C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

[C2] 1966 327 power-glide K19 California convertible restoration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2019, 09:23 AM
  #41  
mrhurt
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrhurt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Boyan
I believe you have a 1974 CE block.
it seems you would be correct, this info is from chevelle forum site

It's important to note that the "CE" designation for replacement Chevrolet engines did not start until 1968 so any year designation in the engine number would be for 1968 and later. The CE block stamp year is the year the block was stamped and not for what year of car the block was destined for since a generic block for fitted engine could be used as a warranty replacement for any number of years' engines, applications, and for cars produced from any assembly plant
Old 02-13-2019, 04:38 PM
  #42  
GTOguy
Race Director
 
GTOguy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: Fresno California
Posts: 17,504
Received 3,443 Likes on 2,113 Posts
Default

The block can't be a 1974 block...it has the road draft tube/PCV boss cast into it behind the distributor. 1968 was the last year that hole was there. Need a casting number off the block (by bellhousing). My $$$ says it's a 1964 block....and it has all the correct, impossible to find '66 AIR and smog equipment. Very cool.
Old 02-13-2019, 11:47 PM
  #43  
Vitaminmopar
Burning Brakes
 
Vitaminmopar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2014
Location: Colorado Springs CO
Posts: 910
Received 334 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GTOguy
The block can't be a 1974 block...it has the road draft tube/PCV boss cast into it behind the distributor. 1968 was the last year that hole was there. Need a casting number off the block (by bellhousing). My $$$ says it's a 1964 block....and it has all the correct, impossible to find '66 AIR and smog equipment. Very cool.
1969 was the last year for the rear block vent canister, that block casting was 3933180 I bought a short block 327 in 76 over the counter with the crankcase vent provision present. Based on this and the block stamped with CE this a 1974 casting.
Old 02-14-2019, 07:46 AM
  #44  
mrhurt
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrhurt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GTOguy
The block can't be a 1974 block...it has the road draft tube/PCV boss cast into it behind the distributor. 1968 was the last year that hole was there. Need a casting number off the block (by bellhousing). My $$$ says it's a 1964 block....and it has all the correct, impossible to find '66 AIR and smog equipment. Very cool.
Originally Posted by Vitaminmopar
1969 was the last year for the rear block vent canister, that block casting was 3933180 I bought a short block 327 in 76 over the counter with the crankcase vent provision present. Based on this and the block stamped with CE this a 1974 casting.
here is the casting off the back of the block, im still not sure of what it is.



Old 02-14-2019, 08:07 AM
  #45  
856666
Drifting
 
856666's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 1,772
Received 195 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

On the other side of the 3959512 there is a casting date - Post a picture of it

example
J 17 4 = November 17, 1974

Phil

Last edited by 856666; 02-14-2019 at 08:10 AM.
Old 02-14-2019, 08:19 AM
  #46  
mrhurt
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrhurt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 856666
On the other side of the 3959512 there is a casting date - Post a picture of it

example
J 17 4 = November 17, 1974

Phil
B 2 / 4 dont know what the thing is between 2 and 4?
Old 02-14-2019, 08:25 AM
  #47  
856666
Drifting
 
856666's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 1,772
Received 195 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

B - February
21 - 21st day
4 - 1974
Old 02-14-2019, 09:07 AM
  #48  
mrhurt
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrhurt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Taken from the Z28 forum:

In 71, they started using the run letter before the year. I have seen it before.
C- Chevrolet
E- engine
C- third run of warranty blocks
1- 71
The rest is sequential.
If you look by the starter boss on the bottom, it will tell you the month and year it was assembled.

guess now i can pull starter off to further investigate
Old 02-14-2019, 09:18 AM
  #49  
65hihp
Le Mans Master
 
65hihp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Cold Harbor, VA
Posts: 7,281
Received 3,266 Likes on 1,687 Posts

Default

It's a service engine from 1974. That sums it up as far as the engine case is concerned.
Further investigation into the origins of the engine block is time spent chasing your tail. What's to be gained?
There is a lot of work to be done on that car. It should be a real nice driver when it's finished.
Old 02-14-2019, 09:33 AM
  #50  
mrhurt
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrhurt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 65hihp
It's a service engine from 1974. That sums it up as far as the engine case is concerned.
Further investigation into the origins of the engine block is time spent chasing your tail. What's to be gained?
There is a lot of work to be done on that car. It should be a real nice driver when it's finished.
the best thing to be gained was me hopefully increasing my knowledge

yes there is a ton of work to be done, i can imagine the owner will spend lots of time cruzing around smiling and waving
Old 02-14-2019, 07:38 PM
  #51  
Mr Fufu
Pro
 
Mr Fufu's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2015
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 732
Received 166 Likes on 103 Posts
Default Upgrade to 3 or 4 speed auto?

Hi mrhurt,

Considering that the car no longer has its born-with engine, what is the owner's goal regarding originality?

I'd suggest upgrading the Powerglide to a THM350. That's a three speed auto, with superior gear ratios. I did this swap into my PG equipped '67 coupe a couple of years ago, and it was a significant improvement.

The PG has but two ratios: 1.76 low and 1:00 high. The THM350 has 3 ratios: 2.52, 1.52, and 1:00 The swap is relatively easy, as these things go. Benefits include better acceleration from a standing start, less 'hunting' between low and high, and more flexibility with a second gear for hill-climbing and engine braking.

The THM350 was designed by GM as a replacement for the venerable PG, has virtually the same length and spline count, etc. It'll bolt right up to the driveshaft, the trans cooler lines bolt up too. You can re-use the existing PG shifter mechanism by using a kit from Shiftworks. They also sell a complete new shifter assembly if you want to go that route.



