C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Proof of original motor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2018, 09:14 PM
  #41  
Factoid
Le Mans Master

 
Factoid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Location: San Antonio, TX/Mahopac, NY
Posts: 8,380
Received 5,554 Likes on 2,797 Posts
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C7 of the Year Winner - Modified
Default

Originally Posted by ZR Guy
This car was NOT judged by Bloomington Gold Corvettes, and is NOT Bloomington Gold Certified. A Director from Bloomington Gold wrote a letter stating that the car had a numbers matching rebuilt motor. It is his belief that the motor was the original motor, but NOT a verification from Bloomington Gold Corvettes. Since the motor has been rebuilt and said to have been decked, the original 'fingerprint' of the engine is no longer in place and Bloomington Gold Corvettes would not certify such a car as having the original engine. It is not normal practice to have such a letter sent from Bloomington Gold Corvettes.
I have spoken with Matt from Harwood Motors and he will be adding more clarification to the car's description to emphasize that it has a 'numbers matching engine'. He was very knowledgeable of the Corvette industry and does not want to mislead persons to thinking the car has been Bloomington Gold Certified.

Guy Larsen
President Bloomington Gold Corvettes
Guy, I find this troubling for your organization. Your letterhead was used in what appears to be an inappropriate way. Your letterhead should be reserved for official business. In any regulated business this would be a breach of compliance. I won’t go so far as to say it is a misrepresentation, but as the president, you should be concerned.
Old 12-12-2018, 09:52 PM
  #42  
68hemi
Race Director
 
68hemi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Cottonwood AZ
Posts: 10,698
Received 3,048 Likes on 1,934 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Factoid


Guy, I find this troubling for your organization. Your letterhead was used in what appears to be an inappropriate way. Your letterhead should be reserved for official business. In any regulated business this would be a breach of compliance. I won’t go so far as to say it is a misrepresentation, but as the president, you should be concerned.
I am sure the president of the organization cringed when he discovered this but the horse is out of the barn now. Probably some smooth talking owner talked the author into it without the author thinking of the consequences. The letter mean nothing since the engine could be anything in the car today. As said previously the stamping never should have been milled off. Who know how that mistake took place. Then to make matters worse they let a 3 year old stamp the fresh pad.
Old 12-12-2018, 09:57 PM
  #43  
Critter1
Melting Slicks
 
Critter1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Pasco Florida
Posts: 2,842
Received 621 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

What difference, at this point.... does it make? (where have we heard that before?) Either way, it no longer has it's original stamp pad characters so the block being original or not is not important. It means nothing.

Last edited by Critter1; 12-12-2018 at 10:11 PM.
The following users liked this post:
kenba (12-13-2018)
Old 12-13-2018, 10:24 AM
  #44  
colo63sw
Safety Car
 
colo63sw's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: arvada co
Posts: 3,748
Received 88 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Critter1
What difference, at this point.... does it make? (where have we heard that before?) Either way, it no longer has it's original stamp pad characters so the block being original or not is not important. It means nothing.
It makes a difference on the sales price. 80K is a lot of coin for a 66 vert without the original motor.

Pointing at a document and hand waving only goes so far.
Old 12-13-2018, 10:27 AM
  #45  
colo63sw
Safety Car
 
colo63sw's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: arvada co
Posts: 3,748
Received 88 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Greg
The real smart thing to do would have been to stop the milling machine after the head surface was decked and before it hits the pad. Simple.
I have done exactly this in the past. Most machine shops offer this service without question. I don't think there is a machinist out there today that doesn't understand the value of original numbers.
They are at the center of the muscle car engine world and will do what ever a customer asks in this regard. Nowadays they just don't mill numbers off by mistake.
"oops, I machined your original numbers off without thinking, so the hit your car will take in value is more than the cost of the rebuild"
Who would risk that liability?
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

This just raises the fishyness meter to near the top of the scale. A 10K rebuild to boot.
Old 12-13-2018, 11:21 AM
  #46  
Critter1
Melting Slicks
 
Critter1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Pasco Florida
Posts: 2,842
Received 621 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by colo63sw
It makes a difference on the sales price. 80K is a lot of coin for a 66 vert without the original motor.

Pointing at a document and hand waving only goes so far.
You may have misunderstood what I said. In my opinion, having the original block without it's original stamp characters is no more valuable than having any non original re-stamped block.
Old 12-13-2018, 11:22 AM
  #47  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by karkrafter
Just curious, what does his age have to do with it? People die, things they said or wrote don't lose it's truth...

