Would a M20 hold up to 600+ HP?
#1
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Would a M20 hold up to 600+ HP?
I'm thinking about installing my old 600+ HP 406 in my Vette (dyno tested at 590 HP without any tuning on race gas and will certainly be well above 600 HP on E85 with some tuning) and I'm not sure if that would require upgrading any of the drivetrain, including the M20 transmission.
Planning on running E85 as the engine has 13.5:1 compression. I have no intention of installing sticky tires or ever taking the car to the track. I'd think that the tires would spin before any damage is caused by the engine's power. I also have 3.08 gears which reduces stress on the half shafts.. However, I'm not sure. Does anyone have any experience with this kind of power on a otherwise stock drivetrain?
Planning on running E85 as the engine has 13.5:1 compression. I have no intention of installing sticky tires or ever taking the car to the track. I'd think that the tires would spin before any damage is caused by the engine's power. I also have 3.08 gears which reduces stress on the half shafts.. However, I'm not sure. Does anyone have any experience with this kind of power on a otherwise stock drivetrain?
#2
Drifting
Probably not particularly helpful to you, but I'm running something in the 500 HP range from my 350 through my M20.
I regularly launch pretty hard, but not abusively. I'm running 3.23 gears and painfully tall 325/70/15 rear tires.
I would certainly put some time and attention into your universals and make sure the rest of your stuff is fairly fresh. You can get a bunch of 'clunks' really fast with old rubber.
I would politely offer that the 3.08 gears would probably put MORE stress on the transmission, not LESS. Another rear ratio like 3.23, 3.55, or even 3.73 would give you more mechanical advantage against the tire, pulling stress out of the transmission and putting it into the rear half of your drivetrain. This strategy would work better if you don't have sticky tires. And it would make 1st gear increasingly worthless, especially at that power level.
If you are kind to your equipment and don't go nuts with tires (stick to fairly ordinary BFG's), I don't see why you wouldn't expect a certain amount of durability from the combination. If you were itching to rebuild your rear end, I'd personally investigate 3.55 gears over the 3.08.
I regularly launch pretty hard, but not abusively. I'm running 3.23 gears and painfully tall 325/70/15 rear tires.
I would certainly put some time and attention into your universals and make sure the rest of your stuff is fairly fresh. You can get a bunch of 'clunks' really fast with old rubber.
I would politely offer that the 3.08 gears would probably put MORE stress on the transmission, not LESS. Another rear ratio like 3.23, 3.55, or even 3.73 would give you more mechanical advantage against the tire, pulling stress out of the transmission and putting it into the rear half of your drivetrain. This strategy would work better if you don't have sticky tires. And it would make 1st gear increasingly worthless, especially at that power level.
If you are kind to your equipment and don't go nuts with tires (stick to fairly ordinary BFG's), I don't see why you wouldn't expect a certain amount of durability from the combination. If you were itching to rebuild your rear end, I'd personally investigate 3.55 gears over the 3.08.
Last edited by keithinspace; 01-03-2016 at 01:45 PM.
#4
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Probably not particularly helpful to you, but I'm running something in the 500 HP range from my 350 through my M20.
I regularly launch pretty hard, but not abusively. I'm running 3.23 gears and painfully tall 325/70/15 rear tires.
I would certainly put some time and attention into your universals and make sure the rest of your stuff is fairly fresh. You can get a bunch of 'clunks' really fast with old rubber.
I would politely offer that the 3.08 gears would probably put MORE stress on the transmission, not LESS. Another rear ratio like 3.23, 3.55, or even 3.73 would give you more mechanical advantage against the tire, pulling stress out of the transmission and putting it into the rear half of your drivetrain. This strategy would work better if you don't have sticky tires. And it would make 1st gear increasingly worthless, especially at that power level.
If you are kind to your equipment and don't go nuts with tires (stick to fairly ordinary BFG's), I don't see why you wouldn't expect a certain amount of durability from the combination. If you were itching to rebuild your rear end, I'd personally investigate 3.55 gears over the 3.08.
I regularly launch pretty hard, but not abusively. I'm running 3.23 gears and painfully tall 325/70/15 rear tires.
I would certainly put some time and attention into your universals and make sure the rest of your stuff is fairly fresh. You can get a bunch of 'clunks' really fast with old rubber.
I would politely offer that the 3.08 gears would probably put MORE stress on the transmission, not LESS. Another rear ratio like 3.23, 3.55, or even 3.73 would give you more mechanical advantage against the tire, pulling stress out of the transmission and putting it into the rear half of your drivetrain. This strategy would work better if you don't have sticky tires. And it would make 1st gear increasingly worthless, especially at that power level.
If you are kind to your equipment and don't go nuts with tires (stick to fairly ordinary BFG's), I don't see why you wouldn't expect a certain amount of durability from the combination. If you were itching to rebuild your rear end, I'd personally investigate 3.55 gears over the 3.08.
#5
Team Owner
Thread Starter
That's what I'm afraid of.. If I upgrade the drivetrain, I'm looking at several thousands of dollars in drivetrain upgrades instead of just dropping in a engine that I already have..
When I had my racecar, I spent almost $10k in drivetrain upgrades.
When I had my racecar, I spent almost $10k in drivetrain upgrades.
Last edited by GrandSportC3; 01-03-2016 at 02:51 PM.
#6
Drifting
I hear you.
I believe, rightly or wrongly, that 95% of the failures you would/could experience would be the result of off-the-line shock loading.
If you are respectful off the line and don't speed shift, I don't see why the equipment wouldn't stay together.
I wouldn't classify this as boring. I have some 50 foot long burnouts in my driveway and can say with supreme confidence that I don't "beat" on my car.
