Notices
C4 General Discussion General C4 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech

C4 the lowest corvette ever made

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2015, 06:38 PM
  #21  
Christi@n
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Christi@n's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: Trieste Italy
Posts: 1,575
Received 59 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Seen. Pretty good car
Old 12-06-2015, 11:14 AM
  #22  
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
 
Tom400CFI's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Park City Utah
Posts: 21,544
Received 3,181 Likes on 2,322 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by QCVette
The '92 owner's video states the COG is 15".

I found a portion of the video at the following link that is the performance review section. Take a look at about 7:54 into the video.
I'm sure the COG changed slightly as the ride height and equipment/content changed over the years.

It's true though, the C4 is the lowest 'Vette and the COG is also the lowest. Newer cars are higher/taller (and bigger all around) due to
1. Govn't safety standards, then
2. Styling.

For ped x'ing safety, the hoods have gone UP. For side impact safety, the top of doors have gone UP. Those two things pretty much establish your rear quarter panel elevation to rear bumper/deck lid height...which is high. Now, if we maintain the C4 roof line @~47", what does our car look like? It looks like some kind of armored battle vehicle w/slits for a windsheild, door glass and back glass. It would look retarded. So, to keep things in scale*, the roof goes UP, too...and you end up w/a BIG car; today's 'Vette, Camaro, Mustang, Challenger/Charger, etc.

Also note that this all drives wheels size from a styling perspective, too, IMO. Imagine a C6 rear quarter panel (a huge slab), filled w/a 16" wheel/tire combo. You virtually need a 20" wheel now days, to look to scale, w/in the massive rear quarter panels we see now.

*I constantly see new cars today and I tell my friends; "Man...that car looks like a caricature of a _____________." -What ever it is. Too big, boxy form, "styled" w/over sized features/cues (like massive tail lights) from an earlier car to give it the desired identity and reasonable proportions.



.

Last edited by Tom400CFI; 12-06-2015 at 11:54 AM.
Old 12-06-2015, 11:24 AM
  #23  
Christi@n
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Christi@n's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: Trieste Italy
Posts: 1,575
Received 59 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Personally like c6 and c7 style, but c5 rear end is not so beautiful.

Last edited by Christi@n; 12-06-2015 at 11:24 AM.
Old 12-06-2015, 12:12 PM
  #24  
Weck86
Racer
 
Weck86's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: Hill Country TX
Posts: 424
Received 91 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tom400CFI
I'm sure the COG changed slightly as the ride height and equipment/content changed over the years.

It's true though, the C4 is the lowest 'Vette and the COG is also the lowest. Newer cars are higher/taller (and bigger all around) due to
1. Govn't safety standards, then
2. Styling.

For ped x'ing safety, the hoods have gone UP. For side impact safety, the top of doors have gone UP. Those two things pretty much establish your rear quarter panel elevation to rear bumper/deck lid height...which is high. Now, if we maintain the C4 roof line @~47", what does our car look like? It looks like some kind of armored battle vehicle w/slits for a windsheild, door glass and back glass. It would look retarded. So, to keep things in scale*, the roof goes UP, too...and you end up w/a BIG car; today's 'Vette, Camaro, Mustang, Challenger/Charger, etc.

Also note that this all drives wheels size from a styling perspective, too, IMO. Imagine a C6 rear quarter panel (a huge slab), filled w/a 16" wheel/tire combo. You virtually need a 20" wheel now days, to look to scale, w/in the massive rear quarter panels we see now.

*I constantly see new cars today and I tell my friends; "Man...that car looks like a caricature of a _____________." -What ever it is. Too big, boxy form, "styled" w/over sized features/cues (like massive tail lights) from an earlier car to give it the desired identity and reasonable proportions.



.
You've obviously thought about, studied or done car styling design. I have thought about this, but your explanation makes a lot of sense. Especially after I considered it for awhile. Thanks
Old 12-06-2015, 05:48 PM
  #25  
93Rubie
Safety Car
 
93Rubie's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Indiana PA
Posts: 3,750
Received 185 Likes on 129 Posts

Default

I parked next to a C7 once. It was stupid how much lower the entire car looks. The roofline looks a good 2" lower. The rear end has to be a good 6-8" lower. You can see out of a C4 you cannot see anything out of C7. Heck the C5's and C6's didn't get better for sight lines.

IMHO, the my C4 looked low and sleek. It actually looks a LOT smaller too. Its longer but you'd never know. Shorter and skinnier.

I understand the "big butt" look for aerodynamics and you have to have high belt lines with the side impact regulations so thus the high rear ends. Too bad they look terrible. Jerry Palmer always preached, "proportion, proportion, proportion." He got it right.
Old 12-06-2015, 06:37 PM
  #26  
Christi@n
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Christi@n's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: Trieste Italy
Posts: 1,575
Received 59 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

The lowest COG, the better handling...

