When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I don't believe that the upper shock mount will be a problem. In the JMR kit, his coilovers only have 2" of travel and uses 750# springs. This is pretty much the same upper mount. Appreciate the input though. I absorb it all and will take it into consideration.
What's the advantage of these arms? They are lighter and stronger. Our uppers will save you 6 lbs. 3 lbs each arm. The lowers will save you 4 1/2 lbs. 2 1/4 lbs each side.
For info, what is the material spec and are the arms stress relieved after welding?
There are many types of chromemoly steel with different amounts of chromium and moly. The steel should have an ASTM or AISI spec (maybe called an SAE spec) that defines the chemical composition. Low chrome steels are air hardenable meaning they can be brittle in the as-welded condition. Hence the question about stress relieving after welding.
I don't think the tubing is thick enough to warrant stress relieving being < .120???
Stress relieving can't be done w/ an oxy/acet torch, just heating it red hot and then letting it cool again does more harm than good. For propre stress relieving you need an autoclave (vacuum) and a fixture to support the part to be stress relieved. The autoclave is then set to slowly heat to 1150-1250F or so in about 4 hrs, maintain the temp for a certain amount of time (usually a couple of minutes to hours depending on part) and slowly cool down. All this w/ the fixture supporting the part and keeping it from deforming. There's no way you can do this with a torch, and there's another problem with the torch, scaling! When you torch the part glowing red hot after welding you get scakubg, Consequently a small layer is removed so that your wall thickness is reduced.
So, either the parts get really expensive with the whole autoclave procedure or you use them as welded, torching just makes things worse. With the relativly thin material (wall thickness) the whole weld area gets reasonably uniformly heated during the welding so stress cracking shouldn't be a problem if the weld is sound.
There are many types of chromemoly steel with different amounts of chromium and moly. The steel should have an ASTM or AISI spec (maybe called an SAE spec) that defines the chemical composition. Low chrome steels are air hardenable meaning they can be brittle in the as-welded condition. Hence the question about stress relieving after welding.
I don't know much about metals. I just know that they are chromoly. I don't know how the whole process works after they are welded. We are not making the arms in house. They are being made exclusively for us by a company that makes many other tubular a-arms.
Here is an updated pic of the lower coilover arm. These arms are weighing in at 10lbs w/ball joints. 4.25 lbs lighter than stock and 2 lbs lighter than the semi-coilovers pictured in the 1st post. Also an updated pic of the upper.
I don't know much about metals. I just know that they are chromoly. I don't know how the whole process works after they are welded. We are not making the arms in house. They are being made exclusively for us by a company that makes many other tubular a-arms.
It's a bit frightening that the materials might not even be made to a spec. If you're not aware of the material spec, that raises other questions relating to the quality control of the assemblies. For example, what filler metal, if any, is being used for the welds? Does it match the tube metallurgy? Sounds like we should know a bit more about these before committing. Sounds like some specs should be developed-possibly discuss with the fabricator and at least document materials & quality control considerations so future A-arms are the same as the first. If there are no specs, how do you know these A-arms are stronger than OEM as previously stated?
I don't think the tubing is thick enough to warrant stress relieving being < .120???
Stress relieving can't be done w/ an oxy/acet torch, just heating it red hot and then letting it cool again does more harm than good. For propre stress relieving you need an autoclave (vacuum) and a fixture to support the part to be stress relieved. The autoclave is then set to slowly heat to 1150-1250F or so in about 4 hrs, maintain the temp for a certain amount of time (usually a couple of minutes to hours depending on part) and slowly cool down. All this w/ the fixture supporting the part and keeping it from deforming. There's no way you can do this with a torch, and there's another problem with the torch, scaling! When you torch the part glowing red hot after welding you get scakubg, Consequently a small layer is removed so that your wall thickness is reduced.
So, either the parts get really expensive with the whole autoclave procedure or you use them as welded, torching just makes things worse. With the relativly thin material (wall thickness) the whole weld area gets reasonably uniformly heated during the welding so stress cracking shouldn't be a problem if the weld is sound.
Can't really comment on the need for stress relief or the method until we know the material spec. Some chromemoly steels are really not made for welding. If it's 1 1/4 CR, you may be right, depending on carbon content. Best to wait for the material spec before developing a stress relief procedure or deciding it's not required.
It's a bit frightening that the materials might not even be made to a spec. If you're not aware of the material spec, that raises other questions relating to the quality control of the assemblies. For example, what filler metal, if any, is being used for the welds? Does it match the tube metallurgy? Sounds like we should know a bit more about these before committing. Sounds like some specs should be developed-possibly discuss with the fabricator and at least document materials & quality control considerations so future A-arms are the same as the first. If there are no specs, how do you know these A-arms are stronger than OEM as previously stated?
Like I said, I don't know. All a-arms are built in a jig so they are made the same everytime. I'm sure the fabricator, who has to have a license and is certified knows what type of materials to use and not to use. This is not specialty. If it was, I could answer your questions more appropiately. These arms have been on my car for about 3 months and I have had zero problems with them. If you called me up and asked me how I built my bearing assemblies, that would be a different story.
Coilover lower a-arms, I like the first version you posted and would buy those.
I would prefer the first design and modifiy your arm myself the lower shock mount for coilover, it looks stronger. I always think of double shear being better. The later version with the tabs, I like something on the other side supporting the tab. The first ones that you showed have essentially a stock lower shock mount giving you something to weld to, to support the shock mount from both sides.
Years ago I bought a set of your rear offset trailing arms and modified the bushing ends to take the Guldstrand Spherical Bearings and toe adjustment screws and gusseted the arms in other locations.
For us that modify the parts bought, you have to leave us something to tinker with!
I received mine today, very nice worksmanship and TIG welding. No price break for skipping the powdercoating though huh .
What coilovers are you guys selling/using with these? I probably won't be to that point until around Memorial Day - got to strip, dip, and powdercoat the frame first.
Again, thanks for getting these to me so quick, they are very nice pieces.
Now if only my tall deck Warhawk LS7X block and 12* heads would arrive I'd be really happy.
I received mine today, very nice worksmanship and TIG welding. No price break for skipping the powdercoating though huh .
What coilovers are you guys selling/using with these? I probably won't be to that point until around Memorial Day - got to strip, dip, and powdercoat the frame first.
Again, thanks for getting these to me so quick, they are very nice pieces.
Now if only my tall deck Warhawk LS7X block and 12* heads would arrive I'd be really happy.
We will be using QA1 coilovers with these. They are the 12 point adjustable ones. Nice pieces. When your ready, let me know. I should have them up on our site here in the next 2 weeks.
Powder coating was deducted from the price. If you only knew how much it really cost to powder coat parts in standard colors, your jaw would probably drop, considering what people pay for it. Our cost is even lower since we own our powder coating plant.
Now if only my tall deck Warhawk LS7X block and 12* heads would arrive I'd be really happy.
I was wondering what direction you would go in. I have read a few articles on the Warhawk pieces and they look real good. I'm not trying to hijack this thread but how quickly are all of the components going to be available?
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.