C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How effective is stock cooling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2018, 03:19 AM
  #1  
DorianC3
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DorianC3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,090
Received 354 Likes on 265 Posts
Default How effective is stock cooling

Gents,

Yesterday was an unusually warm spring day for Belgium: 85 F.

The lump of iron in the engine bay is a nondescript rebuild.

Nonetheless, at idle, it was getting hot. I shut things down when getting to the stripe after 210. It also seemed slow to cool down at 55 MPH.

I have:
  • A stock looking mechanical fan on there; and a cheap auxiliary fan which probably doesn't pull much;
  • A water pump looks new-ish and is clearly aftermarket aluminum;
  • The radiator looks OEM as well and in good condition;
  • The car seems to have the correct air dam under the front;
  • The fan shroud, however... looks awful. It looks like stainless steel rattle-canned black. I believe it is not OEM. It also seems to have rather large gaps between it and the radiator;
  • The thermostat is new.
Will tossing the electric fan and installing a well-sealed, OEM-style fan shroud solve my woes? I was a bit surprised to see that it took so long for the temp to drop at speed.

I am trying to make my ride into a daily driver. I tend to be trusting of OEM engineering and tend to think that if something is not working well, someone monkeyed with it. I guess I could install a DeWitt rad plus a good electric fan and shroud but honestly, that expense would delay other projects and I am not a fan (pun intended) of electrical relays for something as critical as cooling.

What are your thoughts?

Last edited by DorianC3; 04-20-2018 at 03:19 AM.
Old 04-20-2018, 03:35 AM
  #2  
DorianC3
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DorianC3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,090
Received 354 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

Hmmmm, apparently this is OEM style...

Old 04-20-2018, 03:47 AM
  #3  
DorianC3
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DorianC3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,090
Received 354 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

Hmmmm x2

There are seals up front as well? That might explain the slow to cool at speed.
Old 04-20-2018, 04:51 AM
  #4  
DorianC3
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DorianC3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,090
Received 354 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

Reading other threads and beginning to think that the cheap electric fan I have may be a source of restriction as well. Solution at this point seems to be:
  • toss cheap electric fan
  • replace all the seals around the rad and core support (where are the locations?)
  • confirm that the steel shroud is of stock design and should be effective...

Last edited by DorianC3; 04-20-2018 at 05:00 AM.
Old 04-20-2018, 05:00 AM
  #5  
roscobbc
Drifting
 
roscobbc's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: East London/SW Essex UK
Posts: 1,388
Received 95 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

My experience of an early 427 powered C3 is that the OEM system is adequate cooling wise IF (and only IF) all OEM parts are in place. You need to make sure ALL cooling air ONLY come through the front grille area. So that means that all the rubber seals around the radiator, radiator surround and under the hood MUST be in place. For the same reason the OEM shroud MUST be in place. Radiator - is it working correctly?, it may not leak but are some of the gills blocked? - engine waterways and galleries, simple flushing may not remove years of compacted crud - a chemical flush may be needed. That can bring its own issues then with leaks from potentially dodgy freeze plugs. Hoses - are you 100% sure these are OK, that the springs within them are in place to prevent hoses collapsing?
I went through all of the above with mine - every improvement I made dropped the temperature by a degree or so. You only need to make 3 or 4 'improvements' to bring temperatures down to a suitable level. And back then I did use Water Wetter - and it did reduce temperatures by a further degree or two.......
Ultimately I bought a De Witt radiator - and now it runs 175/180 degrees on average - 190 on hot days perhaps. (and that's with 570 hp 489 - OEM shroud and fan)

Last edited by roscobbc; 04-20-2018 at 05:02 AM.
The following users liked this post:
DorianC3 (04-20-2018)
Old 04-20-2018, 05:28 AM
  #6  
DorianC3
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DorianC3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,090
Received 354 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

(and that's with 570 hp 489 - OEM shroud and fan)
And no auxiliary electric fan, correct?
Old 04-20-2018, 05:39 AM
  #7  
DorianC3
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DorianC3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,090
Received 354 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

Thanks Rosco,

Words of wisdom, clearly. I do think that electric fan, compounded by the poor/missing seals is a liability.
Old 04-20-2018, 07:04 AM
  #8  
7T1vette
Team Owner
 
7T1vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Crossville TN
Posts: 36,599
Received 2,713 Likes on 2,271 Posts

Default

The "weak link" in your cooling system is likely the [old] radiator. The stock radiator was adequate when new; but years of collecting mineral deposits on the inside of the cooling fins can greatly reduce cooling efficiency. Use an LED light to look down into the radiator (if it has a cap). If you see brownish deposits on all of the inside walls, that may be your problem. You can use radiator CLEANER (not radiator flush) to remove those deposits, but you must follow the directions on the label.

Or you can install a new, aluminum radiator (3 or 4 row type) which will likely solve your problem.

P.S. If that aftermarket water pump is the "high volume" type, it is not helping with your issues. Forcing more water through the same system is only adding heat, due to the extra (and unnecessary) work that the pump is doing. The water pump and the radiator are the two most important elements of your cooling system...and their capabilities need to be matched. Throwing a hi-volume water pump in with a stock radiator is not necessarily an improvement. However, that pump might be fine with a new, higher capacity radiator.

Last edited by 7T1vette; 04-20-2018 at 07:05 AM.
The following users liked this post:
DorianC3 (04-20-2018)
Old 04-20-2018, 07:13 AM
  #9  
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Easy Mike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,469 Likes on 1,248 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default

Originally Posted by DorianC3
...apparently this is OEM style...
For non AC, standard shift small block cars. AC and/or AT and big blocks usually got the fiberglass shroud. For applicable model years, the AIM shows both installations.
The following users liked this post:
DorianC3 (04-20-2018)
Old 04-20-2018, 08:12 AM
  #10  
Big2Bird
Le Mans Master
 
Big2Bird's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,823
Received 1,014 Likes on 808 Posts

Default

It will also run hot if too retarded in the ignition, or too lean.
I would check them first.
Old 04-20-2018, 10:33 AM
  #11  
69427
Tech Contributor
 
69427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Posts: 18,355
Received 768 Likes on 550 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Big2Bird
It will also run hot if too retarded in the ignition, or too lean.
I would check them first.


Lots of good advice in this thread, and checking the too often ignored timing curve is a good idea too.
Old 04-20-2018, 10:41 AM
  #12  
zwede
Race Director
 
zwede's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 11,300
Received 333 Likes on 255 Posts

Default

I would call the stock cooling system 'marginal'. From the 1971 owner's manual:

During normal operation, gauge will indicate around the 210 dgr mark. Hard driving, heavy traffic with stop and go, or prolonged idling in hot weather will produce a gauge reading around the 230 dgr mark.


That does not sound like a great cooling system to me.

I've modified my cooling system and I rarely run above 180 dgrs (454 BBC). I used an aluminum radiator and spal electric fans. Also switched the expansion tank for the later overflow tank instead.
Old 04-20-2018, 12:03 PM
  #13  
vince vette 2
Drifting
 
vince vette 2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 1,279
Received 223 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

I won't dispute any of the possible causes mentioned. I will reiterate the issue of properly directed airflow to the radiator. The dealer failed to attach the rubber air-dam extension onto the integrated front bumper/spoiler on my 1980. I didn't know it supposed to be there until sometime later and didn't bother with it until 6 or 7 years after that. The car routinely ran in the 210 deg range without that 1.5 wide strip of rubber. After I put it on, 180 to 190 was the norm.
Old 04-20-2018, 03:58 PM
  #14  
Haggisbash
Melting Slicks
 
Haggisbash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Dunedin NZ.
Posts: 2,038
Received 230 Likes on 198 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zwede
I would call the stock cooling system 'marginal'. From the 1971 owner's manual:

During normal operation, gauge will indicate around the 210 dgr mark. Hard driving, heavy traffic with stop and go, or prolonged idling in hot weather will produce a gauge reading around the 230 dgr mark.


That does not sound like a great cooling system to me.

I've modified my cooling system and I rarely run above 180 dgrs (454 BBC). I used an aluminum radiator and spal electric fans. Also switched the expansion tank for the later overflow tank instead.
Don't forget though that by 71 they were starting to run retarded timing for emissions reasons and of course this made the engine run hotter than before.
Old 04-20-2018, 04:01 PM
  #15  
Haggisbash
Melting Slicks
 
Haggisbash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Dunedin NZ.
Posts: 2,038
Received 230 Likes on 198 Posts

Default

First thing I would do is establish exactly what the temp is with an IR gun because I found in my car the gauge was reading 20 deg too high. Mysteriously when I machined the sender down from 5/8 to 3/8 to fit new intake the gauge now reads correctly.
Old 04-20-2018, 04:10 PM
  #16  
vince vette 2
Drifting
 
vince vette 2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 1,279
Received 223 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HeadsU.P.
I guess my first question is, why two fans? GM didn't need two fans for over 40 yrs, why now?
You say the electric fan is not pulling much. How can it pull? You mean push don't you? The mechanical belt driven fan is a puller. A auxilliary electric fan in front of the Rad is a pusher. They need to work together if you insist on this unusual set-up.
Putting a electric fan in front of the Rad is likely blocking more air than actually pushing air.