What are your choices, really? Drop the engine in and see what happens. If the stuff is in decent condition, you should be able to get some real mileage out of it.
I believe, rightly or wrongly, that 95% of the failures you would/could experience would be the result of off-the-line shock loading.
If you are respectful off the line and don't speed shift, I don't see why the equipment wouldn't stay together.
I wouldn't classify this as boring. I have some 50 foot long burnouts in my driveway and can say with supreme confidence that I don't "beat" on my car.
What are your choices, really? Drop the engine in and see what happens. If the stuff is in decent condition, you should be able to get some real mileage out of it.
Last edited by keithinspace; 01-03-2016 at 03:24 PM.
#7
Le Mans Master
The Muncie in my 69 has stood up to the original L-89, an L-88, and an LS-7. All with the same 4.11 rear. IT's been apart exactly ONCE. I pulled it down last fall because the midplate had a minor annoying drip. All the gears and synchro rings were like new. A gasket set, and put it back together. It's never been subjected to a hard launch or a really hard power shift, but it has been used, autocross and a bunch of redlight playing.
#8
Racer
#9
Team Owner
Thread Starter
I hear you.
I believe, rightly or wrongly, that 95% of the failures you would/could experience would be the result of off-the-line shock loading.
If you are respectful off the line and don't speed shift, I don't see why the equipment wouldn't stay together.
I wouldn't classify this as boring. I have some 50 foot long burnouts in my driveway and can say with supreme confidence that I don't "beat" on my car.
What are your choices, really? Drop the engine in and see what happens. If the stuff is in decent condition, you should be able to get some real mileage out of it.
I believe, rightly or wrongly, that 95% of the failures you would/could experience would be the result of off-the-line shock loading.
If you are respectful off the line and don't speed shift, I don't see why the equipment wouldn't stay together.
I wouldn't classify this as boring. I have some 50 foot long burnouts in my driveway and can say with supreme confidence that I don't "beat" on my car.
What are your choices, really? Drop the engine in and see what happens. If the stuff is in decent condition, you should be able to get some real mileage out of it.
#10
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Cooling might be another issue.. Not sure if stock style radiator would be sufficient to keep the monster cool..
#11
Drifting
I'm thinking about installing my old 600+ HP 406 in my Vette (dyno tested at 590 HP without any tuning on race gas and will certainly be well above 600 HP on E85 with some tuning) and I'm not sure if that would require upgrading any of the drivetrain, including the M20 transmission.
Planning on running E85 as the engine has 13.5:1 compression. I have no intention of installing sticky tires or ever taking the car to the track. I'd think that the tires would spin before any damage is caused by the engine's power. I also have 3.08 gears which reduces stress on the half shafts.. However, I'm not sure. Does anyone have any experience with this kind of power on a otherwise stock drivetrain?
Planning on running E85 as the engine has 13.5:1 compression. I have no intention of installing sticky tires or ever taking the car to the track. I'd think that the tires would spin before any damage is caused by the engine's power. I also have 3.08 gears which reduces stress on the half shafts.. However, I'm not sure. Does anyone have any experience with this kind of power on a otherwise stock drivetrain?
#12
Safety Car
So you plan on doing everything with that motor that the motor was not built for ?
Why ?
Why ?
#13
Le Mans Master
I was asking different shops about rebuilding my M20 to go with the 496 I was having built.
They all said it wouldn't hold even in just street use. Even a 4th gear flog could break it.
I now have it stored and went for a M22W to match what the M20 gears were.
They all said it wouldn't hold even in just street use. Even a 4th gear flog could break it.
I now have it stored and went for a M22W to match what the M20 gears were.
#14
Team Owner
Thread Starter
No intention of using sticky tires. Rears are 275/40R18 street tires.
#15
Team Owner
Thread Starter
I did drive the engine on the street before but it ran kinda hot and I was running the best Griffin Radiator and triple electric fans.. The engine is a monster with a huge solid roller cam..
Here's the best run with that engine when it had worse heads and less compression in my old 68 drag car..
Last edited by GrandSportC3; 01-03-2016 at 07:32 PM.
The following users liked this post:
jim in oregon (01-06-2016)
#17
Drifting
sooooo, you're only gonna drive stoplight to stoplight? I m all in favor of big power in street cars , I have 525HP in mine but, I can still run the A/C and drive to Florida if I feel like it.. Theres a point when a race motor belongs on a race track.. It seems to me, and this is just my opinion, if it overheats with alum radiator and 3 fans, it will be miserable to drive anywhere.
#18
Instructor
#19
Team Owner
I'm thinking about installing my old 600+ HP 406 in my Vette (dyno tested at 590 HP without any tuning on race gas and will certainly be well above 600 HP on E85 with some tuning) and I'm not sure if that would require upgrading any of the drivetrain, including the M20 transmission.
Planning on running E85 as the engine has 13.5:1 compression. I have no intention of installing sticky tires or ever taking the car to the track. I'd think that the tires would spin before any damage is caused by the engine's power. I also have 3.08 gears which reduces stress on the half shafts.. However, I'm not sure. Does anyone have any experience with this kind of power on a otherwise stock drivetrain?
Planning on running E85 as the engine has 13.5:1 compression. I have no intention of installing sticky tires or ever taking the car to the track. I'd think that the tires would spin before any damage is caused by the engine's power. I also have 3.08 gears which reduces stress on the half shafts.. However, I'm not sure. Does anyone have any experience with this kind of power on a otherwise stock drivetrain?
Last edited by gkull; 01-03-2016 at 07:55 PM.
#20
Team Owner
Thread Starter