Was the ZR-1 really worth the price of 2 corvettes?
#141
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
#143
Have y'all checked the price of a ***** transplant lately?
#146
Burning Brakes
It was my understanding that GM decided to do away with the ZR-1 because the C5 was coming out. They made the 92-95 model years in specifically limited amounts, and it was not based on orders or demands. It is not a coincidence that 93, 94, and 95 all had 448 produced each year.
Had GM kept the ZR-1 in 1996, the "old style Corvette" would have had 50 more horsepower. That is not a good thing when you are introducing a new body style.
I don't remember where I read all of this, but that is what sticks in my mind. The LT1 hurt it's sales, but was not the " deal killer."
Had GM kept the ZR-1 in 1996, the "old style Corvette" would have had 50 more horsepower. That is not a good thing when you are introducing a new body style.
I don't remember where I read all of this, but that is what sticks in my mind. The LT1 hurt it's sales, but was not the " deal killer."
#147
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: South-central Missouri
Posts: 6,314
Received 500 Likes
on
395 Posts
It was my understanding that GM decided to do away with the ZR-1 because the C5 was coming out. They made the 92-95 model years in specifically limited amounts, and it was not based on orders or demands. It is not a coincidence that 93, 94, and 95 all had 448 produced each year.
Had GM kept the ZR-1 in 1996, the "old style Corvette" would have had 50 more horsepower. That is not a good thing when you are introducing a new body style.
I don't remember where I read all of this, but that is what sticks in my mind. The LT1 hurt it's sales, but was not the " deal killer."
Had GM kept the ZR-1 in 1996, the "old style Corvette" would have had 50 more horsepower. That is not a good thing when you are introducing a new body style.
I don't remember where I read all of this, but that is what sticks in my mind. The LT1 hurt it's sales, but was not the " deal killer."
#148
Le Mans Master
Truth be known, Lotus had an LT5-III 5.7L planned for 95/96 that made 550 chp. That would have put a hurt on STOCK LS1, 2, 3, &7S. (Kinda makes ya wonder "what if" GM went with that motor...let alone what would the world have been like had the LT5 been upped to 6.2L w/ vvt etc., etc.,...)
That would be an awesome car.
#150
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: South-central Missouri
Posts: 6,314
Received 500 Likes
on
395 Posts
Graham Behan, formerly engineering for Lotus on the LT5 project, now working for Lingenfelter.
He showed the motor and spoke about the project at the 2016 Bowling Green gathering. The motor was friggin awesome - VVT, and other tricks.
This is the motor he showed us in 2016... Note the single LARGE runners.
Motor uses dynamic fuel pressure so that a single injector is used w/o loosing low speed performance.
The TB is actually use on the Ford Mustang GTs (IIRC).
As I understand it, this is the ZR-1 project with that gen-III motor installed at the 2016 Lingenfelter gathering, late in 2016.
Titillating to say the LEAST!!
He showed the motor and spoke about the project at the 2016 Bowling Green gathering. The motor was friggin awesome - VVT, and other tricks.
This is the motor he showed us in 2016... Note the single LARGE runners.
Motor uses dynamic fuel pressure so that a single injector is used w/o loosing low speed performance.
The TB is actually use on the Ford Mustang GTs (IIRC).
As I understand it, this is the ZR-1 project with that gen-III motor installed at the 2016 Lingenfelter gathering, late in 2016.
Titillating to say the LEAST!!
The following users liked this post:
1993C4LT1 (12-13-2017)
#153
Race Director
#154
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Compound in the Grove, Ga.
Posts: 11,327
Received 910 Likes
on
583 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods)
2018 C4 of Year Finalist
2015 C4 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '16
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
#155
Race Director