C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Government programs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 09:00 AM
  #21  
capevettes's Avatar
capevettes
CF Community Team
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 90 Days
Active Streak: 120 Days
Conversation Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 19,360
Likes: 5,243
From: Cape Cod, Mass.
2025 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2025 C8 Z06/7/E-Ray of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C8 of the Year Finalist Unmodified
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
2019 C1 of Year Winner (performance mods)
2017 Corvette of the Year Finalist
2016 C2 of Year
2015 C3 of Year Finalist
Default

They added 2 Billion more to keep the program going. Unfortunately, it is so poorly devised, like most of the current administration's programs, that none of the dealers are able to get reimbursement or information from the government.
A local dealer here sold 26 cars under the program and can only get funds for 1 of them and no one will provide them with any information on how to proceed. The paperwork is voluminous and confusing according to many of the dealers.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 09:45 PM
  #22  
eagle275's Avatar
eagle275
Drifting
Supporting Gold
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 1
From: Winston-Salem NC
Default I'm keepin' my gas hog!

I will smoke their asses with my F-350 4X4, 460 cid, and run the frikkin' wheels off it!
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 09:55 PM
  #23  
Skip Burney's Avatar
Skip Burney
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 914
Likes: 10
From: Brooklet Ga.
Default

Fast track to socialism all hail king obama
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 10:08 PM
  #24  
joewill's Avatar
joewill
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,458
Likes: 330
From: Indy Indiana
Default

selling the cars for scrap is a somewhat good idea.. sometimes the metal in a car is worth more than the car.. but from a scrap value standpoint ususally the engine and the tranny are the only thinkg of value in the car.... why pour that stuff down the intake throat and destroy the engine...

thanks big brother for watching over me...
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 11:30 PM
  #25  
Budman68's Avatar
Budman68
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,078
Likes: 7
From: DFW TX
Cruise-In VII Veteran
St. Jude Donor '07
Default

Looking at cars today reminded me why I hate to look at cars.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 08:08 AM
  #26  
MN80Vette's Avatar
MN80Vette
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 21
From: Columbus MN
Default

If this program was really about energy and polution, then they certainly did not consider net cost-benefit. To get a vehicle from raw materials to a vehicle consumer requires far more energy and creates far more polution than the vehicles they are taking out of use.

Yet a nother ill-thought government program. They don't seem to ever think through the big picture over time. I've never seen so many nonthinkers as I see now in our Federal government. If the Federal government was a business in the industry I work in, we would have put them out of business years ago.

The saddest part is that those politicians reflect the population majority that elected them. For example, Minnesotans elected a professional wrestler as governor once and recently elected a Saturday Night Live writer/commedian to the Senate last election.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 06:23 PM
  #27  
killain's Avatar
killain
Thread Starter
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime Gold
Veteran: Navy
St. Jude 20 Year Donor
25 Year Member
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 11,117
Likes: 671
From: SE Pennsylvania
St. Jude Donor '03 thru '26
Oldtimer
Default

Originally Posted by joewill
selling the cars for scrap is a somewhat good idea.. sometimes the metal in a car is worth more than the car.. but from a scrap value standpoint ususally the engine and the tranny are the only thinkg of value in the car.... why pour that stuff down the intake throat and destroy the engine...

thanks big brother for watching over me...
BTW, I'm not making that up. The guy on TV had a gallon Jug with the lable on it saying "Clunker-Killer" pouring it into a cars oil tube. And on the front of the red gallon jug.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #28  
toddalin's Avatar
toddalin
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,897
Likes: 1,356
From: Santa Ana CA
Default

No need to speculate. The link provides the calculator to tell what qualifies and what you can get for it.

http://www.cashforclunkers.ford.com/...25560205373309
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #29  
71white's Avatar
71white
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 254
Likes: 1
Default

Be careful on which link you log on to. check out big brother watching you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWs12...layer_embedded
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 01:35 PM
  #30  
CCrane65's Avatar
CCrane65
Safety Car
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 61
From: Wichita KS
Default

