C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

tubular a-arms

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2018, 02:00 AM
  #181  
naramlee
Burning Brakes
 
naramlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: England AR
Posts: 797
Received 156 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Long weekend, so im working nights on the vette for more tolerable temperatures

found something out about these A arms that let them save money and we need to know.

it took almost 30 pumps of grease to finally fill up the chamber and start seeing grease be forced past the stud, so DO NOT assume 3 pumps and good, they will have to be filled with dang near a 1/4 cup of grease
The following users liked this post:
bmans vette (09-02-2018)
Old 09-02-2018, 02:31 AM
  #182  
Primoz
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Primoz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Posts: 1,116
Received 263 Likes on 128 Posts
2017 C3 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by bmans vette
Please.....lets not rain on this really good thread.

One thing working on these old beauties is the virtue of patience.

No reason we cannot have that with one another also.

On a good note....my Joe's Racing caster camber gauge showed up today.
Each new post inspires me more to get back to work as soon as I can.

Carry on my friends......and keep the info (AND PICTURES) coming.......
Old 09-02-2018, 03:38 PM
  #183  
sunflower 1972
Drifting
 
sunflower 1972's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Wauconda IL
Posts: 1,405
Received 537 Likes on 363 Posts
Default

Opinions please. Anyone think this will be a problem with this gap regarding the spreader bar function?

The bracket is half boxed so, I don't think it will. If anyone feels it could be an issue, what would your solution be?
Old 09-02-2018, 03:45 PM
  #184  
Primoz
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Primoz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Posts: 1,116
Received 263 Likes on 128 Posts
2017 C3 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by sunflower 1972
Opinions please. Anyone think this will be a problem with this gap regarding the spreader bar function?

The bracket is half boxed so, I don't think it will. If anyone feels it could be an issue, what would your solution be?
It might be a problem. But it is a case of wait and see.
You can fabricate a piece to fit in the gap to spread the forces across the whole cross shaft.
Or you can machine that side of the cross shaft also.
The following 2 users liked this post by Primoz:
bmans vette (09-02-2018), sunflower 1972 (09-02-2018)
Old 09-02-2018, 03:51 PM
  #185  
bmans vette
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
bmans vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Athens GA
Posts: 19,446
Received 351 Likes on 304 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13, '15- '16-'17-'18-'19, '21

Default

Originally Posted by sunflower 1972
Opinions please. Anyone think this will be a problem with this gap regarding the spreader bar function?

The bracket is half boxed so, I don't think it will. If anyone feels it could be an issue, what would your solution be?
Interesting issue.
My first reaction was that it would brace the area around the studs. But then I noticed the point of greatest stress on the bracket for the spreader is right in the center where there is the gap between the bracket and the cross shaft. I imagine there will be some flex there. But then again with a stock cross shaft there is a similar valley between the two studs and the spreader bar is attached there also.
If you used this spreader bar with the sock setup and there is no bend in the bracket now from then, I would imagine it would work with the new set up.
Btw....did you check the bracket from the spreader bar to see if it is flat now?
That would be helpful.

Thanks
The following users liked this post:
sunflower 1972 (09-02-2018)
Old 09-02-2018, 07:41 PM
  #186  
naramlee
Burning Brakes
 
naramlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: England AR
Posts: 797
Received 156 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sunflower 1972
Opinions please. Anyone think this will be a problem with this gap regarding the spreader bar function?

The bracket is half boxed so, I don't think it will. If anyone feels it could be an issue, what would your solution be?
like dennis pointed out, the stress is right in the center, easiest way would be to just machine it flat

I dont know how much our frames more, nor how much effort it takes to move it, considering some of the welds i have seen on these frames it can vary alot so what works for one might not be needed on the other

if it is flexing, then it'll bend the brackets slowly just like a screw, alittle bit of movement will exert tremendous pressure

at bare minimum i would build a solid 1" spacer about .010 larger than than the gap so it pre-loads when you tighten the bolts down

but the cleanest/most effective would be to mill it down imo

Last edited by naramlee; 09-02-2018 at 07:45 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by naramlee:
bmans vette (09-03-2018), sunflower 1972 (09-03-2018)
Old 09-03-2018, 04:04 AM
  #187  
naramlee
Burning Brakes
 
naramlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: England AR
Posts: 797
Received 156 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

im getting so close... im going slow because im doing an engine bay restoration at the same time as all of this suspension stuff as well...

but the driver side is nearly done, cleaning the spindle right now then it'll go on and be done for the driver side, so excited cuz I can actually see the positive caster on the top control arm!
The following users liked this post:
bmans vette (09-03-2018)
Old 09-03-2018, 11:59 PM
  #188  
naramlee
Burning Brakes
 
naramlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: England AR
Posts: 797
Received 156 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

interesting read this...

https://www.hemmings.com/magazine/hm...s/3696401.html

im itching for some aluminum spindles to cut down on weight


oh and a side note: ive been using this SEM brand TRIM flat black paint for the engine bay... and WOW... this stuff dries FAST... like hard enough to handle aggressively within 2-3 mins... and hard enough for me to put full boot/ body weight on WITHOUT scuff or tearing after just 10 mins... really blown away with it, it's been perfect for this restoration

Last edited by naramlee; 09-04-2018 at 12:04 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by naramlee:
bmans vette (09-04-2018), caskiguy (09-04-2018)
Old 09-13-2018, 03:57 PM
  #189  
Primoz
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Primoz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Posts: 1,116
Received 263 Likes on 128 Posts
2017 C3 of Year Finalist

Default

Great comparison! Thanks! Now take it easy and don't stress yourself too much. Enjoy!
The following users liked this post:
bmans vette (09-13-2018)
Old 09-13-2018, 04:29 PM
  #190  
bmans vette
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
bmans vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Athens GA
Posts: 19,446
Received 351 Likes on 304 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13, '15- '16-'17-'18-'19, '21

Default

Originally Posted by Primož Krajcar
Great comparison! Thanks! Now take it easy and don't stress yourself too much. Enjoy!
Thanks!
Too anxious to get back to work.
December will be here before I know it....haha
*
Old 09-13-2018, 05:51 PM
  #191  
naramlee
Burning Brakes
 
naramlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: England AR
Posts: 797
Received 156 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Glad to see your doing better!!

i was wondering how they compaired to the van steels
The following users liked this post:
bmans vette (09-13-2018)
Old 09-13-2018, 07:31 PM
  #192  
naramlee
Burning Brakes
 
naramlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: England AR
Posts: 797
Received 156 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmans vette
Thanks!
Definitely a stronger set up than Van Steels.
I have 2 projects...not sure which one will go where.
Maybe I'll sell the Van Steels and buy another set up when they are on sale again.....
have you weighed them yet?

Old 09-13-2018, 07:46 PM
  #193  
OldCarBum
Race Director
 
OldCarBum's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2016
Location: Napa California
Posts: 10,435
Received 4,690 Likes on 2,933 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmans vette
Thanks!
Definitely a stronger set up than Van Steels.
I have 2 projects...not sure which one will go where.
Maybe I'll sell the Van Steels and buy another set up when they are on sale again.....
I purchased a set of Van Steel's upper control arms for my 73 and I'm saving my pennies for a set of their lower control arms.
If you decide to sell your Van Steel lower control arms, and they are the same part number for my 73 send me a PM with a price.
I'll need them to fit with the QA-1 coil overs.
Thanks, Greg

Last edited by OldCarBum; 09-13-2018 at 07:52 PM.
Old 09-14-2018, 01:52 AM
  #194  
naramlee
Burning Brakes
 
naramlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: England AR
Posts: 797
Received 156 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmans vette
Not yet.
I will tomorrow and post here.
I was thinking that posting the measurements of the tubes and the cross shafts also.
Clearly the pics show them to be of considerable difference in sizes..
Thanks
Dennis
lol yeah, like I said, I wouldn't hesitate to put these under my diesel truck they are so overbuilt

interestingly... those aluminium cross shafts on the van steels look almost the same as the steel ones... hehehehe

Old 09-16-2018, 10:22 PM
  #195  
naramlee
Burning Brakes
 
naramlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: England AR
Posts: 797
Received 156 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

alittle update for arm compatibility, they ARE compatible with Wilwood's 12.19 kit, they are close, but more than 3/16 at all points










Last edited by naramlee; 09-16-2018 at 10:26 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by naramlee:
bmans vette (09-18-2018), Primoz (09-16-2018)
Old 09-18-2018, 01:19 PM
  #196  
Van Steel
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
Van Steel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Clearwater FL
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bmans vette
Thanks!
Definitely a stronger set up than Van Steels.
How so?
Old 09-18-2018, 01:32 PM
  #197  
Primoz
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Primoz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Posts: 1,116
Received 263 Likes on 128 Posts
2017 C3 of Year Finalist

Default

Definately a case for stress test and metallurgist.
I hope they will work good with my Van Steel EZ ride kit!

