C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Heads and cam.....here we go again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2018, 02:05 PM
  #21  
Capt. Shark
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
Capt. Shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Into the Mystic And yet, despite the look on my face, you're still talking TN
Posts: 35,754
Received 155 Likes on 108 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23


Default

Originally Posted by ajrothm
I would get rid of the Sanderson "headers" and Performer intake first. They are choking it to death and its only gonna be worse with better heads and a bigger cam.

Pick out your heads first, then select a cam based on the heads/compression. All of those three rollers are about the same size cam you have now so....I wouldn't expect a HUGE gain...maybe 10-15hp... I'd probably go with the AFR 180 heads, RPM air gap intake, and a Comp 230/236* hyd roller.... something in that ball park. With real headers. Should make 400hp+ pretty easy if you can get the compression up with smaller cc chambers.
From Edelbrock's website.......

will not fit under stock Corvette hood.
Old 12-14-2018, 02:16 PM
  #22  
calwldlife
Team Owner
 
calwldlife's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Southern Cal Ca
Posts: 50,466
Received 762 Likes on 613 Posts
St. Jude Donor '22

Default

good thread,
thing about any engine especially small block is
where you want to make power.
lucky that the l-82 has forged parts and can spin to 6500.
so any owner needs to be honest with themselves and
know whether they like low rpm grunt of torque and run out of gears
or high rpm grunt hp and get that motor singing.
Old 12-14-2018, 02:35 PM
  #23  
HeadsU.P.
Le Mans Master
 
HeadsU.P.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2017
Location: Cool Northern Michigan
Posts: 6,902
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,634 Posts
Default

Will Not Fit? Baloney.

If you know what CYA means, that's Edelbrocks way of protecting their reputation. They don't want some big shot attorney trying to sue because a after-mention intake did not fit a after-mentioned vehicle. Read the fine print: will not fit blah-blah-blah.

There are ways around that fitment issue. You have to be creative. You have to be imaginative. Or just look at what others are doing on this forum.
The key words here are: "drop-base-air cleaner".

Last edited by HeadsU.P.; 12-14-2018 at 02:38 PM.
Old 12-14-2018, 02:44 PM
  #24  
Capt. Shark
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
Capt. Shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Into the Mystic And yet, despite the look on my face, you're still talking TN
Posts: 35,754
Received 155 Likes on 108 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23


Default

Originally Posted by HeadsU.P.
Will Not Fit? Baloney.

If you know what CYA means, that's Edelbrocks way of protecting their reputation. They don't want some big shot attorney trying to sue because a after-mention intake did not fit a after-mentioned vehicle. Read the fine print: will not fit blah-blah-blah.

There are ways around that fitment issue. You have to be creative. You have to be imaginative. Or just look at what others are doing on this forum.
The key words here are: "drop-base-air cleaner".
I have read some of the threads discussing that. For what I'm doing, I think my Performer will suffice.
Old 12-14-2018, 02:53 PM
  #25  
HeadsU.P.
Le Mans Master
 
HeadsU.P.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2017
Location: Cool Northern Michigan
Posts: 6,902
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,634 Posts
Default

Thanks to "drop-base" design, you can also run a insulated 1/4" carb spacer or a medium-rise intake, and some Holley owners run the bigger 50cc secondary pump shot. All do-able with aftermarket kits. I believe the common drop base air cleaner is 1 + 1/2" drop.
You just have to make sure you have breathing clearance between fuel bowl vents and bottom of cleaner lid. I believe that is 3/4" minimum.
Old 12-14-2018, 02:57 PM
  #26  
Capt. Shark
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
Capt. Shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Into the Mystic And yet, despite the look on my face, you're still talking TN
Posts: 35,754
Received 155 Likes on 108 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23


Default

Originally Posted by HeadsU.P.
Thanks to "drop-base" design, you can also run a insulated 1/4" carb spacer or a medium-rise intake, and some Holley owners run the bigger 50cc secondary pump shot. All do-able with aftermarket kits. I believe the common drop base air cleaner is 1 + 1/2" drop.
You just have to make sure you have breathing clearance between fuel bowl vents and bottom of cleaner lid. I believe that is 3/4" minimum.
I'll take another look at them. Thanks.
Old 12-14-2018, 04:21 PM
  #27  
jackson
Le Mans Master

 
jackson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
Posts: 7,739
Received 628 Likes on 556 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HeadsU.P.
The key words here are: "drop-base-air cleaner".
i agree ... in addition there's also"offset base air cleaner" which are also available in several different heights along with an Offset ... several manufacturers
https://www.jegs.com/i/Spectre/865/4...iABEgJakPD_BwE

also plain jane performer 2101 certainly capable 400 fwhp.


