Help! can't decide on a cam
THIS CAMSHAFT HAS NO FUEL PUMP LOBE. You are bidding on a ROLLER LT4 hotcam profile camshaft for Camaros, Corvettes, Firebirds. Can be used in the LT1. Specifications 219/228 @.050 492/492 with 1.5 rockers and 525/525 with 1.6 rockers.Lobe Seperation is 112 degrees This cam pulls very good on low end but is great from low midrange to top end.
or
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...3AIT&viewitem=
YOU ARE BIDDING ON A HYDRAULIC ROLLER CAMSHAFT THAT WILL FIT THE 1987 UP CHEVYS AND FIREBIRDS THAT HAVE THE HYDRAULIC ROLLER DESIGN. THESE CAMS ARE INSPECTED,CLEANED, STRAIGHTENED AND THEN GROUND TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF
.495 INTAKE LIFT / DUR.@.050 .218 DEGREES
.502 EXHAUST LIFT / DUR. @.050 .224 DEGREES
LOBE SEPERATION IS II0 DEGREES 112 LOBE SEPERATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
THIS CAM WORKS WITH THE STOCK TORQUE CONVERTER. IF APPLICATION IS FOR LT1/LT4 SPECIFY IF LONG DOWEL PIN IS NEEDED. CAM IS AVAILABLE WITHOUT FUEL PUMP LOBE. THIS CAM LIKES A STAGE ONE CHIP. VERY STREETABLE AND A GOOD ADDITION TO ANY LT1/LT4 POWER PLANT.
VEH Specs: 1991 vette, ADS Super Chip, SLP ported runners, TPIS Bigmouth intake, ported intake, Accel ignition, Bosch III injectors 19#, AFPR, Flow master cat back. plan on replacing springs maybe 1.5 rollers .. do not want to pull heads or replace converter ... and long tubes and 307 gears are in the future plans
Last edited by ch@0s; Nov 10, 2008 at 08:04 PM.
IF it was me, i'd favor the 110 lsa 218/224 cam for a slightly better top end to go with your runners, but LT4 will have good top end regardless so, pick one and be happy

may i suggest 24lb injectors to be on the safer side ? 19's will work but 24's wont have to work as hard. Also i see you dont want to change converter but that combo will love 2800 stall. Its probly the best bang for the buck mod out there next to nitrous
IF it was me, i'd favor the 110 lsa 218/224 cam for a slightly better top end to go with your runners, but LT4 will have good top end regardless so, pick one and be happy

may i suggest 24lb injectors to be on the safer side ? 19's will work but 24's wont have to work as hard. Also i see you dont want to change converter but that combo will love 2800 stall. Its probly the best bang for the buck mod out there next to nitrous

