When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've also been involved with cars all my life, not quite as long as you but close enough. I've noticed the other car guys don't seem to mix with Corvette owners. It's been a while since I've hung out with other car guys, back in the days when owned Mustangs, a few Firebirds, etc. The car guys were generally interested in what's under the hood, modifications, seeing what it will do in the 1/4 mile and so on. I recall viewing Corvettes as being a different class, too expensive, hard to work on and high insurance cost. Out of reach for the average Joe. Those who owned them were generally the more affluent guys, sometimes regarded to be snobs, may have caused some resentment. It seems many of the average car guys don't connect with Corvettes. Could be a nostalgia thing (lack of) or a feeling they don't fit in with Camaros, Mustangs, Firebirds, GTOs, and so on. Corvette owners are more likely to pick apart someone elses car for minor details. Seems to be more competition wrt whose car is more 'original', 'correct', or more valuable. The reputation of being a bit arrogant or snobs may have some basis. Part of the culture?
The muscle car community seems a bit more friendly than the Corvette crowd, more interested in what else is out there, less critical. Could be part of the reason for more interest in muscle cars over Corvettes?
A Corvette owner bragged to me that his car is so original he still has the original oil filter in a bag at home. That's a bit much in my book. I asked him if he kept any of the original gas that the dealer filled the tank with. He actually took the question seriously and had that 'if I buy another one' look where now I think he'll drain the tank.
The Firebird guys aren't like that.
But I've never seen Corvette guys as 'snobs'.
Well - that's not true either. The C1/C2 crowd sometimes look down on the C3 people. The chrome bumper crowd looks down on the rubber bumper crowd. The C6 crowd look down on everyone. And the C4 guys pretend to have real Corvettes...
But the market does exist, and you could make a lot of money selling your Vette on it and buying a Camaro!
I will probably do that in a few years and get an X-code Z28 with NOM that I can beat, BUT I won't be making any money as I'm sure that I'll be upside down on my vette It costs a fortune to restore these cars correctly, even when you do alot of work yourself.
There would be alot more vettes on the road if it had better owner friendly brakes.
If I had to pick between a vette and that green GTO above I would pay the owner to keep the GTO.
Now I got a question.
Why when someone puts a list up of cars they want its a pure dream list.
'69 T/A vert
'70 Superbird or Daytona (Hemi 4 spd, nach
'64 Cheetah
'70 W30 442 or GS Stage III
'67 Iso Grifo (the Italian Corvette).
A stage III GS, whats wrong with a GS stage 1?
And above all what would you do with these garage queens.
The point is, all the above cars could have been had for $2-3k in say 1974, the same could be said for most used mid years and early C3's. I would vintage race the Cheetah and drive the rest about the same as the Vette (that is to say approx 1500-3000 mi. per year). What makes these garage queens any different from the garage queen I have now? How many C3's are DD's driven 12k miles per year? My guess is not many.... And there's nothing wrong with a GS at any stage.
The point is, all the above cars could have been had for $2-3k in say 1974, the same could be said for most used mid years and early C3's. I would vintage race the Cheetah and drive the rest about the same as the Vette (that is to say approx 1500-3000 mi. per year). What makes these garage queens any different from the garage queen I have now? How many C3's are DD's driven 12k miles per year? My guess is not many.... And there's nothing wrong with a GS at any stage.
They made a total of 8 69 T/A convertibles and the last one sold for a million I think - you would drive that car?? You would have to have lots of FU money or be stupid to drive that car. Same goes for an uber rare stage III and hemi bird cars.
You got to be kidding yourself getting a hemi superbird for $3000
You've also got to be kidding yourself if you think muscle cars are worth more than Corvettes just because a hemi superbird or a hemi cuda (or that one of eight TA verts someone mentioned) sell for more than a 78 Vette.
There are lots of relatively valuable cars. Vettes are at the top or at least near it (in terms of current sale value) for every year of production.
i had a chance to buy a 1970 superbird 440 4bbl pistol grip 4spd, vitimin c orange, black int, bench seat, 37000 miles for $6500 in 1985. i really wish i would have bought that car but that was a lot of money for a 17 year old.
