C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Choosing top end kit for a 383

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2008, 04:39 PM
  #1  
janbanan24
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
janbanan24's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Umeå-Sweden
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Choosing top end kit for a 383

Hoping to get some well needed help from this great forum:

I'm rebuilding a 4-bolted 350 with a cast 400 crank and 4.040 bore.

I was looking at maybe the Holley SysteMAX II or some other "top end kit" since I don't have the know how to hand pick the peices my self.

But maybe someone out there can help?

I'm not sure what info I should give to get correct help though...

But I could try:

                  So as you can see I have not planned to have a very high compression ratio or to be revving the engine like crazy for maximum hp.
                  The car will not be a daily driver and I kinda like the sound of bad "racy" idling!
                  ...The goal however is to have the torque pretty early in the rev-register and as much hp as possible without going above maybe 5500rpm?

                  Little Mouse!?



                  ...anyone?

                  Last edited by janbanan24; 02-18-2008 at 04:51 PM. Reason: Swedish spelling! LOL
                  Old 02-18-2008, 08:07 PM
                    #2  
                  andylmusic76
                  Burning Brakes
                   
                  andylmusic76's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Sep 2005
                  Location: Sarasota Florida
                  Posts: 832
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

                  Default

                  i'm pretty sure someone will recommend brodix heads to you. i don't know to much about them, but they have a high reputation to speak for them! i also hear good things about aluminum heads; although, personally i would just use cast as you can't really strip the threads, they won't warp like aluminum, and the weight won't make too much difference unless you're setting it up for racing only. when i was building my engine i was discouraged to use aluminum, so i stuck with cast. i am very pleased with my results though.
                  Old 02-18-2008, 08:17 PM
                    #3  
                  rclinton
                  Pro

                   
                  rclinton's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Feb 2006
                  Location: Jacksonville , NC
                  Posts: 718
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts

                  Default

                  Im getting ready to start building my L82 stroker. Im sure there will be many opinions, For my build, the ball park components I looked for were 64cc cc 195cc runner aluminum heads, 9.7 cr, Lunati voodoo cam .499/.521 lift 219/227 duration with 1.6:1 roller rockers, professional products cyclone intake, with a Lars rebuilt Edelbrock Q-jet, exiting through a set of hooker sidepipe headers. DD 464/491 numbers, will be happy with a 400/400 result. Power made all below 6000 RPM so Im looking forward to a fun street weekend driver. Good luck on your build.
                  Old 02-19-2008, 11:55 AM
                    #4  
                  hammyjoe
                  Heel & Toe
                   
                  hammyjoe's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Apr 2005
                  Location: El Paso TX
                  Posts: 15
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  I felt the same way when I started my rebuild and found all of my answers in this forum. Just finished the rebuild. Used a 4 bolt 383 shortblock bored .40 w/flattop pistons, and cast crank. For the top-end: aluminium vortec heads, magnum 280 cam, rpm airgap intake, 600 cfm edelbrock carb. Still tuning the carb, but am really happy with the outcome. No clearance issues with the hood and gobbs of power. Good luck with yours.
                  Old 02-19-2008, 12:55 PM
                    #5  
                  column5
                  Instructor
                   
                  column5's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Apr 2007
                  Location: Collierville TN
                  Posts: 177
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Originally Posted by hammyjoe
                  I felt the same way when I started my rebuild and found all of my answers in this forum. Just finished the rebuild. Used a 4 bolt 383 shortblock bored .40 w/flattop pistons, and cast crank. For the top-end: aluminium vortec heads, magnum 280 cam, rpm airgap intake, 600 cfm edelbrock carb. Still tuning the carb, but am really happy with the outcome. No clearance issues with the hood and gobbs of power. Good luck with yours.
                  No clearance problems with the air gap? I was at Comp Cams yesterday talking with a guy about their cams and RHS heads. He reccomended the RPM air gap but I was concerned about clearance on my 74.
                  Old 02-19-2008, 02:46 PM
                    #6  
                  hammyjoe
                  Heel & Toe
                   
                  hammyjoe's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Apr 2005
                  Location: El Paso TX
                  Posts: 15
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  I read the fine print after I had already bought the manifold and I'm not sure if having no hood liner helps with the clearance or not. (It's been a long and fun project)