And here is another common mistake with two fans. Standing in front of the car, the mechanical / belt fan turns clockwise. Which way is the electric fan spinning? If its not also turning clockwise you will have more turbulance than you know what to do with.

Either one or the other, not both.
Electric fan as a puller, no mech fan / belt.
Or mech fan no elect aux.
Actually my 80 has two fans - the pulley driven clutch fan and a second electric fan. That was only 27 years after the vette was born. The second fan's temperature switch was apparently set very high. The only time I ever heard it come on was when after some particularly hard driving to avoid getting a ticket (I know, dumb move - but I was around 22 or 23 - and it worked) while I was sitting in the car, behind a barn, with the engine off, I heard it come to life. The obvious takeaway if there is both a mechanical fan and an electric one, the electric is most likely there only for times when the mechanical fan fails or there is a lot of heat in the engine block and the engine is off thus preventing any airflow through the radiator. The cooling effect of the fan in the latter situation would encourage some circulation of the coolant via convection.
Old 04-20-2018, 05:16 PM
  #17  
Crimson Thunder
Burning Brakes
 
Crimson Thunder's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: Doctors Inlet Florida
Posts: 1,039
Received 445 Likes on 273 Posts
Default

Nobody has mentioned fan clutch. Get your car up to temperature and shut it off and try to spin the fan. If it spins more than two revolutions it maybe your problem.

Get notified of new replies

To How effective is stock cooling

Old 04-20-2018, 06:24 PM
  #18  
jb78L-82
Le Mans Master
 
jb78L-82's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,114
Received 740 Likes on 617 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vince vette 2
Actually my 80 has two fans - the pulley driven clutch fan and a second electric fan. That was only 27 years after the vette was born. The second fan's temperature switch was apparently set very high. The only time I ever heard it come on was when after some particularly hard driving to avoid getting a ticket (I know, dumb move - but I was around 22 or 23 - and it worked) while I was sitting in the car, behind a barn, with the engine off, I heard it come to life. The obvious takeaway if there is both a mechanical fan and an electric one, the electric is most likely there only for times when the mechanical fan fails or there is a lot of heat in the engine block and the engine is off thus preventing any airflow through the radiator. The cooling effect of the fan in the latter situation would encourage some circulation of the coolant via convection.
Yup!

As soon as saw your comment, I looked up your car and sure enough an L-82. The 79/80 L-82's ran both the mechanical and an auxiliary electric fan since the later L-82's ran hot as Hades...................My 78 L-82 ran 225 normally and up to 240 with AC on a hot humid day...GM added the electric fan INSIDE the fan shroud on the engine side in 79 to address the heat issue AND the heavy duty spoiler extension:





Heavy Duty cooling L-82's got this ^^^^^^^^^^^^
Old 04-20-2018, 06:50 PM
  #19  
DUB
Race Director
 
DUB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 19,294
Received 2,713 Likes on 2,321 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Haggisbash
First thing I would do is establish exactly what the temp is with an IR gun because I found in my car the gauge was reading 20 deg too high. Mysteriously when I machined the sender down from 5/8 to 3/8 to fit new intake the gauge now reads correctly.


ASSUMING that your temp sender is doing its job correctly can be a big mistake.

I know that I have seen someone on the forum a good while back who put up a chart for all of the temp senders and the ohm readings for the temperatures that will be seen on the particular gauge.

I am NOT saying that all of the previous useful advice is not warranted.

DUB
Old 04-20-2018, 08:58 PM
  #20  
vince vette 2
Drifting
 
vince vette 2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 1,279
Received 223 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jb78L-82
Yup!

As soon as saw your comment, I looked up your car and sure enough an L-82. The 79/80 L-82's ran both the mechanical and an auxiliary electric fan since the later L-82's ran hot as Hades...................My 78 L-82 ran 225 normally and up to 240 with AC on a hot humid day...GM added the electric fan INSIDE the fan shroud on the engine side in 79 to address the heat issue AND the heavy duty spoiler extension:





Heavy Duty cooling L-82's got this ^^^^^^^^^^^^
Here's a question then on the heavy duty cooling. What that include a triple core radiator vs double core on others. Back in the 90's my original radiator was leaking and I ordered a replacement. It was only a double core. I called the company that I ordered it from and they said their book (not yet much internet at the time) showed that was correct, but they had a triple core with the same other dimensions. So they sent that. So, with what I'm seeing on this thread it brings me to ask if this was another advantage of the L-82, 50% more cooling surface in the radiator?


Quick Reply: How effective is stock cooling



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM.