How effective is stock cooling
#1
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
How effective is stock cooling
Gents,
Yesterday was an unusually warm spring day for Belgium: 85 F.
The lump of iron in the engine bay is a nondescript rebuild.
Nonetheless, at idle, it was getting hot. I shut things down when getting to the stripe after 210. It also seemed slow to cool down at 55 MPH.
I have:
I am trying to make my ride into a daily driver. I tend to be trusting of OEM engineering and tend to think that if something is not working well, someone monkeyed with it. I guess I could install a DeWitt rad plus a good electric fan and shroud but honestly, that expense would delay other projects and I am not a fan (pun intended) of electrical relays for something as critical as cooling.
What are your thoughts?
Yesterday was an unusually warm spring day for Belgium: 85 F.
The lump of iron in the engine bay is a nondescript rebuild.
Nonetheless, at idle, it was getting hot. I shut things down when getting to the stripe after 210. It also seemed slow to cool down at 55 MPH.
I have:
- A stock looking mechanical fan on there; and a cheap auxiliary fan which probably doesn't pull much;
- A water pump looks new-ish and is clearly aftermarket aluminum;
- The radiator looks OEM as well and in good condition;
- The car seems to have the correct air dam under the front;
- The fan shroud, however... looks awful. It looks like stainless steel rattle-canned black. I believe it is not OEM. It also seems to have rather large gaps between it and the radiator;
- The thermostat is new.
I am trying to make my ride into a daily driver. I tend to be trusting of OEM engineering and tend to think that if something is not working well, someone monkeyed with it. I guess I could install a DeWitt rad plus a good electric fan and shroud but honestly, that expense would delay other projects and I am not a fan (pun intended) of electrical relays for something as critical as cooling.
What are your thoughts?
Last edited by DorianC3; 04-20-2018 at 03:19 AM.
#2
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Hmmmm, apparently this is OEM style...
#3
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Hmmmm x2
There are seals up front as well? That might explain the slow to cool at speed.
There are seals up front as well? That might explain the slow to cool at speed.
#4
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Reading other threads and beginning to think that the cheap electric fan I have may be a source of restriction as well. Solution at this point seems to be:
- toss cheap electric fan
- replace all the seals around the rad and core support (where are the locations?)
- confirm that the steel shroud is of stock design and should be effective...
Last edited by DorianC3; 04-20-2018 at 05:00 AM.
#5
Drifting
My experience of an early 427 powered C3 is that the OEM system is adequate cooling wise IF (and only IF) all OEM parts are in place. You need to make sure ALL cooling air ONLY come through the front grille area. So that means that all the rubber seals around the radiator, radiator surround and under the hood MUST be in place. For the same reason the OEM shroud MUST be in place. Radiator - is it working correctly?, it may not leak but are some of the gills blocked? - engine waterways and galleries, simple flushing may not remove years of compacted crud - a chemical flush may be needed. That can bring its own issues then with leaks from potentially dodgy freeze plugs. Hoses - are you 100% sure these are OK, that the springs within them are in place to prevent hoses collapsing?
I went through all of the above with mine - every improvement I made dropped the temperature by a degree or so. You only need to make 3 or 4 'improvements' to bring temperatures down to a suitable level. And back then I did use Water Wetter - and it did reduce temperatures by a further degree or two.......
Ultimately I bought a De Witt radiator - and now it runs 175/180 degrees on average - 190 on hot days perhaps. (and that's with 570 hp 489 - OEM shroud and fan)
I went through all of the above with mine - every improvement I made dropped the temperature by a degree or so. You only need to make 3 or 4 'improvements' to bring temperatures down to a suitable level. And back then I did use Water Wetter - and it did reduce temperatures by a further degree or two.......
Ultimately I bought a De Witt radiator - and now it runs 175/180 degrees on average - 190 on hot days perhaps. (and that's with 570 hp 489 - OEM shroud and fan)
Last edited by roscobbc; 04-20-2018 at 05:02 AM.
The following users liked this post:
DorianC3 (04-20-2018)
#6
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
(and that's with 570 hp 489 - OEM shroud and fan)
#7
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Thanks Rosco,
Words of wisdom, clearly. I do think that electric fan, compounded by the poor/missing seals is a liability.
Words of wisdom, clearly. I do think that electric fan, compounded by the poor/missing seals is a liability.
#8
Team Owner
The "weak link" in your cooling system is likely the [old] radiator. The stock radiator was adequate when new; but years of collecting mineral deposits on the inside of the cooling fins can greatly reduce cooling efficiency. Use an LED light to look down into the radiator (if it has a cap). If you see brownish deposits on all of the inside walls, that may be your problem. You can use radiator CLEANER (not radiator flush) to remove those deposits, but you must follow the directions on the label.
Or you can install a new, aluminum radiator (3 or 4 row type) which will likely solve your problem.
P.S. If that aftermarket water pump is the "high volume" type, it is not helping with your issues. Forcing more water through the same system is only adding heat, due to the extra (and unnecessary) work that the pump is doing. The water pump and the radiator are the two most important elements of your cooling system...and their capabilities need to be matched. Throwing a hi-volume water pump in with a stock radiator is not necessarily an improvement. However, that pump might be fine with a new, higher capacity radiator.
Or you can install a new, aluminum radiator (3 or 4 row type) which will likely solve your problem.
P.S. If that aftermarket water pump is the "high volume" type, it is not helping with your issues. Forcing more water through the same system is only adding heat, due to the extra (and unnecessary) work that the pump is doing. The water pump and the radiator are the two most important elements of your cooling system...and their capabilities need to be matched. Throwing a hi-volume water pump in with a stock radiator is not necessarily an improvement. However, that pump might be fine with a new, higher capacity radiator.
Last edited by 7T1vette; 04-20-2018 at 07:05 AM.
The following users liked this post:
DorianC3 (04-20-2018)
#9
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,248 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
The following users liked this post:
DorianC3 (04-20-2018)
#10
It will also run hot if too retarded in the ignition, or too lean.
I would check them first.
I would check them first.
#12
Race Director
I would call the stock cooling system 'marginal'. From the 1971 owner's manual:
During normal operation, gauge will indicate around the 210 dgr mark. Hard driving, heavy traffic with stop and go, or prolonged idling in hot weather will produce a gauge reading around the 230 dgr mark.
That does not sound like a great cooling system to me.
I've modified my cooling system and I rarely run above 180 dgrs (454 BBC). I used an aluminum radiator and spal electric fans. Also switched the expansion tank for the later overflow tank instead.
During normal operation, gauge will indicate around the 210 dgr mark. Hard driving, heavy traffic with stop and go, or prolonged idling in hot weather will produce a gauge reading around the 230 dgr mark.
That does not sound like a great cooling system to me.
I've modified my cooling system and I rarely run above 180 dgrs (454 BBC). I used an aluminum radiator and spal electric fans. Also switched the expansion tank for the later overflow tank instead.
#13
I won't dispute any of the possible causes mentioned. I will reiterate the issue of properly directed airflow to the radiator. The dealer failed to attach the rubber air-dam extension onto the integrated front bumper/spoiler on my 1980. I didn't know it supposed to be there until sometime later and didn't bother with it until 6 or 7 years after that. The car routinely ran in the 210 deg range without that 1.5 wide strip of rubber. After I put it on, 180 to 190 was the norm.
#14
Melting Slicks
I would call the stock cooling system 'marginal'. From the 1971 owner's manual:
During normal operation, gauge will indicate around the 210 dgr mark. Hard driving, heavy traffic with stop and go, or prolonged idling in hot weather will produce a gauge reading around the 230 dgr mark.
That does not sound like a great cooling system to me.
I've modified my cooling system and I rarely run above 180 dgrs (454 BBC). I used an aluminum radiator and spal electric fans. Also switched the expansion tank for the later overflow tank instead.
During normal operation, gauge will indicate around the 210 dgr mark. Hard driving, heavy traffic with stop and go, or prolonged idling in hot weather will produce a gauge reading around the 230 dgr mark.
That does not sound like a great cooling system to me.