I suggest you email with PCMFORLESS for their recommendation on both which cam to use AND the injectors to use. It'll be best with a PCM re-program which'll probably include a slight raising of the idle speed, ignition and fuel tweaks and tweaks to the temp the fan(s) come; on among others.
Just my thoughts.
Jake
I suggest you email with PCMFORLESS for their recommendation on both which cam to use AND the injectors to use. It'll be best with a PCM re-program which'll probably include a slight raising of the idle speed, ignition and fuel tweaks and tweaks to the temp the fan(s) come; on among others.
Just my thoughts.
Jake
"A set of lifters run $100.00, springs are $80.00 a set.
Thanks
David"
I have a new set of 1.6 full roller self align rockers that I will install with which ever cam I decide on. I know the hotcam is proven over and over, but then like they say GO BIG OR GO HOME...LOL... Let me know
Thanks, Bob
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
"A set of lifters run $100.00, springs are $80.00 a set.
Thanks
David"
I have a new set of 1.6 full roller self align rockers that I will install with which ever cam I decide on. I know the hotcam is proven over and over, but then like they say GO BIG OR GO HOME...LOL... Let me know
Thanks, Bob
Last edited by ch@0s; Nov 13, 2008 at 09:41 PM.
I was always happier with a cam that had a LITTLE LESS DURATION than optimum than one that had a LITTLE TOO MUCH. In other words, for example, I was happier with one with 224 @ .050 than one with 230.
Dealing with FI engines I was always happier with slightly too wide a LSA than slightly too narrow. So, for me, 113 made me happier than 110.
So I keep the duration on the short side and the LSA wide.
But that's just me.
Jake
I was always happier with a cam that had a LITTLE LESS DURATION than optimum than one that had a LITTLE TOO MUCH. In other words, for example, I was happier with one with 224 @ .050 than one with 230.
Dealing with FI engines I was always happier with slightly too wide a LSA than slightly too narrow. So, for me, 113 made me happier than 110.
So I keep the duration on the short side and the LSA wide.
But that's just me
Jake
I was always happier with a cam that had a LITTLE LESS DURATION than optimum than one that had a LITTLE TOO MUCH. In other words, for example, I was happier with one with 224 @ .050 than one with 230.
Dealing with FI engines I was always happier with slightly too wide a LSA than slightly too narrow. So, for me, 113 made me happier than 110.
So I keep the duration on the short side and the LSA wide.
But that's just me.
Jake
Jake has a good point. But I ended up going in the opposite direction, I pulled a cam with these specs
Duration Advertised: 280° Intake / 288° Exhaust
Duration @ .050'' Lift: 230° Intake / 236° Exhaust
Valve Lift w/1.6 Rockers: .576'' Intake / .570'' Exhaust
Lobe Separation Angle: 113°
and installed one with more lift and a tighter LSA (duration's about the same). I thought I loved the previous cam but I was wrong, I love my current cam. It is docile around town but when the throttle is mashed its a screaming monster.
However, my cam is a custom cam from AI that Ron and Phil had done to match the rest of my combo. An 11:1 engine probably would not like my big hairy cam whereas my 12+:1 compression 355 likes it.
Mike
Last edited by aboatguy; Nov 14, 2008 at 01:18 PM.
Jake has a good point. But I ended up going in the opposite direction, I pulled a cam with these specs
Duration Advertised: 280° Intake / 288° Exhaust
Duration @ .050'' Lift: 230° Intake / 236° Exhaust
Valve Lift w/1.6 Rockers: .576'' Intake / .570'' Exhaust
Lobe Separation Angle: 113°
and installed one with more lift and a tighter LSA (duration's about the same). I thought I loved the previous cam but I was wrong, I love my current cam. It is docile around town but when the throttle is mashed its a screaming monster.
However, my cam is a custom cam from AI that Ron and Phil had done to match the rest of my combo. An 11:1 engine probably would not like my big hairy cam whereas my 12+:1 compression 355 likes it.
Mike
Been there done that, I’m getting older and want haste free drivability. I just sold my truck I sunk 20k into because it had no street manners .. I drove it 300 miles in 2 years it sat in my garage looking pretty. It hauled azz but got hot when the a/c was turned on and got 11 mpg so I could not take it for a nice country drive and still pay my mortgage. I sold it for pennies and bought this Corvette. I intend on making this a very street able car. I plan on spending time cruising and tooling with my son. This cam will do just fine.
On my initial post I started with:
If it were my car I'd go for a higher stall converter before installing a baby cam.
Since we have locking converters there really is no mileage hit with a high quality locking stall converter. Lower gears are great but they have a mileage hit.
Good luck with your build
Mike

the only real mileage hits are accelerating from stops and the converter isnt locked up yet. your rpms are abit higher than with a stock converter. its not bad at all and not really that high, but it is abit higher than a stock converter
also going up hills slower than the mph the converter will lockup at. That sucks when your buzzing 3000 rpm on a 3600 stall goin up a hill stuck behind a slow truck/car going 30 when you have your converter setup to lock at 40. So i have mine set to lock at 30 now and have no problems
Last edited by Orr89rocz; Nov 14, 2008 at 11:36 PM.