Originally Posted by 79L48
I HATE government subsidies.
The scrap market has tanked for things like plastics and common metals used in a lot of cars due to the anticipated influx of tons of cheap and ready to scrap metal coming into the market.
This will likely depress the cost of new American steel, hurting an already reeling market and potentially putting more people out of a job.
I don't like that it is taxpayer funded, like ALL money the government spends.
I think it misses the mark on the era of cars it is focusing on. There are a lot of old early '70s bombers here in Michigan that wouldn't even be roadworthy in any inspection state. They are shooting smoke, burning oil and bounding down the highway at 70+ mph waiting to shed parts or spear into *** end because of drum brakes and poor maintenance. Why aren't we spending the money to forcibly remove these types of cars? Hell, replace them with the cars we are "clunking," now and we'd still be better off.
For that matter, give everyone who owns a qualifying vehicle a $500 voucher for a tune up, brake service and alignment!
Bottom line, government intervention in a so called "free market" continues to erode the principals of our economy, our democracy and our very way of life. Today I am subsidizing farmers, unemployed people who can but don't want to work, families on welfare, single mothers, prisoners and a lot of others I probably don't know about. I can make an argument FOR each of these programs as important benefits to broad portions of our citizenry. But now I am subsidizing people who want a new car? C'mon! :dupe:
You should be happy that the program excludes nearly all classics. Otherwise those of us with big blocks would be getting the most pressure to get them off the road.

cc
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #31  
CCrane65's Avatar
CCrane65
Safety Car
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 61
From: Wichita KS
Default

The EPA wasn't even done calculating which cars would be elligible when the program started. A Preliminary list of cars was published and the dealers used it then were told after the calculations were done that 87 cars were removed from the list.

Those dealers then contacted the new car owners and told them to return the new car and take their old one back or pay the $4500 back.

Nice!

cc
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 07:17 PM
  #32  
Budman68's Avatar
Budman68
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,078
Likes: 7
From: DFW TX
Cruise-In VII Veteran
St. Jude Donor '07
Default

Here's a good one. Finally found the car she likes and the dealer is no longer taking anything new than 2001. That is only suppose to be for Cat 3 Trucks, I'm trading a Cat 2.

The right way to do this program would have been to make you stand in a long line at the DMV, have the car emission tested, then wait 30 Days for a voucher which expired a day ago. lol
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #33  
Dustup7T2's Avatar
Dustup7T2
Terrorizing Orange Cones
Supporting Lifetime
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 17
From: Northern CO
Default

Too much government in my life as it is. Poisoning engines in running vehicles seems wasteful and maybe I'm too melancholy about taking care of machinery. Killing them can't be helping the recycled parts industry or their customers.

A federal run "clunkers" program has $1B reasons not to be effective. I think I'll just run the wheels off my old Ram and give 'Thanks' they aren't searching for my classics (yet).
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2009 | 12:47 AM
  #34  
1973convertiblevette's Avatar
1973convertiblevette
Advanced
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Default

well I heard their adding another $2 billion to the program to keep it going. I do know that here their not using clunker killer they just drain the oil out and start it and let it run until the car/ truck throws a rod and then will no longer run.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2009 | 12:52 AM
  #35  
400hp427vette's Avatar
400hp427vette
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,336
Likes: 1
From: North Bellmore Ny
St. Jude Donor '09
Default

Originally Posted by PRNDL
I'm just bitter 1 year ago donated to charity our 92 Volvo Wagon, 20mpg so not eligible anyway. 2 years ago I donated our 93 Saab 9000, 18 mpg combined so would be eligible! Currently own a 97 lexus ES300, 170k miles on the clock, 19 mpg so NOT ELIGIBLE. It's just a big giveaway for people who bought gas hogs.
Girlfriend has a 99 grand am gt biggest POS ever but not on the list. Guess I should have talked her the firebird the was $500 more 7 years ago and could have gotten a deal on the new Camaro we are buying.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2009 | 12:29 PM
  #36  
toddalin's Avatar
toddalin
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,897
Likes: 1,356
From: Santa Ana CA
Default

Just wait and see if the program is not extended by placing a tax on cars that get less than X mpg to fund rebates for cars that get more than X mpg.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #37  
C3 4ME's Avatar
C3 4ME
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,247
Likes: 471
From: Glen Allen, VA
Default

Someone raised a point ealier and it's my exact argument against this program. I drive a 96 Grand Cherokee every day with 213000 miles. It gets 15-16 around town. I dont' owe a dime on it. Why would I want to trade it in on a new vehicle even with a 4500 credit? I guarantee you I'm not spending $400 on gas over and above what an economy car would get me. That $400 I'm referring to would be my guess as a car payment on a new economy car. That's what I think is what is wrong with today's society as far as money goes. My Jeep runs perfect, so why do I need a new car? My point is, why trade in something that has nothing wrong and you have no payments for something brand new and take on a 60 month or more payment term, just because you got a $4500 credit. I also agree that the credit should only apply if you buy an American car, not a Honda or Toyota.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE