Valve to piston clearance
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Belmont California
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
9 Posts
Valve to piston clearance
I finally got my roller cam degreed in after being off a tooth on the timing gear😜 But, I only have 0.085 to 0.090 valve clearance. Should I just run with this, go with a thicker head gasket? I don't want to fly cut the Pistons to get to the recommended 0.100" clearance. Engine is a big block 427. I plan on spinning it to 7k rpm.
#3
You'll be safe with .050" intake, .080" exhaust, assuming you don't lose control of the valve train?? Minimum of .135" wall pushrods with lightweight retainers.
Pay close attention to your spring pressure. Generally speaking most of our BBC street/strip solid-roller's see about 260/280 closed and 700 (nominal) open.
Thanks, Gary in N.Y.
P.S. The exhaust is more "critical" than the intake.
Pay close attention to your spring pressure. Generally speaking most of our BBC street/strip solid-roller's see about 260/280 closed and 700 (nominal) open.
Thanks, Gary in N.Y.
P.S. The exhaust is more "critical" than the intake.
#5
I had a buddy that used to race Super Gas, and he ran .060" clearance and spun it to 7800 rpms. Big block chevy too! LOL. I know cause I helped him build the engine. He ran that motor for years with no problems (no problems such as P/V clearance issues).
Last edited by htown81vette; 04-09-2016 at 10:46 PM.
#8
That closed spring pressure is very close to what we use on the BBC flat-tappet builds.
Looks as though you may be using a cast-core cam? If you have a steel blank you don't have enough spring. We build no mech-roller's using a cast-core blank.
Thanks, Gary in N.Y.
P.S. Also, I know spring numbers aren't always used on the specific mfr, but that 953 isn't recommended for the BBC, at least not in the catalog. It shows as being for a Mopar which uses a 1.5 rocker ratio?
Last edited by GOSFAST; 04-10-2016 at 10:14 AM.
#9
Race Director
If you have 90 thou on the exhaust I would not sweat it. The specs at 100 thou are there for a very high performance engine that sees 7000RPM all the time and therefore produces a lot of heat. The occasional blip to 7 grand won't do any damage.
#10
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Belmont California
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
9 Posts
It is a steel billet with a cast gear. The springs are what the tech guy at comp cams and the catalog recommend. I told him I wanted to turn 7k. True, I won't be thronging it at 7k rpm in an endurance event but each time I drive the car I have "intentions".😈
So I might want a little more spring or the 0.052" gasket. Thankfully I just measured the push rods but didn't order them yet. I can add 0.015" to each length.
So I might want a little more spring or the 0.052" gasket. Thankfully I just measured the push rods but didn't order them yet. I can add 0.015" to each length.
#11
It is a steel billet with a cast gear. The springs are what the tech guy at comp cams and the catalog recommend. I told him I wanted to turn 7k. True, I won't be thronging it at 7k rpm in an endurance event but each time I drive the car I have "intentions".😈
So I might want a little more spring or the 0.052" gasket. Thankfully I just measured the push rods but didn't order them yet. I can add 0.015" to each length.
So I might want a little more spring or the 0.052" gasket. Thankfully I just measured the push rods but didn't order them yet. I can add 0.015" to each length.
Head gasket choice is not a major issue?
Thanks, Gary in N.Y.
P.S. If you have the cam part number on the cam card and it ends in a -8 number you have a cast core. If you have cast core you WILL have issues down the road, not maybe, positively, just a matter of time. These cores are fine for retro-hyd rollers, not solid rollers!
#13
Dr. Detroit
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,963
Received 3,892 Likes
on
2,564 Posts
Minimum at my shop is .060 intake..... .080 exhaust....
148 is not enough on the seat....456 is not enough over the nose.
What are your springs installed at? (height)
The 953 can be shimmed as it has a lot before bind....you need to remove one and squeeze it on tester to see.....and then check retainer to boss clearance to be sure you have enough room.
I would look at the 954-16....I ran these in Nitrous 1x4 427's with .650 lift.
250/700 closed/open is not necessary at .650 lift.....that would be ideal for .750 +.
Personally....I have never been a huge fan of Comp springs....they do not make their own and they never seem to last in a street application with a lot of lift.
I used a lot of PAC springs......just FYI.
I assume you have a girdle or a shaft system on this?
I hope I have not confused you.....you should check a spring and see where you are really at.
Good luck and have fun.....
Jebby
148 is not enough on the seat....456 is not enough over the nose.
What are your springs installed at? (height)
The 953 can be shimmed as it has a lot before bind....you need to remove one and squeeze it on tester to see.....and then check retainer to boss clearance to be sure you have enough room.
I would look at the 954-16....I ran these in Nitrous 1x4 427's with .650 lift.
250/700 closed/open is not necessary at .650 lift.....that would be ideal for .750 +.
Personally....I have never been a huge fan of Comp springs....they do not make their own and they never seem to last in a street application with a lot of lift.
I used a lot of PAC springs......just FYI.
I assume you have a girdle or a shaft system on this?
I hope I have not confused you.....you should check a spring and see where you are really at.
Good luck and have fun.....
Jebby
#14
Dr. Detroit
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,963
Received 3,892 Likes
on
2,564 Posts
There really isn't a spring recommend on this as it is a custom grind.
The three zeros denote that.....
It is a tight lash cam though....so the ramps are not extremely aggressive.
The 953 may work installed at 1.850....like I mentioned....squeeze one and see.....
The old Comp catalogs had pressures for different installed height.