Seems like I have a dog in the fight but I don't. I'll leave the rest up to you guys either way! Merry Christmas.
I posted this info because post #31 commented about when Bill is no longer with us. Just FYI
Old 12-13-2018, 12:11 PM
  #48  
colo63sw
Safety Car
 
colo63sw's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: arvada co
Posts: 3,748
Received 88 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Critter1
You may have misunderstood what I said. In my opinion, having the original block without it's original stamp characters is no more valuable than having any non original re-stamped block.
OK, I got you.

There are ways to document #s on a block that is going to be decked, take before pics, etc; but in lieu of post #39 it's all moot.

Last edited by colo63sw; 12-13-2018 at 12:12 PM.
Old 12-13-2018, 12:18 PM
  #49  
colo63sw
Safety Car
 
colo63sw's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: arvada co
Posts: 3,748
Received 88 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by karkrafter
Just curious, what does his age have to do with it? People die, things they said or wrote don't lose it's truth...

Seems like I have a dog in the fight but I don't. I'll leave the rest up to you guys either way! Merry Christmas.
People forge things, including documents. Once Bill has gone to heaven; unless there is all kinds of evidence that the doc is factual, the doc won't be worth much. Some people think it is worth 0 now.
Old 12-13-2018, 12:34 PM
  #50  
kolsen911
Burning Brakes
 
kolsen911's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: McMinnville Oregon
Posts: 946
Received 262 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Wow a lot of serious heart burn, is it or isn't it. If I had a chance to look at the car I would walk around it a few times then climb in my Hemi/Vette and drive off with a smile on my face.
Old 12-13-2018, 01:50 PM
  #51  
vettebuyer6369
Administrator
 
vettebuyer6369's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from where I call home. Blue lives matter.
Posts: 51,410
Received 5,329 Likes on 2,775 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Factoid


Guy, I find this troubling for your organization. Your letterhead was used in what appears to be an inappropriate way. Your letterhead should be reserved for official business. In any regulated business this would be a breach of compliance. I won’t go so far as to say it is a misrepresentation, but as the president, you should be concerned.
I don’t see what Bill did that was wrong. the letter does not indicate Bloomington Gold as an organization certified or stated anything. Bill has every right to identify himself as a current or former Bloomington Gold Director as a support to his credentials and opinion. And, all he has done here is provide personal knowledge that this motor did in fact have, in his opinion, original matching numbers prior to the owner’s decision to risk obliteration of them during a decking at rebuild.

This is not a Bloomington Gold document. This is a personal note by a person who identified himself as a Bloomington Gold Director.
Old 12-13-2018, 02:05 PM
  #52  
Greg
Just another Corvette guy
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Greg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Palm Springs, CA.
Posts: 8,518
Received 3,835 Likes on 1,782 Posts

Default

Vb6369,
Not to beat this thing to death, but the glaring omission in his letter is the word "opinion" that you used in your post. Instead, he chose the word "confirm". And using the BGC letter head lends an air of pseudo-certification.
Old 12-13-2018, 02:10 PM
  #53  
Factoid
Le Mans Master

 
Factoid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Location: San Antonio, TX/Mahopac, NY
Posts: 8,380
Received 5,554 Likes on 2,797 Posts
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C7 of the Year Winner - Modified
Default

Originally Posted by Vettebuyer6369


I don’t see what Bill did that was wrong. the letter does not indicate Bloomington Gold as an organization certified or stated anything. Bill has every right to identify himself as a current or former Bloomington Gold Director as a support to his credentials and opinion. And, all he has done here is provide personal knowledge that this motor did in fact have, in his opinion, original matching numbers prior to the owner’s decision to risk obliteration of them during a decking at rebuild.

This is not a Bloomington Gold document. This is a personal note by a person who identified himself as a Bloomington Gold Director.
Steve, that’s exactly the point. It’s a personal letter written on official letterhead. I would have no issue if it was a personal letter written on his personal letterhead and in the body of the letter he identified himself as a BG judge. The fact that he chose to write a personal letter using official letterhead brings many questions to mind. Was he trying to add credibility by using official letterhead or was it a simple mistake? If I write you a letter using the official letterhead of the major insurance company I work for and suggest that in my personal opinion, your car is a stolen vehicle, it would carry significant weight. If an IRS agent...anyway, you get the point. It is in poor form and in some industries illegal to use official letterhead for a personal matter. It also degrades the credibility of BG as you see a perfect example here in this thread. Credible organizations that want to stay that way protect their brand and image as if it was gold no matter how small the deviation.
Old 12-13-2018, 02:17 PM
  #54  
68hemi
Race Director
 
68hemi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Cottonwood AZ
Posts: 10,698
Received 3,048 Likes on 1,934 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Factoid


