Ok, so you think NCRS judging is difficult......
#1
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: High Mountains of New Mexico
Posts: 3,266
Received 1,390 Likes
on
682 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2015 C3 of the Year Finalist
Ok, so you think NCRS judging is difficult......
I used to restore and take '67 and '68 Shelbys to judging. They are judged by an organization known as SAAC (Shelby American Auto Club). After a few years of beating my head against an opaque brick wall to figure out how to restore a car to meet their criteria (they have no manuals or books about any of it, only the few judges they have know), and what their criteria even was, which was never clear, I gave up after a National meet. I had a conversation with one of their judging leads recently that should illustrate how not to do it:
Them: "The point is the correct historic looking parts are first most important. A date coded part within a acceptable range of the build date of the car is just icing on the cake IMO. I see people getting tunnel vision on finding a date code for a given part which date codes are typically hard or impossible to see once installed and yet many other highly visible items overlooked or not corrected. Consistency across the spectrum of items makes the most sense."
Me: What is the acceptable range for a date code on a part, relative to the car's build date?
Them: "It depends on what part it is....and its based on how other similar cars were built."
Me: Thanks! Can entrants find out the list of parts and the acceptable date variances before they restore and enter the car for judging?
Them: "Yes, they need to research every part individually. If it were easy, everyone would do it."
Then a person who recently had his car done chimed in: "Amen"
Then another lead judge chimed in: "No EASY button. Plus many of this sort of publications tend to produce cookie cutter cars"
I am so glad I am in NCRS and not in SAAC judging anymore......
Them: "The point is the correct historic looking parts are first most important. A date coded part within a acceptable range of the build date of the car is just icing on the cake IMO. I see people getting tunnel vision on finding a date code for a given part which date codes are typically hard or impossible to see once installed and yet many other highly visible items overlooked or not corrected. Consistency across the spectrum of items makes the most sense."
Me: What is the acceptable range for a date code on a part, relative to the car's build date?
Them: "It depends on what part it is....and its based on how other similar cars were built."
Me: Thanks! Can entrants find out the list of parts and the acceptable date variances before they restore and enter the car for judging?
Them: "Yes, they need to research every part individually. If it were easy, everyone would do it."
Then a person who recently had his car done chimed in: "Amen"
Then another lead judge chimed in: "No EASY button. Plus many of this sort of publications tend to produce cookie cutter cars"
I am so glad I am in NCRS and not in SAAC judging anymore......
Last edited by mikelj; 12-01-2017 at 06:08 PM.
The following users liked this post:
csherman (12-04-2017)
Popular Reply
12-01-2017, 08:35 PM
Instructor
I've got a '65 vert that looks correct, but I'm sure it's not...and that's fine by me.
I'm not going to replace a part with something from Autozone, but then again, I'm fine with something that isn't date matched.
The NCRS guys have a lot of knowledge, and I have no problem learning from them. But I have absolutely no interest in getting my car judged.
I bought it to enjoy it...and that's not sweating over correct bolts...
Different strokes for different folks...there's room in the Hobby for all...
#2
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
Why don't you just be kind to yourself and enjoy the car. Whatever it is.
Why participate in the "look what I've got that you ain't got" deal?
Why participate in the "look what I've got that you ain't got" deal?
Last edited by MikeM; 12-01-2017 at 06:35 PM.
The following 8 users liked this post by MikeM:
64Corvette (12-06-2017),
69427 (12-02-2017),
Bill Pilon (12-04-2017),
C.T. (12-01-2017),
Cpe04 (12-06-2017),
and 3 others liked this post.
#3
Le Mans Master
Pretty closed minded response there Mike. Is there no room whatsoever in your world for corvette owners who seek to make their car meet the as-delivered standard, AND drive it too, like many of us do?
#4
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
You either got the beef or you don't!
I like the hobby side of cars, not the money side or the worry wart side.
Last edited by MikeM; 12-01-2017 at 07:01 PM.
The following 6 users liked this post by MikeM:
64Corvette (12-06-2017),
69427 (12-02-2017),
Aerovette (12-06-2017),
Bill Pilon (12-04-2017),
Cpe04 (12-06-2017),
and 1 others liked this post.
#5
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: High Mountains of New Mexico
Posts: 3,266
Received 1,390 Likes
on
682 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2015 C3 of the Year Finalist
I like Bowtie type cars too, but I suppose they are too "perfect" for you. But if you like rust, dirt, grime, mods, etc. and don't care about any judging, you are free to stay away from any NCRS events, you will not be missed, remember in America, there is a seat for every.......
Last edited by mikelj; 12-01-2017 at 07:20 PM.
#8
Le Mans Master
The following users liked this post:
mikelj (12-01-2017)
#9
Instructor
I've got a '65 vert that looks correct, but I'm sure it's not...and that's fine by me.
I'm not going to replace a part with something from Autozone, but then again, I'm fine with something that isn't date matched.
The NCRS guys have a lot of knowledge, and I have no problem learning from them. But I have absolutely no interest in getting my car judged.
I bought it to enjoy it...and that's not sweating over correct bolts...
Different strokes for different folks...there's room in the Hobby for all...
Last edited by C2 Jeff; 12-01-2017 at 08:44 PM.
#10
Race Director
Actually, that sounds somewhat like Bloomington Judging.
The following users liked this post:
mikelj (12-01-2017)
#11
Drifting
The absolute key to the success of NCRS judging is to judge the cars according to a written standard for the car(s) and not against other cars. Where the Shelby system breaks down is in their reluctance to "release the secrets" so that everyone knows what the goal is.
When the calendar flips to 2018, it will represent 38 years since Keith Kibbee's 1961-2 JG Revision revamped the format, standard deductions and interpretations for that manual AND the rest of the manuals. Keith and Judy's efforts led him to the National Judging Chair and to the President's Chair. He led the hobby even further along the right path.
When the calendar flips to 2018, it will represent 38 years since Keith Kibbee's 1961-2 JG Revision revamped the format, standard deductions and interpretations for that manual AND the rest of the manuals. Keith and Judy's efforts led him to the National Judging Chair and to the President's Chair. He led the hobby even further along the right path.
The following users liked this post:
mikelj (12-01-2017)
#12
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: High Mountains of New Mexico
Posts: 3,266
Received 1,390 Likes
on
682 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2015 C3 of the Year Finalist
Maybe it's just me, but if you are putting your car into judging, and they tell you you should ask around amongst the few "experts" about how it should be done, it is very frustrating. NCRS has well developed standards and guidelines, all documented and presented so that a novice, like I was ten years ago, can pick it up and actually make sense of it. SAAC has about 5 people who know everything, as they judge your car, but they never document anything. They say. just ask us, but even that is frustrating. It is like the old Damon Runyon character who is 7 feet tall and wants to shoot craps, but only in his hat, which he holds above your head, and then he tells you if you won or lost, since you can't see the dice. But they refuse to document anything, or even give you a score sheet before the meet, as they change all the time, they say. NCRS is just head an shoulders above this, of course if you care about such frivolity..........
#13
Burning Brakes
The factory produced cookie-cutter cars. If as-delivered is the goal, they should be striving for cookie-cutter cars. I was a member of SAAC in the early days and really enjoyed it. Whereas NCRS started out as a restoration organization, SAAC was more of an owners club. Almost all the SAAC cars were modified to some degree and the individual uniqueness made it interesting. When the focus shifted to as-delivered it became increasingly boring. Row after row of identical cars. Envious? Not even close.
Last edited by Swept57; 12-02-2017 at 10:14 AM.
#14
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Posts: 18,346
Received 767 Likes
on
549 Posts
Oh, I'm sorry, you were serious.
Some of us own Corvettes for the sports car aspect of the vehicle. Speed and handling. Hence the reason a lot of the typical Chevrolet cheap and heavy parts no longer reside on my car (don't worry, they're all piled up in the corner of the garage for the wife to sell with the car the day after my funeral).
When I want to ride in something original I just borrow my wife's Ford SUV. Amusingly, it will probably out accelerate or out corner most any C1 in the process.