You may want to call them and see if that info is still available.
BTW....that is a nice cam for a 427......you will be happy with it.
Jebby
The three zeros denote that.....
It is a tight lash cam though....so the ramps are not extremely aggressive.
The 953 may work installed at 1.850....like I mentioned....squeeze one and see.....
The old Comp catalogs had pressures for different installed height.
You may want to call them and see if that info is still available.
BTW....that is a nice cam for a 427......you will be happy with it.
Jebby
Last edited by Jebbysan; 04-10-2016 at 03:02 PM.
#15
That series denotes a steel blank with the Everwear gear (I believe), in my book here it is a hyd-roller deal. You can put mech-rollers on it but the spring it calls for here in the listing is the 933-16 not the 953??
The 933's call for a 170# seat pressure @ 1.950". I believe even this is still too low for anything with a 1.7 rocker??
I also doubt that cam will make any power in the 7000 RPM range?? We use many similar grinds on the "real" retro hyd-roller platform. It's not a bad street cam for that size unit!
Thanks, Gary in N.Y.
P.S. I would try once more to get hold of Comp and see if they can clarify it some. I will stand by my original statement that 140#/150# on a mech-roller is not a real good choice!
The 933's call for a 170# seat pressure @ 1.950". I believe even this is still too low for anything with a 1.7 rocker??
I also doubt that cam will make any power in the 7000 RPM range?? We use many similar grinds on the "real" retro hyd-roller platform. It's not a bad street cam for that size unit!
Thanks, Gary in N.Y.
P.S. I would try once more to get hold of Comp and see if they can clarify it some. I will stand by my original statement that 140#/150# on a mech-roller is not a real good choice!
#16
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Belmont California
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
9 Posts
Jebby-
I'm not running a shaft system or girdle and the heads are vintage 1967 Al rect port. So I want to keep the spring pressures as low as possible and get the job done but I clearly don't want to break off a stud boss. Right now I'm shimmed in at 1.900. At 473 #/in rate and an 0.030 shim I'd only get around 15# of added pressure at open and closed. I was no where near cool bind minimum when I checked.
So it seems I can run it with a std 0.039 gasket with 0.085 intake valve clearance?
I'm not running a shaft system or girdle and the heads are vintage 1967 Al rect port. So I want to keep the spring pressures as low as possible and get the job done but I clearly don't want to break off a stud boss. Right now I'm shimmed in at 1.900. At 473 #/in rate and an 0.030 shim I'd only get around 15# of added pressure at open and closed. I was no where near cool bind minimum when I checked.
So it seems I can run it with a std 0.039 gasket with 0.085 intake valve clearance?
#17
Dr. Detroit
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,963
Received 3,892 Likes
on
2,564 Posts
Jebby-
I'm not running a shaft system or girdle and the heads are vintage 1967 Al rect port. So I want to keep the spring pressures as low as possible and get the job done but I clearly don't want to break off a stud boss. Right now I'm shimmed in at 1.900. At 473 #/in rate and an 0.030 shim I'd only get around 15# of added pressure at open and closed. I was no where near cool bind minimum when I checked.
So it seems I can run it with a std 0.039 gasket with 0.085 intake valve clearance?
I'm not running a shaft system or girdle and the heads are vintage 1967 Al rect port. So I want to keep the spring pressures as low as possible and get the job done but I clearly don't want to break off a stud boss. Right now I'm shimmed in at 1.900. At 473 #/in rate and an 0.030 shim I'd only get around 15# of added pressure at open and closed. I was no where near cool bind minimum when I checked.
So it seems I can run it with a std 0.039 gasket with 0.085 intake valve clearance?
When I asked about the shaft or girdle I thought it was a small block...then I re-read your OP. Duh moment....
I would go 954....
Good luck
Jebby
Last edited by Jebbysan; 04-10-2016 at 03:44 PM.
#18
Dr. Detroit
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,963
Received 3,892 Likes
on
2,564 Posts
I can feel ya on the want to get it done with as little as possible deal....
The stud bosses on those heads were not the strongest....
Seen a lot of welded units in my time.
Jebby
The stud bosses on those heads were not the strongest....
Seen a lot of welded units in my time.
Jebby
#19
Team Owner
Gary knows his valve train builds. My advice is to run light weight tulip valve stem valves like the manley proflow valves and light weight retainers.
That cam is extremely mild for 427 ci. It's the cam i use in my 383 for a daily driver 236/242 SR cam. My first 427 build had the CC xtreme 242/248 and it was so mild that i jump up to a custom lobe around 250 /256
If you want valve control with lighter valves it is still going to take something like 220# closed and around 600# open with your low valve lift
That cam is extremely mild for 427 ci. It's the cam i use in my 383 for a daily driver 236/242 SR cam. My first 427 build had the CC xtreme 242/248 and it was so mild that i jump up to a custom lobe around 250 /256
If you want valve control with lighter valves it is still going to take something like 220# closed and around 600# open with your low valve lift
#20
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Belmont California
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
9 Posts
Thanks Gary and Jebby. It seems the consensus is that the 953 springs are a little light. I specifically discussed this with the comp cam tech guy. So I'm a little irritated.
When I got the heads surfaced the machinist was surprised to see there were no weld repairs. I've had them since 1977 but with a stock solid flat cam. I really don't want to break them.
When I got the heads surfaced the machinist was surprised to see there were no weld repairs. I've had them since 1977 but with a stock solid flat cam. I really don't want to break them.