When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a 71 Vert with 350SB & std trans. The trans cross member in this car has holes provided for the exhaust pipes to pass through on there way back to the mufflers mounted rear of the differential.
I was thinking about 3 Inch pipes back and marring them up to my headers that have 3 inch collectors. I was planning on using an 8 inch long stainless braided flex section from the headers to the exhaust pipe to reduce any engine vibration that would be transmitted through the exhaust pipe and bank into the Trans cross member. I found the stainless braided flex section similar to what is used in front wheel drive cars and they do come in 3 inch diameters.
Has anyone done this and what should I be aware of (maybe to avoid)?
I changed to 3" two years ago. didn't use any flex stuff. once the pipes were thru the crossmember and centered i placed hanger brackets to keep the pipe centered. I have had no problems - i like the sound better -but i seem to have lost some bottomend power going to 3" exhaust.
From: Downtown Annapolis, MD. The Future is where we all have to live. Let's not screw it up.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11
That should come as no surprise, as you really need back-pressure at lower rpm band. 3 " pipes will definitely reduce back-pressure. Great at top end though. It's a trade off.
I had my car on a Mustang Dyno with the Stans TriY headers & 2" exhaust and I had it on later with the 3" exhaust....Guess what...
Absolutely NOTHING! There was NO marked difference between 2" and 3" exhaust on my mildly tuned 350. It has dual (free flow) cats & 3".
The only difference is that is sounds a bit cooler now.
I wish I could post that either way had superior numbers on HP or Torque but...Nope. On my own personal car, no difference between 2 and 3 inch exhaust.
No need for 3 inch exhaust. A good 2 1/2 system will flow enough for a 500 HP SB. 3 ich is far a large high winding SB or a healthy BB motor. The 2 1/2 system will fit better also.
I used 7 inch pipe to add to my cross member. It doesn't need to be that big. My exhaust is 3 inch and I didn't need to cut so much out of the CM. Because the floor is now lower that the upper part of the arch.
You are better off with a custom cross member. The stock exhaust holes are too close to the tranny and heat is the enemy. It also makes for complicated exhaust pipe bends. My system is a straight shot back from the headers.
I had my car on a Mustang Dyno with the Stans TriY headers & 2" exhaust and I had it on later with the 3" exhaust....Guess what...
Absolutely NOTHING! There was NO marked difference between 2" and 3" exhaust on my mildly tuned 350. It has dual (free flow) cats & 3".
The only difference is that is sounds a bit cooler now.
I wish I could post that either way had superior numbers on HP or Torque but...Nope. On my own personal car, no difference between 2 and 3 inch exhaust.
The power difference in the end might not have changed, but did you take note if there was a difference in the power curves? I'd imagine the 3" exhaust would have shifted more power to the right on the dyno instead of lower in the RPM's. Also, if there was more area under the curve with the 2" or 3" ?
I did something similar, but I used some stainless bellows instead of the flex pipe. I put them in the system just in front of the tranny x-member. No rattles, sounds better, and even has more ground clearance than my old pre-bent 2 1/2" pipes I bought from one of the major vendors.
I don't have any before & after HP numbers to compare the difference. No complaints though .... I've got 300 ft-lbs @ 2k rpm at the rear wheels, and I get 1.9 sec 60' times on street tires so it isn't too soft on the bottom end.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by xccter
That should come as no surprise, as you really need back-pressure at lower rpm band. 3 " pipes will definitely reduce back-pressure. Great at top end though. It's a trade off.
No, no, no. Backpressure is never a good thing. Engines make horsepower by pumping air. Restricting the output (exhaust) decreases the input (volumetric efficiency), and thereby, reduces horsepower.
If I recall correctly, I got them from a local Earl's race supply shop in Indianapolis, IN. Regretfully, the bellows didn't have a manufacture label on them, so I don't know who actually made them.
No, no, no. Backpressure is never a good thing. Engines make horsepower by pumping air. Restricting the output (exhaust) decreases the input (volumetric efficiency), and thereby, reduces horsepower.
I am not trying to argue but Visard says sometimes you can get too big, and I just talked to Jerry Stahl today and he told me I should run 1 5\8 Primarys not 1 3\4" for better streetablity but my engine guy said 1 3\4 so who knows?
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by V-Rod
I am not trying to argue but Visard says sometimes you can get too big, and I just talked to Jerry Stahl today and he told me I should run 1 5\8 Primarys not 1 3\4" for better streetablity but my engine guy said 1 3\4 so who knows?
No argument here. The discussion was concerning the post-collector pipe sizing. There's little to no tuning going on there. The header pipes, by contrast, are sized (diameter and length) to allow pressure waves and gas inertia to improve the VE. No disagreement with your engine guys here.
I am not trying to argue but Visard says sometimes you can get too big, and I just talked to Jerry Stahl today and he told me I should run 1 5\8 Primarys not 1 3\4" for better streetablity but my engine guy said 1 3\4 so who knows?
Bet dollars to donuts stahl's had more hands-on with more real motors ... and stahl's in the "optimal performance via exhaust" business. If both your wrench & stahl are given exactly same parameters ... I'd go w/ stahl's advice.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.