Steve, that’s exactly the point. It’s a personal letter written on official letterhead. I would have no issue if it was a personal letter written on his personal letterhead and in the body of the letter he identified himself as a BG judge. The fact that he chose to write a personal letter using official letterhead brings many questions to mind. Was he trying to add credibility by using official letterhead or was it a simple mistake? If I write you a letter using the official letterhead of the major insurance company I work for and suggest that in my personal opinion, your car is a stolen vehicle, it would carry significant weight. If an IRS agent...anyway, you get the point. It is in poor form and in some industries illegal to use official letterhead for a personal matter. It also degrades the credibility of BG as you see a perfect example here in this thread. Credible organizations that want to stay that way protect their brand and image as if it was gold no matter how small the deviation.
with this 100%
Old 12-13-2018, 03:02 PM
  #55  
Duck916
Team Owner
 
Duck916's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Location: Various places in California. Not currently aflame.
Posts: 20,509
Received 634 Likes on 392 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Factoid


Steve, that’s exactly the point. It’s a personal letter written on official letterhead.
If I wrote a personal letter on my company's letterhead, my job would be at risk.

As for the "confirmation" of the numbers before the rebuild, why didn't someone take photos? That doesn't make sense.

Oh well. I know the engine in my car was a matching number engine....once. I'm not sure what it matched, but it sure matched something.....
Old 12-13-2018, 03:27 PM
  #56  
jet-tech
Pro
 
jet-tech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Grapevine TX
Posts: 626
Received 121 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Here's my 2 cents. With only 9787 miles on it, why would the engine need to be decked on rebuild?
Old 12-13-2018, 03:36 PM
  #57  
Powershift
Race Director
 
Powershift's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Luling Louisiana
Posts: 10,463
Received 1,681 Likes on 1,307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jet-tech
Here's my 2 cents. With only 9787 miles on it, why would the engine need to be decked on rebuild?
Smooth and persuasive machine shop owner looking to maximize his monthly profit.

Larry

Get notified of new replies

To Proof of original motor?

Old 12-13-2018, 03:56 PM
  #58  
tgtexas02
Drifting

 
tgtexas02's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Galveston & Belton Texas
Posts: 1,294
Received 294 Likes on 184 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vettebuyer6369


I don’t see what Bill did that was wrong. the letter does not indicate Bloomington Gold as an organization certified or stated anything. Bill has every right to identify himself as a current or former Bloomington Gold Director as a support to his credentials and opinion. And, all he has done here is provide personal knowledge that this motor did in fact have, in his opinion, original matching numbers prior to the owner’s decision to risk obliteration of them during a decking at rebuild.

This is not a Bloomington Gold document. This is a personal note by a person who identified himself as a Bloomington Gold Director.
First, I don't have a problem with the car being for sale regardless of alterations or stamp pad. It looks like someone spent a good amount of money to make it a really nice car-just not a pure pedigree as things kinda/sorta stand right now. I do have a problem with the casual "oh, let it be" because it is a highly regarded Bloomington guy that runs in upper circles. Consequently, I totally disagree with you on "I don't see what Bill did that was wrong". It was done with official letterhead, his complete Bloomington signature block, and signature--that is a Bloomington official document and position to me. This is a Bloomington issue to fix and never repeat and not an issue about the car. I don't care who "Bill" is connected to. By the way, my name is Bill too. I'm done-if I can get the hairs on my neck to relax.
Old 12-13-2018, 04:20 PM
  #59  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

Originally Posted by karkrafter
What am I missing? The Bloomington Gold guy is stating HE personally inspected the block BEFORE it was decked. And he states the 'right' numbers were there at that time. I mean I don't know the guy but if the letter is real and I'd bet it is, easy enough to check up on...it would be good enough for me.
Exactly! As usual eveyone wants to doubt it. THe main concern is its the original, so it is problem solved...nothing to doubt or discuss.
Someone else here recently photo'd or videod his to verify it was the original and he got a bunch of crap. Why waste someones time if they prove it if thats what ones really after?

I can hear a gear reduction starter and definitely a different cam, does sound well built. Decking a block is alll part of doing it right

Last edited by cv67; 12-13-2018 at 04:26 PM.
Old 12-13-2018, 05:52 PM
  #60  
Greg
Just another Corvette guy
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Greg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Palm Springs, CA.
Posts: 8,518
Received 3,835 Likes on 1,782 Posts

Default

cuisinartvette,
Are you and karkrafter in possession of some information that hasn't been shared here? If so, can you please share it with us and maybe that will put this baby to bed.
Because nowhere in the posted letter does Mr. Locke state that
"HE personally inspected the block BEFORE it was decked. And he states the 'right' numbers were there at that time."
Greg


Quick Reply: Proof of original motor?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 AM.