When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I had a motor dynoed the other day. It's a 383 SBC, Canfield ported 195's, RPM AirGap, 750 DEMON Vacuum secondaries, 11:1 compression, gapless rings, beehive springs, COMP hydraulic roller 242/248 @ .050 .541/.562 lift
The motor made peak power @ 5600 rpm. I was expecting a peak around 6000-6200. Does 5600 peak sound low for such a big cam in a 383?
That intake manifold and carburetor is going to hold it back a little bit. If you want to raise the power peak go to a single plane manifold and an 800CFM carb. Do you have headers on this thing? Going larger on pipe diameter and shorter on length will raise it also.
an intersteing little tool, though i cant say i like the results for my 327, according to that i only need a 512 CFM carb at 83% efficiency, or a 600 cfm carb at 100%,
Say it aint so ....... the factory Qjet flows more than that
Last edited by sweethence; Feb 7, 2006 at 12:07 PM.
That intake manifold and carburetor is going to hold it back a little bit. If you want to raise the power peak go to a single plane manifold and an 800CFM carb. Do you have headers on this thing? Going larger on pipe diameter and shorter on length will raise it also.
BigBlockk
Later.....
I know you're right about the single plane but I've seen many similar combos in magazine articles and online that peaked around 6000 with an RPM Airgap. We had to use Shoenfield headers from one of his circle track cars because my headers were hitting the dyno mount. They were 1 3/4 primaries. Mine are 1 3/4" primary "shorties".
The dyno sheet showed 94.6 VE @ 4900 rpm. I'm not sure if the ports are matched but I know the intake ports on the heads have the entrance ported (smoothed) about 1.5" into the port and I remember seeing some portwork on the manifold too. I assume they are matched if they took the time to do both.
Just as a "virtual engine", my DynoSim shows peak HP at 6000 rpm and peak torque at 4500 rpm based on your engine specs.....my own engine is very similar but with slightly less cam and it pulls strongly to 6500 rpm with the RPM Air Gap and Demon 825 carb. The peaks were the same when I had an Edelbrock 750 also.
Does anyone think the Canfield195's are too small for the cam? I'm considering going to the 215's or 220's. I'm thinking about a WP single plane and a Mighty DEMON 825 for track days too.
Does anyone think the Canfield195's are too small for the cam? I'm considering going to the 215's or 220's. I'm thinking about a WP single plane and a Mighty DEMON 825 for track days too.
heres the dyno on my 383, peaks at around 6000RPM
its with Brodix track 1 heads and EB TorkerII manifold.
Speeddemon 750 mec sencondaries
Cam is a solid roller
Valve Lift:
Intake = .562
Exhaust = .562
Duration @ .015"
Intake = 268
Exhaust = 268
LC = 110
Does anyone think the Canfield195's are too small for the cam? I'm considering going to the 215's or 220's. I'm thinking about a WP single plane and a Mighty DEMON 825 for track days too.
The ported 195's may be for sale soon.
I saw your dyno figures the other day. I would have expected a higher peak hp rpm. Is it possible that your into valve float? i just don't think that you can use the word race car and H-rollers in the same sentence. I have the exact same cam on my 427 small block and it zings to 7000 rpm where I set my rev limiter. I just sold my H-rollers and installed S-rollers. I'm also just running a 750 cfm. I could probably run a 600 - 650 cfm and only be down a few poneys.
Another thing to look at is timing. High swirl heads require 6-8 degrees less total timing than old heads. Dyno runs have found the best power in the 32 or so degrees max the best.
Do you have any head flow info on your heads? Because 195's with @265+ cfm intake should support over 500 hp.
Put a Victor E or a Super Victor CNC on that engine and you are gonna shift the peak HP to a higher RPM!
Even though the Performer RPM is better at lower RPM, you can still expect a 10+ HP gain with a performance single plane intake, preferably with a spacer!!
I saw your dyno figures the other day. I would have expected a higher peak hp rpm. Is it possible that your into valve float? i just don't think that you can use the word race car and H-rollers in the same sentence. I have the exact same cam on my 427 small block and it zings to 7000 rpm where I set my rev limiter. I just sold my H-rollers and installed S-rollers. I'm also just running a 750 cfm. I could probably run a 600 - 650 cfm and only be down a few poneys.
Another thing to look at is timing. High swirl heads require 6-8 degrees less total timing than old heads. Dyno runs have found the best power in the 32 or so degrees max the best.
Do you have any head flow info on your heads? Because 195's with @265+ cfm intake should support over 500 hp.
I don't think valve float is an issue. I have COMP beehive springs on the motor. It pulled to the 6000 limit I imposed on the operator without any unusual sounds or drastic dip in power.. It only lost 6hp from the peak at 5600 to 6000.
They used 113 race fuel so I don't know if that had any adverse effect. They started with 35 total timing and jumped to 40. I would have rather started about 32 and increased in smaller increments. It was my first dyno experience and I was just so glad the thing started up after all the problems I'd had with it. I probably didn't didn't give my input like I should have but experience is a good teacher. Next time I'll be more involved in what's going on.
I don't have exact flow #'s on the heads but I assume they're marginally better than "out the box" Canfield195's. So you're right, they should support 500+hp.
Put a Victor E or a Super Victor CNC on that engine and you are gonna shift the peak HP to a higher RPM!
Even though the Performer RPM is better at lower RPM, you can still expect a 10+ HP gain with a performance single plane intake, preferably with a spacer!!
If I go with a single plane it'll be World Products. I've read alot of good things about their SBC single plane. Besides I don't want to just shift everything up in the rev band. I think it should be making more power overall. By 5600 this motor with the parts in it should be at 485-495hp and should peak at around 6000-6200 at 500-505hp. It should be making 500+ft lbs at about 4600. The motor was dyno'd with the full serpentine accessory drive including alternator, power steering pump and water pump but I don't think that made much of a difference.
If I go with a single plane it'll be World Products. I've read alot of good things about their SBC single plane. Besides I don't want to just shift everything up in the rev band. I think it should be making more power overall. By 5600 this motor with the parts in it should be at 485-495hp and should peak at around 6000-6200 at 500-505hp. It should be making 500+ft lbs at about 4600. The motor was dyno'd with the full serpentine accessory drive including alternator, power steering pump and water pump but I don't think that made much of a difference.
I haven't seen too many similar engines with relatively small intake runners on the heads (< 200 cc) get up to close to 500 HP... I believe that you'd need bigger heads...
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.