I would be curious to know if C4 has better handling than a C6 or a C7, to say the true when I move steer fron left to right car is pretty sticked to the ground, seems to be inside a formula car....

c6 or c7 should be no less

Also about proportion the "sectio aurea" is always the right proportion

Last edited by Christi@n; 12-06-2015 at 06:39 PM.
Old 12-06-2015, 07:18 PM
  #27  
prinzSD455
Safety Car
 
prinzSD455's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Antioch Ca
Posts: 3,721
Received 110 Likes on 69 Posts
Finalist 2020 C4 of the Year - Unmodified

Default

Originally Posted by Tom400CFI
I'm sure the COG changed slightly as the ride height and equipment/content changed over the years.

It's true though, the C4 is the lowest 'Vette and the COG is also the lowest. Newer cars are higher/taller (and bigger all around) due to
1. Govn't safety standards, then
2. Styling.

For ped x'ing safety, the hoods have gone UP. For side impact safety, the top of doors have gone UP. Those two things pretty much establish your rear quarter panel elevation to rear bumper/deck lid height...which is high. Now, if we maintain the C4 roof line @~47", what does our car look like? It looks like some kind of armored battle vehicle w/slits for a windsheild, door glass and back glass. It would look retarded. So, to keep things in scale*, the roof goes UP, too...and you end up w/a BIG car; today's 'Vette, Camaro, Mustang, Challenger/Charger, etc.

Also note that this all drives wheels size from a styling perspective, too, IMO. Imagine a C6 rear quarter panel (a huge slab), filled w/a 16" wheel/tire combo. You virtually need a 20" wheel now days, to look to scale, w/in the massive rear quarter panels we see now.

*I constantly see new cars today and I tell my friends; "Man...that car looks like a caricature of a _____________." -What ever it is. Too big, boxy form, "styled" w/over sized features/cues (like massive tail lights) from an earlier car to give it the desired identity and reasonable proportions.



.
Man how I agree 100%. I recently vacationed in Hawaii and rented a new convertible Camaro. Talk about feeling like you are driving an armored tank. The sight line are horrible and there are massive blind spots when making lane changes or backing up at an angle to the Main Street. The Cadillacs are not any better.
Old 12-06-2015, 10:02 PM
  #28  
crowz
Melting Slicks
 
crowz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 1999
Location: Ashland Alabama
Posts: 2,931
Received 125 Likes on 108 Posts

Default

I haven't driven a c6 or c7 but if the visibility is worse than my c4 god help me if I drove one. I feel like I cant see out that great in the c4 compared to my trucks since its so low to the ground. That was thing I kept wondering on the recent trip the wife and I took was if it would of been safer in the truck visibility wise. Course I was being paranoid about some nut hitting us in unfamiliar territory as it was
Old 12-06-2015, 10:25 PM
  #29  
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
 
Tom400CFI's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Park City Utah
Posts: 21,544
Received 3,181 Likes on 2,322 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by crowz
I haven't driven a c6 or c7 but if the visibility is worse than my c4 god help me if I drove one.
C6 is way worse. I had one before I got my C4. When I first drove the C4, after being used to the C6, I couldn't believe how EASY it was to see out, in all directions.
Old 12-07-2015, 02:53 PM
  #30  
95wht6spd
Le Mans Master
 
95wht6spd's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 7,408
Received 271 Likes on 211 Posts

Default

I think the C4 is pretty good with visibility, except height wise. There are a couple lights close to the stop line, and if I pull all the way up, I can't see the light. My C5Z is better forward, but the larger B pillars make me uneasy changing lanes, I have to rely a lot more on the side mirrors.
Old 12-08-2015, 09:44 AM
  #31  
Renfield
Drifting
 
Renfield's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2015
Location: Shit Creek, USA
Posts: 1,674
Received 188 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95wht6spd
I think the C4 is pretty good with visibility, except height wise. There are a couple lights close to the stop line, and if I pull all the way up, I can't see the light. My C5Z is better forward, but the larger B pillars make me uneasy changing lanes, I have to rely a lot more on the side mirrors.
http://lightinsight.com

I bought one of these years ago for my Miata. You won't regret it! No affiliation.

I find the C4 to have brilliant visibility, though the side rear views are too small. When I drove a friend's 2014 Camaro, I felt like I was in a bunker looking out through tiny slits.
Whenever I see a C5 that old sir mix-a-lot song comes to mind. Except I do NOT like big butts.
The following users liked this post:
95wht6spd (12-08-2015)
Old 12-08-2015, 11:39 AM
  #32  
95wht6spd
Le Mans Master
 
95wht6spd's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 7,408
Received 271 Likes on 211 Posts

Default

Thanks, I might try that, have never seen one before. I wonder how if it works well with a tint strip. I don't like big butts either, on anything, but I hint the Z looks smaller because it doesn't have the glass hatch. Z has a lot more headroom too. I think the 6/7 look even bigger/worse, but that is another thread.



Quick Reply: C4 the lowest corvette ever made



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM.