Gas for a 1969 Corvette
#2
Burning Brakes
While this sticker was probably on the car when it was new
Realistically, use the lowest octane fuel that does not cause any pinging or misfires. There is no magic answer. What engine you have, timing, heads, etc all play a factor.
Realistically, use the lowest octane fuel that does not cause any pinging or misfires. There is no magic answer. What engine you have, timing, heads, etc all play a factor.
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Westminster Maryland
Posts: 30,173
Likes: 0
Received 2,878 Likes
on
2,515 Posts
Hi b,
Were you kidding? I believe the octane warning sticker only appeared on cars with the L-88 option.
Hi Mike,
I think the queston now is whether a lead additive needs to be used or not. Others know more about that than I do, and I'm sure you'll get some replies.
Regards,
Alan
Were you kidding? I believe the octane warning sticker only appeared on cars with the L-88 option.
Hi Mike,
I think the queston now is whether a lead additive needs to be used or not. Others know more about that than I do, and I'm sure you'll get some replies.
Regards,
Alan
#4
Race Director
6500 red line, use 93, any thing less than 6500, then 87-89 octane should be all that's necessary.....don't use additives as they don't work and merely make the price of the pump gas more expensive
#7
Burning Brakes
Hi b,
Were you kidding? I believe the octane warning sticker only appeared on cars with the L-88 option.
Hi Mike,
I think the queston now is whether a lead additive needs to be used or not. Others know more about that than I do, and I'm sure you'll get some replies.
Regards,
Alan
Were you kidding? I believe the octane warning sticker only appeared on cars with the L-88 option.
Hi Mike,
I think the queston now is whether a lead additive needs to be used or not. Others know more about that than I do, and I'm sure you'll get some replies.
Regards,
Alan
#8
I guess I should be asking if I should be adding a lead additive or octane booster or both. Was there "unleaded" gas available in 1969? I thought there was only "leaded" gas in 1969.
#9
Race Director
Are your heads and valves original? The valve seats are where you might run into trouble but I'm not sure thact adding lead additive will get you very far.
#10
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,248 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
If a fuel advisory sticker was placed on the car at the factory, the AIM will show it and list the GM part number. The catcon cars usually had a notice about unleaded fuel, but placement of the notice could vary between model years.
#11
Le Mans Master
The posted sticker actually equates to 99 octane today, so if running an ultra high compression car like that, get the highest rating premium and probably mix in some racing fuel. It does matter, as have some high compression cars, and when fuels in the tank for awhile with octane dropping, car just doesnt have the intended power. The premium labels weren't only Vette thing, as recall seeing them on many cars from that era, when shopping with my dad. Unleaded came out before 75' cats, as GM dropped compression in 71' to use it.
#13
Melting Slicks
Also can only get E-10 here is Missouri and that works well too.
#14
Le Mans Master
Nothing wrong with E10, as ethanol actually has high higher octane rating, but less BTU(energy) than gas. Maybe look into a little carb re-jetting to optimize it though. To much alcohol isn't doing rubber hoses any favors though. Indy and other race series run pure alcohol, so gotta be something to it. We've all heard of E85, which is still 15% gas. Main reason, is you can't these cars to start winter time without it. Actually closer to E80, as the denatured ethanol used is already poisoned with 5% gas for drinkability, and the bootleggers aren't wanting trucks carrying raw product from the distilleries.
#15
Race Director
amoco had unleaded back then. As far as lead additives I searched recently and couldn't find any. My '69 runs fine on 93 octaine 10.25 compression you can run lower but may have to retard timing to keep from pinging and lose performance. the other boosters are useless.
#16
Drifting
OK, I did take down the heads down twice for a cleaning cut. Plus I did have the distributor curved. My 69 engine (350/350) had an 11 to 1 compression ratio and I used Sunoco 94. When I took the engine apart for rebuild, there was detonation damage to the forged pistons. You could see the small chips that were missing due to detonation. Maybe I didn’t hear it due to the load exhaust. But there was definitely detonation damage.
I am not so sure Sunoco 94 is enough unless you do all the things that reduce detonation like running a cooler thermostat and retarding your timing (which will hurt gas mileage and performance).
I am not so sure Sunoco 94 is enough unless you do all the things that reduce detonation like running a cooler thermostat and retarding your timing (which will hurt gas mileage and performance).