C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

1960 Vette: 245 HP vs. 270 HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2020, 07:43 PM
  #1  
C1-Fan
Cruising
Thread Starter
 
C1-Fan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2017
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1960 Vette: 245 HP vs. 270 HP

Greetings from Texas. I have a 1960 Corvette (black with silver coves) with a numbers matching 283 engine with 2 four-barrel carbs and 245 HP. Can anyone tell me the differences in a 1960 Corvette with:

1. 283 / 2x4 barrel carbs with 245 HP
2. 283 / 2x4 barrel carbs with 270 HP?

I have heard that the differences include a different cam and a different radiator. Is this accurate? Are there any other differences that you may know about?

I'm planning to have the the motor in my Corvette rebuilt and I am considering making it a 270 HP Car. Any wisdom / insights would be greatly appreciated.
Old 04-05-2020, 07:46 PM
  #2  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,529 Likes on 3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

The tach face for the 270 HP engine has a higher redline.

The generator pulley is likely larger on the 270 engine.
Edit: The above statement is incorrect. 270 HP and 245 HP engines both use 1102043 generators with 3-5/8" offset pulley

The carburetors are almost certainly calibrated differently.

If you install the correct "top tank radiator", I believe you have to also replace the radiator support.

Last edited by jim lockwood; 04-06-2020 at 09:37 AM.
Old 04-05-2020, 08:26 PM
  #3  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

First and foremost the 270hp cars have solid lifters and the legendary Duntov 097 camshaft.

The carbs are set up for the more aggressive camshaft characteristics.

Last edited by Frankie the Fink; 04-05-2020 at 08:27 PM.
Old 04-05-2020, 09:12 PM
  #4  
1snake
Le Mans Master
 
1snake's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 8,000
Received 652 Likes on 446 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jim lockwood
The tach face for the 270 HP engine has a higher redline.

The generator pulley is likely larger on the 270 engine.

The carburetors are almost certainly calibrated differently.

If you install the correct "top tank radiator", I believe you have to also replace the radiator support.
The hood is also different in order to clear the top tank reservoir.
Old 04-05-2020, 09:32 PM
  #5  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,529 Likes on 3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by 1snake
The hood is also different in order to clear the top tank reservoir.
I was under the impression that the hood difference was between '60 and prior years, not between 1960 cars with brass and aluminum radiators. Not true?
Old 04-05-2020, 10:34 PM
  #6  
1snake
Le Mans Master
 
1snake's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 8,000
Received 652 Likes on 446 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jim lockwood
I was under the impression that the hood difference was between '60 and prior years, not between 1960 cars with brass and aluminum radiators. Not true?
There was a change in hoods during the 1960 model year. Here's a commonly posted pic. Only the later hoods had the clearance for the top tank and the required different radiator support.
40+ years ago, I talked at length with Noland Adams about the issues with the "new" aluminum radiator and how GM dealt with the issues and shortages of them.


Last edited by 1snake; 04-05-2020 at 10:49 PM.
Old 04-05-2020, 11:24 PM
  #7  
alblosser
Racer

 
alblosser's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Uniontown Ohio
Posts: 295
Received 90 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

I thught the 270 hp engines also had a higher compression ratio.
Old 04-06-2020, 04:59 AM
  #8  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by alblosser
I thught the 270 hp engines also had a higher compression ratio.
Only the FI engine.
Old 04-06-2020, 07:47 AM
  #9  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,529 Likes on 3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by 1snake
There was a change in hoods during the 1960 model year. Here's a commonly posted pic. Only the later hoods had the clearance for the top tank and the required different radiator support.
40+ years ago, I talked at length with Noland Adams about the issues with the "new" aluminum radiator and how GM dealt with the issues and shortages of them.
This looks to be a case of the factory simply using up left over '59 hood stock opportunistically on cars with brass radiators.

The current '58 - '60 judging guide sez this about the re-designed hood:

"This hood was also used for most low horsepower 1960 brass radiator equipped cars."

