tremec 5 spd
#41
Supporting Vendor
I did get their clutch. I'm inclined to believe that maybe it has something to do with the ratios, as when I use the clutch in reverse (I think its a higher ratio gear than first in the Tremec) I get no chatter.
I'm hoping someone has done the install with SST's clutch and a 3.5 or 3.7 and can weigh in here...
I'm hoping someone has done the install with SST's clutch and a 3.5 or 3.7 and can weigh in here...
Excessive bellhousing runout, parallelism issues and clutch disc contamination can also cause chatter.
Jeff
__________________
Jeff Kauffman
VP Sales and Marketing
Silver Sport Transmissions
2250 Stock Creek Blvd.
Rockford TN 37853
jeff.kauffman@shiftsst.com
Authorized TREMEC Elite Distributor
Jeff Kauffman
VP Sales and Marketing
Silver Sport Transmissions
2250 Stock Creek Blvd.
Rockford TN 37853
jeff.kauffman@shiftsst.com
Authorized TREMEC Elite Distributor
#42
Supporting Vendor
I did get their clutch. I'm inclined to believe that maybe it has something to do with the ratios, as when I use the clutch in reverse (I think its a higher ratio gear than first in the Tremec) I get no chatter.
I changed to the 3.08 to get the top gear RPMs down with the old Muncie, so now that I have overdrive, I don't mind switching back. Its just that its a PIA to change the rear end...I'm hoping someone has done the install with SST's clutch and a 3.5 or 3.7 gear and can weigh in here...
I changed to the 3.08 to get the top gear RPMs down with the old Muncie, so now that I have overdrive, I don't mind switching back. Its just that its a PIA to change the rear end...I'm hoping someone has done the install with SST's clutch and a 3.5 or 3.7 gear and can weigh in here...
Jeff
#44
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 3,111
Received 1,120 Likes
on
576 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2017 C2 of Year Finalist
Jeff, I PM'd you.
The clutch is yours, and the runout was extremely small (my firm measures such things in the ten thousandths all day long, so it's accurate, beyond any doubt). I'd guess that if contamination or parallelism were issues, it'd chatter in reverse too...
For the rest of you guys, I'm not unhappy with SST at this point, they've been great, I'm sure they'll continue to be helpful...
Last edited by Vettrocious; 04-20-2017 at 04:45 PM.
#45
Pro
Thread Starter
Yeah, I spoke to them and heard that the rear end change would fix it. I don't doubt that they know what they're talking about, but it'd be nice to hear from someone who has personal experience with the combination of the 3.7 (or 3.5) rear end, SST clutch and the Tremec.
Thanks,
Mike
Thanks,
Mike
#46
Supporting Vendor
Jeff, I PM'd you.
The clutch is yours, and the runout was extremely small (my firm measures such things in the ten thousandths all day long, so it's accurate, beyond any doubt).
For the rest of you guys, I'm not unhappy with SST at this point, they've been great, I'm sure they'll continue to be helpful...
The clutch is yours, and the runout was extremely small (my firm measures such things in the ten thousandths all day long, so it's accurate, beyond any doubt).
For the rest of you guys, I'm not unhappy with SST at this point, they've been great, I'm sure they'll continue to be helpful...
I realize I may be beating a dead horse here, don't hesitate to reach out if needed.
Jeff
#47
Pro
Thread Starter
Jeff, I PM'd you.
The clutch is yours, and the runout was extremely small (my firm measures such things in the ten thousandths all day long, so it's accurate, beyond any doubt). I'd guess that if contamination or parallelism were issues, it'd chatter in reverse too...
For the rest of you guys, I'm not unhappy with SST at this point, they've been great, I'm sure they'll continue to be helpful...
The clutch is yours, and the runout was extremely small (my firm measures such things in the ten thousandths all day long, so it's accurate, beyond any doubt). I'd guess that if contamination or parallelism were issues, it'd chatter in reverse too...
