Mystery Holley Part
#1
Old Pro Solo Guy
Thread Starter
Mystery Holley Part
Found these strange looking "phenolic" spacers in my LS6 #4803-1 Holley today.
One was stuck in the metering block and one was hiding behind the float.
???????
One was stuck in the metering block and one was hiding behind the float.
???????
#3
Dr. Detroit
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,962
Received 3,891 Likes
on
2,563 Posts
Wow...30 years playing with Holleys and never seen those.....but spooky is probably right, what else would it be for!?
Jebby
Jebby
#4
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2017
Location: Cool Northern Michigan
Posts: 6,879
Received 2,112 Likes
on
1,622 Posts
If I had to make a guess, I would say anti-slosh baffle. During hard braking or acceleration the fuel in the bowls likes to play games by uncovering jets causing fuel starvation and causing the float settings to whack-out.
On the 4150s Holley installed vent whistles to control sloshing fuel from exiting out the fuel bowl vents during braking / accelerating.
On the 4150s Holley installed vent whistles to control sloshing fuel from exiting out the fuel bowl vents during braking / accelerating.
Last edited by HeadsU.P.; 03-14-2019 at 03:23 PM.
#5
Old Pro Solo Guy
Thread Starter
Neither Jeff nor I had ever seen them either over decades of playing with Holleys. But this carb looks very original inside and out, even down to the jets the power valves, etc. But this is also an over the counter CE carb, not OEM install, dated 1975.
These things would reduce the fuel volume a good bit, maybe 40% in the front bowl only. I don't think it is a slosh item, because most of this volume reduction is on the bottom of the bowl. At any rate, I will install the more traditional white plastic bowl whistle to control slosh on braking.
Oh just a thought, maybe we have it backwards, maybe they are to prevent the front jets from going dry under acceleration? Might actually work for that. This is a factory LS6 carb. Might actually need it. Makes the bottom of the front bowl sort of V-Shaped.
But then the back jets would starve right? (That's why Holley made the rear jet extensions tubes.)
I am still "baffled".
???
Bakelite is also a heck of a heat insulator. Vapor lock/heat transfer effect?
These things would reduce the fuel volume a good bit, maybe 40% in the front bowl only. I don't think it is a slosh item, because most of this volume reduction is on the bottom of the bowl. At any rate, I will install the more traditional white plastic bowl whistle to control slosh on braking.
Oh just a thought, maybe we have it backwards, maybe they are to prevent the front jets from going dry under acceleration? Might actually work for that. This is a factory LS6 carb. Might actually need it. Makes the bottom of the front bowl sort of V-Shaped.
But then the back jets would starve right? (That's why Holley made the rear jet extensions tubes.)
I am still "baffled".
???
Bakelite is also a heck of a heat insulator. Vapor lock/heat transfer effect?
#6
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2017
Location: Cool Northern Michigan
Posts: 6,879
Received 2,112 Likes
on
1,622 Posts
I'm not convinced its for volume removal. The more fuel in the bowl, the bigger the fuel bowl, the cooler the fuel remains = win-win.
Put a pot of cool water on the hot stove then a tablespoon of water and see which one heats up faster.
As far as insulating, millions of SBC out there which had or have the heat-cross-over under the carb. So which is it? Heat up the carb or insulate the carb from heat?
Put a pot of cool water on the hot stove then a tablespoon of water and see which one heats up faster.
As far as insulating, millions of SBC out there which had or have the heat-cross-over under the carb. So which is it? Heat up the carb or insulate the carb from heat?
Last edited by HeadsU.P.; 03-14-2019 at 03:42 PM.
#7
Dr. Detroit
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,962
Received 3,891 Likes
on
2,563 Posts
I want to know too...like why?!
Jebby
#8
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 13,652
Received 4,919 Likes
on
1,929 Posts
I've seen those phenolic spacers in at least a half-dozen original GM-installed Holleys. For as many as I've seen, I have reason to believe they were part of the GM OEM Holley configuration package. I can see no purpose for them other than to reduce fuel volume.
Lars
Lars
#10
Burning Brakes
I'm pretty sure it was an emission piece back in the day (I was a cust. service counterman for a auto parts chain whse), I'm pretty sure I read about them in regards to pollution control but never saw them. I do know that if you are track/dragging this car you'll want to remove them, adding the whistles and extensions are well received improvements. Lower volume can lead to big changes in level during full load wot.
#11
Burning Brakes
I'm not convinced its for volume removal. The more fuel in the bowl, the bigger the fuel bowl, the cooler the fuel remains = win-win.
Put a pot of cool water on the hot stove then a tablespoon of water and see which one heats up faster.
As far as insulating, millions of SBC out there which had or have the heat-cross-over under the carb. So which is it? Heat up the carb or insulate the carb from heat?
Put a pot of cool water on the hot stove then a tablespoon of water and see which one heats up faster.
As far as insulating, millions of SBC out there which had or have the heat-cross-over under the carb. So which is it? Heat up the carb or insulate the carb from heat?
#12
Old Pro Solo Guy
Thread Starter
Stop gap emissions attempt sounds correct to me. Especially since several have been seen on other "original" Holleys.
The chemist in me thinks the fuel surface area would remain the same and that would not reduce evaporative emissions, and volume is irrelevant. But the way the phenolic or bakelite would tend to insulate the remaining fuel in the carb sure could slow the evaporation rate after shut-off. And then other Holleys had bowl vents (why?) GM, and Chevy in particular often had a way of meeting these mandated changes so they were intentionally very easy for the real racers to un-do.
I am thinking of camshafts so big they were really designed for open headers, 2 inch (small block) exhaust on L88s, headers in trunk on 68 Z28s, and the goofy secondary throttle stop limit on 400 cu in Firebirds that knocked 30-40 hp off the GTO motor to stay under an arbitrary HP/CU in limit. Strange times indeed, the 70s! I put the severely retarded timing on 70-73 cars in this same camp. Just compare those spark-controlled timing curves to the fairly well performance-optimized curve that a factory 63 Fuelie had. They all helped emissions, or mandates, not performance, but were easy to change.
The chemist in me thinks the fuel surface area would remain the same and that would not reduce evaporative emissions, and volume is irrelevant. But the way the phenolic or bakelite would tend to insulate the remaining fuel in the carb sure could slow the evaporation rate after shut-off. And then other Holleys had bowl vents (why?) GM, and Chevy in particular often had a way of meeting these mandated changes so they were intentionally very easy for the real racers to un-do.
I am thinking of camshafts so big they were really designed for open headers, 2 inch (small block) exhaust on L88s, headers in trunk on 68 Z28s, and the goofy secondary throttle stop limit on 400 cu in Firebirds that knocked 30-40 hp off the GTO motor to stay under an arbitrary HP/CU in limit. Strange times indeed, the 70s! I put the severely retarded timing on 70-73 cars in this same camp. Just compare those spark-controlled timing curves to the fairly well performance-optimized curve that a factory 63 Fuelie had. They all helped emissions, or mandates, not performance, but were easy to change.
Last edited by leigh1322; 03-14-2019 at 10:47 PM.