what 69 vette came with 370 hp 350 ci
#1
Navigator
Thread Starter
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: bryceville FLORIDA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what 69 vette came with 370 hp 350 ci
This car has a 1 owner history from ny to fl. I got the car after it rear ended a volvo. The car had doc. 51000 miles with car show ribbons and all . I bought it just for the int. and side pipes. But fell in love with the car and revived it into a sweet driver. My question is has any one ever seen a 69 LT1 before? The car has a solid lift LT1 350 with all the matching #'s also was a fac side pipe car 4spd with a L88 465:1 FC 69 rear end!!! I would like any input about what anyone mite know about this car thanks scott in fl.
#2
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Frederick Maryland
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
10 Posts
Never say never, but no factory '69 should have come with an LT-1 engine.
The block could have been restamped to look original or it's possible it could have been a factory test car that was sold, though it's much less likely than an engine restamp.
The same goes for an L88 rear end...someone swapped it in more likely than not. In over forty years there's no real way of telling what's original and what's not anymore without verifiable documentation.
The block could have been restamped to look original or it's possible it could have been a factory test car that was sold, though it's much less likely than an engine restamp.
The same goes for an L88 rear end...someone swapped it in more likely than not. In over forty years there's no real way of telling what's original and what's not anymore without verifiable documentation.
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Westminster Maryland
Posts: 30,173
Likes: 0
Received 2,878 Likes
on
2,515 Posts
Hi Scott,
I also believe that someone created an engine, side-pipe, rear end, combination, that they wished had been available from St. Louis in 1969.
I'm curious what the documentation is?
Regards,
Alan
I also believe that someone created an engine, side-pipe, rear end, combination, that they wished had been available from St. Louis in 1969.
I'm curious what the documentation is?
Regards,
Alan
#5
I have a 69 LT-1 but it is an over the counter short block assembly. Anybody could stamp a vin and engine code on the pad as the others have said, just like anybody could put in a different rear.
#6
Burning Brakes
According to the "1969 Stingray Guidebook" by Rick Bizzoco:
He goes on to say:
So apparently there was one factory built 69 LT1 (not quite stock since it had the Dzus fasteners and the American Mags with race tires), and one dealer prepped (Clippinger Chevrolet) LT1.
There's a picture of the factory LT1 in his book on page 91 if anyone would like to see it.
By the way, I hope I don't get in Dutch with the publisher for quoting the book!! No part of the book is to be reproduced unless making short quotes for a review, so in that vein, I'd like to review this book...
Considering it was written in 1994, it's a little dated. I found it to be a pretty good reference with a few inconsistancies and flaws, but overall, something anyone with a 69 Vette should have. 68 and 70+ owners might also find it useful.
Ed
Chevrolet produced one LT1 in 1969 that included the LT1 hood, LT1 strip, Dzus fasteners and Americal Mags with race tires. This car was discussed in an article in Sports Car Graphic... The Chevrolet built LT1 had the N14 side exhaust option. This car was used in the press review of the 1970 Chevrolet models.
Two known documented LT1's were, however, produced in 1969. The second was dealer-prepared and sold by Clippinger Chevrolet in Covina, CA. Bob Wingate of Clippinger Chevrolet in Covina, CA assisted Jeff Butler with the purchase of this LT1; it was offered under Warranty. When the car came through it lacked the LT1 hood and distinctive striping, having instead the standard 350cu. in. hood.
There's a picture of the factory LT1 in his book on page 91 if anyone would like to see it.
By the way, I hope I don't get in Dutch with the publisher for quoting the book!! No part of the book is to be reproduced unless making short quotes for a review, so in that vein, I'd like to review this book...
Considering it was written in 1994, it's a little dated. I found it to be a pretty good reference with a few inconsistancies and flaws, but overall, something anyone with a 69 Vette should have. 68 and 70+ owners might also find it useful.
Ed
Last edited by restoman1; 04-25-2012 at 05:42 PM.
#7
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Westminster Maryland
Posts: 30,173
Likes: 0
Received 2,878 Likes
on
2,515 Posts
Hi Ed,
I agree with your thoughts about the "69 STINGRAY GUIDBOOK".
It's really one of the most useful books for anyone interested in original 68-72 cars.
Regards,
Alan
I agree with your thoughts about the "69 STINGRAY GUIDBOOK".
It's really one of the most useful books for anyone interested in original 68-72 cars.
Regards,
Alan
#8
Navigator
Thread Starter
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: bryceville FLORIDA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never say never, but no factory '69 should have come with an LT-1 engine.
The block could have been restamped to look original or it's possible it could have been a factory test car that was sold, though it's much less likely than an engine restamp.
The same goes for an L88 rear end...someone swapped it in more likely than not. In over forty years there's no real way of telling what's original and what's not anymore without verifiable documentation.
The block could have been restamped to look original or it's possible it could have been a factory test car that was sold, though it's much less likely than an engine restamp.
The same goes for an L88 rear end...someone swapped it in more likely than not. In over forty years there's no real way of telling what's original and what's not anymore without verifiable documentation.
#10
Navigator
Thread Starter
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: bryceville FLORIDA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#11
Team Owner
I didn't know that the LT-1 engine...with Holley carb, etc....would fit under a stock SB Corvette hood.
#12
Race Director
#13
Navigator
Thread Starter
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: bryceville FLORIDA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#14
Burning Brakes
Hi Ed,
I agree with your thoughts about the "69 STINGRAY GUIDBOOK".
It's really one of the most useful books for anyone interested in original 68-72 cars.
Regards,
Alan
I agree with your thoughts about the "69 STINGRAY GUIDBOOK".
It's really one of the most useful books for anyone interested in original 68-72 cars.
Regards,
Alan
Its not a stock hood it is a LT1 hood with all the LT1 stripes that is whats strange about the car it has all the markings of an LT1 but its a 69.
Ed
#15
Le Mans Master
I have heard lots of tall tales in the past, most do not pan out, but occasionally one does.
#16
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,468 Likes
on
1,247 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
You should expect expert work from an accomplished restamper.
69 VINs do not contain option information.
...Is there a site to search vin# to be sure before i sell this L88 FC rear end and should have kept it for value reasons...
#17
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Las Vegas - Just stop perpetuating myths please.
Posts: 7,098
Received 373 Likes
on
356 Posts
Qjet #07029207.
FYI i have a good core Qjet #07029207. I have been told this 0 for left digit designates it's a overcounter/field replacement for a '69 vette but can't verify this - can anyone else. 7029207 is corvette only for '69 and used on the 350/350. Date code is for '68 (25x8) and that's OK. PM me for pix. The core is in good condition but really should be rebuilt before return to service.
Anyone verify this?
cardo0
Anyone verify this?
cardo0
#19
Navigator
Thread Starter
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: bryceville FLORIDA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/memb...cottsinfl.html my profile page has some photo's that i had fun trying to upload i guess i have to brush up on my forum skill's
#20
What I always found interesting is that RPO LT-1 is listed in multiple places (right between L-46 and L-36) in the Specifications section of the 1969 owners manual. My car was built in Aug '69 and I do believe its the original manual so that would mean that the LT-1 engine was a reality at the time the owners manuals were printed. I've often wondered if they had intended to include it as an option in '69 but for some reason they weren't ready. Specificaly, the '69 manual specs cooling system capacity, plug type, idle speed, timing specs, & valve clearances for the LT-1.