Remember Moxie, these are Chevrolets (GM's cheap car division), not Ferraris or Rolls Royces. There's no place for snobbery when driving a Chevrolet.
#15
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
#16
Safety Car
I enjoy my car because the black paint is like a mirror and deep as Crater Lake.
I enjoy my car because the interior is black leather and all the details are flawless, not sloppy.
I enjoy my car because it feels, sounds and smells just like I remember these cars did 50 years ago.
I enjoy my car because almost all the mods I have made are subtle and invisible to most except the most **** OCD examiner.
I enjoy my car because I upgraded certain aspects in order to make it more fun to drive.
I enjoy my car because I built it to be rattle and leak free.
I enjoy my car because It handles a helluva lot better than it did when it rolled off the assembly line.
Probably the reason I like my car best is because it still has 327 (331 actually) cubic inches and looks original (except for the headers), but it can dust off any stock C4 (including ZR1), C5 (including Z06) and most stock C6s with LS3 engine. Its top speed is well over 150 (although I never dared go above 155), and gets about 23 MPG at a 75-80 MPH (I live in NJ ) cruise.
I enjoy my car because the interior is black leather and all the details are flawless, not sloppy.
I enjoy my car because it feels, sounds and smells just like I remember these cars did 50 years ago.
I enjoy my car because almost all the mods I have made are subtle and invisible to most except the most **** OCD examiner.
I enjoy my car because I upgraded certain aspects in order to make it more fun to drive.
I enjoy my car because I built it to be rattle and leak free.
I enjoy my car because It handles a helluva lot better than it did when it rolled off the assembly line.
Probably the reason I like my car best is because it still has 327 (331 actually) cubic inches and looks original (except for the headers), but it can dust off any stock C4 (including ZR1), C5 (including Z06) and most stock C6s with LS3 engine. Its top speed is well over 150 (although I never dared go above 155), and gets about 23 MPG at a 75-80 MPH (I live in NJ ) cruise.
Last edited by 65tripleblack; 12-02-2017 at 11:06 AM.
#17
Safety Car
Hence, I have to laugh to myself whenever these arguments get re-hashed every couple weeks or so. The great majority of people who "collect" old cars live in rural areas. The smart money...........people from urban areas..... see no value in these relics, and therefore the false economics related to them will auto-correct when the market dries up in the very near future.
You people who think your ancestors are going to be rich some day because of your old, junk Chevy have got another thing coming. You'd best tell your neighbor, Homer, to get on his John Deere backhoe and dig ya a big ole hole in the nigh corner of the back forty. Get ya some white velvet and silk and gussie up the interior. Then tell the kinfolk ta bury you in your antique treasure. The rest will be turned into kitchen appliances before long.
Last edited by 65tripleblack; 12-02-2017 at 11:03 AM.
#18
Team Owner
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Coloring within the lines
Posts: 27,309
Received 1,919 Likes
on
1,332 Posts
Unless someone else wants to pay to make my car like their view of a correct Corvette, whatever that is, I really have never understood all the jealousy and frankly third-grade comments one person has about another's car.
I think it's juvenile, or perhaps a serious self-esteem issue with some folks, but it's why some folks hate the Corvette "better than you" mentality.
I think it's juvenile, or perhaps a serious self-esteem issue with some folks, but it's why some folks hate the Corvette "better than you" mentality.
#19
Melting Slicks
This is why I dont belong to any car clubs anymore. I like all types of cars and the people that enjoy the hobby also. I joined a club when I bought my 63. First meeting a fellow member says what do u have? I say 63 coupe. He says they r not much and proceeds to tell me how bad they ride and how bad they r built. I say what do u have? He says a 74 convertible. I tell him nice car. Never went back. I like NCRS cars and original un-restored and hot rods. I seem to be going to more NSRA shows and Good Guys shows.
Last edited by morly1963; 12-02-2017 at 11:23 AM.
The following 7 users liked this post by 63Corvette:
appelen (12-05-2017),
Dr L-88 (12-02-2017),
Easy Rhino (12-02-2017),
jerry gollnick (12-02-2017),
Mike Geary (12-03-2017),
and 2 others liked this post.