C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Newbie with questions about a '67 Vette

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2017, 01:38 PM
  #1  
stevenmk
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
stevenmk's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 182
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Default Newbie with questions about a '67 Vette

Guys, I am excited to be part of your group. I am now in a position in life where I can buy my first Corvette, and like many of you I love the '67 Stingray.

There is one for sale on Hemmings - Marina Blue/L68 motor, black leather interior, and power windows.

I have been working with the owner the past couple of days to to insure it has the correct motor components. Everything checks out from the carbs to the heads.

I got the trim tag from him yesterday, and immediately noticed the STD for interior, so the car should have standard black vinyl and not leather. I want to make sure I am looking at the tag correctly, and am asking for your help. I have included a pic of the Trim Tag below.

He does not have the Tank Sticker, so how can I determine what options the car came with? He did include the Protect-o-Plate, which I cannot read. I have included a pic of it below. Thanks for any help you can give!

Steve




Old 05-16-2017, 04:29 PM
  #2  
65GGvert
Team Owner
 
65GGvert's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Kannapolis NC
Posts: 20,579
Received 3,220 Likes on 2,302 Posts

Default

Maybe this will help. It came with black vinyl. Interestingly, L-36, 3.08 posi rear



Last edited by 65GGvert; 05-16-2017 at 04:45 PM.
The following users liked this post:
stevenmk (05-28-2017)
Old 05-16-2017, 04:39 PM
  #3  
Velox
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Velox's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Des Moines, Iowa, USA Iowa
Posts: 1,344
Received 106 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

Here's some more help:
976 - Marina Blue paint, STD - black vinyl interior, VIN 19437S115406 (approximate birthday for that VIN is April 3, 1967), engine assembly stamp TO323JCH which is Tonawanda plant March 23, 1967 with suffix JC = 400HP 427 L36 engine with 3x2 carbs and 4 speed, the H is for Holley carb(s). AT0328W is the differential stamp, big block 3.08:1 built March 28, 1967 at the Warren Plant. The transmission stamp is P = Muncie, 7 = 1967, C17 = March 17 and D suffix I dunno, may be Day Shift designation, someone here will know
The following users liked this post:
stevenmk (05-28-2017)
Old 05-16-2017, 04:51 PM
  #4  
65GGvert
Team Owner
 
65GGvert's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Kannapolis NC
Posts: 20,579
Received 3,220 Likes on 2,302 Posts

Default

Copied from a JohnZ post a few years ago:

All big-blocks on all car lines were affected by the Engineering Change that reduced the advertised power rating; the L-36 was reduced from 400hp to 390hp, but no L-36's left St. Louis with 400hp stickers - the 390hp stickers got there just before production started. There were no changes to any of the engines - only the stickers changed.
Old 05-16-2017, 05:10 PM
  #5  
3Mar67
Pro
 
3Mar67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Location: Niagara Falls Ontario
Posts: 644
Received 170 Likes on 55 Posts

Default

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...nd-rivets.html
The following users liked this post:
Velox (05-16-2017)
Old 05-16-2017, 05:17 PM
  #6  
Velox
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Velox's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Des Moines, Iowa, USA Iowa
Posts: 1,344
Received 106 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65GGvert
Copied from a JohnZ post a few years ago:

All big-blocks on all car lines were affected by the Engineering Change that reduced the advertised power rating; the L-36 was reduced from 400hp to 390hp, but no L-36's left St. Louis with 400hp stickers - the 390hp stickers got there just before production started. There were no changes to any of the engines - only the stickers changed.
If this refers to my brain fart above (typed L36 when I meant to type L68) then yes, OOPS, my mistake. The JC designation is for L68 (400HP) not for L36 (390HP)
Old 05-16-2017, 05:18 PM
  #7  
Velox
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Velox's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Des Moines, Iowa, USA Iowa
Posts: 1,344
Received 106 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

Good catch I THOUGHT that was a very familiar plate
Old 05-16-2017, 05:59 PM
  #8  
stevenmk
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
stevenmk's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 182
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Guys, thanks for all of the great information. The interior switch from vinyl to leather sent up a red flag for me.

I take it after going through 3Mar67's link that this car is suspect. I am trying to get the Tank Tag from the owner to see what options the car is supposed to have. And I agree that it is probably overpriced although I am not the expert here...

I think I will probably pass on the car. Thanks to all...

Steve
Old 05-16-2017, 06:10 PM
  #9  
Nowhere Man
Team Owner
 
Nowhere Man's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,006
Received 6,943 Likes on 4,782 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist

Default

Doing the resto process it's common to use leather seat covers instead of standard vinyl seat covers. If you look at the numbers leather is rare option. To most it's no big deal or not a deal breaker. The big thing is to get the POP validated as real GM issued tag. I wouldn't bank on the tank sticker and besides if you can't prove it came with the car it's not helping.
Old 05-16-2017, 06:18 PM
  #10  
3Mar67
Pro
 
3Mar67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Location: Niagara Falls Ontario
Posts: 644
Received 170 Likes on 55 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nowhere Man
Doing the resto process it's common to use leather seat covers instead of standard vinyl seat covers. If you look at the numbers leather is rare option. To most it's no big deal or not a deal breaker. edit
I agree 100%.