So the hood is essential for cars with top tank radiators but was also used on brass radiator cars.
Old 04-06-2020, 09:02 AM
  #10  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

As to the wisdom of "building" a 270hp car.....

I had an original 270hp car and they are a hoot to drive, and the solid lifter sound is unmistakable.

Would I go to the trouble to try to build one, cloned from an original 245hp engine. No. It would be expensive, they require a bit more maintenance and, depending on what the OP means by "numbers matching", if there is a stamp pad engine suffix, it won't be fooling anybody.

There is nothing wrong with tooling around in an original 245hp car with dual quads,
Old 04-06-2020, 09:45 AM
  #11  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,529 Likes on 3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Frankie the Fink
It would be expensive, they require a bit more maintenance and, depending on what the OP means by "numbers matching", if there is a stamp pad engine suffix, it won't be fooling anybody.,
If that's a reference to periodically adjusting valve lash, it doesn't match my experience.

In 41 years of maintaining my '60 290 HP car, I bet I've adjusted the valve lash at most three times. The last time, in 2013, was because I had R&R-ed one head and there was simply no choice but to adjust the lash.

The amount of maintenance my '60 solid lifter engine requires is on par with that required by the hydraulic lifter engine in my '63.
The following 2 users liked this post by jim lockwood:
alblosser (04-06-2020), OLDED (04-14-2020)
Old 04-06-2020, 10:32 AM
  #12  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Don’t really want to debate it.

Still, my opinion for the OP is to restore the car to factory 245hp specs.
Old 04-06-2020, 10:55 AM
  #13  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

PS. I'd change the cam to the 270. It'll make a whole different driving experience over what you have now. Not a whole lot of power increase, just different feel. Enjoy the feel and sound of a Corvette instead of a Bel Air.

I wouldn't bet it would be necessary to do anything to your carburetors to make it work with the different camshaft. Bump the initial timing up 4-5 degrees.

Last edited by MikeM; 04-06-2020 at 10:57 AM.
The following users liked this post:
OLDED (04-14-2020)
Old 04-06-2020, 10:57 AM
  #14  
1snake
Le Mans Master
 
1snake's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 8,000
Received 652 Likes on 446 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jim lockwood
This looks to be a case of the factory simply using up left over '59 hood stock opportunistically on cars with brass radiators.

The current '58 - '60 judging guide sez this about the re-designed hood:

"This hood was also used for most low horsepower 1960 brass radiator equipped cars."

So the hood is essential for cars with top tank radiators but was also used on brass radiator cars.
I'm aware of what the Judging Guide says and disagree using the term "most". That's not been my experience over the years. If they were using left over 59 hoods, they must have had one he!! of a stock pile of them. Years ago I had the opportunity to examine a 1 owner 230HP 1960. It had the early style hood, brass rad. etc. and it was a late March car. The most amazing thing about that car was it had never been wrecked and had 100% of its original Cascade Green paint.

To the O.P. - If you're wanting to create the look of the 270HP car, at a minimum, you'll need a top tank rad. and core support and possibly a hood. You may want to price that rad.at DeWitt's. The price alone may scare you. The 270HP engine is a sweet driver. Here's a pic. of mine. I've had it for 46 years and it was my daily driver for the fist 10 years. It never leaked a drop, even in the rainy Pacific Northwest and being parked outside. Only adjusted the lifters once in those 10 years. Then I did a complete body off restoration and it's lived a charmed life ever since.

The following users liked this post:
frankturbo (04-06-2020)
Old 04-06-2020, 01:53 PM
  #15  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,529 Likes on 3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by 1snake
I'm aware of what the Judging Guide says and disagree using the term "most". That's not been my experience over the years
That's interesting and I'd like to learn more. Do you mind sharing your data?

Get notified of new replies

To 1960 Vette: 245 HP vs. 270 HP




Quick Reply: 1960 Vette: 245 HP vs. 270 HP



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 PM.