                  Before I started my project I was looking at the same top-end kits, but had read in this forum that to make the advertised hp your rpm's are up around 6000 or more. I'm not comfortable spinning my shortblock that high. Cast crank and all. For me, learning about the different components and building it was 90% of the fun.
                  Old 02-19-2008, 03:08 PM
                    #7  
                  VIPERBARON
                  Racer
                   
                  VIPERBARON's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Mar 2006
                  Location: Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (home in Colorado Springs)
                  Posts: 291
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  If you are using the stock rods, then the dish pistons will give you lower compression ratio.
                  Stock 350 rods are 5.56 inches long and the stock crank has a stroke of 3.48 inches.
                  Cast crank? Why oh why? Find a good forged 4340, internally balanced crank. Forged rods are a plus as is forged pistons.
                  While you are at it, just go to a 383 stroker.
                  Old 02-19-2008, 03:57 PM
                    #8  
                  janbanan24
                  Intermediate
                  Thread Starter
                   
                  janbanan24's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Sep 2006
                  Location: Umeå-Sweden
                  Posts: 39
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Ok, thanks for all the input and cheering on!

                  Am I wrong to assume that modern aluminium heads are better than old iron heads in most every way?
                  Should be better engineered combustion cambers and runners, less warping/heat collecting and should move the center of gravity down and back a little if Im not misstaken?

                  And one other thing: crank and rods are "original type" cast iron from a 400 so yes it was a 383 stroker while it was 030 bore (when I bought it) ...now 040 bore, should make it a 385 stroker or something like that?

                  So how would it be with this set up you think?
                  Heads: Trick Flow 195, CNC, 64cc
                  Intake: Performer RPM
                  Cam: Comp Cams 12-246-3 (Hyudral)
                  Rocker ratio: 1.6

                  ...but then I think I would have to modify the hood!?
                  Old 02-19-2008, 04:18 PM
                    #9  
                  VIPERBARON
                  Racer
                   
                  VIPERBARON's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Mar 2006
                  Location: Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (home in Colorado Springs)
                  Posts: 291
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Yup, 3.75 inch stroke, 5.7 inch rods with 4.040 pistons will give you a wolloping 385.
                  Alum heads disapate heat better than iron, so you can run a tad higher compression ratio. Weight savings too as alum heads weigh in at 25 pounds and iron hit better than 70 pounds. Each.
                  Old 02-19-2008, 05:58 PM
                    #10  
                  jackson
                  Le Mans Master

                   
                  jackson's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Sep 2001
                  Location: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
                  Posts: 7,739
                  Received 628 Likes on 556 Posts

                  Default

                  400: rods are 5.565", stroke 3.75", bore 4.125"

                  350: rods are 5.7", stroke 3.48", bore 4"

                  Jan? You are running short 400 rods right? What is Part Number of your KB d-cups? Is it KB142 with -18cc dish?

                  Has your block been decked? If so, how much?

                  if stock deck, & KB142 & 3.75" stroke ... get a 64 or 62cc head ... 62cc & GM 10105117 gasket (0.028" x 5.8cc) would be pretty good. Better would be deck block to remove about 0.012"-0.014", KB142, same GM gasket but 64cc heads ... that'll get your quench in the ~ 0.040" range w/ about 9.6:1 scr.
                  Old 02-21-2008, 05:16 PM
                    #11  
                  janbanan24
                  Intermediate
                  Thread Starter
                   
                  janbanan24's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Sep 2006
                  Location: Umeå-Sweden
                  Posts: 39
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Originally Posted by jackson
                  400: rods are 5.565", stroke 3.75", bore 4.125"

                  350: rods are 5.7", stroke 3.48", bore 4"

                  Jan? You are running short 400 rods right? What is Part Number of your KB d-cups? Is it KB142 with -18cc dish?