For the rest of you guys, I'm not unhappy with SST at this point, they've been great, I'm sure they'll continue to be helpful...
#48
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Feb 2015
Location: Huntsville AL & Hills of Southern TN
Posts: 2,288
Received 903 Likes
on
594 Posts
No bashing going on from me. Our car is a 3.70. Chatter was ugly. We took Centerforce out with the initial SST kit install so I chose to put new Centerforce parts back in to replace the parts supplied with the kit. I had no idea what was in the car when we purchased it but really liked it (didn't want to reuse the CF parts we took out). Maybe the base SST components are improved from a year ago. But the expense of removing the new TKO to replace with higher end clutch components is way more than upgrading to start with. That's my point. And again, if I ever do another C2 TKO upgrade I will definitely use SST... and the best clutch money can buy.
To summarize.... SST and their transmission has been great.... just don't cheap out on the clutch on a 6K upgrade to at least a +50k car. The expense of pulling your new TKO back out (if paying someone) is way more than buying the best to start with. I know.
To summarize.... SST and their transmission has been great.... just don't cheap out on the clutch on a 6K upgrade to at least a +50k car. The expense of pulling your new TKO back out (if paying someone) is way more than buying the best to start with. I know.
#49
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 3,111
Received 1,120 Likes
on
576 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2017 C2 of Year Finalist
No bashing going on from me. Our car is a 3.70. Chatter was ugly. We took Centerforce out with the initial SST kit install so I chose to put new Centerforce parts back in to replace the parts supplied with the kit. I had no idea what was in the car when we purchased it but really liked it (didn't want to reuse the CF parts we took out). Maybe the base SST components are improved from a year ago. But the expense of removing the new TKO to replace with higher end clutch components is way more than upgrading to start with. That's my point. And again, if I ever do another C2 TKO upgrade I will definitely use SST... and the best clutch money can buy.
To summarize.... SST and their transmission has been great.... just don't cheap out on the clutch on a 6K upgrade to at least a +50k car. The expense of pulling your new TKO back out (if paying someone) is way more than buying the best to start with. I know.
To summarize.... SST and their transmission has been great.... just don't cheap out on the clutch on a 6K upgrade to at least a +50k car. The expense of pulling your new TKO back out (if paying someone) is way more than buying the best to start with. I know.
Before that, though, I probably could use some input from someone on why the chatter goes away in reverse...
#50
Race Director
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: Fresno California
Posts: 17,505
Received 3,443 Likes
on
2,113 Posts
Chatter may go away in reverse if your reverse gear is lower than your first gear. You benefit from the torque multiplication of the low gear, which stresses the engine/clutch less.
#51
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 3,111
Received 1,120 Likes
on
576 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2017 C2 of Year Finalist
So, if SST can tell me the gear ratios of the TREMEC first gear and also its reverse gear, I should be able to figure out what differential ratio will give me the same first gear situation that I have in reverse today. Hopefully, end of problem. 🍾🍾
#52
Race Director
Reverse is 3.00 with the 3.27 first, and 2.56 with the 2.87.
So reverse is always lower gearing (taller) than first. Probably doesnt explain the chattering difference as you were hoping.
Last edited by tuxnharley; 04-20-2017 at 07:43 PM.
#53
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 3,111
Received 1,120 Likes
on
576 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2017 C2 of Year Finalist
It depends on which model Tremec you have. I believe there are two different first gear ratios available. Mine is a 3.27 ratio. There is also a 2.87 available.
Reverse is 3.00 with the 3.27 first, and 2.56 with the 2.87.
So reverse is always lower gearing (taller) than first. Probably doesnt explain the chattering difference as you were hoping.
Reverse is 3.00 with the 3.27 first, and 2.56 with the 2.87.
So reverse is always lower gearing (taller) than first. Probably doesnt explain the chattering difference as you were hoping.
