C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GM 4586642 cylinder head info needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2008, 02:23 AM
  #1  
arneoe
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
arneoe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Hokksund, Norway
Posts: 87
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default GM 458642 cylinder head info needed

I am seeking technical information for GM iron cylinder heads, casting number 458642. I am looking for intake/exhaust runner sizes and flow. The heads came with my Five Star 383/360 HP crate engine.
regards
Arne

Last edited by arneoe; 10-08-2008 at 02:36 AM. Reason: misprint
Old 10-08-2008, 09:29 AM
  #2  
wfo76
Drifting
 
wfo76's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Mortec doesn't say much about them,

458642.....75-84...350..........350

just look like generic passenger car heads and probably stock with 1.94/1.50 valves.

Did they go with bigger valves or do anything to them?
Old 10-08-2008, 11:47 AM
  #3  
arneoe
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
arneoe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Hokksund, Norway
Posts: 87
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wfo76
Mortec doesn't say much about them,

458642.....75-84...350..........350

just look like generic passenger car heads and probably stock with 1.94/1.50 valves.

Did they go with bigger valves or do anything to them?
Thanks for your reply... No I do not think they modified the heads.... the usual 1.94/1.5 valves and 76cc combustion camber.... They'll be quite ordinary smog heads I recond, hopefully close to the 333882?
rgds
Arne
Old 10-16-2008, 04:37 AM
  #4  
arneoe
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
arneoe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Hokksund, Norway
Posts: 87
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

According to the engine builder the GM#4586642s on my 383 are 72cc not 76cc as I first mentioned. He also states that they are simular to the 882, 993 and 441. I am no sure if this is true... the 441 and 882 are 76cc and is different in flow. Any comments on this?
regards
Arne
Old 10-17-2008, 08:53 AM
  #5  
gerry72
Safety Car
 
gerry72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

It is similar to any smog-era smallblock head. It was used on the 400 so there may be small holes for the steam channels. Certainly nothing remarkable except that it wasn't one of the "lightweight" scalloped castings so it's a bit more durable. Just a run of the mill head, really.
Old 10-17-2008, 02:00 PM
  #6  
billla
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
billla's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 6,224
Received 58 Likes on 41 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14

Default

FYI, any of the "smog" heads will make ~30 fewer HP @ 1 HP/CID just due to the combustion chamber shape.
Old 10-18-2008, 02:44 PM
  #7  
arneoe
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
arneoe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Hokksund, Norway
Posts: 87
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gerry72
....... Certainly nothing remarkable except that it wasn't one of the "lightweight" scalloped castings so it's a bit more durable. ........
TNX OM! ... nice to hear that is not a "light weight one".... I plan do a porting job on the runners to just to get best possible alignment for headers and intake manifold. There is a lot to gain with such a rough casting...
best regards
Arne
Old 10-18-2008, 03:34 PM
  #8  
arneoe
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
arneoe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Hokksund, Norway
Posts: 87
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by billla
FYI, any of the "smog" heads will make ~30 fewer HP @ 1 HP/CID just due to the combustion chamber shape.
Sure mate!.... but I recond an extra 20 - 30 HP can be aceived using the existing "smogies" for us "amateurs"....Would'nt you think?.... I'll sure it's a matter of cylinder head casting and some skill.... This is this not the first time I've touched a cylinder head, so I know very well what to do, if there anough metal in the runners... lets hope this is true...

We'll see what brings..... Anyway, I'll follow E-Bay closely for a good bargin.... I might come across a pair of Dart Iron Eagle 180cc ... good for bolt on.... While waiting I'll stick to my "smogies"....

Arne

Last edited by arneoe; 10-18-2008 at 03:39 PM. Reason: typo
Old 10-18-2008, 04:07 PM
  #9  
billla
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
billla's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 6,224
Received 58 Likes on 41 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14

Default

Originally Posted by arneoe
but I recond an extra 20 - 30 HP can be aceived using the existing "smogies" for us "amateurs"....Would'nt you think?.... I'll sure it's a matter of cylinder head casting and some skill.... This is this not the first time I've touched a cylinder head, so I know very well what to do, if there anough metal in the runners... lets hope this is true...
The runners will be right around 165cc - and there's not enough "meat" there to significantly increase the cross-section, especially to feed a 383. Considering the inability to significantly increase the cross-section of the runner and poor combustion chamber configuration it's not really worth it IMHO. Flow is around 205/140 I/E @ .400 lift.

I also know my way around a head and a grinder - and there's little or no gain in matching the heads/intake at power levels of 1HP/CID or less.

Finally, if you must keep these heads and take a grinder to them, work on the short radius of the intake and exhaust and the bowl - you'll find a lot more power there than trying to hog out the runners or "flare" them to match the intake.
Old 10-19-2008, 06:29 AM
  #10  
arneoe
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
arneoe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Hokksund, Norway
Posts: 87
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by billla
The runners will be right around 165cc - and there's not enough "meat" there to significantly increase the cross-section, especially to feed a 383. Considering the inability to significantly increase the cross-section of the runner and poor combustion chamber configuration it's not really worth it IMHO. Flow is around 205/140 I/E @ .400 lift.

I also know my way around a head and a grinder - and there's little or no gain in matching the heads/intake at power levels of 1HP/CID or less.

Finally, if you must keep these heads and take a grinder to them, work on the short radius of the intake and exhaust and the bowl - you'll find a lot more power there than trying to hog out the runners or "flare" them to match the intake.
Thank you very much for your reply OM! I appreciate your concern about possible wasted porting job on my GM 458642 cylinder heads. You assume a flow of 205/140 I/E @ .400 lift, which as I can see is very close to the GM 333882. If this is correct I’ll be very close to my goal for the time being. The 882 is, as I can judge, is one of the better smog heads and will serve my purpose. I am looking for cylinder heads, which give me highest possible flow speed, with less than 190cc intake runners, at 0.200 thru 0.400 lifts. I am not concerned about highest possible HP at WOT, I just want a descent torque in the range 2000 thru 4000 rpm. Just for your guidance here is my setup:

383CID (as per the engine builder: 360HP/410 ft. lbs @ 3800, ….blue print)

Static compression rate 9.6 : 1 (assuming with 72cc comp cambers)
GM 458642 cylinder heads, 1.94/1.5 valves, modified valve bowls and seats (I have not verified this yet by visual inspection), 72cc cambers (probably grid off from 76cc). Assuming similar specification as GM 333882……. information for the GM 458642s is very hard to find! ….So this is more and less qualified guesses.

Edelbrock 600 CFM (have also a 1411, 750 CFM to be tested out)
Power Plus Cyclone intake manifold (have also an Edelbrock Performer to be tested out)

Long tube headers (1 5/8” to 3”)
Dual 2.5” with H compensation close to headers (no Cats or smog devices) and low restricted mufflers

L82 Vette (4 speed M/T and 3.7:1)

I am looking forward to receive your comments,
Best regards
Arne

Last edited by arneoe; 10-19-2008 at 06:38 AM. Reason: typo
Old 10-19-2008, 08:30 AM
  #11  
billla
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
billla's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 6,224
Received 58 Likes on 41 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14

Default

The GMPP Vortec does exactly what you're looking for - plot out the flow numbers in a spreadsheet and look at the midrange flow; incredible, and for so cheap!

I just think you're really choking back 383 CID with those heads - they're marginal even for a 350.
Old 11-09-2008, 08:05 AM
  #12  
arneoe
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
arneoe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Hokksund, Norway
Posts: 87
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by billla
The GMPP Vortec does exactly what you're looking for - plot out the flow numbers in a spreadsheet and look at the midrange flow; incredible, and for so cheap!
I just think you're really choking back 383 CID with those heads - they're marginal even for a 350.
I have checked the flow for I/E and they seems OK for my purpose. However, the cambers are too small (need 70 - 76 cc) and the allowed lift won´t fit my XE268H cam. Any suggestions where I can get such pre-machined Vortec heads from to a resonable price?
regards
Arne

Get notified of new replies

To GM 4586642 cylinder head info needed




Quick Reply: GM 4586642 cylinder head info needed



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 PM.