                  Has your block been decked? If so, how much?

                  if stock deck, & KB142 & 3.75" stroke ... get a 64 or 62cc head ... 62cc & GM 10105117 gasket (0.028" x 5.8cc) would be pretty good. Better would be deck block to remove about 0.012"-0.014", KB142, same GM gasket but 64cc heads ... that'll get your quench in the ~ 0.040" range w/ about 9.6:1 scr.
                  Sorry, maybe I was not very clear about this, lets try again:
                  Rods are 5.7
                  Stroke 3.75
                  Pistons KB197
                  Block is decked, but I really don't know how much!:o

                  Thanks again for your help!
                  Old 02-21-2008, 08:08 PM
                    #12  
                  V77Vette
                  Instructor
                   
                  V77Vette's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Dec 2007
                  Location: Sanderson Texas
                  Posts: 247
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  i may be wrong but i thought a 400 had different size mains than a 350
                  unless thats what you mean when you said you had the crank machined
                  or its a 350 mains 400 crank? (i see now where you said it was a 383 stroker so thats prob what you have)


                  sorry my bad i just seen where you said original type crank and thought an original 400 crank wouldnt fit in a 350 block

                  Last edited by V77Vette; 02-21-2008 at 08:24 PM.
                  Old 02-22-2008, 08:40 PM
                    #13  
                  janbanan24
                  Intermediate
                  Thread Starter
                   
                  janbanan24's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Sep 2006
                  Location: Umeå-Sweden
                  Posts: 39
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Yeah, I think the 400 has different size mains. (If that's what you would call the cranc bearring areas? I'm from Sweden you know so English is not my first language! )
                  ...so the "mains" were probably machined before the crank would fit in the 350 block, and are now machined again because they were worn from bad lubrication.
                  I guess it was pretty missleading to say "400 crank and rods" when I actually ment: 383 stroker with cast iron crank and rods, where ever the parts came from.

                  SO! I have a colegues friend who is bringing over a container from US to Sweden with a car and I can let my future cam, heads, intake manifold and stuff like that ride along in the boot, help me out here, again:o , what would make sense to buy to make a torque-monster out of this 385 stroker?

                  BTW you can see some pictures in this 16-page-thread in a Swedish Corvetteforum about my Florida salvage:
                  http://www.clubcorvette.se/forum/vie...er=asc&start=0

                  Last edited by janbanan24; 02-22-2008 at 08:47 PM.
                  Old 02-23-2008, 10:08 AM
                    #14  
                  jackson
                  Le Mans Master

                   
                  jackson's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Sep 2001
                  Location: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
                  Posts: 7,739
                  Received 628 Likes on 556 Posts

                  Default

                  Originally Posted by janbanan24
                  Sorry, maybe I was not very clear about this, lets try again:
                  Rods are 5.7
                  Stroke 3.75
                  Pistons KB197
                  Block is decked, but I really don't know how much
                  KB197 has -12cc dish and 1.433" CD. Find out. You need to know how much your block's been decked so you can choose correct gasket & head. If ... IF your block had NOT been decked ... KB197 and 10105117 gasket & 64cc heads will yield about 10.1:1 scr w/ 0.045" quench.
                  If ... IF same stuff but your block decked 0.006" ... it'll yield about 10.2:1 scr w/ 0.039" quench.

                  If you want scr about 9.6:1 you should consider a 70cc head.
                  Old 02-23-2008, 05:28 PM
                    #15  
                  janbanan24
                  Intermediate
                  Thread Starter
                   
                  janbanan24's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Sep 2006
                  Location: Umeå-Sweden
                  Posts: 39
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Ok, I see!

                  So how do I "find out"?

                  Can I control it by checking that the deck is flat and then install one piston and measure from tdc?