#54
Race Director
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes
on
621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07
the transmission is a Keisler SS700, I used to use a MY6 4spd where 4th was OD and that is all the gears I needed. now I have 5 and it is just a pia to have to use all the gears to get to 1 to 1 gearing or OD..
for the average person, in MY opinion, 5spd is just an extra gear, God forbid if one has 6 or more.... so, I skip a gear, 2nd being the easiest to skip...
Bill
for the average person, in MY opinion, 5spd is just an extra gear, God forbid if one has 6 or more.... so, I skip a gear, 2nd being the easiest to skip...
Bill
#55
Race Director
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes
on
621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07
I just finished my car with the TREMEC 5 speed. After a couple of short drives I'm finding a lot of clutch chatter in first gear. Silversport tells me my problem is the 3.08 differential, that a 3.5 or 3.7 would not have this issue. Not sure why they're telling me now, as they knew the ratio before I ordered the trans. I can put the original pig (with a 3.7) back in, but before going to all that trouble , I'm wondering if annyone else experienced this?
3.27 x 3.08 = 10.07
3.09 x 3.36 = 10.38
of course a 3.5 or 3.7 wouldn't be a problem....
the SS700 1st is 2.66 so
2.66 x 3.36 = 8.94.... not even close to the preferable 10+.... i'm the one that needs a 3.5 or 3.7...
if the Tremec is the 2.87
2.87 x 3.08 = 8.84.... again, not close to 10
and, it will depend a lot on what engine you have and where it develops its torque... a high performance engine is usually shy on low end torque, so that exacerbates the problem...
if installing and the making modifications weren't so difficult, i'd undo it and rebuild the MY6 and put it back in....
bottom line, you should be good with the Tremec with 3.27; the 2.87, not so good...; what is causing the 'chatter I can only guess, something like oil on the disc could cause it...
Bill
Last edited by wmf62; 04-21-2017 at 05:16 AM.
#56
Pro
I just finished my car with the TREMEC 5 speed. After a couple of short drives I'm finding a lot of clutch chatter in first gear. Silversport tells me my problem is the 3.08 differential, that a 3.5 or 3.7 would not have this issue. Not sure why they're telling me now, as they knew the ratio before I ordered the trans. I can put the original pig (with a 3.7) back in, but before going to all that trouble , I'm wondering if annyone else experienced this?
Last edited by jet-tech; 04-21-2017 at 12:19 AM.
#57
Supporting Vendor
I found your order and you have a TKO 600 (TCET5009) with the following ratios:
2.87
1.89
1.28
1.00
.64 O/D
Reverse - 2.56
I don't know what the conversation was between you and Ben at the time but I would have steered you to the 500 (TCET4616) with these ratios:
3.27
1.98
1.34
1.00
.68 O/D
Reverse - 3.00
3.08 gears can be difficult to work with and personally, I prefer the gearing of the 500 series when using a 3.08. That being said, you have one of the easiest clutch kits to work with and it still should not be chattering. I do think increasing your gearing would eliminate the chatter. This would reduce the need to slip the clutch as much to get the car moving which is a big benefit with a 327 engine that does not have a lot of low end grunt.
The rule of thumb regarding gearing is you want a 10.0 starting line ratio. Your current combination is 8.84 (2.87 1st gear x rear axle ratio) and if you switched to a 3.73 rear that would provide an SLR of 10.70. 10.70 is a bit on the low side but totally acceptable with a 327 engine.
For comparison, the 3.27 1st gear would provide a 10.07 SLR.
Jeff
Last edited by SilverOverdrives; 04-21-2017 at 09:06 AM.