I've modified my cooling system and I rarely run above 180 dgrs (454 BBC). I used an aluminum radiator and spal electric fans. Also switched the expansion tank for the later overflow tank instead.
#15
Melting Slicks
First thing I would do is establish exactly what the temp is with an IR gun because I found in my car the gauge was reading 20 deg too high. Mysteriously when I machined the sender down from 5/8 to 3/8 to fit new intake the gauge now reads correctly.
#16
I guess my first question is, why two fans? GM didn't need two fans for over 40 yrs, why now?
You say the electric fan is not pulling much. How can it pull? You mean push don't you? The mechanical belt driven fan is a puller. A auxilliary electric fan in front of the Rad is a pusher. They need to work together if you insist on this unusual set-up.
Putting a electric fan in front of the Rad is likely blocking more air than actually pushing air.
And here is another common mistake with two fans. Standing in front of the car, the mechanical / belt fan turns clockwise. Which way is the electric fan spinning? If its not also turning clockwise you will have more turbulance than you know what to do with.
Either one or the other, not both.
Electric fan as a puller, no mech fan / belt.
Or mech fan no elect aux.
You say the electric fan is not pulling much. How can it pull? You mean push don't you? The mechanical belt driven fan is a puller. A auxilliary electric fan in front of the Rad is a pusher. They need to work together if you insist on this unusual set-up.
Putting a electric fan in front of the Rad is likely blocking more air than actually pushing air.
And here is another common mistake with two fans. Standing in front of the car, the mechanical / belt fan turns clockwise. Which way is the electric fan spinning? If its not also turning clockwise you will have more turbulance than you know what to do with.
Either one or the other, not both.
Electric fan as a puller, no mech fan / belt.
Or mech fan no elect aux.
#18
Le Mans Master
Actually my 80 has two fans - the pulley driven clutch fan and a second electric fan. That was only 27 years after the vette was born. The second fan's temperature switch was apparently set very high. The only time I ever heard it come on was when after some particularly hard driving to avoid getting a ticket (I know, dumb move - but I was around 22 or 23 - and it worked) while I was sitting in the car, behind a barn, with the engine off, I heard it come to life. The obvious takeaway if there is both a mechanical fan and an electric one, the electric is most likely there only for times when the mechanical fan fails or there is a lot of heat in the engine block and the engine is off thus preventing any airflow through the radiator. The cooling effect of the fan in the latter situation would encourage some circulation of the coolant via convection.
As soon as saw your comment, I looked up your car and sure enough an L-82. The 79/80 L-82's ran both the mechanical and an auxiliary electric fan since the later L-82's ran hot as Hades...................My 78 L-82 ran 225 normally and up to 240 with AC on a hot humid day...GM added the electric fan INSIDE the fan shroud on the engine side in 79 to address the heat issue AND the heavy duty spoiler extension:
Heavy Duty cooling L-82's got this ^^^^^^^^^^^^
#19
Race Director
ASSUMING that your temp sender is doing its job correctly can be a big mistake.
I know that I have seen someone on the forum a good while back who put up a chart for all of the temp senders and the ohm readings for the temperatures that will be seen on the particular gauge.
I am NOT saying that all of the previous useful advice is not warranted.
DUB
#20
Yup!
As soon as saw your comment, I looked up your car and sure enough an L-82. The 79/80 L-82's ran both the mechanical and an auxiliary electric fan since the later L-82's ran hot as Hades...................My 78 L-82 ran 225 normally and up to 240 with AC on a hot humid day...GM added the electric fan INSIDE the fan shroud on the engine side in 79 to address the heat issue AND the heavy duty spoiler extension:
Heavy Duty cooling L-82's got this ^^^^^^^^^^^^
As soon as saw your comment, I looked up your car and sure enough an L-82. The 79/80 L-82's ran both the mechanical and an auxiliary electric fan since the later L-82's ran hot as Hades...................My 78 L-82 ran 225 normally and up to 240 with AC on a hot humid day...GM added the electric fan INSIDE the fan shroud on the engine side in 79 to address the heat issue AND the heavy duty spoiler extension:
Heavy Duty cooling L-82's got this ^^^^^^^^^^^^