Old 12-14-2018, 05:07 PM
  #28  
REELAV8R
Le Mans Master
 
REELAV8R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Location: Hermosa
Posts: 6,056
Received 1,034 Likes on 852 Posts

Default

RPM airgap intake is not the only way to accomplish the goal of high RPM and cool intake charge. You can fashion an oil splash shield onto a 2101 and that is nearly as good as the air gap.

The biggest difference between the RPM vs the 2101 is the cut down center divider. So you could take a 2101 and cut down the center divider or run a thick open carb gasket that would allow air to pass over the center divider to accomplish similar goals.

I run an oil splash shield and an open carb gasket of .80" thickness to accomplish both.
I run my RPM up to 6300 regularly with this set up. A standard performer 2101 with no mods and a high lift, long duration cam may be a bit of a mismatch and you will not be able to get the higher RPM performance from it.
The runner sizes on the 2101 may become choke points as well. Mine has been opened up to provide more volume to feed the heads.

I did all this to accommodate the stock air cleaner assembly and provide hood clearance. This allows the use of cold air intake vs under hood intake air. Additional air intake tubes did have to be added however to feed all the air the engine wanted and not restrict the intake due to the single snorkel on the stock arrangement.

Last edited by REELAV8R; 12-14-2018 at 05:11 PM.
Old 12-14-2018, 09:34 PM
  #29  
Sky65
Le Mans Master

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Sky65's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,657
Received 613 Likes on 368 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05, '09, '15

Default

Originally Posted by Capt. Shark
Latest update.......

Howards recommended this cam....https://www.howardscams.com/hydrauli...ms-cl110525-10

Seems like way overkill? 2300-6100 rpm?

Anyway, I'm going to bite the bullet and do TKO 5 speed and aluminum heads and roller cam. Screw it, right? I've already got a buttload of money in this thing now.

I'm leaning towards the Lunati Voodoo in the first post. My next question is heads. I know AFR is the gold standard but I've been reading and hearing some very good things about Profiler. Anybody have any experience with them?

https://www.profilerperformance.com/...ree-heads.html
I'm using the Profilers and a Howards hyd roller cam in my 65. It runs very well. Has a little chop at idle but very streetable. It will smoke the 275/50 17 rear tires to the 6300 rev limiter just by stomping on it at a 15 mph roll. I last summer i changed to 1.6 rockers to bring the lift to .560. It moved the power band up little. I think the 1.5s were better for the street.

1969 Gen I 4 bolt main block .030 over, zero decked
.039 head gasket
GM forged crank, stock
Weisco forged flat top pistons 7cc valve relief, floating
Scat forged rods 5.7
Profiler heads 185 runners, 64cc chambers
Howards hyd roller cam 110885-08. 225/225 .525/.525 108LSA, Advertised Duration: 278 int./278 exh
Comp 1.5 roller rockers
Edelbrock 5419 3x2 intake with Rochester 2GC carbs. Center primary carb, outside carbs secondary with progressive linkage. All carbs rated 250 cfm
Hooker headers to sidepipes. 1 3/4 primaries, mufflers are 3 1/2" OD chambered with 3" center bore
MSD Dist and 6AL box
14# initial timing, 22 mech advance, 10# vacuum
GM L88 17lb flywheel

Tom

Last edited by Sky65; 12-14-2018 at 09:34 PM.
Old 12-15-2018, 08:56 AM
  #30  
Capt. Shark
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
Capt. Shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Into the Mystic And yet, despite the look on my face, you're still talking TN
Posts: 35,754
Received 155 Likes on 108 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23


Default

Originally Posted by REELAV8R
RPM airgap intake is not the only way to accomplish the goal of high RPM and cool intake charge. You can fashion an oil splash shield onto a 2101 and that is nearly as good as the air gap.

The biggest difference between the RPM vs the 2101 is the cut down center divider. So you could take a 2101 and cut down the center divider or run a thick open carb gasket that would allow air to pass over the center divider to accomplish similar goals.

I run an oil splash shield and an open carb gasket of .80" thickness to accomplish both.
I run my RPM up to 6300 regularly with this set up. A standard performer 2101 with no mods and a high lift, long duration cam may be a bit of a mismatch and you will not be able to get the higher RPM performance from it.
The runner sizes on the 2101 may become choke points as well. Mine has been opened up to provide more volume to feed the heads.

I did all this to accommodate the stock air cleaner assembly and provide hood clearance. This allows the use of cold air intake vs under hood intake air. Additional air intake tubes did have to be added however to feed all the air the engine wanted and not restrict the intake due to the single snorkel on the stock arrangement.
I'll take a look at doing that. I'd like to keep the stock snorkels {two on my car}. Where did you find an .80 thick gasket?

Originally Posted by Sky65
I'm using the Profilers and a Howards hyd roller cam in my 65. It runs very well. Has a little chop at idle but very streetable. It will smoke the 275/50 17 rear tires to the 6300 rev limiter just by stomping on it at a 15 mph roll. I last summer i changed to 1.6 rockers to bring the lift to .560. It moved the power band up little. I think the 1.5s were better for the street.

1969 Gen I 4 bolt main block .030 over, zero decked
.039 head gasket
GM forged crank, stock
Weisco forged flat top pistons 7cc valve relief, floating
Scat forged rods 5.7
Profiler heads 185 runners, 64cc chambers
Howards hyd roller cam 110885-08. 225/225 .525/.525 108LSA, Advertised Duration: 278 int./278 exh
Comp 1.5 roller rockers
Edelbrock 5419 3x2 intake with Rochester 2GC carbs. Center primary carb, outside carbs secondary with progressive linkage. All carbs rated 250 cfm
Hooker headers to sidepipes. 1 3/4 primaries, mufflers are 3 1/2" OD chambered with 3" center bore
MSD Dist and 6AL box
14# initial timing, 22 mech advance, 10# vacuum
GM L88 17lb flywheel

Tom
The cam Howards recommended is hotter than yours. I don't know what they are thinking? Thanks for the info about Profiler. I'm seriously considering them.
Old 12-15-2018, 09:07 AM
  #31  
Capt. Shark
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
Capt. Shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Into the Mystic And yet, despite the look on my face, you're still talking TN
Posts: 35,754
Received 155 Likes on 108 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23


Default

Another possible head source is Promaxx. Apparently they are the latest reincarnation of Patriot. Speed shop here has good things to say about them and they are very reasonably priced.

https://promaxxperformance.com/product/maxx-183-sbc/
Old 12-15-2018, 09:30 AM
  #32  
HeadsU.P.
Le Mans Master
 
HeadsU.P.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2017
Location: Cool Northern Michigan
Posts: 6,902
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,634 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Capt. Shark
Another possible head source is Promaxx. Apparently they are the latest reincarnation of Patriot. Speed shop here has good things to say about them and they are very reasonably priced.

https://promaxxperformance.com/product/maxx-183-sbc/
Love mine. I got the 2169 after watching a YouTuber bandsaw one of those heads in half. He explained that the ProMaxx had more "meat" than cheaper heads have.
These heads tend to go on sale at the two big box stores (S & J) in the winter. I got a pair shipped to me for under seven bills. I elected to keep the smaller springs that come with them because they are good to 0.550 lift I believe?

Keep in mind with most aluminum heads you will need the following additions.
Top notch headgaskets that will work flawlessly at mating aluminum to iron.
Top notch (ARP) head bolt kit.
Longer pushrods that will work with guide plates and a pushrod length checking tool.
Longer reach sparkplugs.
You will need to adapt your stock Water Temp sending unit to the smaller NPT on the head. Or have the head drilled & tapped larger.

If you want to see some pixs of these heads, click on my profile & build photo album.
Old 12-15-2018, 10:44 AM
  #33  
Capt. Shark
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
Capt. Shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Into the Mystic And yet, despite the look on my face, you're still talking TN
Posts: 35,754
Received 155 Likes on 108 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23


Default

Originally Posted by HeadsU.P.
Love mine. I got the 2169 after watching a YouTuber bandsaw one of those heads in half. He explained that the ProMaxx had more "meat" than cheaper heads have.
These heads tend to go on sale at the two big box stores (S & J) in the winter. I got a pair shipped to me for under seven bills. I elected to keep the smaller springs that come with them because they are good to 0.550 lift I believe?

Keep in mind with most aluminum heads you will need the following additions.
Top notch headgaskets that will work flawlessly at mating aluminum to iron.
Top notch (ARP) head bolt kit.
Longer pushrods that will work with guide plates and a pushrod length checking tool.
Longer reach sparkplugs.
You will need to adapt your stock Water Temp sending unit to the smaller NPT on the head. Or have the head drilled & tapped larger.

If you want to see some pixs of these heads, click on my profile & build photo album.
Those are nice looking! And under $700? I'll keep an eye on them for a sale. 2169HR are $900 at Summit as well as Promaxx website and the Maxx series head is only another $50.

As far as the temp sender, I bought a sender from Lectric Limited that they claimed would be a correct match for the original gauge, paid $40 at a machine shop to have it turned down to fit my Dart iron head and it reads just as high (about 30* higher) as the plain jane sender.
Old 12-15-2018, 11:02 AM
  #34  
resdoggie
Had a 1976 L-82, 4-sp

Support Corvetteforum!
 
resdoggie's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: Some days your the dog and some days your the hydrant.
Posts: 5,338
Received 1,199 Likes on 925 Posts
Royal Canadian Navy

Default

Originally Posted by Capt. Shark
Latest update.......

Howards recommended this cam....https://www.howardscams.com/hydrauli...ms-cl110525-10
I have the sister to that cam i.e. 112* lobe separation vice 110* which is the only difference between the two cams. My engine specs below.
Old 12-15-2018, 11:20 AM
  #35  
Capt. Shark
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
Capt. Shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Into the Mystic And yet, despite the look on my face, you're still talking TN
Posts: 35,754
Received 155 Likes on 108 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23


Default

Originally Posted by resdoggie
I have the sister to that cam i.e. 112* lobe separation vice 110* which is the only difference between the two cams. My engine specs below.
Your engine is built way past mine, I just cannot imagine being satisfied with that cam with what I am doing.
Old 12-15-2018, 11:29 AM
  #36  
resdoggie
Had a 1976 L-82, 4-sp

Support Corvetteforum!
 
resdoggie's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: Some days your the dog and some days your the hydrant.
Posts: 5,338
Received 1,199 Likes on 925 Posts
Royal Canadian Navy

Default

Not really. Stock L-82 bottom end bored 0.030" over. Changed heads, intake and cam. That seems to be what you're doing. The other stuff I've done was just upgrades. Don't brush off using a Team G single plane intake. It doesn't lose that much low end tq compared to the rpm air gap and will be a lot easier to fit an air filter under the hood.
Old 12-15-2018, 11:39 AM
  #37  
HeadsU.P.
Le Mans Master
 
HeadsU.P.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2017
Location: Cool Northern Michigan
Posts: 6,902
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,634 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Capt. Shark
Those are nice looking! And under $700? I'll keep an eye on them for a sale. 2169HR are $900 at Summit as well as Promaxx website and the Maxx series head is only another $50.

As far as the temp sender, I bought a sender from Lectric Limited that they claimed would be a correct match for the original gauge, paid $40 at a machine shop to have it turned down to fit my Dart iron head and it reads just as high (about 30* higher) as the plain jane sender.
It was in the dead of winter when those heads went on sale for $685. After conducting extensive research, then finally pulling the trigger, they jumped to $715, which is what I ended up paying, I guess.

I really wanted to keep the reliable stock Water Temp sender so I took the new passenger side cyl head to a machine shop for a drill & tap. I think that was $30-35.

If you go with these heads or another set, always put a torque wrench on the rocker studs to double check it. Strange things happen sometimes in manufacturing.