It's a nice looking car.
Old 05-16-2017, 06:35 PM
  #11  
68hemi
Race Director
 
68hemi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Cottonwood AZ
Posts: 10,698
Received 3,048 Likes on 1,934 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Nowhere Man
Doing the resto process it's common to use leather seat covers instead of standard vinyl seat covers. If you look at the numbers leather is rare option. To most it's no big deal or not a deal breaker. The big thing is to get the POP validated as real GM issued tag. I wouldn't bank on the tank sticker and besides if you can't prove it came with the car it's not helping.
The build sheet and trim tags have been available for a long time and with all of the info available on the web and in print they are now very hard to determine if they are original or not. People are much better today at making an original small block car look like a real big block car as all of parts and telltale signs are known and available. There are many cars out there that have been "made" passed and still no one knows. The only way to determine if a car was born as represented is if there is some kind of iron clad documentation back to day one which gets harder and harder to find as these cars get older and people die off.
They are advertised as matching numbers which is true but that does not necessarily mean they were born that way. The auction houses hype them as such but they all have disclaimers that protect them if it is later determined the car was not born as it is today. Most of the big buyers are savvy to all of this and more and more it seems they don't care and buy what they like just based on the general appearance of the car.
It is only on hobbyist specific sites like this that the members are sometimes purist and get upset and try to play detectives to figure out (if the can) what something really is. EVERYONE can be fooled at some point.
Old 05-16-2017, 07:47 PM
  #12  
65GGvert
Team Owner
 
65GGvert's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Kannapolis NC
Posts: 20,579
Received 3,220 Likes on 2,302 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Velox
If this refers to my brain fart above (typed L36 when I meant to type L68) then yes, OOPS, my mistake. The JC designation is for L68 (400HP) not for L36 (390HP)
It didn't refer to that at all. I just thought it was interesting that the JC designation shows 400hp in some charts and 390 in others. I don't even know which the original car in question is now.
Old 05-16-2017, 08:22 PM
  #13  
Nowhere Man
Team Owner
 
Nowhere Man's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,006
Received 6,943 Likes on 4,782 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by 65GGvert
It didn't refer to that at all. I just thought it was interesting that the JC designation shows 400hp in some charts and 390 in others. I don't even know which the original car in question is now.
as fair as GM was concerned the L36 (427/390) and L68 (427/400) was the same engine. when you ordered the 400 car the L36 was entered in the system and the L68 was added to it as a 390 to 400 conversion. the only difference was the intake, carb, air cleaner, and the parts that went along with it
Old 05-16-2017, 08:23 PM
  #14  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 68hemi
The build sheet and trim tags have been available for a long time...
The build sheet detail per car (options, etc.) has never been available; if you're lucky enough to have the build sheet (tank sticker), only NCRS can link it directly to any car's VIN.
Old 05-16-2017, 09:58 PM
  #15  
Kerouac
Pro
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Kerouac's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2014
Location: South Pasadena CA
Posts: 548
Received 38 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

You may be new, but you got a comment by John Z! That's a pretty prestigious way to come on board. Welcome!
Old 05-16-2017, 10:09 PM
  #16  
ndabunka
Advanced
 
ndabunka's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2014
Posts: 66
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

A $125K vette is an impressive "first vette" so congrats on having the coin to be able to spend that with ease. IMHO any vette selling at that level should come with a long history verifying it's provenance.
Old 05-16-2017, 10:24 PM
  #17  
ricks327
Race Director
 
ricks327's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Birmingham Mi
Posts: 12,580
Received 1,613 Likes on 901 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kerouac
You may be new, but you got a comment by John Z! That's a pretty prestigious way to come on board. Welcome!
He is not new but he is not the final word on being authentic.

Get notified of new replies

To Newbie with questions about a '67 Vette

Old 05-17-2017, 02:03 PM
  #18  
RatDog
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
RatDog's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: The Golden Triangle, Florida
Posts: 6,200
Received 1,581 Likes on 818 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
St. Jude Donor '20-'21-'22-'23-'24

Default

Originally Posted by Nowhere Man
Doing the resto process it's common to use leather seat covers instead of standard vinyl seat covers. If you look at the numbers leather is rare option. To most it's no big deal or not a deal breaker. The big thing is to get the POP validated as real GM issued tag. I wouldn't bank on the tank sticker and besides if you can't prove it came with the car it's not helping.
If everything else checks out and the car is otherwise honest and legitimate, the leather seats would not stop me from buying the car for a second. Some consider the swap to leather from original vinyl to be an upgrade but if you are going to go the judging route or if you for some reason prefer vinyl, you can swap back to vinyl for $458 from Al Knoch. That's peanuts compared to the price you're going to be paying for the car. Even if you're going to have your car judged, the swap from vinyl to leather may not be a huge deduction. Maybe someone else can jump in with definitive information on that.

Use the incorrect seat covers as a bargaining point to help get the price down.

Too bad your seats aren't teal. If they were, I'd buy them from you in a heartbeat. I want to swap out the teal vinyl seats in my '67 for leather and have had them on backorder with Al Knoch since February because he's trying to find a new supplier for teal leather.

Steve
Old 05-17-2017, 02:20 PM
  #19  
68hemi
Race Director
 
68hemi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Cottonwood AZ
Posts: 10,698
Received 3,048 Likes on 1,934 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by ricks327
He is not new but he is not the final word on being authentic.
It was a general comment not directed at the subject car.
Old 05-17-2017, 02:26 PM
  #20  
68hemi
Race Director
 
68hemi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Cottonwood AZ
Posts: 10,698
Received 3,048 Likes on 1,934 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by JohnZ
The build sheet detail per car (options, etc.) has never been available; if you're lucky enough to have the build sheet (tank sticker), only NCRS can link it directly to any car's VIN.
My comment regarding the build sheet is not specific to this car but rather a general comment for the hobby. Every time a build sheet is shown on line you can bet there is a forger collecting the add to their info to make a sheet.

I don't like to be negative but every time I see someone asking online for help verifying a car it just reminds me of what has happened to this hobby.


Quick Reply: Newbie with questions about a '67 Vette



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 PM.