You've also got to be kidding yourself if you think muscle cars are worth more than Corvettes just because a hemi superbird or a hemi cuda (or that one of eight TA verts someone mentioned) sell for more than a 78 Vette.
There are lots of relatively valuable cars. Vettes are at the top or at least near it (in terms of current sale value) for every year of production.
You really think a 78 vette is worth more than a musclecar?
Have you looked at the price of a 70 Hemi cuda latley,
Boss 302 mustang, 442 W30 or a 69 Camaro anything?
WHat you smokin?
You really think a 78 vette is worth more than a musclecar?
Have you looked at the price of a 70 Hemi cuda latley,
Boss 302 mustang, 442 W30 or a 69 Camaro anything?
WHat you smokin?
See - that's just it. I'm not arguing that. I'm only saying that a 78 Corvette is worth more than a 78 Camaro - and probably worth more than anything else built in 78. I'm not comparing a 78 Corvette to anything made in 1969, or 1970, or any year other than 1978. YOU are doing that.
Why would I compare a 1978 Corvette to a 1969 Camaro when I can compare a 1969 Corvette to a 1969 Camaro? Which is the better comparison when looking at the relative values of each brand?
I'm not cherry-picking. You are. I'm saying that the ONLY legitimate comparison is to look at different cars of THE SAME YEAR.
See - that's just it. I'm not arguing that. I'm only saying that a 78 Corvette is worth more than a 78 Camaro - and probably worth more than anything else built in 78. I'm not comparing a 78 Corvette to anything made in 1969, or 1970, or any year other than 1978. YOU are doing that.
Why would I compare a 1978 Corvette to a 1969 Camaro when I can compare a 1969 Corvette to a 1969 Camaro? Which is the better comparison when looking at the relative values of each brand?
I'm not cherry-picking. You are. I'm saying that the ONLY legitimate comparison is to look at different cars of THE SAME YEAR.
Well then your not talking to me!
I contesting the following:
'70 Superbird or Daytona (Hemi 4 spd, nach
'64 Cheetah
'70 W30 442 or GS Stage III
'67 Iso Grifo (the Italian Corvette).
And above all what would you do with these garage queens. The point is, all the above cars could have been had for $2-3k in say 1974
You got to be kidding yourself getting a hemi superbird for $3000
I didn't say anything about vette, Im saying you could never get a Hemi Superbird for $3000.
Well then your not talking to me!
I contesting the following:
I didn't say anything about vette, Im saying you could never get a Hemi Superbird for $3000.
My dad told me that he could have picked up a 71 hemi cuda with 30K miles in 1976 during the gas crisis for $5K and shelby mustangs were cheap too. I can imagine that a hemi super bird was very undesirable at that time also with all the other gas guzzling big blocks. If only you could go back in time
See - that's just it. I'm not arguing that. I'm only saying that a 78 Corvette is worth more than a 78 Camaro - and probably worth more than anything else built in 78. I'm not comparing a 78 Corvette to anything made in 1969, or 1970, or any year other than 1978. YOU are doing that.
Why would I compare a 1978 Corvette to a 1969 Camaro when I can compare a 1969 Corvette to a 1969 Camaro? Which is the better comparison when looking at the relative values of each brand?
I'm not cherry-picking. You are. I'm saying that the ONLY legitimate comparison is to look at different cars of THE SAME YEAR.
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C3 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019
I thought this video was kind of funny looking at the Charger 500 by today's standards.
I was born in '63 so when I think of Corvettes I think of what I remember when I was a kid. The C3. I can't imagine how radical those crazy body lines must have seemed in '68. I always assumed they used fiberglass because they could not make those shapes out of metal back then but that was just my theory. I also thought they did not rust, so what did I know?
I have always loved Mopars, but when I was looking the market had driven the price of cuda's out of the park even for junk. Then one day I thought "corvette!" Hell yea. I don't NEED a back seat. I am just building it to cruise around in. I don't need a practical car. CORVETTE IT IS!
And this has to do with?................................... .......
Yea this site reflects that!
Yes as with the famous 425 horse 350 cid, im sure its quit tame and very streetable manners, for about 5 mins until the new owners gets sick of it and puts it back up for sale at the first cruise in.