                  ...or is there a quicker way?
                  Old 02-24-2008, 11:09 AM
                    #16  
                  jackson
                  Le Mans Master

                   
                  jackson's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Sep 2001
                  Location: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
                  Posts: 7,739
                  Received 628 Likes on 556 Posts

                  Default

                  Originally Posted by janbanan24
                  Can I control it by checking that the deck is flat and then install one piston and measure from tdc?
                  Yes ... that is how you do the job.

                  Check four cylinders 1, 7, 2 & 8. You can use same piston-rod ... move it from 1 to 7 to 2 to 8. At each cylinder, measure how far piston is "down in hole" ... measure around each hole at 4 places 0, 90, 180 & 270 ... then average those to average how far down in hole. Measure from deck to piston's flat area of crown near outer diameter of piston ... notice at extreme outer edge of piston there is a chamfer ... do not measure from deck to chamfer ... measure from deck to just inside chamfer. Dunno how much your block decked ... but in a STOCK UNCUT block that piston should be about 0.017" down in hole. Expect yours to be something less than 0.017".

                  Acquire accurate, precise numbers and post back here at this thread.
                  Old 03-02-2008, 04:33 AM
                    #17  
                  janbanan24
                  Intermediate
                  Thread Starter
                   
                  janbanan24's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Sep 2006
                  Location: Umeå-Sweden
                  Posts: 39
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  When I don't have the cam yet, how do i determine tdc?

                  Should I just try to see when the piston is as high up as possible and put a steel ruler over the deck and measure with (don't know the english word... thin steel leafs?)
                  ...or should I mount a "indicator clock" to the deck to se the absolute tdc?

                  Get notified of new replies

                  To Choosing top end kit for a 383

                  Old 03-02-2008, 08:45 AM
                    #18  
                  Capella
                  Advanced
                   
                  Capella's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Nov 2007
                  Location: Central Texas
                  Posts: 82
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Originally Posted by janbanan24
                  ...or should I mount a "indicator clock" to the deck to se the absolute tdc?
                  Yes.
                  Old 03-02-2008, 11:02 AM
                    #19  
                  69camfrk
                  Le Mans Master
                   
                  69camfrk's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Jan 2006
                  Location: GA "When I grow up, I'm gonna get a Trans Am and run from the cops". Direct quote from my 4yo son.
                  Posts: 5,921
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

                  Default

                  Originally Posted by hammyjoe
                  I read the fine print after I had already bought the manifold and I'm not sure if having no hood liner helps with the clearance or not. (It's been a long and fun project)

                  Before I started my project I was looking at the same top-end kits, but had read in this forum that to make the advertised hp your rpm's are up around 6000 or more. I'm not comfortable spinning my shortblock that high. Cast crank and all. For me, learning about the different components and building it was 90% of the fun.
                  Cast crank is no problem as long as you're not putting a severe shock on it ie: drag slicks. If the reciprocating assembly is balanced on a 350 going past 6 grand isn't an issue. I am using the Holley systemax set up on my '69 Camaro on a 350. I spin past 6 grand pretty much everytime I drive the car. My crank is cast but the assy is balanced. I'm going to do a 383 for my "new" '72 but the motor will be all forged stuff on this one. I'm planning on using the Brodix head package as it is only a few hunderd dollars more than the Holley. No cam with it, but most everything else.
                  Old 04-09-2008, 12:56 PM
                    #20  
                  janbanan24
                  Intermediate
                  Thread Starter
                   
                  janbanan24's Avatar
                   
                  Member Since: Sep 2006
                  Location: Umeå-Sweden
                  Posts: 39
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  So, now I know that I have a 4-bolted 350 block, 400-cranc, 350-rods and KB-hyper pistons -12cc.
                  The block has not been decked so the distance from deck to piston is appr. 0.0059, bore is .040 and I also have a "Victor Reinz SB Chevy 350 Performance Gasket Set", but I don't know the thickness of head gaskets yet.

                  Any ideas?


                  Quick Reply: Choosing top end kit for a 383



                  All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 AM.