C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

[C2] Pictures Of 327 Hoses Please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2016, 07:24 PM
  #1  
D-FRESH3
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
D-FRESH3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2016
Location: Seekonk Massachusetts
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Pictures Of 327 Hoses Please

I am doing some work on my 66 327/300 HP car. I am replacing all of the hoses (radiator/heater/expansion tank) with "correct" style hoses. I also bought a master kit with all the proper clamps. Could you please post some pictures of "correct" engine compartments with proper hose clamps and heater hose routing? Thank you.
Old 11-28-2016, 09:24 PM
  #2  
buns
Safety Car
 
buns's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,142
Received 690 Likes on 537 Posts

Default

No pictures, just diagrams.


https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-diameter.html
Old 11-28-2016, 09:36 PM
  #3  
Gary's '66
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Gary's '66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Wilton Ca.
Posts: 3,115
Received 192 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Here's a few of mine. Unfortunately it's an L79 but, the expansion tank hookup should be the same. Hope they help a little.

Gary






Old 11-28-2016, 09:49 PM
  #4  
66jack
Team Owner
 
66jack's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 30,347
Received 830 Likes on 574 Posts

Default

Here's my L79 also...







Old 11-28-2016, 09:55 PM
  #5  
Critter1
Melting Slicks
 
Critter1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Pasco Florida
Posts: 2,842
Received 621 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

The pictures of the heater hose routing in 66Jack's post are pretty close.

By the way, it's not absolutely necessary to buy heater hose wit the GM logo screened on. There were several suppliers of hose to GM and one used the GM logo while others did not.

Personal opinion... the hoses with the (way too bold/bright) GM logo look silly.

Last edited by Critter1; 11-28-2016 at 09:58 PM.
Old 11-29-2016, 01:39 AM
  #6  
Rich Yanulis
Melting Slicks
 
Rich Yanulis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY and Clearwater, FL
Posts: 2,076
Received 196 Likes on 144 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Critter1
There were several suppliers of hose to GM and one used the GM logo while others did not.

Personal opinion... the hoses with the (way too bold/bright) GM logo look silly.
I believe these are the original (53 year old) hoses on my '63.

Old 11-29-2016, 06:34 AM
  #7  
VITIV Coupe
Burning Brakes
 
VITIV Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Somewhere North of The 49th Parallel Ontario
Posts: 1,150
Received 151 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

I would shovel the coal in Hell for a thousand years to have an engine bay like that 66Jack.
Old 11-29-2016, 07:05 AM
  #8  
bradc6
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
bradc6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Pace Florida
Posts: 10,298
Received 345 Likes on 195 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11
National Champs Gators 4 St. Jude '09

Default

Here's some pics of my 66 327/300hp.
Attached Images    
Old 11-29-2016, 08:07 AM
  #9  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Originally Posted by Critter1
The pictures of the heater hose routing in 66Jack's post are pretty close.

By the way, it's not absolutely necessary to buy heater hose wit the GM logo screened on. There were several suppliers of hose to GM and one used the GM logo while others did not.

Personal opinion... the hoses with the (way too bold/bright) GM logo look silly.
I don't know about silly but the repro rubber I get from the vendors have very light logos on them that will smudge and wear off pretty damn easily....
Old 11-29-2016, 01:09 PM
  #10  
Gary's '66
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Gary's '66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Wilton Ca.
Posts: 3,115
Received 192 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Frankie the Fink
I don't know about silly but the repro rubber I get from the vendors have very light logos on them that will smudge and wear off pretty damn easily....
If you look at my top radiator hose, the white "GM" and numbers are almost obliterated.

Gary
Old 11-29-2016, 01:16 PM
  #11  
Gary's '66
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Gary's '66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Wilton Ca.
Posts: 3,115
Received 192 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bradc6
Here's some pics of my 66 327/300hp.
Nice engine bay, even though you have those "silly" logos on all the hoses.

Gary
Old 11-29-2016, 02:25 PM
  #12  
Mike67nv
Melting Slicks

 
Mike67nv's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,142
Received 273 Likes on 194 Posts
2018 C2 of Year Finalist
2015 C2 of the Year Finalist

Default

Although it doesn’t matter functionally, duplicating the original heater hose routing on 66-67’s is something many people get wrong (slightly different than 63-65). The ‘designed’ routing is shown in the AIM below (UPC 1, Sheet D7). Common mistakes are not getting the supply tank Tee at a 45° angle, not routing the 5/8 heater hose from the lower heater core pipe over the Tee and then below the 3/4 hose going back up to the intake manifold nipple. There appears to be a conflict in the AIM regarding whether the 5/8 hose is inboard or outboard of the 3/4 hose before going over the Tee (View B appears to be outboard, main illustration inboard). However, pictures in Noland’s book (page 392) support the outboard position.

