1968 Corvette production.
That’s why you won’t find any ’68 Corvette coupes with VIN numbers below 10,000; there weren’t any!"
#14
My folks were friends with another couple in Orange. The husband struggled for years with an Austin Healey 3000, and the wife wanted to surprise him with a '68 Corvette from Selman Chevrolet. Must have been later in the model year because she wanted a coupe at first. Howard Selman talked her out of it, telling her the T-tops were rattly and leaky. Hubby was THRILLED with his bronze convertible, drove, loved and babied it for years.
Anybody else get a surprise like that?
Anybody else get a surprise like that?