I don't get this?
They will go 70mph on the interstate, 30mph down main street USA.
Some people like an American car they can drive without all the valve adjusting, low gear, loping, car shaking, scaring little old ladies attitudes.
If you can't get into a 77 Vette and go riding around and enjoy it you might as well just go back to driving for John Force because your just too much of a man for the normal masses you God like phenom you.
You don't get why 165hp is not enough in a car that weighs 3400 pounds? You don't get why a car that doesn't scare old ladies is not going to get young men's hearts racing? Are you one of those guys who keeps their Corvette in an airtight bubble and drives a Prius to work?
Corvettes are not sports cars they are GT cars. What is a GT car? A snobby European name for a boulavard cruiser with a massive engine to make it go fast (to make English people think they are not actually driving a blue collar muscle car...). Not that far away from a muscle car. So, it kinda makes sense to me that Corvettes would appeal to some muscle car fans, the point of which is to have a powerful engine. They make all the right sounds too (loud ones that scare old ladies).
With the brakes thing, you wrote that you didn't think disc brakes were a good thing. The alternative to disc brakes are drum brakes, like old Caddys have, and that was a story about why drum brakes are... Is English your first language pall? Or did you get disc brakes confused with drum brakes? Discs are the good ones
Man, really getting into the spirit of corvetteforum!
You got to be kidding yourself getting a hemi superbird for $3000
After they were a couple years old, THEY WERE JUST USED CARS! A used Cobre could be had for $2500. Someone I know did just that with used Ferrari's, Lambo's, Alfa's and Jag's from the 60's to early 70's. Everybody told him he was nuts for buying all those used cars. He has about 20 of them and spent less than 100k on the bunch. Today their worth MILLIONS. I would have done the same thing but I didn't get my licence until 1975.
As for the T/A I believe they made 89, but still crazy money. Why not drive it? You could clone one without so much as a donor car shopping catalogs. It's still a Firebird.
Last edited by parkerracing; Sep 3, 2011 at 05:37 AM.
After they were a couple years old, THEY WERE JUST USED CARS! A used Cobre could be had for $2500. Someone I know did just that with used Ferrari's, Lambo's, Alfa's and Jag's from the 60's to early 70's. Everybody told him he was nuts for buying all those used cars. He has about 20 of them and spent less than 100k on the bunch. Today their worth MILLIONS. I would have done the same thing but I didn't get my licence until 1975.
As for the T/A I believe they made 89, but still crazy money. Why not drive it? You could clone one without so much as a donor car shopping catalogs. It's still a Firebird.
697 total 69 trans am's were created and 8 of those were convertibles. Check your facts. You couldn't clone one and pass it off as the real deal. Pontiac's are easy to verify pedigree, unlike vette's.
After they were a couple years old, THEY WERE JUST USED CARS! A used Cobre could be had for $2500. Someone I know did just that with used Ferrari's, Lambo's, Alfa's and Jag's from the 60's to early 70's. Everybody told him he was nuts for buying all those used cars. He has about 20 of them and spent less than 100k on the bunch. Today their worth MILLIONS. I would have done the same thing but I didn't get my licence until 1975.
As for the T/A I believe they made 89, but still crazy money. Why not drive it? You could clone one without so much as a donor car shopping catalogs. It's still a Firebird.
That's nothing, a retired car dealer around the corner (who I bought my first car off) bought TWO 300SL Gullwings in the 1970s, both needing work. Purchase price, $750 each... He still has both, fully restored now.
He also has a Cord roadster that was bought new by Amelia Earhart which he bought after it came to Australia for next to nothing. It was the first car he bought for his dealership and he kept it.
The Cord has a plaque on the dash certifying that, that particular one had a tested top speed of 108mph before being sold. Not a feature of many modern cars!
Well then your not talking to me!
I contesting the following:
I didn't say anything about vette, Im saying you could never get a Hemi Superbird for $3000.
I guess we were arguing across each other at other people!
I agree with you. Even when these cars were new and some of then DID cost $3,000, comparing that to $3,000 today is silly. Compensate for inflation and that's like $15,000 or $18,000 today.