The other popular swap is to use a 700-4R overdrive trans, but that is more involved, requires drive shaft to be cut, a custom rear trans mount, and electrics to control the torque converter lockup and overdrive functions. I carefully evaluated the merits of both swaps and for me the TH350 came out ahead as it costs about half what a 700-R4 swap would cost. Also, if you're running a 3.08 or 3.36 rear end, the fuel saving advantages of overdrive are less compelling, considering the owner probably won't be commuting or taking long drives on the interstate.

The benefits of a 3 or 4 speed auto are significant, and in my case, going with the TH350 swap really improved the driving enjoyment of my '67.

I can provide my research on the PG to TH350 and 700-R4 swaps, if you like.

-Alex
Old 02-15-2019, 07:21 AM
  #52  
mrhurt
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrhurt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr Fufu
Hi mrhurt,

Considering that the car no longer has its born-with engine, what is the owner's goal regarding originality?

I'd suggest upgrading the Powerglide to a THM350. That's a three speed auto, with superior gear ratios. I did this swap into my PG equipped '67 coupe a couple of years ago, and it was a significant improvement.

The PG has but two ratios: 1.76 low and 1:00 high. The THM350 has 3 ratios: 2.52, 1.52, and 1:00 The swap is relatively easy, as these things go. Benefits include better acceleration from a standing start, less 'hunting' between low and high, and more flexibility with a second gear for hill-climbing and engine braking.

The THM350 was designed by GM as a replacement for the venerable PG, has virtually the same length and spline count, etc. It'll bolt right up to the driveshaft, the trans cooler lines bolt up too. You can re-use the existing PG shifter mechanism by using a kit from Shiftworks. They also sell a complete new shifter assembly if you want to go that route.



The other popular swap is to use a 700-4R overdrive trans, but that is more involved, requires drive shaft to be cut, a custom rear trans mount, and electrics to control the torque converter lockup and overdrive functions. I carefully evaluated the merits of both swaps and for me the TH350 came out ahead as it costs about half what a 700-R4 swap would cost. Also, if you're running a 3.08 or 3.36 rear end, the fuel saving advantages of overdrive are less compelling, considering the owner probably won't be commuting or taking long drives on the interstate.

The benefits of a 3 or 4 speed auto are significant, and in my case, going with the TH350 swap really improved the driving enjoyment of my '67.

I can provide my research on the PG to TH350 and 700-R4 swaps, if you like.

-Alex
yeah send me whatever info you have, im not sure what i can talk the owner into. he is sentimental about the car being as period correct as possible, he knows the motor has been changed. as many of us are, the cars are an emotional attachment.
Old 02-15-2019, 09:06 AM
  #53  
565758
Racer
 
565758's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Location: North Florida
Posts: 499
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default fan

Wondering if the fan blade is correct? Can anyone confirm?
Old 02-15-2019, 10:11 AM
  #54  
mrhurt
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrhurt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 565758
Wondering if the fan blade is correct? Can anyone confirm?
hmm, don't know? it looks to be a factory GM clutch fan, not sure if born with car or not.

any numbers or identification supposed to be there?
Old 02-16-2019, 12:42 PM
  #55  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Boyan
I believe you have a 1974 CE block.
That's correct - the 3959512 block casting never had a production application - it was only used for factory replacement of 4"-bore engines (302, 327, 350), was available machined for either small-journal or large-journal cranks/bearings, and had the rear crankcase vent port to accommodate PCV systems. This block is always in demand due to the presence of the rear crankcase vent port for use as a restoration engine.
Old 02-16-2019, 02:24 PM
  #56  
itsforfun
Racer
 
itsforfun's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Central KY
Posts: 430
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

If you need them!
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...air-250-a.html
Old 02-20-2019, 02:40 PM
  #57  
mrhurt
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrhurt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itsforfun
manifolds look good, tubes are very fragile though thanks

Get notified of new replies

To 1966 327 power-glide K19 California convertible restoration

Old 02-20-2019, 05:34 PM
  #58  
vark_wso
Drifting

 
vark_wso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Sun Prairie WI
Posts: 1,802
Received 347 Likes on 241 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mrhurt
manifolds look good, tubes are very fragile though thanks
Try very hard to preserve the driver's side A.I.R. tube and the hose, check valve to pump. One year only, 327 only, Corvette only, etc. This is a very difficult part to find.
The 4th photo in your original post #1 shows it pretty well. Note how the the vertical tube for the check valve is plumbed straight up. Same on a '66 L79 car, but completely different in '67 model year.


Last edited by vark_wso; 02-20-2019 at 06:24 PM. Reason: clarity
Old 04-06-2020, 06:46 PM
  #59  
split1963
Instructor
 
split1963's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2015
Posts: 113
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vark_wso
Try very hard to preserve the driver's side A.I.R. tube and the hose, check valve to pump. One year only, 327 only, Corvette only, etc. This is a very difficult part to find.
The 4th photo in your original post #1 shows it pretty well. Note how the the vertical tube for the check valve is plumbed straight up. Same on a '66 L79 car, but completely different in '67 model year.
I have a 67 with the tube that is bent as you mentioned but where the tube is bent it broke. still king of hanging there with a hole. is there a way to repair that section, I have tried to remove the tubes but no luck, don't want to cut them off as some suggested.

Are they braised on with solder or? the tube look and feels like copper not sure how to remove them
Thx in advance


Old 04-07-2020, 07:53 AM
  #60  
mrhurt
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrhurt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i dont know, im almost to that point of putting the engine back in, im crossing my fingers i dont break tubes


Quick Reply: [C2] 1966 327 power-glide K19 California convertible restoration



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 AM.