Get notified of new replies

To Heads and cam.....here we go again

Old 12-15-2018, 01:25 PM
  #38  
Crimson Thunder
Burning Brakes
 
Crimson Thunder's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: Doctors Inlet Florida
Posts: 1,039
Received 445 Likes on 273 Posts
Default

I'm running the Comp 276HR cam that you had listed in your first post in my 350 with AFR 195 heads. It seems to work well and has absolutely no valve noise.
Old 12-15-2018, 01:39 PM
  #39  
7t9l82
Le Mans Master
 
7t9l82's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2010
Location: melbourne florida
Posts: 6,329
Received 576 Likes on 459 Posts
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified

Default

i will make a couple observations purely for what its worth, meaning nothing lol. somebody said their cam sounded like a solid lifter? whats wrong with that, I'm seriously thinking of going to a solid lifter cam, these hydraulic lifter cams put so much weight on the valve train and I've seen more than one send needle bearings through an engine. theres no free lunch folks. another thing is the rpm air gap definitely does fit under the hood of late model c3 Corvettes. i can't imagine why someone would put really good flowing aluminum heads on a car and put that l-82 intake on it,with stock 882 heads yeah an air gap maybe only worth 5 to 7 horsepower but with good flowing heads we changed things a bit didn't we? the fact is it is NOT under any circumstances the same as the z/28 LT-1 intake its the same as the cast iron crap on tow trucks except its made of aluminum, which is desireable because you can recycle it and make a real intake. there is a lot of good advice on this forum and some that is not. do your research, ask the cam companies what they think, and good luck.because luck has a role to play in this too. and if i offended anyone that wasn't my intent .if you want it to look stock paint it. i recently saw a mustang "gasp" with an LS motor in it dressed up and looked so much like a 351 it would amaze you. if you guys don't talk to me have a Merry Christmas and a blessed new year.
The following users liked this post:
HeadsU.P. (12-16-2018)
Old 12-15-2018, 02:49 PM
  #40  
Capt. Shark
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
Capt. Shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Into the Mystic And yet, despite the look on my face, you're still talking TN
Posts: 35,754
Received 155 Likes on 108 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23


Default

Originally Posted by HeadsU.P.
It was in the dead of winter when those heads went on sale for $685. After conducting extensive research, then finally pulling the trigger, they jumped to $715, which is what I ended up paying, I guess.

I really wanted to keep the reliable stock Water Temp sender so I took the new passenger side cyl head to a machine shop for a drill & tap. I think that was $30-35.

If you go with these heads or another set, always put a torque wrench on the rocker studs to double check it. Strange things happen sometimes in manufacturing.
They are not far from me. I will find out if I can do a local pick up..........for a few bucks less.

Originally Posted by Crimson Thunder
I'm running the Comp 276HR cam that you had listed in your first post in my 350 with AFR 195 heads. It seems to work well and has absolutely no valve noise.


Originally Posted by 7t9l82
i will make a couple observations purely for what its worth, meaning nothing lol. somebody said their cam sounded like a solid lifter? whats wrong with that, I'm seriously thinking of going to a solid lifter cam, these hydraulic lifter cams put so much weight on the valve train and I've seen more than one send needle bearings through an engine. theres no free lunch folks. another thing is the rpm air gap definitely does fit under the hood of late model c3 Corvettes. i can't imagine why someone would put really good flowing aluminum heads on a car and put that l-82 intake on it,with stock 882 heads yeah an air gap maybe only worth 5 to 7 horsepower but with good flowing heads we changed things a bit didn't we? the fact is it is NOT under any circumstances the same as the z/28 LT-1 intake its the same as the cast iron crap on tow trucks except its made of aluminum, which is desireable because you can recycle it and make a real intake. there is a lot of good advice on this forum and some that is not. do your research, ask the cam companies what they think, and good luck.because luck has a role to play in this too. and if i offended anyone that wasn't my intent .if you want it to look stock paint it. i recently saw a mustang "gasp" with an LS motor in it dressed up and looked so much like a 351 it would amaze you. if you guys don't talk to me have a Merry Christmas and a blessed new year.
Say it isn't so I got recommendations from Comp, Lunati and Howards (of which I am skeptical). With my Performer intake and stock air cleaner the top of the air cleaner touches the underhood insulation. I would have to use a drop base as the Air Gap is .3" taller.

I think it's voodoo.....gonna go find a witch doctor and get him to throw some bones


Quick Reply: Heads and cam.....here we go again



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.