McLeod RST versus RXT Twin Disk Clutch
#1
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Posts: 39,561
Received 548 Likes
on
375 Posts
McLeod RST versus RXT Twin Disk Clutch
Any comments about these two versions? The RST has organic based clutch facings and the RXT has ceramic. The RST is rated at 800 hp, the RXT at 1000 hp. My concern about buying the RXT for a basically street car is that the RXT is advertised as having a slightly aggressive off-idle clutch lockup feature as compared to the RST. This creates the thought that the RXT might be a little awkward for street use. Any comments? (This time of the year, McLeod is closed).
Is there another twin disk that is also a favorite?
Is there another twin disk that is also a favorite?
#3
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Posts: 39,561
Received 548 Likes
on
375 Posts
(The engine so far has not yet been populated with a cam shaft, rods, and pistons. I'm buying things for the 70 gradually over the years. Major things remaining aside from the engine build: a rear end rebuilt for the higher HP, high HP rated aluminum radiator, Hooker sidepipe headers.)
................................
(about three hours after the above post). Just pulled the trigger on the RST. With a lot of luck, I could get it tomorrow for a New Years weekend project.
Last edited by 68/70Vette; 12-30-2010 at 04:10 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Tommyfrc (03-27-2019)