Again, it doesn’t matter functionally, only if you want to duplicate the AIM. Below is a pic of how I routed my ’67 hoses with the silly logos.



Old 11-29-2016, 02:48 PM
  #13  
Critter1
Melting Slicks
 
Critter1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Pasco Florida
Posts: 2,842
Received 621 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike67nv
Although it doesn’t matter functionally, duplicating the original heater hose routing on 66-67’s is something many people get wrong (slightly different than 63-65). The ‘designed’ routing is shown in the AIM below (UPC 1, Sheet D7). Common mistakes are not getting the supply tank Tee at a 45° angle, not routing the 5/8 heater hose from the lower heater core pipe over the Tee and then below the 3/4 hose going back up to the intake manifold nipple. There appears to be a conflict in the AIM regarding whether the 5/8 hose is inboard or outboard of the 3/4 hose before going over the Tee (View B appears to be outboard, main illustration inboard). However, pictures in Noland’s book (page 392) support the outboard position.

Again, it doesn’t matter functionally, only if you want to duplicate the AIM. Below is a pic of how I routed my ’67 hoses with the silly logos.



You have the routing correct. Still need more angle on the "T" fitting though. That will raise the 3/4" hose OVER the battery and then you can shorten the short hose to the supply tank. (you would probably need a longer heater to T fitting hose though) The 45° angle is important.
Old 11-29-2016, 02:51 PM
  #14  
Critter1
Melting Slicks
 
Critter1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Pasco Florida
Posts: 2,842
Received 621 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

I judged engine and compartment at the Bloomington Gold event from the beginning for about ten years and I can only remember two cars that had the heater hoses and routing correct.

Last edited by Critter1; 11-29-2016 at 02:51 PM.
Old 11-29-2016, 05:56 PM
  #15  
jasonsamara
Safety Car
 
jasonsamara's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 4,888
Received 746 Likes on 243 Posts

Default

I figured I would chime in with my 66 327 300hp that still is all original under the hood with the exception of the upper radiator hose (but I still have it).









The following users liked this post:
Critter1 (11-29-2016)
Old 11-29-2016, 06:37 PM
  #16  
Gary's '66
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Gary's '66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Wilton Ca.
Posts: 3,115
Received 192 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Well, they may not be correct however, my reason for running the heater hoses as I did was to hide the heater core shut off valve I installed to cut down on summer heat.

Betcha you can't find it in my pic!

Gary
Old 11-29-2016, 07:13 PM
  #17  
Critter1
Melting Slicks
 
Critter1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Pasco Florida
Posts: 2,842
Received 621 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jasonsamara
I figured I would chime in with my 66 327 300hp that still is all original under the hood with the exception of the upper radiator hose (but I still have it).









Very nice original. Thanks.

It looks like the hose from the "T" to supply tank is very short, just as it should be. If it's original, would it be possible to give us a measurement?

Last edited by Critter1; 11-29-2016 at 07:16 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To Pictures Of 327 Hoses Please

Old 11-29-2016, 08:33 PM
  #18  
jasonsamara
Safety Car
 
jasonsamara's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 4,888
Received 746 Likes on 243 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Critter1
Very nice original. Thanks.

It looks like the hose from the "T" to supply tank is very short, just as it should be. If it's original, would it be possible to give us a measurement?
Of course it's crammed up against the wall for the winter with another one right up against it. I got in there the best I could for having to lean in from the front and it should be 2 1/8".
Old 11-29-2016, 09:38 PM
  #19  
Critter1
Melting Slicks
 
Critter1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Pasco Florida
Posts: 2,842
Received 621 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jasonsamara
Of course it's crammed up against the wall for the winter with another one right up against it. I got in there the best I could for having to lean in from the front and it should be 2 1/8".
Ok, thank you.
Old 11-29-2016, 11:40 PM
  #20  
Tmichaelson
Pro
 
Tmichaelson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2012
Posts: 690
Received 211 Likes on 135 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 66jack
Here's my L79 also...x







That engine bay SETS THE STANDARD. Only problem is " IT " makes my L79 bay look like CRAP.
The following users liked this post:
66jack (11-29-2016)


Quick Reply: [C2] Pictures Of 327 Hoses Please



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 AM.