#58
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 3,111
Received 1,120 Likes
on
576 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2017 C2 of Year Finalist
Mike,
I found your order and you have a TKO 600 (TCET5009) with the following ratios:
2.87
1.89
1.28
1.00
.64 O/D
Reverse - 2.56
I don't know what the conversation was between you and Ben at the time but I would have steered you to the 500 (TCET4616) with these ratios:
3.27
1.98
1.34
1.00
.68 O/D
Reverse - 3.00
3.08 gears can be difficult to work with and personally, I prefer the gearing of the 500 series when using a 3.08. That being said, you have one of the easiest clutch kits to work with and it still should not be chattering. I do think increasing your gearing would eliminate the chatter. This would reduce the need to slip the clutch as much to get the car moving which is a big benefit with a 327 engine that does not have a lot of low end grunt.
The rule of thumb regarding gearing is you want a 10.0 starting line ratio. Your current combination is 8.84 (2.87 1st gear x rear axle ratio) and if you switched to a 3.73 rear that would provide an SLR of 10.70. 10.70 is a bit on the low side but totally acceptable with a 327 engine.
For comparison, the 3.27 1st gear would provide a 10.07 SLR.
Jeff
I found your order and you have a TKO 600 (TCET5009) with the following ratios:
2.87
1.89
1.28
1.00
.64 O/D
Reverse - 2.56
I don't know what the conversation was between you and Ben at the time but I would have steered you to the 500 (TCET4616) with these ratios:
3.27
1.98
1.34
1.00
.68 O/D
Reverse - 3.00
3.08 gears can be difficult to work with and personally, I prefer the gearing of the 500 series when using a 3.08. That being said, you have one of the easiest clutch kits to work with and it still should not be chattering. I do think increasing your gearing would eliminate the chatter. This would reduce the need to slip the clutch as much to get the car moving which is a big benefit with a 327 engine that does not have a lot of low end grunt.
The rule of thumb regarding gearing is you want a 10.0 starting line ratio. Your current combination is 8.84 (2.87 1st gear x rear axle ratio) and if you switched to a 3.73 rear that would provide an SLR of 10.70. 10.70 is a bit on the low side but totally acceptable with a 327 engine.
For comparison, the 3.27 1st gear would provide a 10.07 SLR.
Jeff
Sounds like maybe the lack of chatter in reverse is just an anomaly. As I stated earlier, I do have the original differential case (one that originally had 4.11 gears) that now has a 3.7 in it. I could go with the 3.7 or put the 4.11 gear back into that case. This is not a car that will be raced and highway cruising is more important than off the line performance, so I think putting the 3.7 back in will be best. Not looking forward to tearing into it again, though...
Mike
#59
Supporting Vendor
Thanks Jeff,
Sounds like maybe the lack of chatter in reverse is just an anomaly. As I stated earlier, I do have the original differential case (one that originally had 4.11 gears) that now has a 3.7 in it. I could go with the 3.7 or put the 4.11 gear back into that case. This is not a car that will be raced and highway cruising is more important than off the line performance, so I think putting the 3.7 back in will be best. Not looking forward to tearing into it again, though...
Mike
Sounds like maybe the lack of chatter in reverse is just an anomaly. As I stated earlier, I do have the original differential case (one that originally had 4.11 gears) that now has a 3.7 in it. I could go with the 3.7 or put the 4.11 gear back into that case. This is not a car that will be raced and highway cruising is more important than off the line performance, so I think putting the 3.7 back in will be best. Not looking forward to tearing into it again, though...
Mike
You could do either.
Assuming a 26" tire diameter, 2200 cruising rpms would equal...
3.70 = 71.28 mph
4.11 = 64.69 mph
Highway cruising being the goal, the 3.70 would be more appropriate.
Jeff
#60
Melting Slicks
Just a thought..
I just finished my car with the TREMEC 5 speed. After a couple of short drives I'm finding a lot of clutch chatter in first gear. Silversport tells me my problem is the 3.08 differential, that a 3.5 or 3.7 would not have this issue. Not sure why they're telling me now, as they knew the ratio before I ordered the trans. I can put the original pig (with a 3.7) back in, but before going to all that trouble , I'm wondering if annyone else experienced this?