Get notified of new replies

To tubular a-arms

Old 09-18-2018, 04:22 PM
  #198  
naramlee
Burning Brakes
 
naramlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: England AR
Posts: 797
Received 156 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Van Steel
How so?
oh crap, here we go.... -goes to get popcorn-

In the defense of Dennis

Van Steel's arms are great, we aren't bashing their construction, which to me is more than adequate for daily road use, the problem with them is the price... they are nearly 1600.00 for the front setup, and once again, nothing against your product, but for 1600.00 im going to save up and get the Speed Direct Arms, im already 2/3 of the way for the price, i'll save that additional amount and go with the all aluminium kit for weight savings. The issue isn't that your arms are mid range, they are low-high range arms, you go from 249.99 for all 4 of these Chinese arms, straight to 1800.00 then to 2600.00, mid range should be like what most other companies charge for their sets, 1000-1200. Once again, I insinuate nothing against VS, this is merely an observation of other manufacturers, their kits and pricing.

I hold a certified 5G welder position and fabricator for nearly 10 years, I've removed the powdercoating on the welds and i'll back the strength of these Chinese arms, they aren't the best/cleanest, BUT they are HUGE, compared to VS, not that is a good thing, it's really not, but in the case of China, it's better to err on the side of bigger, i'll trust our engineers before I trust the guys building these things, and it's only through my own research I trust these arms at all.

This thread isn't built for bashing anyone's product, it was started by Primo as a question / interesting idea. This is the culmination of our research, and mainly the choice of arms is due to prices that, in our opinion, are too much and there had to be a better option. Hence the return to old school style hot rodding, take whats available and make it fit for a reduced price.

Last edited by naramlee; 09-18-2018 at 11:49 PM.
Old 09-19-2018, 09:39 AM
  #199  
Van Steel
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
Van Steel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Clearwater FL
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

No offense but he made the comment, he should explain.

You're a welder, you should also know your labor isn't cheap. If it was, you probably wouldn't be a certified welder. If it's made in America, you're going to pay more. What are the other benefits besides being cheap and using a lesser quality tubing?
Old 09-19-2018, 10:32 AM
  #200  
naramlee
Burning Brakes
 
naramlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: England AR
Posts: 797
Received 156 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Van Steel
No offense but he made the comment, he should explain.

You're a welder, you should also know your labor isn't cheap. If it was, you probably wouldn't be a certified welder. If it's made in America, you're going to pay more. What are the other benefits besides being cheap and using a lesser quality tubing?
none taken at all

the main benefit is cost, they are 6 times cheaper, i was willing to throw the money away if they wernt worth using, but as it stands, i now have 1500.00 to put towards rear end components, i wouldnt have even considered aftermarket and would have just refurbished my oem arms and had to live with less caster and try to stabilize the higher speeds in other parts of the suspension.

sure i get the idea of cost/labor, BUT... let me ask this, why are the uppers so expensive? Most other companies offer the uppers at probably close to cost and the bulk of the profit margin comes from the lowers, ive used Hotchkis, QA1, Maximium Motorsports and Addco and speedway, and this is the norm pricing with them.

Im just curious what makes the VS arms so much better to warrant almost the same price as the lowers when there is half the welding and looks like close to half the material. Im not trying flame anyone or anyone's product, but clarify our position.

and just because i get paid a fair wage doesnt mean i just upgrade my spending habits, i just cant see spending 1800-2400 on control arms unless i was just flat worried about every last ounce of weight to shed, for the same money i can put that into an aluminum rear end and have far greater returns per capita, which is my plan. Maybe in the future i will upgrade the front to aluminum arms, but honestly due to price ratios to best weight, it will be going with Speed Directs aluminium arms, once again, no offence ment.

Last edited by naramlee; 09-19-2018 at 10:40 AM.


Quick Reply: tubular a-arms



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.