What RPM at 80 mph?
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
What RPM at 80 mph?
I have the 427 with the M21 trans and 3:73 rear end gears. The speed limit in AZ is 75 and you can get away with 80 all day long. Just wondering what kind of RPM I will be turning with that set up at that speed. I hope to find out for myself in a week or so, but until them, can you all help me out????
#2
Drifting
http://www.csgnetwork.com/multirpmcalc.html
use the bottom calculator, just need to know tire height
heres some basic info for your setup:
27" tall tire (stock) - 3700 rpm
28" tire- 3580
29" tire- 3450
FWIW- stock 27" tire with OD added ~ 2,800 rpm
use the bottom calculator, just need to know tire height
heres some basic info for your setup:
27" tall tire (stock) - 3700 rpm
28" tire- 3580
29" tire- 3450
FWIW- stock 27" tire with OD added ~ 2,800 rpm
Last edited by Tiger Joe; 11-16-2017 at 09:49 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Bart K (11-16-2017)
#3
Racer
Thread Starter
http://www.csgnetwork.com/multirpmcalc.html
use the bottom calculator, just need to know tire height
heres some basic info for your setup:
27" tall tire (stock) - 3700 rpm
28" tire- 3580
29" tire- 3450
FWIW- stock 27" tire with OD added ~ 2,800 rpm
use the bottom calculator, just need to know tire height
heres some basic info for your setup:
27" tall tire (stock) - 3700 rpm
28" tire- 3580
29" tire- 3450
FWIW- stock 27" tire with OD added ~ 2,800 rpm
Thanks Tiger Joe! Either way, it sounds like I will be looking for a 5th gear, but hey, what the hell!
#5
Melting Slicks
Fwiw,...
FWIW, I have a 68 with a 454, 80mph does 3500 rpm +/- with a 3.36 rear. No problem all day long.
IMHO, these engines will run 3000 4000rpm with no problems all day long. I think we see the modern Corvettes with 1500rpm on the tach at 85mph and therefore think a steady 3000 4000 is unacceptable.
Now no doubt, 1500 is better and less wear, and certainly running 3500 you will need to stop for gas a lot more often
IMHO, these engines will run 3000 4000rpm with no problems all day long. I think we see the modern Corvettes with 1500rpm on the tach at 85mph and therefore think a steady 3000 4000 is unacceptable.
Now no doubt, 1500 is better and less wear, and certainly running 3500 you will need to stop for gas a lot more often
#6
Nam Labrat
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: New Orleans Loo-z-anna
Posts: 33,898
Received 4,178 Likes
on
2,738 Posts
FWIW, I have a 68 with a 454, 80mph does 3500 rpm +/- with a 3.36 rear. No problem all day long.
IMHO, these engines will run 3000 4000rpm with no problems all day long. I think we see the modern Corvettes with 1500rpm on the tach at 85mph and therefore think a steady 3000 4000 is unacceptable.
Now no doubt, 1500 is better and less wear, and certainly running 3500 you will need to stop for gas a lot more often
IMHO, these engines will run 3000 4000rpm with no problems all day long. I think we see the modern Corvettes with 1500rpm on the tach at 85mph and therefore think a steady 3000 4000 is unacceptable.
Now no doubt, 1500 is better and less wear, and certainly running 3500 you will need to stop for gas a lot more often
Rookie here......how about settling for 2500 rpm for a highway car....it gives the engine and the fuel gauge a "break"
The following users liked this post:
20mercury (11-16-2017)
#7
Racer
Thread Starter
FWIW, I have a 68 with a 454, 80mph does 3500 rpm +/- with a 3.36 rear. No problem all day long.
IMHO, these engines will run 3000 4000rpm with no problems all day long. I think we see the modern Corvettes with 1500rpm on the tach at 85mph and therefore think a steady 3000 4000 is unacceptable.
Now no doubt, 1500 is better and less wear, and certainly running 3500 you will need to stop for gas a lot more often
IMHO, these engines will run 3000 4000rpm with no problems all day long. I think we see the modern Corvettes with 1500rpm on the tach at 85mph and therefore think a steady 3000 4000 is unacceptable.
Now no doubt, 1500 is better and less wear, and certainly running 3500 you will need to stop for gas a lot more often
Yeah, I am not sure what the rear end gearing in the newer Vettes is, but I am sure they have either automatic or 6+ speed transmissions that make that 1500 RPM possible. Fortunately, I do not plan on cross country road trips at that speed. My trips on the freeway are 50 to maybe an occasional 150 mile trip. It should be a blast around town!
The following users liked this post:
Bart K (11-16-2017)
The following users liked this post:
Bart K (11-17-2017)
#11
Le Mans Master
About 2450 for my 82 with 3.55 rear end and AOD. Right on calculation from website. Only get 15 mpg if I am good about driving. 13 if I get on it all the time. Yes, the 3.55 rear end does improve performance, even on a lowly 82.
#12
Race Director
The 365 hp mrrcruiser is basically a clone of iron head 71 LS-6. Touch milder cam with 114 lobe sep to avoid exhaust water reversion. Those engines run 4to 5k all day at 3/4 throttle. A throttle setting you can only use in a car for 5 seconds...maybe 12.5 seconds at the track. You ain't gonna hurt a 427 or 454 at3500 light throttle.
The following users liked this post:
Bart K (11-17-2017)
#15
Racer
Thread Starter
Nothing lowly about an 82 Larry! I love the look of those cars. As for gas mileage.............not worried about it! This car will not be driven all the time, so I can afford a tank of gas now and then!!!
#16
Racer
Thread Starter
The 365 hp mrrcruiser is basically a clone of iron head 71 LS-6. Touch milder cam with 114 lobe sep to avoid exhaust water reversion. Those engines run 4to 5k all day at 3/4 throttle. A throttle setting you can only use in a car for 5 seconds...maybe 12.5 seconds at the track. You ain't gonna hurt a 427 or 454 at3500 light throttle.
#18
Drifting
I get in my 1976 vette with a transplanted big block 454 and a 3:73 rear, and I am screaming down the highway pleasantly doing 70 at about 3100 rpm's. Then I go to work the next day in my 1994 vette lt1, I am rumbling down the highway doing 70 at 1900 rpm's.
I prefer the big block.
I prefer the big block.
The following users liked this post:
Bart K (11-18-2017)
The following users liked this post:
Bart K (11-18-2017)